| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 | Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09)
| DrPostman  
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
 United States
5/8/2009 8:06 AM
 | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
I do not know, That is why I am waiting for more video's. That is the only reason that makes me wonder.
But think for a moment, if this is true, do you think that Nasa will tell us about it. It is dangerous to the life on the earth. Every body will panic.
How many people they will choose to take with themselves under ground? Or will they flee the earth? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 472228
It's not up to NASA. NASA doesn't control the planet. There
is no place else to go but here. There is no way to keep
something hidden that tens of thousands of amateur astronomers
in hundreds of nations could see.
I really don't understand why people think NASA is so powerful.
Every body has right to know what is happening. yet they think they have right to decide for people destiny. They are gods on the earth. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 472228
Who is deciding what, and how are they deciding. What does
NASA have to do with that Iranian with a good telescope and
a blog right now? What does NASA have to do with that Mongolian
and their astronomy web site right now?
NASA is not the bogyman that people seem to want to make
them out to be.
"Even the “pussy cat” icon you proudly display has obvious sexual overtones,
in the since it is mocking the valued emotional need you have been deprived
of, since childhood."
-- Volar, one of Zetatalk's most rabid supporters, makes one of the strangest
statments I have ever read on GLP.
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Have diseased plants? There's an app for that. A friend
of mine has developed Plant Doctor 1.0 Check it out at:
[link to www.plantdoctorapp.com] or get it at iTunes at:
[link to itunes.apple.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 472228
 Netherlands
5/8/2009 8:13 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
I am not agree but will not discuss with you around how powerfull is NASA. That is not the issue here.
Lets see if we get more details around this object/video... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 674631
 Australia
5/8/2009 9:19 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
I do not know, That is why I am waiting for more video's. That is the only reason that makes me wonder.
But think for a moment, if this is true, do you think that Nasa will tell us about it. It is dangerous to the life on the earth. Every body will panic.
How many people they will choose to take with themselves under ground? Or will they flee the earth?
It's not up to NASA. NASA doesn't control the planet. There
is no place else to go but here. There is no way to keep
something hidden that tens of thousands of amateur astronomers
in hundreds of nations could see.
I really don't understand why people think NASA is so powerful.
Every body has right to know what is happening. yet they think they have right to decide for people destiny. They are gods on the earth.
Who is deciding what, and how are they deciding. What does
NASA have to do with that Iranian with a good telescope and
a blog right now? What does NASA have to do with that Mongolian
and their astronomy web site right now?
NASA is not the bogyman that people seem to want to make
them out to be. Quoting: DrPostman
Mr Postman (or please show a copy of your degree certificate here),
Please stop helping slow down the economic recovery of the World.
Just let people talk, then order bunker-building and let them spend their hard-earned money on supplies.
Let the Governments cash up on taxes when people do rush to the shops,
What is it that you are doing?
Do you REALLY think you are a great educator or what?
Disclaimer: I do not know anything about Nibiru or Marduk or any other planets.
Best regards,
With respect etc etc...
Some reader. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 601445
Netherlands
5/8/2009 9:33 AM | | Anonymous Coward
User ID: 428864
United States
5/8/2009 9:36 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 601445
Indeed...here's a few more.
 |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 674681
Australia
5/8/2009 9:42 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 428864
yeah YEAH YEAAH
DAS IST FANTASTISCHE!!!!
"DR" is still thinking now....
My GOD...
Where exactly is this WORLD at now?
Who would really know the answers.
The educational systems are in ruins, worldwide.
No-one below 50 yrs of age knows what they are doing, where are we headed now, think about that, with Nibiru in mind or not. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 674681
Australia
5/8/2009 9:48 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
FUCK YOU, "DR", stop freaking calling yourself names.
freedom of speech is paramount on the Internet, you wouldn't have fucking brains to really "ban" me.
Nothing personal, though, man, just "business" I don't profit from.
Let the people TALK about anything they BLOODY WANT, already NOW!\ |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 539080
Netherlands
5/8/2009 10:21 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Let the people TALK about anything they BLOODY WANT, already NOW!\ Quoting: Anonymous Coward 674681
... friend freedom of speach, freedom of mind...I love it. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 674723
Australia
5/8/2009 10:39 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Let the people TALK about anything they BLOODY WANT, already NOW!\
... friend freedom of speach, freedom of mind...I love it. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 539080
We all fucking love that, but every time we talk abouit it, the SILENCE follows |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 539080
Netherlands
5/8/2009 11:06 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Let the people TALK about anything they BLOODY WANT, already NOW!\
... friend freedom of speach, freedom of mind...I love it.
We all love that, but every time we talk abouit it, the SILENCE follows Quoting: Anonymous Coward 674723
I see... well not anymore...watch closely this specific time. Many events are happening simultaneously. Lets be patient little bit more… |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 493498
United States
5/8/2009 11:54 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Get back on track folks - this is about the validity of the supposed Nibiru video.
There is only ONE reflection on the window when there should be TWO reflections on the window that move around with the camera in the first 2 mninutes.
The smaller object at approx 5.30 min moves IN FRONT OF A THIN TOWER!!
Also, when the darker filter is applied, only ONE of the objects stays bright, while the OTHER ONE dims. Why???
Look again people!! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 539080
Netherlands
5/8/2009 12:49 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
There is only ONE reflection on the window when there should be TWO reflections on the window that move around with the camera in the first 2 mninutes. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 493498
I do not know if that is law. You can have one or two reflections, depending on your position to the light and the type of the equipment that you use.
Tower: I think that what you refer as tower, are clouds. If Camera zooms out, you can clearly see the 3 distinctive towers( 2 thin buildings at the left side and one large building at the right side). Your tower is not visible when the camera is zooming out. Time 2:46.
If we can have the picture of the location we can say whether it is a tower or not. Your tower is not always visible. But other 3 towers are clearly visible.
Also, when the darker filter is applied, only ONE of the objects stays bright, while the OTHER ONE dims. Why??? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 493498
Good question, if you tell me the nature of this object, I can tell you why. As long as we do not know this object, we can not say why its brightness is little bit different from the sun.
thanks for analyse... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 493498
United States
5/8/2009 1:00 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Tower: I think that what you refer as tower, are clouds. If Camera zooms out, you can clearly see the 3 distinctive towers( 2 thin buildings at the left side and one large building at the right side). Your tower is not visible when the camera is zooming out. Time 2:46.
If we can have the picture of the location we can say whether it is a tower or not. Your tower is not always visible. But other 3 towers are clearly visible.
thanks for analyse... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 539080
Well, the particular thin tower in question that the orb goes in FRONT of, is straight and vertical on the right of the smaller orb at 5:30 min of which the smaller orb appears to be in front of it, blotting the tower out. If the orb was behind the tower, it would appear as a dark vertical line in front of the orb.
Thanks for looking:-) |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 539080
Netherlands
5/8/2009 1:09 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Tower: I think that what you refer as tower, are clouds. If Camera zooms out, you can clearly see the 3 distinctive towers( 2 thin buildings at the left side and one large building at the right side). Your tower is not visible when the camera is zooming out. Time 2:46.
If we can have the picture of the location we can say whether it is a tower or not. Your tower is not always visible. But other 3 towers are clearly visible.
thanks for analyse...
Well, the particular thin tower in question that the orb goes in FRONT of, is straight and vertical on the right of the smaller orb at 5:30 min of which the smaller orb appears to be in front of it, blotting the tower out. If the orb was behind the tower, it would appear as a dark vertical line in front of the orb.
Thanks for looking:-) Quoting: Anonymous Coward 493498
thanks you too, friend,
yes, but it is not clear if it is a tower. yes it is straight but I am not sure, there is at the same location an horizontal line, which looks like cloud also. We need picture of the location.
We will find out... with little bit patient... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 539080
Netherlands
5/8/2009 1:12 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
i will go and search and see if I can find somewhere else, some more info.
Till later friends... |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 674857
United States
5/8/2009 1:53 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
It's been my understanding that Nibiru is supposed to be approaching from the south; from BELOW the ecliptic, like this:
[link to s299.photobucket.com]
I'd also like to point out a couple of things - first, decades ago astronomers were searching for something that was causing a perturbation of the orbits of multiple planets in our solar system. It was this search that brought about the discovery of Pluto in the 30s. It was agreed, though, that Pluto was way too small to be causing the perturbations they were seeing.
Second, in 1983, a very large object was discovered by whatever space telescope they had at the time. It was very big, far away, but coming in our direction. A story about it was published in the New York Times that year. I had saved a clipping of it myself for a long time but it eventually got lost. This could be verified by anyone willing to research that article. |
| The Other One
User ID: 671720
United States
5/8/2009 2:28 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
What about these chemtrails that people are seeing they are all over the place. To cover the possibilty of Planet X being exposed to the public. Do the people have a right to see if it is intended to be there for us to see??
We will see! |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 548017
United States
5/8/2009 2:38 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Second, in 1983, a very large object was discovered by whatever space telescope they had at the time. It was very big, far away, but coming in our direction. A story about it was published in the New York Times that year. I had saved a clipping of it myself for a long time but it eventually got lost. This could be verified by anyone willing to research that article. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 674857
It was the IRAS and it turned out that it did not detect any objects in our solar system. That's why everyone is always citing 26 year old newspaper articles.
[link to spider.ipac.caltech.edu]
[link to www.badastronomy.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 548017
United States
5/8/2009 2:43 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
What about these chemtrails that people are seeing they are all over the place. To cover the possibilty of Planet X being exposed to the public.
We will see! Quoting: The Other One 671720
Sorry, but this has got to be one of the most implausible Nibiru theories of all. How exactly would this work? |
| Mercuriel™
Finaliter
User ID: 342233
 Canada
5/8/2009 3:08 PM
 | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Thats easy to answer...
If all You ever have are Cloudy Skies - What then can You see of the Stars or the Heavens ?
Nothing but them dam Clouds I'd wager.
That said, for Me the Jury is still out on that Theory but its fairly easy to answer as to why it would occlude the sighting of objects that may be above the Clouds...
Surely You can understand that - No ?
Peace, Light, Life, Love, Unity and Harmony.
Namaste,
Mercuriel |
| DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
United States
5/8/2009 3:08 PM
| | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Mr Postman (or please show a copy of your degree certificate here), Quoting: Anonymous Coward 674631
Why? You don't really care.
Please stop helping slow down the economic recovery of the World.
Just let people talk, then order bunker-building and let them spend their hard-earned money on supplies.
Let the Governments cash up on taxes when people do rush to the shops,
What is it that you are doing? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 674631
Tasking you, obviously.
Do you REALLY think you are a great educator or what?
Disclaimer: I do not know anything about Nibiru or Marduk or any other planets.
Best regards,
With respect etc etc...
Some reader. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 674631
You you think you are a great fearmonger defender?
What about these chemtrails that people are seeing they are all over the place. To cover the possibilty of Planet X being exposed to the public. Do the people have a right to see if it is intended to be there for us to see??
We will see! Quoting: The Other One 671720
The sky is too big to cover with condensation trails. You
can't hide things in the heavens.
Sorry, but this has got to be one of the most implausible Nibiru theories of all. How exactly would this work? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 548017
They only look at the sky on cloudy days? Just guessing.
"Even the “pussy cat” icon you proudly display has obvious sexual overtones,
in the since it is mocking the valued emotional need you have been deprived
of, since childhood."
-- Volar, one of Zetatalk's most rabid supporters, makes one of the strangest
statments I have ever read on GLP.
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Have diseased plants? There's an app for that. A friend
of mine has developed Plant Doctor 1.0 Check it out at:
[link to www.plantdoctorapp.com] or get it at iTunes at:
[link to itunes.apple.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
5/8/2009 3:16 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
It's been my understanding that Nibiru is supposed to be approaching from the south; from BELOW the ecliptic, like this:
[ link to s299.photobucket.com]
I'd also like to point out a couple of things - first, decades ago astronomers were searching for something that was causing a perturbation of the orbits of multiple planets in our solar system. It was this search that brought about the discovery of Pluto in the 30s. It was agreed, though, that Pluto was way too small to be causing the perturbations they were seeing.
Try to keep up. After the masses of Neptune and Uranus were updated with more accurate values obtained by mission flyby's, the "perturbations" in their orbits disappeared.
Here's some info...
[link to adsbit.harvard.edu]
[link to discovermagazine.com]
[link to findarticles.com]
[link to www.liveleak.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
5/8/2009 3:18 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Thats easy to answer...
If all You ever have are Cloudy Skies - What then can You see of the Stars or the Heavens ?
Nothing but them dam Clouds I'd wager.
That said, for Me the Jury is still out on that Theory but its fairly easy to answer as to why it would occlude the sighting of objects that may be above the Clouds...
Surely You can understand that - No ?
No. There are plenty of clear skies. I am an astrophotgrapher and get plenty of chances to make long exposures (hours at a time) of the heavens. |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 597166
United States
5/8/2009 3:23 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Second, in 1983, a very large object was discovered by whatever space telescope they had at the time. It was very big, far away, but coming in our direction. A story about it was published in the New York Times that year. I had saved a clipping of it myself for a long time but it eventually got lost. This could be verified by anyone willing to research that article.
It was the IRAS and it turned out that it did not detect any objects in our solar system. That's why everyone is always citing 26 year old newspaper articles.
[ link to spider.ipac.caltech.edu]
[ link to www.badastronomy.com]
snip:
There is much emphasis placed on the 1983 “discovery” of a mysterious heavenly body by NASA’s Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) on the outskirts of the Solar system, some 50 billion miles (540 AU) away. Naturally the world’s media will have been very excited by such a discovery and began making noises that perhaps this was Planet X (the most popular accessible resources for Planet X advocates is the Washington Post article published on December 31st 1983 titled “Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered“). In actuality, astronomers weren’t sure what the infrared object was (the clue is in the word “mystery”). Initial media reports postulated that it could be a long-period comet, or a planet, or a far-off young galaxy or a protostar (i.e. a brown dwarf). As soon as the last possibility is mentioned, suddenly this became the “discovery” that Planet X was in fact a brown dwarf orbiting in the outer reaches of our Solar System.
So where did the Washington Post get its story? The story was published in response to the research printed a paper titled “Unidentified point sources in the IRAS minisurvey” (by Houck et al, published in Astrophysical Journal Letters, 278:L63, 1984). Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, co-investigator in the IRAS project, was interviewed and strongly stated that what IRAS had seen was not “incoming mail” (i.e. the results did not suggest there was an object approaching Earth). On reading this interesting research, I was especially drawn to the paper’s conclusion:
[link to www.universetoday.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 674726
United States
5/8/2009 3:29 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
Mr Postman (or please show a copy of your degree certificate here),
Why? You don't really care.
Please stop helping slow down the economic recovery of the World.
Just let people talk, then order bunker-building and let them spend their hard-earned money on supplies.
Let the Governments cash up on taxes when people do rush to the shops,
What is it that you are doing?
Tasking you, obviously.
Do you REALLY think you are a great educator or what?
Disclaimer: I do not know anything about Nibiru or Marduk or any other planets.
Best regards,
With respect etc etc...
Some reader.
You you think you are a great fearmonger defender?
What about these chemtrails that people are seeing they are all over the place. To cover the possibilty of Planet X being exposed to the public. Do the people have a right to see if it is intended to be there for us to see??
We will see!
The sky is too big to cover with condensation trails. You
can't hide things in the heavens.
Sorry, but this has got to be one of the most implausible Nibiru theories of all. How exactly would this work?
They only look at the sky on cloudy days? Just guessing. Quoting: DrPostman |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 88145
United States
5/8/2009 3:29 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
[link to www.universetoday.com]
"Although these IRAS observations were seeing mysterious objects, at this stage, there was no indication that there was an object (let alone a brown dwarf) powering its way toward us. But the rumours had already begun to flow. When follow-up papers were published in 1985 (Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., 1985) and 1987 (The IRAS View of the Extragalactic Sky, Soifer et al., 1987), there was little if any media interest in their findings. According to these publications, most of the IRAS observations in the 1984 paper were distant, ultra-luminous young galaxies and one was a filamentary structure known as “infrared cirrus” floating in intergalactic space. IRAS never observed any astronomical body in the outer reaches of the Solar System." |
| DrPostman
Forum Moderator
User ID: 51197
United States
5/8/2009 4:44 PM
| | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
you seem awfuly concern about nibiru and you come across a little scared Quoting: Anonymous Coward 674726
You seem awfully obsessed with fear. I know why.
"Even the “pussy cat” icon you proudly display has obvious sexual overtones,
in the since it is mocking the valued emotional need you have been deprived
of, since childhood."
-- Volar, one of Zetatalk's most rabid supporters, makes one of the strangest
statments I have ever read on GLP.
Can't PM? Feel free to email me at DrPostman(at)gmail.com
Have diseased plants? There's an app for that. A friend
of mine has developed Plant Doctor 1.0 Check it out at:
[link to www.plantdoctorapp.com] or get it at iTunes at:
[link to itunes.apple.com] |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 548017
United States
5/8/2009 4:50 PM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
[ link to www.universetoday.com]
"Although these IRAS observations were seeing mysterious objects, at this stage, there was no indication that there was an object (let alone a brown dwarf) powering its way toward us. But the rumours had already begun to flow. When follow-up papers were published in 1985 (Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, Houck et al., 1985) and 1987 (The IRAS View of the Extragalactic Sky, Soifer et al., 1987), there was little if any media interest in their findings. According to these publications, most of the IRAS observations in the 1984 paper were distant, ultra-luminous young galaxies and one was a filamentary structure known as “infrared cirrus” floating in intergalactic space. IRAS never observed any astronomical body in the outer reaches of the Solar System."
You beat me to it:) |
| Michael Lee Hill
User ID: 673126
United States
5/9/2009 3:29 AM
 | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
"You get what you concentrate on, there is no other main rule" |
| Anonymous Coward
User ID: 601445
Netherlands
5/9/2009 3:39 AM | | Re: Nibiru 2012 real video (21.04.09) | Quote |
|
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 | |
|
