Godlike Productions Banner
Users Online Now: 690 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 143,393
Pageviews Today: 469,925Threads Today: 835Posts Today: 12,249
10:55 PM
Join Now, Free! (& No Ads) | FAQ | Links | Link to Us
 New! GLP YOUTUBE CHANNEL | GLP Radio! | Contact
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Rate this Thread
Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 56

IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.

 RSS 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 531497
11/14/2008 9:30 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

I don't believe it was the "Bush administration." It's bigger than that. Follow the money.
...........

maybe the Bush administration simply "allowed" to happen...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 551280

Especially the insurance money and the gold that was in the basement. Idol1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 551363
11/14/2008 9:34 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

"There is no fucking way Bush and/or his administration had anything to do with 911 with regard to planning or carrying out the attack."

wow pac, that's some pretty compelling evidence to support your opinion.

we know you're a drunk, but can you please lay off the shit on friday nights.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 551363
11/14/2008 9:36 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

pac how many vaccinations did you recieve in the military?

my theory is that you have a tad bit of down syndrome from all of the the poison that was forced into your body.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 506578
11/14/2008 9:39 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Ok now Im 100% sure this guy is a paid shill
 Quoting: ATTC


Highly unlikely. Pac is just an idiot.

He has been wrong on virtually EVERYTHING! Basically, if you want to look smart on any given subject, go with the opposite of what PacNfudge says.

Pac can't "debate" this subject. His knowledge lacks severely.

Norman Mineta testimony at the 9/11 commission anyone?
TheHandThatFeeds
User ID: 518310
11/14/2008 9:42 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

I think my favorite piece of evidence throughout this whole ordeal was the investigation results for the collapse of WTC 7. The answer was something to the effect of this:

"We have solved the mystery of the collapse! The answer is that this happens to be the first building of it's kind to collapse due to fire. Have a nice day."

That is like me trying to prove my innocence in a murder trial like so:

"I now inform the jury that after a team of investigators (hired by me of course), examined the scene, we have concluded that my wife died due strange circumstances. Apparently, she is the first of her kind (human) to commit suicide by stabbing herself 32 times, chopping herself up and throwing herself into river. Have a nice trial."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 551363
11/14/2008 9:43 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

"Highly unlikely. Pac is just an idiot."

agreed.

the one good thing about obama winning is that instead of pac spamming nothing but anti obama and anti mccain threads all day everyday, he now spams some anti obama/anti nwo threads on occasion. even know the source is a moron, some of those threads have a positive message.

and pac, you're on the NWO Red list now with your anti Obama shit, so you might as well drop the act and hop on the truth wagon.

your pro bush delusional shit aint gunna save ya.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 535854
11/14/2008 9:49 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Is Russia behind 9/11 ?

.......... [no doubt !!!]

[link to www.anti-communistanalyst.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 347151
11/14/2008 9:50 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

PACNWguy has trouble seeing the truth because he's got his head shoved so far up his ass. PACNWguy's problem is obvious, see here.....

[link to img.photobucket.com]
Ikaika
User ID: 204551
11/14/2008 9:52 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

What was gained?
Iraq--->oil---->permanent base in Iraq.
That's all.
J.H.F.C.
User ID: 517645
11/14/2008 9:53 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

PACNW guy,

You appear to be an honest and good person, but I can't help thinking that you are a bit above your head here.

As in HOW MANY TRILLIONS OF WORTHLESS DOLLARS HAS THIS ADMINISTRATION DEVIED UP TO ALL OF ITS FRIENDS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY AND THE WORLD?

Or could I be wrong?

Should I have said QUADRILLIONS????????????

WTF?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 347151
11/14/2008 9:54 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Hidden camera captures another image of PACNWguy....

[link to radio.weblogs.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 551340
11/14/2008 10:03 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

I haven't read the thread, and I may be repeating some of the instances of motive:

1. Financial gain from stock shorts in United, American and insurance companies.

2. Low cost (otherwise prohibited) implosion demolition of Twin Towers.

3. Destruction of FBI records on Murray Building in OK.

4. Destruction of financial records on tptb.

5. Blame Muslims in order to invade Afghanistan and Iraq. Afghanistan for gas pipeline across mountains and Iraq for oil and possible stargate access.

6. Implement Patriot Act to supress sheeple and spy on all communications.

7. Kill off Naval Intelligence officers.

8. Test kevlar at Pentagon renovations for ability to control building damage from missile hits. (It worked!)

9. Destroy US image as world financial center.

10. Show who was in control of military (Cheney).

11. Possibly take selected persons out of public arena.

12. Damm shock and awe!

Above are just a few.
TheHandThatFeeds
User ID: 518310
11/14/2008 10:16 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

I think Pac has given up. I'm sure we haven't read the last of his posts. We aren't that lucky.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 225509
11/14/2008 10:30 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Permanent Military bases in Iraq, control of opium trade, unending threat from "terrorists", vital oil pipelines, unconstitutional legislation passed at home, money laundering, theft of WTC gold..., etc.


is that enough for you?




...and all the lucrative Blackwater/black op spy mercenaries at $300,000 each...some say as many of those as GIs...and all the Bechtel and Halliburton and unknown arms dealers and the missing billions of dollars and Carlyle Group is raking in the cash ... government with no oversight.

BUSH IS A PUPPET who is very rich, well kept and plays with his government toys.

The entire world was "reset" to a false War on Terror that is and will continue to suck the souls of the lower (getting killed in battle) and middle (financing with taxes) classes, just as it did the Roman Empire.

The above mentioned corporations and those connected with them neither finance nor fight...they as a kleptocracy prosper...called the ruling and upper middle class and those directly tied to said class.


His soul has always been sold ... he just did as he was told and he has no more or no less than he did before. Just 8 years older...back to high-society
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 543309



BOOYAH!!

Right on!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 225509
11/14/2008 10:40 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

WITHOUT MOTIVE, THERE IS NOTHING TO CONNECT BUSH TO THE CRIME.

WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE?


MOTIVE? MOTIVE WAS TO DESTROY GWB AND REPUBLICAN PARTY.

PART OF DEM. PARTY COOPERATED WITH THOSE WHO SEND

TERRORISTS AGAINST US. OR SHOULD I SAY THEY ORDERED IT?

LOOK HOW ECONOMY WAS COLLAPSING JUST BEFORE

ELECTION. IT LOOKS TO ME VERY COORDINATED.

BARNEY FRANK AND CH. DODD DID VERY GOOD JOB.


 Quoting: jarha


Answer this question, you dumb fuck:

With WHOM did the Pakistani ISS Officer who gave Mohammed Atta the $100,000.00 payment for the deed meet on the DAY OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001?

Answer that, eh?

Bob Grahm
Peter Goss

Now who are these people?

Answer that, shit for brains.

sbus
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 380667
11/14/2008 10:50 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

synchromystic

They were "allowed" to get through security.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 551396
11/14/2008 10:52 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

The U.S. president is little more than a stooge. Been that way since Woodrow Wilson.
TEXAS UNCENSORED
User ID: 551279
11/14/2008 11:37 PM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[37][38][39] investigative journalist John Pilger, in The New Statesman,[40] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[41] all argue that PNAC members used the events as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words) in order to enact long-desired plans.[42]

"When the Towers came down," William Rivers Pitt writes in his editorial in Truthout.org, "these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy."[32]

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

-PNACNWOguy
 Quoting: PNACNWOguy 551179


PLANNED to use as the New Pearl Harbor. Karl Rove spoke of it, with intent on a NWO, with their cabal ( a hijacked US ) in control. He was looking for young adults to join PNAC.
The Bush's knew the builders, planners, and architects of the WTC Complex. GWB openly spoke about how the steel was treated, how they were built in sections & why, and most importantly that demolitions were prewired in the construction. He said that all of the buildings in NYC were prewired.
It was All Planned decades in advance.
This in 1972.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 459297
11/15/2008 12:29 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

It's true. It could have been the Democrats. I see how they behave on here.

They are capable. Look what they are letting in now. I'm not sure you can't just suspect the Republicans.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 459297
11/15/2008 12:31 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner,[37][38][39] investigative journalist John Pilger, in The New Statesman,[40] and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch,[41] all argue that PNAC members used the events as the "Pearl Harbor" that they needed––that is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words) in order to enact long-desired plans.[42]

"When the Towers came down," William Rivers Pitt writes in his editorial in Truthout.org, "these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy."[32]

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!!!

-PNACNWOguy



PLANNED to use as the New Pearl Harbor. Karl Rove spoke of it, with intent on a NWO, with their cabal ( a hijacked US ) in control. He was looking for young adults to join PNAC.
The Bush's knew the builders, planners, and architects of the WTC Complex. GWB openly spoke about how the steel was treated, how they were built in sections & why, and most importantly that demolitions were prewired in the construction. He said that all of the buildings in NYC were prewired.
It was All Planned decades in advance.
This in 1972.
 Quoting: TEXAS UNCENSORED 551279


Modern explosives must have been used to make it explode into dust. Somebody pushed the button.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 549263
11/15/2008 12:40 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

911 was not an inside job. There was nothing gained by the Bush Administration.

The end of the Bush Administration is but a few weeks away and he has not issued martial law, or become world dictator like everyone said. If he could go back and not have 911, Bush would be better off.

What did he achieve but ridicule and risk himself and hundres of co-conspirators of being hung as traitors? For it to have been an inside job, too many people would have known about it and the odds of someone "talking" and exposing the conspiracy would have been great. It was a bold and dangerous plan and would have needed a reward equal to the risk of being caught.

Nothing has been gained. Bush could have had the war in IRAQ without 911 and I really dont see how that war has been any big benefit to anyone in the Bush administration.

The economy is shit, Bush's ratings are in the toilet.

We have a new Marxist Socialistic President. No one could have forseen Obama, so getting him elected wasnt the reason for 911.

If it had been an inside job, Bush would have done it a few more times and been a dictator now instead of going off to Texas to retire.

What was gained by 911?

WITHOUT MOTIVE, THERE IS NOTHING TO CONNECT BUSH TO THE CRIME.

WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE?
 Quoting: PACNWguy


You gotta be kidding me. No war = no war profiteering. 911 was the exact thing called for by the "Project For A New American Century" so that they could do what they were BEGGING clinton to do, and that is go to war with Iraq. Bush's team was full of PNAC guys, and guess what happened right after 911, war with Iraq, a country that had NOTHING to do with 911. And look at the money made from that war by groups like the Carlyle Group. And who makes money from the investments the Carlyle Group? Well, ALL of the PNAC guys, AND the Bush family, AND the Cheney family, AND the royalty from Saudi Arabia, where the 911 hijackers came from and also to where we graciously shipped free of charge the Bin Ladens still in America in the days after 911.

What did they have to gain? A LOT OF FUCKING MONEY. They robbed this country (and this world mind you) B-L-I-N-D. And they still do to the tune of trillions.

Oh but were just a nation of whiners right?

Moron.
TEXAS UNCENSORED
User ID: 551279
11/15/2008 1:05 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Modern explosives must have been used to make it explode into dust. Somebody pushed the button.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 459297


Sure. What ever team reached the top first. Ini these drills, the team named 'terrorists' got to the top first, then choppered out seconds before the collapse.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 364476
11/15/2008 2:36 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

the true record of the number of american dollars printed...destroyed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 542030
11/15/2008 2:41 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

this thread is still on here?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 459297
11/15/2008 2:57 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

Modern explosives must have been used to make it explode into dust. Somebody pushed the button.


Sure. What ever team reached the top first. Ini these drills, the team named 'terrorists' got to the top first, then choppered out seconds before the collapse.
 Quoting: TEXAS UNCENSORED 551279


Someone pushed the button. The building exploded into dust in seconds.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 459297
11/15/2008 2:58 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

The question is who.
2600
User ID: 519925
11/15/2008 3:05 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

The luster of a mythological Saudi hiding in some underground cave in Pakistan has run it's course. The new enemy will be someone we can actually see on the news everyday and he will again soon be the president of Russia.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 464050
11/15/2008 3:07 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

911 was not an inside job. There was nothing gained by the Bush Administration.

The end of the Bush Administration is but a few weeks away and he has not issued martial law, or become world dictator like everyone said. If he could go back and not have 911, Bush would be better off.

What did he achieve but ridicule and risk himself and hundres of co-conspirators of being hung as traitors? For it to have been an inside job, too many people would have known about it and the odds of someone "talking" and exposing the conspiracy would have been great. It was a bold and dangerous plan and would have needed a reward equal to the risk of being caught.

Nothing has been gained. Bush could have had the war in IRAQ without 911 and I really dont see how that war has been any big benefit to anyone in the Bush administration.

The economy is shit, Bush's ratings are in the toilet.

We have a new Marxist Socialistic President. No one could have forseen Obama, so getting him elected wasnt the reason for 911.

If it had been an inside job, Bush would have done it a few more times and been a dictator now instead of going off to Texas to retire.

What was gained by 911?

WITHOUT MOTIVE, THERE IS NOTHING TO CONNECT BUSH TO THE CRIME.

WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE?
 Quoting: PACNWguy

What was gained? Well fuck I'd think it was pretty obvious by now. Oil and Opium.

Iraq = Illegal war for oil. That's a fact.

Afghanistan = War for control of the opium. Look at how much opium AFghanistan produces every year. It's god knows how many semi's and freighters worth of the stuff, and it's mostly all exported.

How does anyone think that opium gets out of Afghanistan? By horseback? Or camel? Think for a minute.

With a massive military force from numerous nations occupying Afghanistan, OBVIOUSLY they are helping get the opium out. Seriously, that much opium requires a fuck of a lot of shipping, and that much transport is most definitely going to get noticed in a country occupied by many militaries. OBVIOUSLY.

Early 2001 - The Taleban destroyes all the opium crops.

Oct. 2001 - US invasion.

2002 - Present day - The biggest production run of opium anywhere in the history of the world. Thousands of percent more opium produeced and EXPORTED during these years. All under teh watchful eye of numerous militaries.

So what was gained, the OP asks?

Well there's your fucking answer.
Mickeyblue
User ID: 330969
11/15/2008 10:31 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

The first thing he did when he assumed office was to negate the old rule of being ab le after , I think, Twselve years open to public scrutiny his presxidential record. He effectively took that c lear b ac k tohis father's time in offic e, including Clinton's and through his reign and we wsill not have that to view. He has removed the protections of a number of amendments that the Constitution afforded us.

We have the Patriot Act which was shoved down our throats and which when parts of it were to be sunsetted were not. We have the Military Commissions Act.
We have set aside the Posse Comitatus Act. We have had passed all across this country various acts, bills, legislative rulings which further, piece by piece, destroy protections, restricts freedoms ( we now have special, daily designated free speech zones??)and the list goes on and on.

We are assiduously under attack and from within have done far more damage than any outside enemy could ever pray to visit upon us.

We are and have bled this country dry, indebting future generations and making it tougher and tougher for children to ever even make a complaint for fear of being marked a terrorist.

I could go one for way more and very specific reasons why what was done and what it accomplishes that were and are desired by those who do desire to make America just another country and to get rid of the middle class and bring us under a global canopy thereby ushering in the NWO.

Yes! 'They', those people for whom this has been a long desired goal openly use the terms which state their global objectives and plans for you and I and they are rapdily falling into place.

Bush and cronies are merely subsets to this plan and they have done their jobs as well as the Clinton's and now we will have Obama fulfilling his role but the direction will not alter nor the objectives with perhaps only the devil being in the details.

I am so sorry for you that you cannot see how far we have travelled since 911 away from those things which we cherished and set us apart from any other country ever.
Phennommennonn Subscriber
The Queen Of Mean
User ID: 526890
11/15/2008 10:37 AM
Re: IF 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB, WHAT WAS THE REWARD FOR THE MASSIVE RISK? WHAT WAS THE MOTIVE? NOTHING WAS GAINED.Quote

pac you start a thread then abandon it? - i hardly saw any rebuttals from you.

i used to hold some respect for your threads hun....but this one here is raising my eyebrows atcha.

sorry - fail.
~The road to hell, is paved with good intentions.

~Be careful what you wish for, history starts now.
[link to youtube.com]
Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 56
Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Post a New Thread
Post New Thread
Reply to this Thread
Reply
View Your Favorites
View Favorites
Vote for Us!
Vote For Godlike Productions!
Vote for Us!  Valid HTML 4.01 Transitional



Disclaimer:
This website exists for entertainment purposes only. The reader is responsible for discerning the validity, factuality or implications of information posted here, be it fictional or based on real events. Moderators on this forum make every effort to review the material posted on this site however, it is not realistically possible for our small staff to manually review each and every one of the more than 5000 posts GodlikeProductions gets on a daily basis. The content of posts
on this site, including but not limited to links to other web sites, are the expressed opinion of the original poster and are in no way representative of or endorsed by the owners or administration of this website. The posts on this website are the opinion of the specific author and are not statements of advice, opinion, or factual information on behalf of the owner or administration of GodlikeProductions. This site may contain adult content and if you feel you might be offended by such content, you should log off immediately.

Not all posts on this website are intended as truthful or factual assertion by their authors. Some users of this website are participating in internet role playing, with or without the use of an avatar. NO post on this website should be considered factual information on face value alone. Users are encouraged to USE DISCERNMENT and do their own follow up research while reading and posting on this website. Godlikeproductions.com reserves the right to make changes to, corrections and/or remove entirely at any time posts made on this website without notice. In addition, Godlikeproductions.com disclaims any and all liability for damages incurred directly or indirectly as a result of a post on this website.

This site is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. You should not assume that this site is error-free or that it will be suitable for the particular purpose which you have in mind when using it. In no event shall Godlikeproductions.com be liable for any special, incidental, indirect or consequential damages of any kind, or any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, those resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether or not advised of the possibility of damage, and on any theory of liability, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of this site or other documents which are referenced by or linked to this site.

Some events depicted in certain posting and threads on this website may be fictitious and any similarity to any person living or dead is merely coincidental. Some other articles may be based on actual events but which in certain cases incidents, characters and timelines have been changed for dramatic purposes. Certain characters may be composites, or entirely fictitious.

We do not discriminate against the mentally ill!

Fair Use Notice:
This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Users may make such material available in an effort to advance awareness and understanding of issues relating to civil rights, economics, individual rights, international affairs, liberty, science & technology, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

This Disclaimer is subject to change at anytime.

Mail Webmaster with questions or comments about this site.

Page generated in 0.18s (6 queries)