MUST READ!!! Former Police Officer Challenges Court Jurisdiction

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.


Uh, yeah, you are an idiot, it did work you MORON, so go back to sleep or learn something and wake the hell up.

so did you collect your fee?

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.

Failure to respond to a offer timely is a dishonour

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.


Failure to respond to a offer timely is a dishonour

Update on the case, I had a 3rd party check the case file, there is nothing pending on the case, only a letter from the county attorney telling them to instruct the defendant to file a formal request for jurisdiction, which they tried to do already, I just sent it back to them with a note. The note said, "Since you have not identified the DEFENDANT and have not proven jurisdiction over ME, I will not be filing anything with your Company until the debt I am owed via the contract with your employee has been paid in full."

There was no signature on the DOCKETT ENTRY they sent me.

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.


Failure to respond to a offer timely is a dishonour


but failure to respond is not an automatic agreement to a contract.

I, as an Agent of the PERSON had already served, via registered US Mail a NOTICE on the Judge that I reserved all of my rights and charged a fee of $2500 in Gold and silver coin of the united States for acting as Agent of the PERSON. I gave her 24 hours to reject my offer to serve as an agent over the account by dropping the charge with prejudice. If she did not, I would consider my offer accepted and fulfill the order to present the PERSON at a hearing.


uh yeah, that's not how it works.
you can't enter into such a contract without approval of the other party, and failure to respond is not approval.

this guy is nuts.


Failure to respond to a offer timely is a dishonour


but failure to respond is not an automatic agreement to a contract.

It is if the contract stipuates it is. She is in dishonor, that is why she tried to postpone the hearing another week, so she could try to get out of the fact she was LAWFULLY NOTICED of my fee, I sent it registered, return reciept, restricted deliver to her and it was signed for.

That is proof of service and the contract clearly stated she HAD to respond within the time alloted or it was self-exectuting. That is her law, not mine.
Peace.

i'm sorry, but you cannot force someone into a contract in this manner.
go ahead and try to get the money out of them, it will never happen.

i'm sorry, but you cannot force someone into a contract in this manner.
go ahead and try to get the money out of them, it will never happen.

i'm sorry, but you cannot force someone into a contract in this manner.
go ahead and try to get the money out of them, it will never happen.


You go into a business with the prices clearly listed for service, give them an order which they fill honorably then dont pay them and see what happens. That is commercial LAW, she came to me as an agent of a Corporation, sent me a ORDER signed by her own hand. I sent a fee schedual and she did not withdraw the order. I, as agent, fullfilled the ORDER and now she owes me a fee.

It is that simple and that legal.

i'm sorry, but you cannot force someone into a contract in this manner.
go ahead and try to get the money out of them, it will never happen.


You go into a business with the prices clearly listed for service, give them an order which they fill honorably then dont pay them and see what happens. That is commercial LAW, she came to me as an agent of a Corporation, sent me a ORDER signed by her own hand. I sent a fee schedual and she did not withdraw the order. I, as agent, fullfilled the ORDER and now she owes me a fee.

It is that simple and that legal.

i'm sorry, but you cannot force someone into a contract in this manner.
go ahead and try to get the money out of them, it will never happen.


You go into a business with the prices clearly listed for service, give them an order which they fill honorably then dont pay them and see what happens. That is commercial LAW, she came to me as an agent of a Corporation, sent me a ORDER signed by her own hand. I sent a fee schedual and she did not withdraw the order. I, as agent, fullfilled the ORDER and now she owes me a fee.

It is that simple and that legal.


but there was no agreement on her part to fulfill your terms.

you sent in your terms of agreement, she did not reply, which means she did not enter into the contract. the 24 period was part of your terms, and since she didn't agree to the terms that's not something that can be held against her. you cannot form a binding contract based on failure to respond.

but there was no agreement on her part to fulfill your terms.

you sent in your terms of agreement, she did not reply, which means she did not enter into the contract. the 24 period was part of your terms, and since she didn't agree to the terms that's not something that can be held against her. you cannot form a binding contract based on failure to respond.

Ahhhhhhh, it's nice to watch a free man in action!

Dang, so you mean to tell me, that I hold no liability to respond or appear in court for a small claims case for non payment? I'm ordered to court by the 28th, and if I do not show, then the judge can find for the plaintiff, and order me to pay the fee contested.

But by your logic, I dont need to reply or appear, because I in no way agreed to the terms? That's good to know. Can I get your name, address, phone # and such so I can let the judge know it was you who advised me that I am not bound by any contract I did not agree to enter into, since it was based on their terms, not mine?

Awaiting info.

Former Police Officer Challenges Court Jurisdiction
[link to maya12-21-2012.com]

On the day of April 20, 2009, a Free man on the land commonly known as Martin Earl: Fisher went to the business office of The Navajo County Court. I went to present the PERSON, a legal fiction which lives only in a fictional world of Legist Personas Case No. CR2009-0303, Navajo County, Arizona .

Now THAT is a MORAN, and a king-sized one.