Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,655 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 42,915
Pageviews Today: 85,251Threads Today: 41Posts Today: 677
01:10 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Legalize drugs to stop violence - Jeffrey A. Miron

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 601648
United States
03/24/2009 03:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Legalize drugs to stop violence - Jeffrey A. Miron
[link to www.cnn.com]

CAMBRIDGE, Massachusetts (CNN) -- Over the past two years, drug violence in Mexico has become a fixture of the daily news. Some of this violence pits drug cartels against one another; some involves confrontations between law enforcement and traffickers.

Recent estimates suggest thousands have lost their lives in this "war on drugs."

The U.S. and Mexican responses to this violence have been predictable: more troops and police, greater border controls and expanded enforcement of every kind. Escalation is the wrong response, however; drug prohibition is the cause of the violence.

Prohibition creates violence because it drives the drug market underground. This means buyers and sellers cannot resolve their disputes with lawsuits, arbitration or advertising, so they resort to violence instead.

Violence was common in the alcohol industry when it was banned during Prohibition, but not before or after.

Violence is the norm in illicit gambling markets but not in legal ones. Violence is routine when prostitution is banned but not when it's permitted. Violence results from policies that create black markets, not from the characteristics of the good or activity in question.

The only way to reduce violence, therefore, is to legalize drugs. Fortuitously, legalization is the right policy for a slew of other reasons.

Prohibition of drugs corrupts politicians and law enforcement by putting police, prosecutors, judges and politicians in the position to threaten the profits of an illicit trade. This is why bribery, threats and kidnapping are common for prohibited industries but rare otherwise. Mexico's recent history illustrates this dramatically.

Prohibition erodes protections against unreasonable search and seizure because neither party to a drug transaction has an incentive to report the activity to the police. Thus, enforcement requires intrusive tactics such as warrantless searches or undercover buys. The victimless nature of this so-called crime also encourages police to engage in racial profiling.

Prohibition has disastrous implications for national security. By eradicating coca plants in Colombia or poppy fields in Afghanistan, prohibition breeds resentment of the United States. By enriching those who produce and supply drugs, prohibition supports terrorists who sell protection services to drug traffickers.

Prohibition harms the public health. Patients suffering from cancer, glaucoma and other conditions cannot use marijuana under the laws of most states or the federal government despite abundant evidence of its efficacy. Terminally ill patients cannot always get adequate pain medication because doctors may fear prosecution by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

Drug users face restrictions on clean syringes that cause them to share contaminated needles, thereby spreading HIV, hepatitis and other blood-borne diseases.

Prohibitions breed disrespect for the law because despite draconian penalties and extensive enforcement, huge numbers of people still violate prohibition. This means those who break the law, and those who do not, learn that obeying laws is for suckers.

Prohibition is a drain on the public purse. Federal, state and local governments spend roughly $44 billion per year to enforce drug prohibition. These same governments forego roughly $33 billion per year in tax revenue they could collect from legalized drugs, assuming these were taxed at rates similar to those on alcohol and tobacco. Under prohibition, these revenues accrue to traffickers as increased profits.

The right policy, therefore, is to legalize drugs while using regulation and taxation to dampen irresponsible behavior related to drug use, such as driving under the influence. This makes more sense than prohibition because it avoids creation of a black market. This approach also allows those who believe they benefit from drug use to do so, as long as they do not harm others.

Legalization is desirable for all drugs, not just marijuana. The health risks of marijuana are lower than those of many other drugs, but that is not the crucial issue. Much of the traffic from Mexico or Colombia is for cocaine, heroin and other drugs, while marijuana production is increasingly domestic. Legalizing only marijuana would therefore fail to achieve many benefits of broader legalization.

It is impossible to reconcile respect for individual liberty with drug prohibition. The U.S. has been at the forefront of this puritanical policy for almost a century, with disastrous consequences at home and abroad.

The U.S. repealed Prohibition of alcohol at the height of the Great Depression, in part because of increasing violence and in part because of diminishing tax revenues. Similar concerns apply today, and Attorney General Eric Holder's recent announcement that the Drug Enforcement Administration will not raid medical marijuana distributors in California suggests an openness in the Obama administration to rethinking current practice.

Perhaps history will repeat itself, and the U.S. will abandon one of its most disastrous policy experiments.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 637426
Australia
03/24/2009 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Legalize drugs to stop violence - Jeffrey A. Miron
Is this why they've stockpiled 4 years worth of world supply of heroin in Afghanistan?

When TSHTF the US government is going to legalise it and become the pusher?
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 601648
United States
03/24/2009 03:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Legalize drugs to stop violence - Jeffrey A. Miron
Is this why they've stockpiled 4 years worth of world supply of heroin in Afghanistan?

When TSHTF the US government is going to legalise it and become the pusher?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 637426


I wouldn't be surprised.
anonymous coward.
User ID: 571992
United States
03/24/2009 04:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Legalize drugs to stop violence - Jeffrey A. Miron
Legalizing this crap won't make the problem go away. Far from it. You have to understand that even prescription pain killers, opiates, can cause horrendous damage to people's lives and minds. How could you advocate legalizing any of this.

I know you are young and stupid. You think this will make your life happier and easier and solve the problem. It won't! To make this crap legal and socially acceptable will only increase the problem as it is a proven fact that human beings cannot control themselves and use moderation when it comes to substances that excite the pleasure center of the brain.

1. If we legalized prostitution, there are men and women in this country that would whore themselves to death without even taking a break to rest.

2. If we legalized mind-altering drugs in this country, there are men and women who would whore themselves on them to death, or even worse-to the point that they are vegetables, but still alive. You gonna take care of them? I didn't think so.

That is the main reason why your, let's legalize this and take away it's power, argument is a load of CRAP! The financial power of mind-altering substances is only one part of the problem. The escapism/avoidance of life through the means of chemically induced altered states is a whole other issue that would become quickly out of control if this stuff was allowed and socially acceptable all of a sudden. It's like giving high school kids permission to have keggers every night. Yeah, that would work out really well. NOT!





GLP