My beef has always been the ethnocentrism at the top. I understand why the top exists, but I'm on the side of the pyramid looking at both the elite and the dumbed down cattle and that kind of sucks from a social perspective; though I can "have fun" within the matrix like a playground. Just got to follow the rules.

If there were not ethnocentrism at the top, I could be included simply because I have that kind of brain.


There are two general types of world orders that are possible here:

1. The deceptive world order that we have today.

2. An honest world order as I've explained it throughout this thread.


Deceptive World Order:
I firmly believe that ethnocentrism is at the top of the current deceptive world order. If there were not this ethnocentrism, and instead others were included as they were naturally able, I probably wouldn't mind this type of world order so much.


Honest World Order:
This is a much more fun and beautiful world; but will doomsday be more or less likely with this order?

Essentially, people, the honest world order is a total global tyranny - with regard to technology production only.

The deceptive world order is a total global tyranny with regard to everything. That's why they want to spread democracy to the world - that's the global tyranny. When you control the brains, democracy is tyranny. The point of tyranny is the control over the brains.


I used to think that I needed the technological information in order to decide which of the two world orders above has the higher probability of doomsday - but I'm thinking now that may not be the case. I can just project to the obvious realization of doomsday technology that is relatively easy to create. It exists today, I'm sure of it.

EVEN IF IT DOES NOT EXIST, IT COULD BOURGEON OUT AT ANY TIME. That is a key point which causes me to not need to talk to the elite directly to complete the thought. Before, on a previous post, I told you elites that I needed to talk to you directly about the technology. I just wanted to talk with you; tried to trick you.

However, the ETHNOCENTRIC part of the equation is not answered yet. That's why I need to talk with you. If you don't talk with me, the assumption is ethnocentrism in my thinking. The thinking there is that if you were not ethnocentric, you would talk with me; thus you just consider me to be a "curious little slave."