Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,238 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 279,142
Pageviews Today: 363,267Threads Today: 98Posts Today: 1,436
03:16 AM

Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing

President's meeting with judges questioned Lawyer challenging eligibility raises issue of secret conference

IN secret conference
User ID: 599138
United States
01/23/2009 09:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
President's meeting with judges questioned Lawyer challenging eligibility raises issue of secret conference
President's meeting with judges questioned
Lawyer challenging eligibility raises issue of secret conference

Posted: January 23, 2009
12:25 am Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

A lawyer who is working on one of the cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that challenges the eligibility of President Barack Obama to occupy the Oval Office is raising concerns over a meeting between the defendant in the case and the judges who are expected to review it.

The case is one of many brought before U.S. courts that allege Obama doesn't meet the "natural born" requirement of the U.S. Constitution for the president. It's one of about half a dozen that have reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which already has declined to grant hearings to several cases.

Orly Taitz, whose case is scheduled to be heard tomorrow in a conference among justices, a private meeting at which they review cases and decide whether they should hold a hearing, confirmed on her website today that a supplemental brief in her arguments had been distributed.

But the website also reported she "had to explain … many of us citizens are also concerned about the eight out of nine justices meeting privately with Mr. Obama (while the cases are pending)."

(Story continues below)

The blog continued, "No reporters were allowed. No attorneys were invited on behalf of the plaintiffs. This causes many of us citizens to question the rules of judicial ethics and causes us to question the impartiality on behalf of the justices."

The report said "quite a number of people" have raised their questions with their U.S. representatives over the issues.

According to a CBS report, Obama visited the Supreme Court before his inauguration at the invitation of Chief Justice John Roberts. The report described it as a protocol visit.

According to a separate published report, Obama and then-Vice President-elect Joe Biden met in a court conference room with Roberts and seven other justices for about 45 minutes.

The report said the only absent justice was Samuel Alito.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 215,000 others and sign the petition demanding proof of eligibility now!

The supplemental documents in the Taitz case cite an executive order concerning qualifications issued by President George Bush on Jan. 16.

"This action is seeking the mandate for the U.S. State Department, the FBI and the Director of the Personnel Department to seek the documents for verifying Obama's legitimacy as president and also his citizenship of the United States," the blog reported.

The Supreme Court document reveals that the Taitz case is scheduled for conference tomorrow, and her supplemental briefs have been distributed to the justices.

Taitz said her arguments rest on precedents from both the California Supreme Court, which years ago removed a candidate for president from the ballot because he was only 34, and the U.S. Supreme Court's affirmation of the ruling. The Constitution requires a president to be 35. Her case raises not the issue of age, but Obama's birthplace and citizenship status, which also are specified in the Constitution.

The lawsuits that have been brought allege in various ways Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some allege his birth took place in Kenya, and his mother was a minor at the time of his birth – too young to confer American citizenship. They argue Obama's father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Kenyan citizen subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time and would have handed down British citizenship.

There also are questions raised about Obama's move to Indonesia when he was a child and his attendance at school there when only Indonesian citizens were allowed and his travel to Pakistan in the '80s when such travel was forbidden to American citizens.

One case, being handled by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, is seeking Obama's school records from Occidental College, which could reveal if Obama, for example, attended class on aid intended for foreign students.

Another lawyer working on similar allegations, Philip J. Berg, has written to Congress seeking an investigation, while Taitz' filings have been before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, said the issue isn't going to disappear.

Others agreed.

[link to www.wnd.com]

Last Edited by Phennommennonn on 10/13/2011 09:14 PM
Forum Administrator

01/23/2009 09:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: President's meeting with judges questioned Lawyer challenging eligibility raises issue of secret conference
The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors.>>>

Because it isn't going to have any doctors sigs on it and the hospital of note has no records of his being born there that's why. Better chance he was born in Canada than Kenya IMO, but either way with Hawaii allowing people to register a birth with no real proof of the birth actually occuring in Hawaii? it'll raise a question of whether it is proof enough.

Some people are never going to be satisfied, so what, there are always going to be those people, but if there is a question? Let the SC make the call, he has the will of the people now so if what I said is the only issue? It will more likely than not go in his favor, which for me? I would live with it and that would be that, next time the people ought to know better BEFORE they elect somebody. But as long as he keeps jerking around and not disclosing anything?...it'll never die and the fact that there are 15 or however many petions with various courts including the SCOTUS is freakin ridiculous that he doesn't end it. He can have 4 years of USURPER! and ILLEGAL FAKE PRESIDENT blaring in his face 24/7 for all I care until he steps up, just like Bush had STOLEN ELECTION!!! BS Blaring at him.
E-mail anytime SHRGLP@Yahoo.com
Inquiring about a ban?, include the IP address found here. [link to www.showmemyip.com]

Ooooh, see the fire is sweepin' Our very streets today...
Burns like a red coal carpet, Mad bulls lost the way...
War, children, it's just a shot away...it's just a shot away....