Freeman-On-The-Land status given to Canadian Man! Documents show Proof! | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 516288 Canada 11/14/2008 01:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 496431 Canada 11/14/2008 01:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
hard to handle User ID: 311866 United States 11/14/2008 01:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 497709 Canada 12/16/2008 04:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 573758 United States 12/16/2008 05:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
FreeManAndHisLog User ID: 603308 Japan 01/29/2009 04:03 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I recommend you check out this: "The Right of Self-Determination"... [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) It starts with an overview of the Constitution for the United States but then goes on to the Law of Nations and many other things including contracts, forming societies and details on why commercial redemption regarding liens (Security Agreements) etc. may be considered "ideological terrorism" under the various 'Acts' and 'Codes' as you do not have standing to use "set off" because you are not party to the compact that created their society. |
Free Store. User ID: 142947 Canada 01/29/2009 04:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I say it's Canadian golden information I mean you can apply for crown land <: that I know..is this what it is or something else? paste of one of the links Hi! Here is an email with attachments I send to anyone wishing to put the gov on notice Only a free man may make a move against the government where, the government find themselves pinned to the wall with the law. Most people are not even remotely aware you can literally fire the government and therefore, become a non-resident existing outside the jurisdiction of municipal, provincial and federal governments. This age old concept of free men only once existed as a nation in the entire written history of the world when the united states of America declared independence from England and shortly there after lost it when the sovereign man traded his sovereignty for citizenship in the new found British corporation called The UNITED STATES of AMERICA in 1868, where they went downhill ever since. On the other hand, free men have existed on and off for well over a thousand years in England and a long time ago in Germany. The only lawful, protected and enshrined forever in an Act of Parliament constitution in Canada is the Magna Carta. Anything else is deemed by me, to be an imposter. So far, there is no disputing that. Any questions???...... just ask and I will let you in on what I know. Jack |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 553433 United States 01/29/2009 04:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 550600 Canada 01/29/2009 10:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | when i pay property taxes should i give them 10 dollars over the amount, never submit the invoice, and instead call it a donation? i live in the city, but my other place is totally off the register other than property taxes. my place is my country as far as i am concerned. i don,t need nothing from them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 550600 Canada 01/29/2009 10:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 550600 Canada 01/29/2009 10:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 550600 Canada 01/29/2009 11:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 654439 Canada 04/10/2009 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Colanaly User ID: 684683 Canada 05/21/2009 10:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is rather interesting to view some of the comments located in the various posts. At first glance, the ideology behind the "Freeman-on-the-land" appears to be rather attractive to those persons wishing to rid themselves of the responsibilities and requirements of social existence. The discussions concerning requirements for operator's licences and vehicle registrations, payment of income tax, adherence to statute law and similar comments are rather intriguing. If the status proclaiming the "Freeman-on-the-land" was actually recognized and granted, thereby permitting an individual to proceed through life without the requirements imposed by any government of legal statute, would that also mean the following? 1) As the various governments provide funding for medical services within Canada, does such status then negate the ability to utilize medical services within the Province. In Alberta, the hospital cost for a non-Canadian for a one day period as set out in the fee schedule is in excess of $1,000 per day. Would this hospital cost and any associated costs for tests, dressings, etc be borne entirely by the "Freeman"? 2) Governments provide funding for infrastructure, including the construction of new highways and maintenance of existing roadways and such funding is obtained through taxation and vehicle registration fees. Should a "freeman" chose to use such roadways, would they be required to pay whatever "toll" the government would impose to use such roadways? 3) Governments provide funding for social services and assistance programs such as emergency welfare, Employment Insurance, Legal Aid, public health inspections fairness to employees (Labor Relations), fire suppression, emergency medical services, etc. Again such funding is normally obtained via taxation. Would the "Freeman" be required to eat in dirty restaurants, undergo horrific work conditions, become proficient in fire extinguisher usage and drive themselves to a hospital in times of emergency because of the "freedom" ideology? I see numerous references to "if anyone does revoke or deny consent the exist free of government control and statutory restraints". I would submit that abdication from any type of government control or restraints, in any and all matters, would logically be followed by total removal from any and all assistance, programs or services provided by government, including Canada Pension, Medicare and Old Age Pension payments. There would be no Employment Insurance claims, no requirement for payment of Legal Aid services nor would there be gratis permission to use any existing buildings, infrastructure, educational facility or medical care centers without payment of whatever fees may be levied. Your opinions? |
Wallonthefly User ID: 764737 Canada 09/06/2009 11:11 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I recommend you check out this: "The Right of Self-Determination"... Quoting: FreeManAndHisLog 603308[link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) It starts with an overview of the Constitution for the United States but then goes on to the Law of Nations and many other things including contracts, forming societies and details on why commercial redemption regarding liens (Security Agreements) etc. may be considered "ideological terrorism" under the various 'Acts' and 'Codes' as you do not have standing to use "set off" because you are not party to the compact that created their society. Huh? Whaat? Don't follow. Are you saying that you can't claim "freeman" status because you're not a member of thier society that makes it possible, or that you can because your not a member of thier society? |
Wallonthefly User ID: 764737 Canada 09/06/2009 11:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I recommend you check out this: "The Right of Self-Determination"... Quoting: Wallonthefly 764737[link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) [link to www.themillionairenu.com] (24 mins) It starts with an overview of the Constitution for the United States but then goes on to the Law of Nations and many other things including contracts, forming societies and details on why commercial redemption regarding liens (Security Agreements) etc. may be considered "ideological terrorism" under the various 'Acts' and 'Codes' as you do not have standing to use "set off" because you are not party to the compact that created their society. Huh? Whaat? Don't follow. Are you saying that you can't claim "freeman" status because you're not a member of thier society that makes it possible, or that you can because your not a member of thier society? I suspect you mean the latter, because anything else would be bullshit. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 639476 Canada 09/07/2009 12:01 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is rather interesting to view some of the comments located in the various posts. At first glance, the ideology behind the "Freeman-on-the-land" appears to be rather attractive to those persons wishing to rid themselves of the responsibilities and requirements of social existence. The discussions concerning requirements for operator's licences and vehicle registrations, payment of income tax, adherence to statute law and similar comments are rather intriguing. Quoting: Colanaly 684683If the status proclaiming the "Freeman-on-the-land" was actually recognized and granted, thereby permitting an individual to proceed through life without the requirements imposed by any government of legal statute, would that also mean the following? 1) As the various governments provide funding for medical services within Canada, does such status then negate the ability to utilize medical services within the Province. In Alberta, the hospital cost for a non-Canadian for a one day period as set out in the fee schedule is in excess of $1,000 per day. Would this hospital cost and any associated costs for tests, dressings, etc be borne entirely by the "Freeman"? 2) Governments provide funding for infrastructure, including the construction of new highways and maintenance of existing roadways and such funding is obtained through taxation and vehicle registration fees. Should a "freeman" chose to use such roadways, would they be required to pay whatever "toll" the government would impose to use such roadways? 3) Governments provide funding for social services and assistance programs such as emergency welfare, Employment Insurance, Legal Aid, public health inspections fairness to employees (Labor Relations), fire suppression, emergency medical services, etc. Again such funding is normally obtained via taxation. Would the "Freeman" be required to eat in dirty restaurants, undergo horrific work conditions, become proficient in fire extinguisher usage and drive themselves to a hospital in times of emergency because of the "freedom" ideology? I see numerous references to "if anyone does revoke or deny consent the exist free of government control and statutory restraints". I would submit that abdication from any type of government control or restraints, in any and all matters, would logically be followed by total removal from any and all assistance, programs or services provided by government, including Canada Pension, Medicare and Old Age Pension payments. There would be no Employment Insurance claims, no requirement for payment of Legal Aid services nor would there be gratis permission to use any existing buildings, infrastructure, educational facility or medical care centers without payment of whatever fees may be levied. Your opinions? This is not legal advice, but your questions deserve a response. I will try as it is an interesting idea. In my opinion; 1) Health Care, Freemen would be responsible for costs. 2) No "toll". Roads are paid for through fuel taxes, which would be paid at time of fuel purchase by freeman. 3) No Social services or welfare provided to freeman. Education at cost (private school) Legal Aid is not available to middle class and up at present, Freeman the same. Labour relations, Health Inspections, WorkSafe are Business corporate responsibilities and not freeman responsibility. Fire,Police,Water/Sewer and other municipal functions are paid by property tax, If the freeman owned property he would pay through those taxes.If no property, no tax. Canada Pension, Employment Insurance are Insurance programs paid by worker/Employer. If freeman works and pays into, he should be able to collect. As an end note; The reality is, By law, Income tax is deducted by business complying with government requirement for each employee. Whether freeman or not, a worker is going to pay those taxes. By law, GST/HST/PST is collected by business at point of sale on all purchases whether by a freeman or not. Government has structured it's collection and protection racket around corporate compliance. The tax collectors of modern society are business's. Whether an individual can appeal to common law and override corporate (maritime) law is irrelevant. Government through it's corporate tax collectors will get its pound of flesh, freeman or not. Regards JWD |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 760482 United States 09/07/2009 12:10 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | the ideology behind the "Freeman-on-the-land" appears to be rather attractive to those persons wishing to rid themselves of the responsibilities and requirements of social existence. Quoting: Colanaly 684683Statutes are not a way of life. Freemen don't need to look towards state governance to tell them what they can or cannot do. Free men are guided by the spirit and are fulfilled in every way by it. To answer your questions: 1) The freeman should have mastered the lawyers parlor trick of debt set-off. 2) Study case law and find that there is a "Right to Travel" and the State is bankrupt hence it owes us access to its roads. 3) Governments provide funding for social services and assistance programs: See #1 The free man, like Neo, contracts in and out of The System whenever appropriate. Learn forms and legalese. Keep it simple by knowing who you are = the one who can sign. |
stix User ID: 791015 Canada 10/10/2009 03:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 534125 United States 10/10/2009 04:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 770964 Canada 10/10/2009 05:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes sirree, I sent in my notice of intent & understanding, my claim of right and my dee schedules. Anyone trying to put me on an imaginary boat is going to pay through the nose with real silver maples of face value. All orders get met with a true bill which an actor (administrative tribunal) can't sign. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 770964 Canada 10/10/2009 05:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes sirree, I sent in my notice of intent & understanding, my claim of right and my dee schedules. Anyone trying to put me on an imaginary boat is going to pay through the nose with real silver maples of face value. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 770964All orders get met with a true bill which an actor (administrative tribunal) can't sign. That should be 'fee' schedule, not dee schedule. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5177067 United Kingdom 11/11/2011 11:58 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Yes sirree, I sent in my notice of intent & understanding, my claim of right and my dee schedules. Anyone trying to put me on an imaginary boat is going to pay through the nose with real silver maples of face value. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 770964All orders get met with a true bill which an actor (administrative tribunal) can't sign. That should be 'fee' schedule, not dee schedule. Good point...your observation of this man's typo clearly destructs all of his arguments. FFS |
Will User ID: 7689284 Canada 12/31/2011 10:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Ok.. Forget that benefit stuff..it balances out and you can be , should be,. BOTH..you determine when and where you are what..keep the corporation..keep sovereignty..have it all.. tax free..yes.. sovereigns collect tax not pay them :0) let the zombies pay taxes to YOU.. Ok..:0) Dean Clifford is going to provide what we need..the rest, the flesh and blood appearances in kangaroo court are our gig.. as sovereign or one of a few court venues we are basically owning the court.. turns the game right side up again..as it was meant to be.. Forget the fmotl gig..that's just pure adolescent crap.. for dope dealers and losers.. Draw heat like poo on stick.. there is a way..just study the vids, read the pertinent material.. CRF Sec 52/ 32..Ucc1-103 / UCC1-308 sumpin like that.. Have it figgered in 2 days ..the real debt we have is to Dean..and those took us a ways then vanished :0) also you paid for your welfare or pensions..just remember..they can't take prepaid benefits away.. and we are far from broke and there is NO debt.. bogus pillaging liars in GOVT..the interest to IMF is 26 grand second..and we get it all back..hang the dogs..after trial.. then we hang em..:0) and by the way..you are filthy stinkin rich so relax already..:0) peace |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 7464497 United States 12/31/2011 10:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | a man with no country can be exported nowhere but the camps. If you have any idea who/what you really are the magna carte did free some from this end game. If you want true freedom, find your tree, perhaps it is there. Little time left however and those against, will be lost. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 1517911 United States 12/31/2011 10:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
me User ID: 8664962 Canada 01/11/2012 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Dear God; Where are you?? We need you!! Everything is so messed!! I have tried, and I am still trying to live by your laws as you have so long ago commanded. Since I began my journey, God, when I first truly realized that I indeed was born of flesh and blood and bone and the fact You did give me the gift of Life with an independent Spirit and a free will, I have been ridiculed, humiliated, spat on, accused, and called many horrible things, and encountered much grief. I have been avoided by family and so called friends and my sanity has been put on trial. I have had many disappointing weeks and miles trying to find another who tries to follow your laws, completely and by the “Book.”. I thought you made us in your image and likeness, and you had given to us this “Gift”, you said we are to have Dominion, over every creeping thing and over this Earth, and we are to subdue it, as you say in (Genesis 1: 26-28) …we are FREE!?? But the sad truth is, Lord, its’ just an illusion… we are only as free as the government and its’ agents allow us to think we are... We have been deceived. We are, in a sense, like animals, we are farmed and groomed, just like the sheep! They believe we are the Crowns’ chattels. They trick us; we are under duress and intimidation, in every way, because in order for us to have the basics in and of life, , we must sign the forms; which they have created, or go without -they call it legal which it has the illusion that we have voluntarily given up our rights and titles you gave us and made us believe this is the truth and the way; …all in exchange for some man-made-invented privileges and so called benefits. God you may have to retrain these people that think and believe they are in charge. They now believe they have total control over every aspect of our lives. They also believe in their authority as the truth; however some of us, we know different …that only you are the “Truth… and the Authority! “ Something is not quite right! I believe many want to obey your laws; however, most are truly afraid of the consequences, if they do follow and obey. The Ministers, the Church Elders, Deacons, and others as well as all the Spiritual Leaders, seem to be afraid of the consequences of following your laws, as it is written. Even though I listen and watch from the heart, every day, of many who profess their faith, I often question, as I have been taught, that words without action are just words and dead in the water. Our places of worship, have been Chartered (sanctioned and controlled) by the government, just so they can issue a TAX receipt, for our “Gifts” to Your ministry. I believe more than ever, it is nothing more than doing business. Why do these places of worship have “Business Hours” posted on the doors? Are you not there all the time? Do we need to make an appointment? Why the door is locked most of the time? Why is it that out of all your creatures, in your great Kingdom, it is only man that is obsessed with the “money syndrome”? It begins in school; we are trained to obey man’s way, not yours. We are to get a good education so that we can get a good job…chase the money, the American dream… and it seems we only live to gather more and more of this man- made perceived wealth, and at the expense of one’s health, family and exploitation of their brothers and sisters. Don’t they know who is really in charge? I often wonder God, what would happen if the government or its agents made a proclamation, which we would have to surrender all currency (their man-made perceived on paper wealth), or face the consequences or maybe have it stamped with an expiry date? What would happen, especially to our Church Ministers and Spiritual leaders, how would they react to this and would they still be as faithful, in knowing their perceived wealth in comfortable pensions are not there, no steady monthly salaries, or paychecks. Would they be so eager to promote the Kingdom or community? Even the one woman you put in charge of our well-being, our acting Queen, Elizabeth II, upon her coronation, took an Oath, to you Lord, that she will uphold your laws and the Gospels. All of her representatives have also taken an Oath to bear true allegiance. How is it that her picture is in most every public office and yours’ isn’t.? God, are you sure you are really in charge? I think that she and her agents, the Crown, are trying to push you out and take over. I think they call that merger and acquisition, or is it… murder and extinction…, God is that treason? Why do they hold onto a Bible when taking an Oath of Allegiance, if they don’t understand what it really means? Did they take that Oath just to get the job or position? I think they call that perjury. God, I need to tell you, that your public servants (our elected public representatives) and their agents do not allow us to take care of your needy and less fortunate, and won’t allow us to feed the hungry on our streets, by giving them a hot cup of coffee or bowl of soup, without a permit. They don’t seem to care. It is only when we ask permission, as though we are children, with no sense and responsibility, and then pay these public servants a required, “Extortion Fee”, they call (“permit fee”), only then the government agency will permit us to engage in helping and nurturing of your needy by turning a blind eye on our activities, which they now call it “legal” , but only until the next years “extortion fee” is required. It really makes no sense, Lord, why would they classify something illegal; and then in an instant can re-classify it legal, once a fee is handed over? God help us, we have been hood-winked! God, your public servants have forgotten who they are and what position they fill. I pray that you open their eyes and hearts so they may see, and also to remind all of our so called leaders, the ones who think they are in charge, just exactly what it really means “to bear True Allegiance” . …to be continued… Just me |
Al User ID: 1237320 Canada 07/11/2012 10:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hi i was just wanting to know how i go about being a free man on the land in canada?? If anyone can help please email me at [email protected] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 19479399 United Kingdom 07/11/2012 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
jaya User ID: 18373145 Canada 08/11/2012 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It is rather interesting to view some of the comments located in the various posts. At first glance, the ideology behind the "Freeman-on-the-land" appears to be rather attractive to those persons wishing to rid themselves of the responsibilities and requirements of social existence. The discussions concerning requirements for operator's licences and vehicle registrations, payment of income tax, adherence to statute law and similar comments are rather intriguing. Quoting: Colanaly 684683 If the status proclaiming the "Freeman-on-the-land" was actually recognized and granted, thereby permitting an individual to proceed through life without the requirements imposed by any government of legal statute, would that also mean the following? 1) As the various governments provide funding for medical services within Canada, does such status then negate the ability to utilize medical services within the Province. In Alberta, the hospital cost for a non-Canadian for a one day period as set out in the fee schedule is in excess of $1,000 per day. Would this hospital cost and any associated costs for tests, dressings, etc be borne entirely by the "Freeman"? 2) Governments provide funding for infrastructure, including the construction of new highways and maintenance of existing roadways and such funding is obtained through taxation and vehicle registration fees. Should a "freeman" chose to use such roadways, would they be required to pay whatever "toll" the government would impose to use such roadways? 3) Governments provide funding for social services and assistance programs such as emergency welfare, Employment Insurance, Legal Aid, public health inspections fairness to employees (Labor Relations), fire suppression, emergency medical services, etc. Again such funding is normally obtained via taxation. Would the "Freeman" be required to eat in dirty restaurants, undergo horrific work conditions, become proficient in fire extinguisher usage and drive themselves to a hospital in times of emergency because of the "freedom" ideology? I see numerous references to "if anyone does revoke or deny consent the exist free of government control and statutory restraints". I would submit that abdication from any type of government control or restraints, in any and all matters, would logically be followed by total removal from any and all assistance, programs or services provided by government, including Canada Pension, Medicare and Old Age Pension payments. There would be no Employment Insurance claims, no requirement for payment of Legal Aid services nor would there be gratis permission to use any existing buildings, infrastructure, educational facility or medical care centers without payment of whatever fees may be levied. Your opinions? opinions aside, if you pay gas tax your paying for roads. governments are holding the country and its resources in trust for the people, unless they demonstrate a breach of that trust. Governments are here to manage our infrastructure and administer the will of the people, failure to do so and then they are not doing their job and must be held to account like the rest of us. |