Is Richard Dawkins a Freemason ?

He can't be.

To be a mason you NEED to believe in an all all powerful deity (be it Christian, Deist, Islamic etc.).

bull sh1t


stanists are in the masons

atheists worship themselves as God dont they

He doesn't claim miracles which is the pure definition of god (being able of doing anything).

Also can you please tell me how darwinism is exactly a religion and how you would define a religion then?

Darwinism has no evidence to back up its wild claims like a chicken comes from a T rex,hence darwinism is a faith system ,ie a form of religion

Darwinists have even been caught faking fossils to promote this weird atheist theory and people like richard darwkins are absolute fanatics who foam at the mouth if you question their B.S

That video is fake. BTw...

Not in European lodges. Certainly not France.

i called Richard Dawkins a Giants Slayer
long live dawkins

Dawkins "preaches" with the same fervour as a fundamentalist. He is not trying to argue from rational position, he is trying to win converts.

How?

lol... very nice

no... he makes the same arguments... only he is correct

No DOUBT!!!!!
They believe in a monotheistic religion and worship Lucifer. They also want to bring down Christianity by putting one of their own as pontiff which ,sadly to say,they have done with the current pope.
To get back on track,
It isn't scientific investigation of Darwinism ( a freemason) that's forbidden -- it's public debate of the findings of such research. Most educated, rational people will find it almost impossible to believe that the debate of Darwinism through mainstream news papers and the principal TV channels is forbidden. I still find it hard to believe myself.

The article below was first commissioned and later censored by the Times Higher Education Supplement [link to www.alternativescience.com] (The circumstances under which it came to be censored, following the intervention of Dr Richard Dawkins ( hence was a free mason, are described in the pages on Scientific Censorship).
Sadly, this site got also censored.

PLease go to this link and read. You won;t find it in any bookstores, and was written by a member of the catholic church who are against the freemasons.

[link to www.catholicvoice.co.uk]

Darwinism is a scientific theory, not a religion, but some supporters of that theory, such as Dawkins, are so fanatical about it that to them it has become almost like a religion. Dawkins and his ilk need to become less ideological and more truly scientific. Then they can look at the Darwin theory objectively and see where it is right and where it is wrong and needs to be modified. Science changes. Dogma does not.

Annie Besant

Was a born catholic

and became an atheist then

later she joined

Freemasonry

and some century latter became a hindu.

How could you trust a word or believe in word of mouth. politician and influential people are always good in lies and denial things.

Of course he is.

He is allowed to be on the world stage, you dont get there unless you befriend the owner of the theater.

Dawkins is too dumb to be a mason.

Yes, he is. That's why he hates on the Catholic Church so much: Freemasons and the Catholic Church are mortal enemies. Freemasons are also allowed to lie with impunity if it furthers the interests of the Lodge or if it serves the interests of fellow Masons.

Dawkins is also a good candidate for the False Prophet mentioned in St. John's Apocalyspe.

No. He can't be, have to believe in some 'higher power' man is accountable to to get accepted in and he's a hardcore militant atheist materialist.

Anonymous Coward,

You lose that bet. The militant atheist Richard Dawkins is definitely NOT a Mason(47=M13+A1+S19+O+N14). The main requirement to becoming a Mason is belief in GOD: the "Grand Architect of this Universe" (G.A.O.T.U.).

See [link to wikipedia.org] .

A base tenant of Freemasonry requires a potential member to believe in God so... you do the math.

A woman didn't become a Freemason.

Who cares - he is going to Hell

I'd say religitards are sick fcks for damning people to hell for not believing in something they have absolutely know evidence of.

Thats some real sick shit.

Hell don't exist , do you think any atheist gives a shit what you think ?

Your not capable of rational thoughts.

That should wipe out all doubt . But if someone is still a bit skeptical.
There's something you need to seriously consider.

Be very careful of what you exclude yourself from.

One life to get it right.

If you have any questions about that video you can go to the youtube site and your questions will more than likely be answered ,

By MR oren evron , The producer of the video.


A comment from the utube page I thought worth mentioning,

Alvin Ambers


Mathematics is far from my strong point, so I have to pay particular attention to presentations like this.

None-the-less, I can appreciate the implications of the mathematical "science" presented.


Just as a personal observation, I would suggest that in accounting for the relatively miniscule disparity (I think less than 3% in the most extreme), could lie in God's awareness that His created Flesh children would suffer a limitation in pronunciation which would not allow Him to give them names for things which would be perfect.

Similarly, we cannot see all colors with our natural eyes, and there are almost certainly colors we have no names for.
Again, too, I am reminded of fractals.


The implications of this presentation are, in a word, ASTOUNDING.



[link to youtu.be]

I think you just have to believe in a "supreme power"... this is their "grand architect" or "divine mind/mechanism" governing the cosmos.. the hermetic god.. seems like it gets fairly ambiguous..

Anyways, Richard Dawkins seems like too much of a naive moron to be a freemason... he is just completely self-deluded I think... definitely under demonic influence though, so at least he has something in common with the masons.

You can also be an extremely useful idiot.

He might be a mason... I don't know.. I bet he has a lot of freemasons in his family, and I'm sure his handlers/promoters have a lot of masons in them.. he just doesn't come off as a mason to me...

One thing though is that Dawkins' affiliations and his past seem to be kept very secret... hard to find out much about it, I've looked...

They are "Humanists" though... they worship man... lots of occult influence behind that stuff... I tend to think the hardline atheists are more useful idiots than anything,though