Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,526 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 363,651
Pageviews Today: 525,145Threads Today: 159Posts Today: 3,478
04:31 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

**BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist

 
Under a Rock
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 12:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
**BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
I don't think these scientist know they spilled the beans, but non the less, they discuss "the Planet" with no name.


A NEW AND VERY ADVANCED PHYSICS:
EXTENSION NEUROSENSING IN THE
STUDY OF FUTURES SCENARIOS
A Preliminary Report

A. R. Bordon E. M Wienz
LIFE PHYSICS GROUP - CALIFORNIA




Whatever you may read into, or believe of, what we say here, we live all of us on Earth in interesting times. One of us in the second half of my life cycle, and will probably not survive the more interesting times forthcoming in the next four or five decades. The other is barely reaching the half mark of his lineage's life expectancy.

The material presented here, in the form of a preliminary report, comes from the joining of the natural capacities of the human body and the being inhabiting it, and a technology array that is, and unfortunately remains, proprietary to this day. It is a product of very advanced physics and daring applications. In this essay we will benefit from its fruits.

EXTENSION NEUROSENSING

First, let's go through a brief explanation of the technology itself. Extension neurosensing is both a method and a set of procedures that involve several elements in a working array.

The elements are (1) a human operator, (2) a computerdriven array of energetic sources (low electromagnetic, sound, and light) that help increase the electrical capacitance of the human operator's cells to a level or threshold, (3) processes that instigate the formation of a stable photonic (or auric) field around the body, (4) the reaching of another cellular energy threshold that stimulates the formation of single/coherent antifields (or harmonics of the field around the body), (5) the union or conjugation of the antifield with a computer generated 3dimensional avatar, and (6) the development of a visual pointofview through CNS (central nervous system) and brain hemispheric synchronization technology. To all of this, (7) the human operator adds his or her own will - or vectorintention.

This is the technologicallyassisted equivalent of clairvoyance on demand. When we focused on what the next 100 years will be like, what follows is a summary of our findings. This essay does not address the howto, the technology behind the method and the procedures used.

FUTURE SCENARIOS

Will the Earth survive these challenges? Its integrity as a planet will, but life on its surface will be severely challenged - from a meteor once and from an asteroid a second time. Yet these will not be extinction level events: life will go on. We will also discover in most surprising ways that we are not alone in the universe, and find out the true framework of how we came to be as a species on this planet. No science fiction writer to date has even come close to the scenarios rendered by extension neurosensing as being historystreams (or time lines) we as a species will collapse into reality as we move forward in time.

Still, humankind will forge a forward path to adolescence and then adulthood under the challenges of an idiotic megalomaniac who will claim himself "king of Earth" and sweettalk a willing mass into believing his word. Those who survive by seeing through the shenanigans and the mirrors used by this artificer will see his demise and ultimate rise of a humankind drastically reduced in numbers. The bogus issue of global warming will become clear by recognizing its accurate sources, and will become moot, for it will be the least of our problems then.

We are not talking about biblical prophecies, though what has become available to us through ENS parallels uncannily much of what students of the Bible read as predictions from Revelation. These are elements in scenarios we have unusually high confidence in, not because there are uncanny correlations between what we have come up with and what other sources of futures information have developed, but because seven neurosensors have derived unusually similar information from what seems to us to be a collapsing cumulus.

A collapsing cumulus is actually one that is changing in accordance to the pattern of quantum collapse of the scenario elements. When two or more neurosensors encounter in parallel, but independent of each other, such quantum collapse of broad events found in the interfaces of two or more extensions is a significant event in the technology used. It means a higher confidence in the information derived and in the method used to derive it.

Here is then what we have encountered in the cumulus, when we began to derive information from it. Please keep in mind that the time intervals are ranges and their limits are plusorminus 50 years either way.

PRESENT TO 2100
When confidence in the method and in the protocols used was well established, we began to look at everything at once. We used heuristics (i.e., search questions) like, "What is going to happen in the next 100 years?," and "What physical changes will occur on Earth in the next 100 years?" The emerging information was both quite explicit and quite surprising. Some of what we got correlated well with other information already in our possession.

Earth

Our planet is clearly a member of a solar system composed of 8 planets on an ecliptic which more or less hosts relatively circular orbits for each of them. Pluto is another story, and so is Europa; as such they have no bearing on our report here. Earth and the inner terrestrial planets, on the other hand, are already being affected by gravitational effects from a good size planet known to us as Planet X, about which there was a lot of noise back in the late 1980s and early 1990s. On Earth, this is an unacknowledged contributor to global warming and a portend to other stresses to the integrity of the Earth. It is no accident that there has been an increase in volcanism and tectonic activity on the surface, in the form of volcanic eruptions and earthquakes.


Statistically speaking, the severity of earthquakes of 4.0 will continue to increase, due mostly to eastwest subduction along the Pacific rim, the African Rim, and the Asian subcontinent. The earthquake issue also bring along with it the likelihood of tsunami in the 10 to 500 feet range, depending on conditions at subaquatic epicenters. Additionally, gravitational effects due to the presence of the incoming planet will eventually (in the next 50 years) extend to the rocky pieces along the Asteroid Belt. This will eventually begin to cause proximity disruptions on members of this band, and resonant disruptions to members of the Kuiper and Oort belts, just outside our solar system. This will result in loose cannonballs, some of which will be of some concern to us. We are already seeing such an increase in meteoric and asteroidal activity.

Technologic development today is being focused on the development of propulsion systems that will enable us to have technological alternatives for dealing with these external threats. Mention of most of these developments have already been made by concerned people in the public domain. However, the context within which they have been developed is not consonant with the frameworks within which their disclosures and discussion have been made on a whole host of websites, books, television programs, and films. This is most disturbing to us, because the greatest weapon at humankind's disposal is the size of the biomind (6 billionplus).

I can understand official reluctance in giving official imprimatur to information concerning these threats. But, according to our emerging Working Model in life physics, communal human vector intention is the most potent force on Earth - something that makes nuclear and particle energy weaponized technologies be like bows and arrows in comparison. This is yet not fully grasped in official circles, let alone understood. And therein lies one of several conundrums for humanity.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
...cont



A Conundrum Of Another Kind

One of the great potentials of extension neurosensing is the capacity for detection, decoding and decipherment of living matrices of life forms anywhere in the universe. In other words, any time there is a life form anywhere in the universe that is an electromagnetically oscillating biological mass (or having tissue that emits a life field), it will be detected by a neurosensor.

We have managed to detect a relatively large number of such oscillating biological entities, and have been able to place locations to approximately 100 of them. However, our confidence level in the validity of these findings is yet not to where I'd like it to be to do a complete and full disclosure. Nevertheless, phenotype (the physical characteristics we could "see") tells us there are basically four forms, or biokinds. The first three we classified them to be ontobioenergetic (that is, they are intelligent biological life forms). The last class was an interesting one, and we labeled them ontocyberenergetic (that is, they were much like a 'Terminator' type of cyborg with very advanced internal network and AI). (Don't think it was Arnold Schwartzenegger!)

The first class was made of groups of humanoids, just like us. In fact, the only variance we detected was height and weight. Our best estimate is that these people, males and females, are anywhere between five and seven feet, and some even taller. In terms of other physical characteristics, skin color ranged from very light to very tan, almost black but without Negroid features. Others displayed Negroid features, but were relatively light skinned and hair straight and browntodark brown. As nearly as could tell by mere gnosive observation (not examining the inside of their bodies to discern physiology and genotype), all of these appeared to be carbonbased. The humanoids represented about 60 percent of our sample.

The second group was sauroid, or what the popular literature refers to as lizardlike or reptilian. These, too, offered wide variances in phenotype and genotype. There were humanoidlike with leatheryhard skins who were extremely tall (seven feet by our estimate), about the same height as us Earth humans (5.6 to 6 ft.), and a third subtype about 5 feet tall at most. All such forms were malefemale typed. Then there were the mothlike, very large and very tall, with what can best be described as wings or winglike protrusions between what we could discern as arms and the trunk of the body. By very large, we mean seven feet and taller. No distinguishable malefemale types were discerned. The third subcategory was the group referred to in the literature as "the grays." Of these, there were at least a dozen variances - in height, body types (including eye size and construction), weight, skin color and means of reproduction. This class represented approximately 30 percent of our sample.

The third group was a small conglomerate of biokinds that looked humanoid, but their genotype and biology showed them to be ironbased (for two humanoidinsectoid blends), one subgroup of magnesiumbased (circulatory system) make up, a third subgroup of siliconbased (sensoria and skeletal structure) sol/gel (soluble/gelatinous) silicon states, but the beige color skin looked rough, even harsh (like the unpolished surface of cement blocks).

The fourth class was ontocyberenergetic - that is to say, they were intelligent, cybernetic organisms dressed by organic tissue. Their shape was hominid, with a larger head than the trunkhead human proportions, and estimated height in the near seven feet range. These are groups we have not examined closely as of yet. There were several groups in this class, some of which we found to be not from our galaxy.

In Conclusion

While verification of the data is a problem (for, those who have information that could confirm or dispel their validity are not talking, nor are they willing to talk to us), the global descriptions generated from the data are strong and reliable. In other words, they come from more than two neurosensors keying in on the same heuristic questions, on more than two examinations of the information cumulus.

This line of research continues to date.
sasha
User ID: 190758
United States
10/17/2008 01:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
interesting find op....
Tmad1

User ID: 502345
United States
10/17/2008 01:07 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
I dont fucking know who is more retarded you pxtards or the new age asswats. Id say its a tie your both a bunch of fucking twats.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528558
United States
10/17/2008 01:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
DOOD THAT IZ WAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY TO MUCH SHIT TO READ MAN!!!!!!!!!!!! RU TALKIN BOUT TEH FICTICIOUS PLANET X ??????????
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528558
United States
10/17/2008 01:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
becuz if u are talking bout planet x, that shit has been debunked for years now.... there is a planet x so much as there is a galactic fed. ship coming to scare everyone.
another do slaphim taunter
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Everyone who's posted a reply (except for sasha)


sbus
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 165351
United States
10/17/2008 01:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
OP do you have any extension neurosensing experience
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528558
United States
10/17/2008 01:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
man nasa had a press releasee that put that myth to shame, and im pretty sure they would know if there was a planet x before you would
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
OP do you have any extension neurosensing experience
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 165351



No not really. I like to think I'm more "aware" than some, and occasionally a dream or two, but that's the extent of it.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
interesting find op....
 Quoting: sasha 190758



Pretty cool if you're into this sort of material.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
[link to www.scribd.com]


If the article posted interests anyone, you'll like this even more.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
"This is most disturbing to us, because the greatest weapon at humankind's disposal is the size of the biomind (6 billionplus).

I can understand official reluctance in giving official imprimatur to information concerning these threats. But, according to our emerging Working Model in life physics, communal human vector intention is the most potent force on Earth - something that makes nuclear and particle energy weaponized technologies be like bows and arrows in comparison. This is yet not fully grasped in official circles, let alone understood. And therein lies one of several conundrums for humanity."


AKA...the GLP effect.
The Monk
User ID: 509459
United States
10/17/2008 01:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
The "Artificer"?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
The "Artificer"?
 Quoting: The Monk 509459



?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
I'm thinking Looking Glass Technology.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528119
Netherlands
10/17/2008 01:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Everyone who's posted a reply (except for sasha)
sbus
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 528217


Yeah, I second that.

This is the kind of mind-bending material that draws me to GLP.

Thanks,

Hey Sasha, Run this by ST in BG, would ya, I'd like to get his take on this.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 528217
United States
10/17/2008 01:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Everyone who's posted a reply (except for sasha)
sbus


Yeah, I second that.

This is the kind of mind-bending material that draws me to GLP.

Thanks,

Hey Sasha, Run this by ST in BG, would ya, I'd like to get his take on this.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 528119



Yeah, there use to be alot of this type info on GLP. We are fully embrasing the physical material world right now. LOL!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 467553
United States
10/17/2008 01:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
hiding
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 516570
United States
10/17/2008 01:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
If there was a Binary partner to our Sun , Perhaps a Blackhole or even a Brown Dwarf do you really think Nasa would say a thing about it .

Come to think about it , We are the Odd System out , Most systems Have a Binary System

Not saying this is the case , But
............................


Binary Research Institute

Gravity Probe B – Results to Date – Does It Show Solar System Motion?

It was recently reported by NewScientist that Gravity Probe B received an “F” from the U.S. Government and the project would receive no more funding.

[link to space.newscientist.com]

I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. Here’s why:

Our government (you and me) spent over $850 million on GP-B, a joint NASA and Stanford project. This was far more than the original budget. In theory the project was simple; put a telescope into space, attach it to some gyros and point it at a nearby guide star. The motion picked up by the gyros was supposed to confirm Einstein’s theory of relativity (that the mass of the earth bends space time) and reveal the exact amount of the relativistic effect.

Over the last decade the GP-B team built the finest gyros known to man, put them in a spacecraft cooled to almost absolute zero, and sent it into a polar orbit far above all the noise of a so-called wobbling earth. In a carefully controlled experiment, whereby the telescope was set to meticulously track the guide star (one with minimal proper motion), they picked up some amazing information – potentially a huge discovery - but it was not what they were looking for.

In order to find the relativistic effect, the GP-B team assumed they only had to cancel out two signals or unwanted motions. First, was the motion of the spacecraft in a polar orbit around the earth. This motion resulted in an aberration between the telescope and the guide star of about 5.1856 arc seconds per orbit. Since that orbit took place every 91 minutes it was an easy signal to spot and remove. The second was the earth’s orbit around the sun, which results in an aberration of 20.4958 arc seconds per year (relative to the guide star). Only one and a half of these orbits took place during the 17 month experiment period so it was harder to find, but it is a motion so well known, that it was also easy to confirm and cancel out. It was assumed that there were no other meaningful celestial motions to cancel, so if the equipment worked right, the only signal left would be the relativistic effect.

There was however another assumption made that now appears to be a potentially huge mistake. That is that the solar system only moves about .005 arc seconds per year. This assumes that the only motion of the solar system is once around the galaxy approximately every 240 million years. The thinking was that this aberration is so small it would not affect the outcome of the experiment. But after netting out the spacecraft and earth orbit motions the remaining signal was far larger than anyone expected. In fact, it is so large it either means there is some unforeseen problem with the gyros or that our sun is part of a binary star system.

Yes, that’s right, if the data is correct our solar system is curving through space (carrying the earth and spacecraft with it of course) so rapidly that the only way to explain it is if our sun is gravitationally bound to another nearby star. When I met with the GP-B team at Stanford last fall they were still in the early process of analyzing the data but openly discussed the idea of an unknown companion to our sun, including the possibility of a not too distant blackhole.

This is by no means the consensus opinion. In fact, most of those analyzing the data suspect the wacky signals are the result of imperfections on the gyros, polhode motion or some other inexplicable anomaly. But given the fact that that the gyros were specifically designed to avoid these types of problems, and were checked by hundreds of scientists before launch, and that the experiment is fairly simple at its core, serious consideration should be given to the idea that the unwanted GP-B signal, deemed to be “noise”, is in fact the signal of a solar system in motion.

A moving solar system model has been the basis of our work here at the Binary Research Institute for the last six years. From this model we have made a number of observations and predications. One is that the observable, commonly known as the precession of the equinox, is principally due to the moving solar system rather than local luni-solar forces (which do produce nutation but very little of the 50 arc seconds of annual earth reorientation). Another is the accelerating precession rate, which has been occurring steadily since Newcomb first provided a formula for the precession constant (which he underestimated and we modified with Kepler’s Laws). Long before the GP-B data was received we wrote Stanford and told them to expect some wacky signals that would appear to mimic precession. One of the subsequent public releases has stated that the signals received do indeed appear to “mimic” the very signals the spacecraft was trying to avoid with its perfect gyros placed far above a so-called wobbling earth.

At this point no one knows quite what to think. Is there something wrong with “the world’s finest gyros ever built” or is our solar system gravitationally bound to some nearby mass? Time will tell.

In the meantime, I can understand the government wanting to shutdown a project that has produced nothing but cost overruns and unexpected results. On the other hand, if the GP-B team is willing to explore novel ideas related to the unwanted signal, they just might discover something even more important than the fifth digit of the relativistic effect, that is, our solar system moves!



[link to www.binaryresearchinstitute.org]
locomotion nli
User ID: 528901
United States
10/17/2008 02:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
"This is most disturbing to us, because the greatest weapon at humankind's disposal is the size of the biomind (6 billionplus).

I can understand official reluctance in giving official imprimatur to information concerning these threats. But, according to our emerging Working Model in life physics, communal human vector intention is the most potent force on Earth - something that makes nuclear and particle energy weaponized technologies be like bows and arrows in comparison. This is yet not fully grasped in official circles, let alone understood. And therein lies one of several conundrums for humanity."


AKA...the GLP effect.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 528217


...and therein lies the true reason why those already in power, work so very hard to keep us fighting among ourselves. It's pretty hard for starving dogs set to fighting over a scrap of rotten meat to reach concensus on anything but their intent to get the largest chunk of rotten meat.

I remember reading about a very interesting experiment (sorry no link, so FWIW) where a person was set down in a room with a glass of water, and was told to variously raise or lower the PH of the water with nothing but their INTENT to do so. Amazingly, the test subjects were able to effect a change in PH, simply through their applied intention to do that.

Imagine with me, what could be done if we all (or even a large majority of us) set out to influence world affairs with our applied intent? My guess is, TPTB have already imagined this scenario and are scared s**tless about its potential.

Thanks for the post and link OP!

Cheers to a better world,

loco
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 478838
United States
10/17/2008 02:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Just because an organization has Physics in the title doen't necessarily make it scientific.
M.A. (Cantab), M.Sc., Ph.D,
User ID: 487016
United Kingdom
10/17/2008 02:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Bordon and Wienz pull the wool over your eyes that they are explaining 'paranormal' things by using scientific gooblygook that sounds impressive but which means nothing once you have re-read it about fifty times.

I should know because Wienz once approached me to be the editor of their journal "Foundation Reports in Life Physics". After I read the research reports on their website
[link to foundationreportsinlifephysics.org]
and others they sent to me, publications which they claimed to be scientific research, I politely refused. Since then, I learnt that Bordon did freelance work in remote viewing for the NSA, no doubt charging huge fees. Looking back, I never made a wiser decision.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528999
United States
10/17/2008 03:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Bordon and Wienz pull the wool over your eyes that they are explaining 'paranormal' things by using scientific gooblygook that sounds impressive but which means nothing once you have re-read it about fifty times.

I should know because Wienz once approached me to be the editor of their journal "Foundation Reports in Life Physics". After I read the research reports on their website
[link to foundationreportsinlifephysics.org]
and others they sent to me, publications which they claimed to be scientific research, I politely refused. Since then, I learnt that Bordon did freelance work in remote viewing for the NSA, no doubt charging huge fees. Looking back, I never made a wiser decision.
 Quoting: M.A. (Cantab), M.Sc., Ph.D, 487016




I have read about this "gooblygook" for years now. The science still being tossed about like an old rag doll is archaic and a front for the masses; like a religion used to suppress and depress.

The real pioneering work has been in consciousness study and experiments since before WWII. You can refuse all the research you want, it doesn't make their experiments or findings any less "real". I applaud those researchers who have stepped out of the physical "box" that has kept us bound for so long.

There is one report title that stood out in my mind, "A physics of life: Are the tenets of Christ and the Buddha actually new, advanced physics?" I've always had the belief within that Christ was a spiritually enlightened quantum physics master. I've read much history of Buddha, Tao, Golden Flower, etc. and it always leads to the undeniable divinity of quantum mechanics.

I'm not sure how working with the NSA for remote viewing purposes is a deterent...we don't have enough answers to judge so absolutely. To each his own though:)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528999
United States
10/17/2008 03:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
"This is most disturbing to us, because the greatest weapon at humankind's disposal is the size of the biomind (6 billionplus).

I can understand official reluctance in giving official imprimatur to information concerning these threats. But, according to our emerging Working Model in life physics, communal human vector intention is the most potent force on Earth - something that makes nuclear and particle energy weaponized technologies be like bows and arrows in comparison. This is yet not fully grasped in official circles, let alone understood. And therein lies one of several conundrums for humanity."


AKA...the GLP effect.






...and therein lies the true reason why those already in power, work so very hard to keep us fighting among ourselves. It's pretty hard for starving dogs set to fighting over a scrap of rotten meat to reach concensus on anything but their intent to get the largest chunk of rotten meat.

I remember reading about a very interesting experiment (sorry no link, so FWIW) where a person was set down in a room with a glass of water, and was told to variously raise or lower the PH of the water with nothing but their INTENT to do so. Amazingly, the test subjects were able to effect a change in PH, simply through their applied intention to do that.

Imagine with me, what could be done if we all (or even a large majority of us) set out to influence world affairs with our applied intent? My guess is, TPTB have already imagined this scenario and are scared s**tless about its potential.

Thanks for the post and link OP!

Cheers to a better world,

loco
 Quoting: locomotion nli 528901




Imagine the effect even a small amount of us on GLP might be having. Who knows? I did read "The Field" by Lynn McTaggert. It gives many examples of the effects from intent. Wonderful book if you haven't read it yet.

I would say they have known about our human potential for thousands of years...why else the consorted effort to control our thoughts and behavior with every available resource and application? Religion, science, diet, work, media, sports, nationhood, music, the list goes on and on and forever into history.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528987
United States
10/17/2008 03:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
These guys....

A. R. Bordon E. M Wienz
LIFE PHYSICS GROUP - CALIFORNIA

These are the same guys & group that James Casbolt had said he had contact with, He said they are actually a secret part of the NSA.

This is the same group that the LERM documents came from that James Casbolt leaked onto the Internet.

Those LERM documents that Casbolt leaked refer to the Lerm Technology and Dr. Neruda from the ttp://www.wingmakers.com site.

All I am saying is that this info should be given a serious look in my own opinion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
10/17/2008 03:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Earth

Our planet is clearly a member of a solar system composed of 8 planets on an ecliptic which more or less hosts relatively circular orbits for each of them. Pluto is another story, and so is Europa; as such they have no bearing on our report here. Earth and the inner terrestrial planets, on the other hand, are already being affected by gravitational effects from a good size planet known to us as Planet X, about which there was a lot of noise back in the late 1980s and early 1990s. On Earth, this is an unacknowledged contributor to global warming and a portend to other stresses to the integrity of the Earth. It is no accident that there has been an increase in volcanism and tectonic activity on the surface, in the form of volcanic eruptions and earthquakes.
 Quoting: Under a Rock 528217


Unfortunately for this quack, none of this is true. There are no unaccounted for gravitational effects on the inner planets and the statistics of earthquakes and volcanoes show no increase over time.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528942
United Kingdom
10/17/2008 03:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
The "Artificer"?
 Quoting: The Monk 509459



Those that have stood at the feet of the 'Artificer' will resonate with your post.

There are more of us than they know.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528999
United States
10/17/2008 04:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Earth

Our planet is clearly a member of a solar system composed of 8 planets on an ecliptic which more or less hosts relatively circular orbits for each of them. Pluto is another story, and so is Europa; as such they have no bearing on our report here. Earth and the inner terrestrial planets, on the other hand, are already being affected by gravitational effects from a good size planet known to us as Planet X, about which there was a lot of noise back in the late 1980s and early 1990s. On Earth, this is an unacknowledged contributor to global warming and a portend to other stresses to the integrity of the Earth. It is no accident that there has been an increase in volcanism and tectonic activity on the surface, in the form of volcanic eruptions and earthquakes.


Unfortunately for this quack, none of this is true. There are no unaccounted for gravitational effects on the inner planets and the statistics of earthquakes and volcanoes show no increase over time.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 88145



Because you have access to all of that data right. LOL
locomotion
User ID: 529094
United States
10/17/2008 06:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
Imagine the effect even a small amount of us on GLP might be having. Who knows? I did read "The Field" by Lynn McTaggert. It gives many examples of the effects from intent. Wonderful book if you haven't read it yet.

I would say they have known about our human potential for thousands of years...why else the consorted effort to control our thoughts and behavior with every available resource and application? Religion, science, diet, work, media, sports, nationhood, music, the list goes on and on and forever into history.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 528999


Yes, who knows indeed...I do believe that we all put our intent on everything we do, for better or worse, and that includes GLP, lightworkers and doomseekers alike! lol

McTaggert's book sounds interesting, and it's always nice to get a recommendation.

IMO our sun most likely is in a binary system,
earthquake 'stats' can be manipulated like all data,
Neruda's writings are fascinating,

And there really IS more under heaven and earth, Horatio...

;)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 528999
United States
10/17/2008 09:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: **BREAKING**Scientific Proof That "the Planet" (you know the one) Does Exist
bump

News