CIA, NSA, and any other AGENTS out here...this thread is for you!

Suuurrreee ... we need them alright!

What are you smoking?

I ran out of stuff to smoke.

And we need them like we need leeches.

Everything has its place in the universe.

Watch "The Lives of Others" and you'll get it.

Hi!

I'm a forum shill and I debunk everything from chemtrails to orgone. How do you do? :)

I work for a government front company which revolves around internet psy-op and misinformation. Looks like you guys confuse yourselves plenty though, the government doesnt need to pay me as much as they do!

I hate Dick Cheney.

That is my opinion.

That is all.

Well one thing my superiors at the DEA haven't figured out is that most of the time I patrol and get called into work, most of the seizures I end up keeping.

Ever since I was recruited to be a DEA officer, i've been padding my medicine cabinet with the proceeds of the investigations.

I even use the surveillance software to spy on my ex-girlfriends.

One time our team busted a giant Ecstasy lab, and I replaced our seizure and evidence with 250,000 tic tacs, and when court day arrived the perp got off free because there was no MDMA content in the crown's evidence.

Sometimes the job gets to me, other times the perks are good.

shit. forgot to log out.

That's more like it.
I can tell the real from the fakers of course (mmm, wonder why).

If that is all then fine but why do you hate Cheney?

Do most members of the intelligence community dislike him and/or the Bushes?

Anyways. As I was saying.

My shill role is basically talking about drugs and baiting all the drug addicts of various web portals to dime them out to their local law enforcement agencies to prosecute and investigate the flow of drugs into North America.

I usually have to feign being in a dissociative state of mind.

I also had to memorize the various slang for the many names of drugs.

For example.. when I am speaking to someone in their early teens, I will have to adapt myself like so:

"Yo Dawg... Got any of that Gang Bang Spinach? Maybe we could trade that Reefer for some of this Abe Lincoln Gouda. "

Because if the shit hits the fans you realize you are all being used as tools?

Your message has been forwarded to the relevant actioning personnel. Thank you and have a nice day.

So the rumors are TRUE!


gET UP ON IT AGENTS!

HA!

Cuz it's 1-8-7 on a undercover v-i-s-h-u-z...




YeAY... and it don't stop.

I have found that the best way to hide, is to not hide at all. The best way to know your mark, is help them draw the bullseye. The fastest way to sort wheat from chaff, is to rend the entire mill. Hell, what hasn't been perpetrated right in front of your noses? But, hey, at least there is a forum about it. Thank you.

=)

Yes, but what about those of us who are awake to the scheme?

Yeah yeah... Don't tell me I just think I'm awake. You can do better than that.

Doesn't it take more work or do you just ignore people who see right through you?

And of the "conspiracy" etc. researchers out there, the ones who are well known, how many are shills just dishing up disinfo to the "awake" people?

i remember blasting this:



and hey OP, ...im willing to place a wager on all intel ABC agency employees hating their superiors, including cheney.

Yes...which just makes their psychological makeup all the more entertaining to explore.

We are all in this mess together. CIA, NSA, and other AGENTS included.

I would never dissuade someone from holding on to the truths that they believe to be self evident. Just as an atheist who claims no religion has no right to 'convince' a Christian that they are mistaken, I have no right or obligation to judge ones level of awareness. They believe what they can, will, and need to believe. To each thier own in this regard. Therefore, there is no pat answer to your question, because there is no set amount of belief in that community. 'Fringe's have lots of tassles, and they tend to tangle up just fine on thier own.

To the second part...how many? I can attempt a percentage, though being tangled in my own particular knots, I am naturally not privy to what every right hand is doing and for what purposes. I will write a number on this napkin and slide it across the table to you....

How does 20% shill, 45% well-meaning but narrow and naive, 15% insane, and 20% on target sound to you?

That sounds very accurate actually.

Is part of the program to get people to distrust all researchers and call everyone "shill"? Cause there sure is a lot of that going on lately.

No, some people really get called Shills because it's so blatantly obvious. If you're spending your free time debunking chemtrails, you probably deserve any shill comments directed at you.

If you're studying and researching something of value, and spending your free time surfacing lost and unaware knowledge and you get called a Shill, you're on the right path.

It doesn't need to be 'part of a program', as it is already part of the program that everyone was born with. To put it less hoity-toity-ly, it is human nature to distrust. It is nature to want to be the one who is in on the BIG DOINGS. It is nature to want to be looked upon as someone to go to when the chips are down, even if just for information. A fair amount of conspiracy watchers feel threatened when a bigger better model of prognosticator comes along, and they often attempt to shoot them down. The primary aim of a shill is to get you to shoot down the wrong people and ideas, not to hijack the process and say 'Hey look at me! I got the Mott's!' That would be counterproductive to the easier and more efficient process of harnessing human nature as it already is. A shill will not be peddling the latest armament....but they will bump into you conveniently when you are aiming your own.

How about 15% Shill, and 5% Contrail believers. The chemtrail shills have been in business so consistently on GLP, they need their own religious following.

Well. You could remove the 5% from the "insane" category and add them there. Two birds.

Yes, very true and informative. The more blatant shills never offer solutions. It would also seem that some shills make certain problems seem more amplified.

Who pays these people? Or is it a number of organizations?

And what do "agents" for the CIA/NSA DO ALL DAY? Are the as compartmentalized as they seem to be and how monitored are these people by their superiors (in private life as well as professional life)?

Also, if anyone wishes, please do tell about surveillance capabilities, experiences or anecdotes.

And FEELINGS.

How has this work affected your personal life and sense of self?

Who pays them? In the end....you do. Government employees and outsourced contractors get your tax monies, directly (by name to the applicant) and indirectly under various appropriations as approved by Congress.

Most agents don't really do a whole hell of a lot, to be honest. Yes, they are very compartmentalized until need to know enters and only then to select individuals. Some are highly monitored at work, most less so. They are assumed to be professionals and are left to carry out their duties, such as they are. The need to think on the fly and adapt to contingencies leaves fair leeway for those sorts to behave as they see fit. The rest simply have paperwork to do and everything stays 'at the office' anyway. Home time is not monitored unless one is under suspicion or assessment for new duties.

As long as you don't bring trouble home to roost or get your name or deeds, or more importantly a superior's name or deeds, in the news...you'll be ok.

Interesting.

Are there actually agents who spend all their time online?

Do most agents tend to believe in what they are doing? Esp. the ones involved with fringe subjects?

Also, I received a call from someone over a year ago who told me that their "entities" were watching. What did that mean? Surveillance lingo? And what would prompt an "agent" to make such a call?

Spending time online can become a dicey situation. Enough time needs to spent to gain a sense of the ebb and flow, which people discuss which things, who are interesting and who are just nutty, etc.. But, there is also a line of thought that spending the needed amount of time with the same group and thought processes can lend itself to a bit of Stockholm Syndrome, in which the agent loses the necessary detachment and perspective. So, no....no one spends ALL thier time online, but some spend much of it for a while.

It is not always clear to agents 'what they are doing', but most do believe in the ultimate good of the process and whatever part in it they are playing. The ones involved in fringe subjects....hmmm. The idea of what is 'fringe' to someone on the inside as opposed to curious onlookers gets a bit smudged. Rather than overstep or confuse, please be more specific with the 'subject'. It can be answered many ways depending on where you go with the idea.

As far as your phone call...in my view it would be unusual for an agent to outwardly announce the known prescence of surveillance. I wouldn't want to speculate further.