Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,542 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,788,652
Pageviews Today: 2,407,320Threads Today: 521Posts Today: 9,558
04:57 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!

 
tommy777
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 515900
Netherlands
01/01/2009 09:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
The Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes! There’s no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially it’s a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesn’t comply by January 16th, the Justices’ will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost! Checkmate!

[link to talkwisdom.blogspot.com]

Ok—Now I see the big picture! Part 1
written by Tom Waite, December 24, 2008

In my previous analysis of the Berg v. Obama Supreme Court case, I said that the Supreme Court Justices were very sly by scheduling a January 9th conference date in order to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. Because just one day earlier, congress is to open up the Electoral College’s sealed votes from each state, count the votes and declare a presidential winner. But now there is a new development, which seems very perplexing at first but I believe I can shed light on this news and reinterpret it as a sign of political chess.

The new development is that on December 18, 2008 Berg filed an injunction (to stay the congressional electoral vote count on January 8, 2009 until Barack Obama proves his qualifications, i.e. that he was born in U.S.A.) and he submitted it to Justice Antonin Scalia. Now the very perplexing news is that this injunction has been granted a conference date of January 16, 2009! I know—you’re all rubbing your eyes in disbelief and also when you put into context that the inauguration is on the 20th of January, I have no doubt that you’re saying, what the FUCK?

Whenever I try to type a website on my comments, I never get posted on this blog, so I’ll creatively refer you to the following website, type in three ‘W’s’ and then a dot and then type ‘americasright’ then a dot and finally type ‘com’. Read the story ‘Berg’s Application for Injunction Curiously Moves On at Supreme Court’ under Tuesday, December 23, 2008. Jeff Schreiber (the person running this blog), is a law student and he can’t fathom the reasoning behind the Supreme Court’s decision to set a date to discuss Berg’s injunction that is well after the time congress will have counted the Electoral College’s votes. In doing so, Jeff feels this conference on January 16, 2009 to discuss Berg’s injunction will be a moot issue.

However, I see it differently, the Justices of the Supreme Court aren’t sequestered in some castle. The Justices know exactly what the issues are and are constantly being bombarded with similar legal applications to be considered regarding Barack Obama’s eligibility for president. As I’ve mentioned in a previous post, if the Justices wanted to dismiss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari they could have but they deliberately chose to discuss it 24 hours after congress officially counts the Electoral College’s votes; reason being Berg’s issue of standing will now be valid! Once Obama official wins the national vote (via the counting of Electoral College’s votes), Berg’s issue of harm being done to him by Obama now becomes legally valid it is no longer theoretical; thus Berg does have legal standing!

Now in a political game of chess, the Supreme Court’s manoeuvring of the January 9th date to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari can be seen as a move of check against Obama. Obama is now in a corner but still can move his king chess piece and similarly with the Writ of Certiorari, Obama still could refuse to deliver evidence proving he was born in United States. I understand why the Justices set a date one week later (January 16) to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes, this move can be seen as check and mate! Meaning Obama’s king can’t move in any direction on the chessboard, thus he’s trapped and has lost the game!

Setting a date to discuss the injunction on preventing congress from counting the Electoral College’s votes isn’t a moot issue; in this context any judgement is retroactive! So that even if congress has counted the Electoral College’s votes and have declared Obama the presidential winner; if the Supreme Court finds Obama ineligible to be a presidential candidate, they can retroactively cancel the results of the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

And that’s why the Supreme Court is allowing for a January 16th conference on Berg’s injunction to stop congress from counting the Electoral College’s vote on January 8th. It’s not a moot issue, it’s a very deliberate political game of entrapment or as in chess it can be seen as a move of checkmate. Because the Supreme Court is basically giving Obama no wiggle room to manoeuvre and escape from the January 9th’s conference of Berg’s Writ of Certiorari. The Supreme Court is ultimately saying to Obama, if you don’t hand over your evidence to us on January 9th, you will be forced to hand over your evidence to us on January 16th, otherwise we’ll retroactively cancel the results from the Electoral College’s votes that were counted back on January 8th!

Ok—Now I see the big picture! Part 2
written by Tom Waite, December 24, 2008

So now I see the big picture and the ultimate endgame that the Supreme Court has in mind for Barack Obama. Just like in chess, the winner is the person who sees many moves in advance; in this case the winner is the Supreme Court! They’ve set a checkmate legal trap for Obama, whereby even if there are no objections by any members of congress, the Electoral College’s votes are counted and Obama is declared the presidential winner on January 8th. The Supreme Court has deliberately chosen to wait until January 9th to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari, whereby Berg’s legal standing (harm that can be done to him by Obama) becomes valid! And finally, the Supreme Court has made it perfectly clear to Obama by its deliberate action of allowing for a January 16th conference regarding Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes; that unless he hands over his evidence to them on January 9th—they’ll retroactively cancel the Electoral College’s voting results from January 8th!

I’m smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar theme—show proof you were born in the United States. But now because just one of these ‘nuisance’ cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys. First, they’ve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral College’s votes) to discuss Berg’s Writ of Certiorari; the case can’t be dismissed—Berg will have legal standing! And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Berg’s injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral College’s votes! There’s no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially it’s a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesn’t comply by January 16th, the Justices’ will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral College’s vote count!

So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost



UPDATE:

Jan 12 2009 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED.


Here's what I believe is going on... AND THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT! More important than most people realize.

Berg's Petition was denied, true. But the case is still open, to be listened to in Conference on Jan. 16. Obviously, the SCOTUS doesn't like Berg's other writs; SCOTUS denied his first writ to stop the election, and his second to stop the Electoral College vote, probably because of Constitutional standing among other things.

But follow this timeline:

[link to origin.www.supremecourtus.gov]
Oct 30 2008 Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due Dec 1, 2008)
Dec 1 2008 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson.
Dec 23 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 16, 2009.
Jan 12 2009 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Bill Anderson GRANTED.
Jan 12 2009 Petition DENIED.

Looking at ALL of the cases against Obama at SCOTUS (Donofrio, Wrotnowski, Lightfoot, all of the Berg cases), THIS one is the only case that has the word “GRANTED” in the orders! NO OTHER Obama case has this little word — Granted. Not accepted, but Granted, by at least 4 Justices.

Furthermore, here's the Amicus Brief filed by Bill Anderson
[link to wthrockmorton.com]

“The amicus (Bill Anderson) is a citizen of the State of Arizona
and an elector of that state for elector for President of the United States.”

The amicus was filed nearly 6 weeks ago — that's a long time ago in this Obama fiasco, my friends. And when was it GRANTED? After the amicus had legal standing -- when his Electoral Vote was counted in Congress on Jan. 8.

Furthermore, Arizona, from where the amicus is filing, is unique in its election laws:

Within the job description and state statutes, there's a step that is required after the Secretary of State has certified the candidates and formatted the ballots. Once this step is complete, the ballot is transmitted to the Attorney General of Arizona, Solicitor General, TO BE CHECKED FOR IT’S LEGALITY. THIS is the authority that allows and forces a sworn duty to perform the real investigation into the legality of candidates and referendums.

Bill Anderson, being an Elector with his vote now counted by the US Senate, operating under Arizona state law, can compel the Solicitor General to make the required investigation to insure the legality of the candidates and ballot, INCLUDING THE SUBPOENA OF A BIRTH CERTIFICATE THROUGH THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT!

This is why the SCOTUS is "kicking it down to the lower court."

In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the Arizona AG is not already coordinating with the US AG to pull Hawaii BC records at this moment! The words "The motion of Bill Anderson for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted" make more sense in this context! Berg's same docket (#08-570) is being heard again on Friday, if you're losing track of the cases...

It almost explains Cheney’s tersely-scripted remarks after the votes were officially counted on Jan. 8 in the Senate, and that canary-eating feline grin of his as he dissolved the special Senate committee.

See post 370 at

[link to www.freerepublic.com]
Be Aware !

User ID: 583855
France
01/01/2009 09:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
My comment to this : you Americans are sinking the boat in

which you are, and this in a sea in fury.



wtf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 580284
United States
01/01/2009 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
Talk About A Broken Fucking Record Pieced Together With Duct Tape.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 362930
United States
01/01/2009 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
stupthrd bsflag stupthrd
djnzb

User ID: 583034
Mexico
01/01/2009 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
Get over this.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 551149
United States
01/01/2009 10:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
So what "landmark conference" will come after this one... wtf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 583859
United States
01/01/2009 10:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
I hope he gets deported back to Kenya where he was born...


.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 573680
United States
01/01/2009 10:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
!!prepare your eyes for something theyve never seen before!!





:ddmm::ddmm:
:ddmm::ddmm:








QUADRUPLE DOSE OF DOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 518350
United States
01/01/2009 10:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
Game, set, match.

It's all over except for the cryin'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 483402
United States
01/01/2009 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
The Fat Lady sings on January 20th.

EVERY piece of BS before the election and after the election all down the drain.

chuckle

YOU LOST. GET OVER IT.
Dr. P ( On U ! )
User ID: 578822
United States
01/01/2009 10:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
O-BUM-A freaks LIVID NOW !

All the lying and Nay Saying will NOT get you FOOLS out of this delema !

Now, let's hear the Liberal cry " But, It's NOT fair ! "

NOW, get your blankys and go suck your thumb, crybabies !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 583855
France
01/01/2009 10:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
My comment to this : you Americans are sinking the boat in

which you are, and this in a sea in fury.



wtf
 Quoting: Be Aware !


Realise what you are doing !
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 583877
United States
01/01/2009 10:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
guess what? Obama—you’ve already lostsfan laugh
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 583878
United States
01/01/2009 10:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
Crying wolf another time, and once again with bsflag
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 583877
United States
01/01/2009 10:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
My comment to this : you Americans are sinking the boat in

which you are, and this in a sea in fury.



wtf


Realise what you are doing !
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 583855

Must be talking to Obama
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 212087
United States
01/01/2009 11:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
There are a great many of us who respect and appreciate our laws, then there are the liberals who for whatever reason feel breaking or ignoring laws which prevent their agenda from moving forwaed or prove one of there own is a creep.. those laws are meant to be ignored. Clinton had his gang of marauders broke laws over and over, hell he even slapped the faces of the NOW gang by molesting women, lying to a grand jury.. no big deal.

I am afraid at this point our public is so disrepectful of our laws, so lacking in the graciousness of our courts that they would quite literally start a revolution if Obama were to be recognized as a law breaking foreigner. So much for our great country..

You young people ought to be more weary loosing rights of this great land that millions have died in foxholes, in battle ships, shot down from over head, they died for your rights and your willing to see the constitution the country broken so a politically correct candidate can be sworn in as your president. If he was not born here then he needs to step down for the sake of this country NOT stay for the sake of his gangster like political machine.
ShowMe State of Mind

User ID: 553115
United States
01/01/2009 11:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
I am waiting to see Hillary turn in her senatorship and then I will know that it is over...
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.~Eleanor Roosevelt

~V~
Avian

User ID: 265661
United States
01/01/2009 11:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
obama is going down
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it."
- Frédéric Bastiat

food, water, ammo, weapons, battery back up solar, hand well pump, wood stove and 1 year of food...oh yeah PM's too...good luck
Nailer45

User ID: 583119
United States
01/01/2009 11:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
obama is going down
 Quoting: Avian

just not as fast as Monica lewinsky but he is going down...LOL
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson
tommy777 (OP)

User ID: 515900
Netherlands
01/01/2009 11:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
obama is going down
 Quoting: Avian


I think so too...

Do you realize that after Jan 8, all of us will have standing and can individualy or collectively Challenge Obama's election and subsequent actions if elected, for which a number of statutes snd determinations

If the House approves the vote of the electoral college on Jan8, then the Writ of Certiori scheduled for Jan9 will be granted, paving the way for the injunction to be heard on Jan 16. SCOTUS will take the time to discuss the ramifications of the pending decision, and they will grant the injunction if the House does nothing to halt the electoral process.

Jan 16 is the key date for that will be the date SCOTUS will set aside the House's decision to validate the electoral votes and will demand that Obama prove his Constitutional eligibility before prior to the vote count.

And, it will be true that every US citizen, 18 or older, will now have standing to also challenge Obama's election. This will also be the reason why they will have no other choice but to act if Obamaclears the Congressional hurdles.

I fully expect to see motions made in the House to set aside the vote count until Obama produces the genuine proof of his eligibility -- beginning with the original BC and other documentation that BHO has kept secret.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 574748
United States
01/01/2009 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
Our next president:
[link to www.youtube.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 569213
United States
01/01/2009 12:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
I am waiting to see Hillary turn in her senatorship and then I will know that it is over...
 Quoting: ShowMe State of Mind


LOL Pure genius!
GraftedPromise U$ofA
User ID: 583907
United States
01/01/2009 12:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
There are a great many of us who respect and appreciate our laws, then there are the liberals who for whatever reason feel breaking or ignoring laws which prevent their agenda from moving forwaed or prove one of there own is a creep.. those laws are meant to be ignored. Clinton had his gang of marauders broke laws over and over, hell he even slapped the faces of the NOW gang by molesting women, lying to a grand jury.. no big deal.

I am afraid at this point our public is so disrepectful of our laws, so lacking in the graciousness of our courts that they would quite literally start a revolution if Obama were to be recognized as a law breaking foreigner. So much for our great country..

You young people ought to be more weary loosing rights of this great land that millions have died in foxholes, in battle ships, shot down from over head, they died for your rights and your willing to see the constitution the country broken so a politically correct candidate can be sworn in as your president. If he was not born here then he needs to step down for the sake of this country NOT stay for the sake of his gangster like political machine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 212087


... bears repeating ...

... and may his political gangster-like machine be destroyed with him ...
.
Xeitgeist
User ID: 484331
United States
01/01/2009 01:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
The Supreme Court has made its devastating move of

So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost! Checkmate!


So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost
 Quoting: tommy777


PACNWGUY is that you?!??!?!?!? I heard you were dead! Welcome back, it's been dull here lately.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 549836
United States
01/01/2009 01:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
5a

What a silly boy - he should know that Bush owns SCOTUS.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 537593
United States
01/01/2009 01:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
What do you think is going to happen when the SCOTUS once again decides for the American people the president of the US? And once again, as 2000, the elected candidate will be shot down. Do you really believe the majority of people in the US will just sit back and take it up the ass once again?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 549836
United States
01/01/2009 01:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
What do you think is going to happen when the SCOTUS once again decides for the American people the president of the US? And once again, as 2000, the elected candidate will be shot down. Do you really believe the majority of people in the US will just sit back and take it up the ass once again?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 537593


Haven't you figured it out yet? That's the 'plan' - civil unrest.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 473060
United States
01/01/2009 01:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
Talk About A Broken Fucking Record Pieced Together With Duct Tape.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 580284

Funny how it still plays, huh?


The truth will be heard.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 583987
United States
01/01/2009 02:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
There are a great many of us who respect and appreciate our laws, then there are the liberals who for whatever reason feel breaking or ignoring laws which prevent their agenda from moving forwaed or prove one of there own is a creep.. those laws are meant to be ignored. Clinton had his gang of marauders broke laws over and over, hell he even slapped the faces of the NOW gang by molesting women, lying to a grand jury.. no big deal.

I am afraid at this point our public is so disrepectful of our laws, so lacking in the graciousness of our courts that they would quite literally start a revolution if Obama were to be recognized as a law breaking foreigner. So much for our great country..

You young people ought to be more weary loosing rights of this great land that millions have died in foxholes, in battle ships, shot down from over head, they died for your rights and your willing to see the constitution the country broken so a politically correct candidate can be sworn in as your president. If he was not born here then he needs to step down for the sake of this country NOT stay for the sake of his gangster like political machine.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 212087



dasbier
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 561632
Netherlands
01/01/2009 02:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
The Supreme Court has made its devastating move of

So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost! Checkmate!


So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Court—well guess what? Obama—you’ve already lost


PACNWGUY is that you?!??!?!?!? I heard you were dead! Welcome back, it's been dull here lately.
 Quoting: Xeitgeist 484331


It certainly is not the REAL Tommy777 who comes from holland and haven't posted here in years...it's prolly one of the mods that hi-jacked his AV...
tommy777 (OP)

User ID: 515900
Netherlands
01/01/2009 02:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: UPDATE: P 6: Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the SCOTUS. Well guess what? Obama, you’ve already lost! Checkmate!
It certainly is not the REAL Tommy777 who comes from holland and haven't posted here in years...it's prolly one of the mods that hi-jacked his AV...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 561632


No, it IS me...
Indeed I have not posted here in years...but lately I have posted some stuff...

Nice you did remember me...

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!