Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,384 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,322,044
Pageviews Today: 1,890,710Threads Today: 518Posts Today: 10,029
03:21 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Ethicists Worry About Opening Pandora's Box of Gender Engineering

 
Krysalis
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 570987
United States
02/23/2009 09:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Ethicists Worry About Opening Pandora's Box of Gender Engineering
Controversial Study Allows Parents to Pick Baby's Sex
Ethicists Worry About Opening Pandora's Box of Gender Engineering
[link to abcnews.go.com]

Just wondering what everyone's opinion on this is. . . .
. . . . .Ethically right or wrong?

The question is asked of almost every prospective parent: "Would you prefer a girl or a boy?"

Now, doctors at Houston's Baylor College of Medicine are conducting a "sex selection" study that will allow couples to make that wish come true -- letting them actually pick their baby's gender.

"We want to know whether using this technology for elective non-medical reasons is a good idea," said Dr. Sandra Carson, director of Baylor's Assisted Reproductive Technology program.

Doctors often analyze embryos for genetic defects, some of which are more common in boys or girls. But in the Baylor study, up to 200 couples going through in vitro fertilization will be allowed to pick either male or female embryos, so researchers can better understand their motivation.

"Before we make the procedure available in a routine, clinical way, I think it's a good idea to get actual facts from couples who are actually doing it," said Carson.

Couples must answer detailed questions about why they want a boy or a girl and how their expectations may differ between having a son or daughter.

Study Approval Took Nine Years

The whole idea of picking a baby's sex is so controversial, it took nine years for researchers to get permission to conduct the study.

The practice, known as "social sex selection," is banned in many countries, including Britain and Canada. It is opposed by major medical organizations in the United States.

"Once you say it's OK to screen for gender, there's nothing that you can say that it's not OK to screen for -- whether it's eye color, hair color, trivial issues," said Boston University ethicist and legal scholar George Annas.

But one recent survey conducted by the University of Illinois at Chicago found 59 percent of women would not use sex selection even if it were free.

"I would never opt for this procedure," one woman told ABC News. "I think it's [childbirth] one of the world's greatest surprises."

According to many ethicists, that's the way it should stay.





GLP