Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,026 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,388,211
Pageviews Today: 3,333,184Threads Today: 821Posts Today: 14,887
09:43 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The Great Obama Swindle of 2008

 
Hiram Abiff
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 541504
United States
11/03/2008 09:47 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
PART ONE
OBAMA: THE ILLEGAL ALIEN

I have become 100% convinced, to a moral certainty, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Barack Obama is not only not a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution to be president, but that he was not even born in the USA, not born in Hawaii, probably in Kenya, never naturalized. If he is elected, he will be the UnConstitutional President from the moment he takes the oath of office, the first president who is not a citizen of the United States.

Why I am so sure?

I was not convinced by the lawsuits filed by Philip Berg, Andy Martin, Jerome Corsi, and others seeking disclosure of Obama's birth certificate. I was not convinced by the books and articles that now abound contesting Obama's origins. I was convinced by the behavior of Barack Obama and his lawyers, asking the governor of Hawaii to seal Obama's birth certificate so it could not be seen, by anyone, and by the behavior of Barack Obama and his lawyers, sealing his records at Columbia University and Harvard Law. Barack Obama is hiding himself from America. And he wants to be POTUS, and Commander-in-Chief.

In the litigation business, one quickly learns that if somebody has a document that will be good for them, they can't wait to give it to you. And if somebody has a document that will hurt them, they'll be tap dancing faster than Richard Gere in Chicago to keep you from getting it.

Obama is tap dancing.

If I were Obama's lawyers, and if there was a good, authentic, birth certificate that proved Barack Obama's birth in Hawaii, I would tell him to instruct the Hawaiian Department of Health to provide a certified copy to every journalist who asked about it, to the Courts and plaintiffs in all the lawsuits, and to make the original available for inspection by any expert forensic document examiner any litigant or news agency engaged to examine the birth certificate for authenticity. I would tell him to come clean, and end the speculation. And I would tell him that the speculation could cost him the election.

But that's not what Obama's lawyers are doing, they're filling motions for summary judgment, not on the merits of the case, but on "technicalities," at least in the Berg case, arguing that Citizens, voters, do not have standing to enforce the United States Constitution, and at least one judge, Richard Barclay Surrick, has agreed.

But what Obama and his lawyers and the Democrat National Committee (DNC) are not doing is being open and honest with America. They're tap dancing faster than Richard Gere in Chicago. So we are forced to this conclusion as a matter of logical necessity:

1. If Barack Obama could produce a good birth certificate that would verify his status as a "natural born citizen," he would. Failing to do so can only hurt him. Failing to do so can cost him the election.

2. He hasn't, and is doing all possible not to.

3. Therefore, we can only conclude that he can't, and that his birth certificate, if it exists at all, is either altered, forged, or shows him born outside the U.S. We have to conclude that producing his birth certificate, if he can, will prove he is not eligible to be president, not a natural born citizen, or not a citizen at all. We can only conclude that Obama and his lawyers know that producing his birth records will hurt him even more than not producing them.

Now, I could be wrong. Barack Obama can prove me wrong by producing a good birth certificate. But he hasn't. Will he? Can he?

PART TWO
NO "STANDING" TO SUE?

In the case of Berg v. Obama, US Federal Judge Richard Barclay Surrick agreed with Obama's lawyers and ruled that Berg, as a citizen, as a voter, has no "standing" to enforce the United States Constitution. I have read that other agencies have asserted that only another presidential candidate has standing to sue respecting the qualifications of a candidate, presumably because, arguendo, only another presidential candidate could be injured (lose an election) as a result of a non-qualified candidate on the ballot.

This may be the most patently absurd, illogical, incomprehensible, astonishing, mind-boggling, and utterly stupid argument I have ever heard in my life – and from a Federal Judge, at that. And if I didn't make myself perfectly clear, let me know and I'll try again.

Let's do the analysis.

1. The U.S. Constitution is a CONTRACT between The People, The States, and The United States, the federal government, that defines and limits the role of the federal government, and the rights of the States and The People, and, among other things, defines and limits the qualifications for president, i.e., that the president must be over the age of 35 years, and must be a natural born citizen.

2. Any party to a CONTRACT has standing to enforce it. This is as basic as it gets. Contract Law 101. First week of law school stuff. And it seems that lawyers and judges all over the country have forgotten all about it. Also, the Constitution was intended to benefit all American citizens, We, The People, and in basic contract law the intended beneficiaries of a CONTRACT, i.e., us, also have standing to enforce it.

3. If We, The People, do not have standing to enforce the CONTRACT, the U.S. Constitution, then it is unenforceable, and if it is unenforceable it is just a historic curiosity that means nothing. It’s just an old piece of parchment. But that was not the intent, and to give intent to the CONTRACT it must be enforceable by its parties and beneficiaries.

4. We, The People, have standing under the First Amendment "to petition the government for redress of grievances." If we have a grievance that a non-citizen, illegal alien, is running for president, I think the First Amendment unequivocally gives every American citizen standing to sue the government to redress that grievance and enforce the Constitution.

I think Judge Richard Barclay Surrick is dead wrong, illogically wrong, irrationally wrong, legally wrong, I think his legal analysis of this issue, in legalese, stinks.

PART THREE
THE DUTY OF CONGRESS

Article II, Section 1, requires that upon taking office the President of the United States shall take the following oath:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the
United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution
of the United States."

Article VI, Clause 3, requires that Senators and Representatives requires:

"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution . . ."

Members of Congress take this oath:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

Having taken this oath, Sen. Barack Obama has violated his oath of office if he is refusing to disclose a birth certificate that proves his candidacy for president is unconstitutional, and I believe this is a mandatory basis for his impeachment.

Having taken these oaths, the President, the Vice President (an executive officer of the United States), every member of the Senate and House, every member of every State legislature, and every executive and judicial officers of the United States and of each State, has a mandatory duty per Article VI Clause 3 of the US Constitution to "support and defend" the Constitution, and that would necessarily include taking whatever action is necessary to assure that no person who does not meet the Constitutional requirement of "natural born citizen" ever becomes President.

And every Federal Judge, and every Justice of the Supreme Court, having taken this oath, also have a mandatory duty to "protect and defend" the Constitution by doing whatever is necessary to assure that no person who does not meet the Constitutional requirement of "natural born citizen" ever becomes President. Indeed, I believe that the Supreme Court has a sua sponte duty to resolve this dispute by ordering, on its own initiative, the immediate production of all of Obama's birth records in order to confirm his place of birth, and prevent the election of an UnConstitutional President. So far, all Justices of the Supreme Court have failed this mandatory duty.

So far, the President, the Vice President, every member of Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, ever Federal Judge and Justice, every member of every State legislature, and every governor, have failed in this duty. They have all failed to fulfill their oaths of office. Every one. They must all demand that Sen. Barack Obama either (a) produce a good birth certificate proving his status as a "natural born citizen," or (b) withdraw his candidacy before November 4th.

All those who do not should be impeached for having failed their oath of office.

PART FOUR
THE GREATEST SWINDLE IN HISTORY

If Senator Barack Hussein Obama cannot prove that he is a "natural born citizen," then Obama, the Democrat National Committee, the Democrats in the Senate and House who support him, and others such as former president Bill Clinton who openly support him, have perpetrated the greatest swindle in history by falsely and fraudulently misrepresenting Obama as Constitutionally eligible to be president, concealing the truth about his place of birth, thereby inducing millions of Democrats by the fraud of concealment, by the lie of non-disclosure, by "trick and device," to invest hundreds of millions of dollars in the Barack Obama presidential campaign to elect an UnConstitutional President.

My opinion.

Note, this is a fraud perpetrated by Sen. Barack Obama, the DNC, and hundreds of Democrats in Congress, on their own constituency, the Democrat voters of America. It is a fraud of the Democrats, by the Democrats, and perpetrated on the Democrats. And it has defrauded Democrats out of more than $600 million.

According to their oaths of office, every Democrat member of Congress has an affirmative duty to assure that their presidential candidate is constitutionally qualified. As soon as questions about Obama's birth arose, every Democrat in Congress had a mandatory duty to confirm his eligibility by demanding release of his birth records. But, they have not. Not to my knowledge. Instead, every Democrat in Congress is complicit in the cover up – the cover up – of Obama's birth certificate, by failing to demand full disclosure to confirm his place of birth.

In my opinion, unless Obama can produce a good birth certificate proving that he is a "natural born citizen," then every Democrat member of Congress, every person managing Obama's campaign, every officer and director of the Democrat National Commitee, and every person who has ever taken an oath to "support and defend" the Constitution and is now supporting an UnConstitutional candidate for president, has participated in a vast left-wing conspiracy to defraud millions of Democrats out of hundreds of millions of dollars to elect an UnConstitutional President.

In my opinion, every one of these people, hundreds of them, should be prosecuted for fraud under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), for if Obama is not a "natural born citizen," that is what the Democrat National Committee (DNC) has become. And every one of them should be tried, convicted, and sent to prison for decades, for this is a $600 billion swindle of America's Democrats, a swindle perpetrated by the DNC and Barack Obama.

Now, I could be wrong. I could be wrong about every opinion I have expressed here.

Sen. Barack Hussein Obama can prove me wrong, quickly, simply, easily, by opening the doors of the hospitals and the Hawaiian Department of Health and showing us, showing America, showing the Democrats, all of his birth records.

Unless and until he does, I will remain convinced that Barack Hussein Obama is not an American citizen.

FamilySecurityMatters.org Contributing Editor Raymond S. Kraft is an attorney and writer in Northern California. He can be contacted at rskraft@vfr.net.
Hiram Abiff (OP)

User ID: 541504
United States
11/03/2008 09:49 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
It's simply unbelieveable it's taken this long, and still no real proof. A man who does this much legal manuvering has something to hide.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 533322
United States
11/03/2008 10:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 531633
United States
11/03/2008 10:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
yep...you keep going on this and let us know what happens. lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 541454
United States
11/03/2008 10:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
It doesn't matter anymore. People want to turn Socialist and they don't care where he was born. Islam has taken over the USA. I sure am going to miss looking at girls sexy legs when they have to wear burkas.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 541005
United States
11/03/2008 01:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
Five stars for this post.

Mods! Will you please flag this thread! Thanks.

.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 533322
United States
11/03/2008 01:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
bump
LushLife

User ID: 343905
United States
11/03/2008 01:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
John McCain, the 2008 Republican nominee, was born at the Coco Solo U.S. military base in the Panama Canal Zone to U.S. parents.

Although the Panama Canal Zone was not considered to be part of the United States, federal law states:

"Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States."

The law that conferred this status took effect on August 4, 1937, one year after John McCain was born.
I don't know where we've been and I've just been there.
LushLife

User ID: 343905
United States
11/03/2008 01:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008

I don't know where we've been and I've just been there.
LushLife

User ID: 343905
United States
11/03/2008 01:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
oops
I don't know where we've been and I've just been there.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 539934
United States
11/03/2008 01:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
I'd be willing to pay for his exportation. Hold on a minute let me check my credit cards.

Man I can only get him half way across the Atlantic.
Hiram Abiff (OP)

User ID: 541692
United States
11/03/2008 01:54 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
Most of the people don't care to look any further than a superficial study of these canidates, and that the true shame of it all. They will regret voting for Obama I'm sure.

McCain says he learned how great a government America has while in a POW camp. Obama wrote he learned his concept of government from his Marxist preaching professors. The Bolhevik Revolution and every version of it has always led to poverty for all except the ruling elite. The people will see an Obama administration will be very similar to the Carter administration, much higher unemployment, dramatically higher taxes of the upper class and a vast majority of the middle class, high inflation, and a much deeper recession.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 540292
United Kingdom
11/03/2008 02:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
Obama had to give up his American citizenship (if, indeed, he ever had it) when he became an Indonesian and entered the school system in Indonesia, which does not permit dual citizenship. Therefore, if no longer Indonesian, he must be a naturalized citizen, which makes him ineligible to be president.

Simple as that. No conspiracies, no speculations. Just FACT.
Lawful or no...
User ID: 540143
United States
11/03/2008 02:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Great Obama Swindle of 2008
True, the logic is simple enough.

However those who mindlessly and/or deliberately continue to support this travesty of an individual, would prefer to IGNORE any and all LAWFUL procedure upon which the entire free world is founded, and attempt to force this coward through in clear VIOLATION of that law.

It is a question of law. It is a question of our Constitution.

It is NOT a question of whether or not we like the individual.
It is NOT a question of whether or not he's a smooth talker.

IT IS A QUESTION OF LAW.

It is indescribable, that there are so many people who claim to be american and so fervently support this sham, who vehemently refuse to hold their "candidate" to the standard of LAW.

Those who continue to support this fraud cannot continue to do so without simultaneously abondoning the Constitution.

This individual has become repugnant to the Constitution.

It is unfortunate, only for those individuals themselves, that they have chosen to trade their portion of the Constitution for a man.

God help them.

News