ZetaTalk LIVE Chat April 18

And if all of them are fake, then PROVE it. I can't prove PX exists, nor can any debunker here prove that it doesn't exist. End of story.


Okay. Did "Planet X" show up and cause a "pole shift" in 2003? Are there any photos anywhere taken with a telescope and solar filters that show an object 4 times the size of Venus hovering near the sun? No? There you go. I just proved it doesn't exist as Nancy describes it.

Next!

When 'he' eventually becomes too discredited he will be replaced by another sock-puppet.

My reply got buried in the quote. You misspelled apologize, Max, I guess you were too busy pointing out the mistake made by the other poster, as if it matters.

Of course it matters, it PROVES Nancy is RIGHT!!

How so, Max? I guess you are getting pretty desperate if a spelling mistake and a misplaced reply within a quote is evidence that Nancy is right. I suppose in the absence of any evidence regarding the pole shift, planet x and all the other topics, this is the best you can do.

Of course I am being facitious. It was just too tempting to toss out complete nonsense and see how the debunkers respond.

It was. Zetatalk is not a "religion". It is "channeled material". It is "information" - information that has no way currently of being proven true or false. "Belief" is not necessary and makes no difference to the fate of both the reader and non-reader alike. Makes no difference to the "bunker" or "de"-bunker alike.



No, it's not a religion, it's a CULT! It requires FAITH because NONE of it has been proved and furthermore ALL the major astronomical claims would require a massive change to the observed universe in order to be true. It's not based on FACT so it's not science, and it's not based on opinion so it's not philosophy.

It's a CULT, plain and simple. The sort of cult that might be started by an attention-starved not-very-well-educated insane woman from Wisconsin.

It was. Zetatalk is not a "religion". It is "channeled material". It is "information" - information that has no way currently of being proven true or false. "Belief" is not necessary and makes no difference to the fate of both the reader and non-reader alike. Makes no difference to the "bunker" or "de"-bunker alike.



No, it's not a religion, it's a CULT! It requires FAITH because NONE of it has been proved and furthermore ALL the major astronomical claims would require a massive change to the observed universe in order to be true. It's not based on FACT so it's not science, and it's not based on opinion so it's not philosophy.

It's a CULT, plain and simple. The sort of cult that might be started by an attention-starved not-very-well-educated insane woman from Wisconsin.

Funny enough, a few months back when I took on Nancy about how a true channeler does not need to "be on the same page", she said in her defense that she doesn't channel, she translates telepathic messages, which is a crock, but now Max says it is channeled material. The story is so convoluted that they can't keep it straight. The main rule of creating and perpetuating an internet hoax is to keep it simple. LOL.

The information can and has been proven largely false, time and time again, but Max doesn't want to look at it because it might mean he is terribly wrong. When you ignore proof, you are operating on pure belief, faith if you will. This is the difference between bunker (those that support bunk) and the debunker (those that expose bunk for what it is - bunk). The bunker just believes because there is no proof that the "information" is true. The debunker looks for evidence to form a conclusion.

I could argue that all religions have a bit of cult in them and all cults have a religious element that keeps the members in fear and awe. Thankfully Nancy doesn't have much time before it all is disproved. I am sure she will come up with a snowy white whopper to move the doom date a few more years into the future when 2012 comes and the pole shift and PX have still not happened.

Nancy tosses out complete nonsense on a weekly basis. What is fascinating to observe is how the PX believers respond with passionate credulity anyway.

Good question. Let's see which of the bunkers is honest. Will they concede that Nancy is wrong, or will they just wait to hear what her next excuse is?

How about it bunkers?

Good question. Let's see which of the bunkers is honest. Will they concede that Nancy is wrong, or will they just wait to hear what her next excuse is?

How about it bunkers?

Who are these "bunkers"? I do not know of any!

Nancy tosses out complete nonsense on a weekly basis. What is fascinating to observe is how the PX believers respond with passionate credulity anyway.


She preys on the ignorant. That's why she chose a subject on which to base her cult that many people know little about - astronomy. Anyone who has the first bit of education in it could see that she's dead wrong.

Good question. Let's see which of the bunkers is honest. Will they concede that Nancy is wrong, or will they just wait to hear what her next excuse is?

How about it bunkers?

Who are these "bunkers"? I do not know of any!

I would like an honest answer to the following question:

To those of you who believe Nancy and claim that "debunkers" will soon find themselves suffering from the "pole shift" - I would like to know what you'll do when 2012 gets here and "Planet X" is still a no show. Nancy and the "Zetas" said it would happen in 2003 and, when it didn't, had to come up with a "white lie." They now say that 2012 is too far out. While neither Nancy or the "Zetas" will specify exactly what they mean by "too far out," on December 31, 2011 time will have run out. "Planet X" will either have caused a "pole shift" by that time or it will be quite visible and undeniable in the sky. So, if nothing happens and there's no sign of "Planet X," will you believe whatever "white lie" Nancy has to come up with to explain another failure? Or will you seriously question what Nancy claims?

No diversions, no dancing about, no insults...please just give an honest answer.

If "Planet X" does show up, I will be one of the first to show up on this forum and admit I was wrong for ever doubting Nancy and spending so much time trying to prove it didn't exist. If I can do that, surely, you can do the same...especially you Free Store. I've asked you this before and all you did was dance about.

And while I'm on the subject...exactly how is the government going to cover up "Planet X" and the "pole shift?" How are they going to control all the people? "Planet X" isn't going to just suddenly show up one day and cause a "pole shift" within minutes or hours. It would be visible for days, weeks...possibly a month or more. How is the government going to control everyone when they know their lives are going to end anyway? There aren't enough military forces anywhere that can control the sheer volume of people. They would be quickly overrun.

I think it's time to stop replying to ZetaMax. He does nothing but dance and spin and pretend to be a balanced observer when it is clear that his only purpose is to keep Nancy's chat thread "churning" with some form of activity.

He cares not how many times he is shown to be an utter fool. He is simply trolling and baiting to make it SEEM as if there is some real debate taking place. There is not.

Fini.

Who are these "bunkers"? I do not know of any!

I think it's time to stop replying to ZetaMax. He does nothing but dance and spin and pretend to be a balanced observer when it is clear that his only purpose is to keep Nancy's chat thread "churning" with some form of activity.

He cares not how many times he is shown to be an utter fool. He is simply trolling and baiting to make it SEEM as if there is some real debate taking place. There is not.

Fini.

You called for this before - to know avail!!

:carfail:

I think it's time to stop replying to ZetaMax. He does nothing but dance and spin and pretend to be a balanced observer when it is clear that his only purpose is to keep Nancy's chat thread "churning" with some form of activity.

He cares not how many times he is shown to be an utter fool. He is simply trolling and baiting to make it SEEM as if there is some real debate taking place. There is not.

Fini.

You called for this before - to know avail!!

:carfail:

That's a lie and you know it Max. Some time ago, a thread was started to discuss Nancy's weekly chat and many debunkers stayed away from Nancy's thread to see how many pages her chat would generate if the debunkers stopped feeding it. We proved the point, that without debunkers, the chat thread dies at around 7 pages. So you started trolling that thread for lack of anything to do at Nancy's. You can only bump a dead thread so many times without looking like a total retard.

As I said, Maxie doesn't CARE if he looks like a total retard. That's part of his trolling technique. He appears to be an intelligent person, so people think they can talk some sense into him. They can't, because his game is INTENTIONALLY disingenuous. People keep posting to him to "show him up", but why? What's the point? We have all seen him ignore anything he can't spin into a continuing argument filled with nothing but more and more and more word-games. That's exactly what he wants and how he keeps the posts coming.

He's shown time and again that he lacks the most basic education on all things scientific.

Well since Max is avoiding taking the challenge, I thought I would lighten things up for the afternoon crowd with an excerpt from Nancy's survival guide, for those that might have missed this gem:

Methods of birth control from the Troubled Times survival guide...

Plug and Play

From the Aboriginals of Australia comes this method which is crude, but effective. It requires some primitive surgery. A hole is made in the base of the male penis, into which a wooden plug can be inserted. During intercourse this plug is removed, enabling ejaculation to take place through the hole in the base of the penis. When conception is desired, the plug is left in place. Not exactly an attractive solution, but desperate situations do require desperate measures.