| | | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 | USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties
| Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
thats cause Amerika never went |
| TruthTeller
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Sometimes it makes me wonder. |
| phoenix rising
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
God won´t let us out there.. |
| Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
We ain´t got the "right stuff" anymore. Simple as that! |
| Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Not Shot!.... I am a mom who spent 20 years staying home to raise my kids... Now I am back to work paying for college educations.... And guess what?.... Social Security considers me a waist. I am not entitled to much benefits for staying home and raising my kids. All they see is "no paychecks". Screw Social Security....I will take care of my kids and myself..... It is call a good 401K. |
| ashesandsackcloth
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
VanAllen belt shields us from the radiation of the sun. They said they rotated the space captsule around into the cool of space to keep the ship from overheating. One problem with that explanation. Not enough atoms of anything out there to cool anything. Think about how a thermos bottle works. Vacume! Keeps hot things hot and cool things cool.
I walked around in a daze for a month when it hit me we didn´t go and it was all a lie.
Thanks Bill Cooper. From one of GOD´s flock |
| Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
2 possible reasons for the 20 year timeframe.
1) They didn´t go the first time so have to invent all the shit they reckon they already have and solve the problems posed by exposure of man and machine to open space. Micro meteors, radiation and temperature.
2) The education system in the USA has deteriorated to such an extent that it´ll take that long to educate some astronauts and scientists.
I choose No.1:) |
| daleth
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Ah yes, Bill Cooper. His death was my personal Kennedy moment and the day the music died. The reality and enormity of it all sank in that day. |
| ashesandsackcloth
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Any of you remember what he wanted us to do on the day he died? |
| daleth
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Shoot ashes I don´t remember, but did it have to do with the Washington Memorial? |
| ashesandsackcloth
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Your very warm Daleth. Probably in more ways than one eh. |
| daleth
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Okay, Washington Monument, the obelisk, my bad. What was it he wanted people to do? |
| Apollo 11
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
I don´t believe that moon hoax rot. Not one ounce of it. They went, but the never told us the whole story.
The Van Allen belt is 180 miles thick. The Apollo 11 spacecraft went through it at 14,000 miles an hour on the way out. It would have been in the VAB about 45 seconds. |
| i is that which i is
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
 Hi All, 
Some people claim that the aliens told us to get out and stay out, or else.
Peace, light, and love.  |
| Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Nope,never happened,all a sham... |
| Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Read the Apollo Hoax again and see they were never on any moon, only a Hollywood Moon.!!!
[link to www.ufos-aliens.co.uk] |
| Anonymous Coward
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Yes, they went, but it took a lot longer than 8 years from the first ideas to actually getting there.
And now they´ve thrown away all the equipment and designs, and a lot of the experts are dead or retired, they´re back to square one. |
| cdwarior
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
The Saturn V was little more than a rocket propelled pinball machine. Not very advanced nor safe. The real goal is to return with H3 for fusion reactors. Permanent commerce between the locations is needed and thus more planning and inventions. |
| Spanker nli
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Doesn´t it make you wonder why we never went back?
Instead of floating in space, why didn´t we build a base on the moon?
It would be much harder to pull a scam like that today. There were a lot more sheep back in the 1960´s.
Ever get a close up of the craft that landed on the moon? It looks like it would be impossible to even fly, let alone carry any humans in it.
Looks like gold foil paper... |
| DogFishHead
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
"Ever get a close up of the craft that landed on the moon? It looks like it would be impossible to even fly, let alone carry any humans in it.
Looks like gold foil paper..."
Isn´t that just typical:
"I´m not an engineer, I don´t know very much about the Apollo program, and I have no qualifications whatsoever to make any judgments about the engineering involved, but SURELY If I don´t understand how something works, or I would have done it different or it just doesn´t ´look right´ to me, then it couldn´t possibly be real!"
That about cover it bro? |
| Neoprophet
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
All of the footage shown about the moon landing was fake. It is possible that we went to the moon, but if we did why all the lies and deceit?
As far as the lunar module goes, that crappy "gold foil" lander was either not what was really used or was a lot more advanced than it was supposed to be. That thing landed in a way that it had to be an antigravity device, but if all the footage is fake then that would explain how it landed while moving sideways. The lander also did not have the ability to escape lunar atmosphere. After the moon program our government never updated school textbooks to state that the moon´s gravity is 64% of Earth´s, not the 17% once believed.
Until we get some REAL footage or reports of what really happened to the Apollo program, we will continue to say WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON. |
| beezle
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
lunar atmosphere? |
| beezle
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
And since when is the moon´s gravity 64% that of Earth´s? Where are you getting a figure like that? |
| Neoprophet
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Atmosphere, yes. Are you aware that there is water vapor on the moon? The moon is not the barren rock people once thought it was. |
| beezle
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
I´m aware of water ICE on the moon, but vapor? |
| Neoprophet
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Western Science claimed that Mars was a barren rock too, but now we find out that there is water on Mars and the sky is not even pink (NASA used a filter to produce that color). |
| Interdimensional warrior
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
I know of about a hundred reasons why the "moonshot" could not have happened as claimed, but I´ll just pose one technical engineering problem to those who ascert that it did indeed .
In space there exists an almost perfect vacuum, a vacuum that has never been equaled by science on Earth. A chemical rocket uses an exothermic chemical reaction to creat thrust in space. This exothermic reaction creates heat, that is the definition of an exothermic reaction. In this case its a fuel being "burned" with pure oxygen. Since heat energy cannot be radiated into or pass through vacuum, all of the heat energy produced by the space crafts´ engine would remain stored withen the craft, and it would be conducted through the lightweieght aluminum craft. Using pure oxygen to oxidize any material results in a hot, extremely efficient chemical reaction. Since all of the heat produced would be stored in the craft while it was in space, the temperature would have exceeded not only th temperature the astronauts could have endured, it would have melted the craft into a blob of metal.
I know some NASA shill will come on and try to explain this one away, but NASA is bound by the laws of physics, just like the rest of the world. Apparently they are unawre of this. |
| Neoprophet
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Would the cold temperature of space stop the ship from overheating? I would guess that a spacecraft is very insulated. |
| beezle
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
Energy can certainly radiate through a vacuum. How do you think we receive the suns energy? |
| Interdimensional warrior
12/8/2005 10:11 AM | | Re: USA Moon Shot in Twenty Years ? Only took eight in the sixties | Quote |
question:"Would the cold temperature of space stop the ship from overheating? I would guess that a spacecraft is very insulated."
In a word, NO. Heat travels by conduction. With no matter present,such as the condition that exists in space, heat cannot transfer away from its source. What allows your car engine to cool down in the earths atmosphere is the conduction of heat from the heat source to the surrounding air(not neccesarily air, it could be any liquid, gas or solid actually , this is an example). This is why devices which produce heat such as an engine have cooling fins or a radiator with as much surface area as possible (or as is needed to maintain a usable temperature range), because the more heated surface area exposed to the air, the more efficently the machine is cooled. This is a basic engineering principle.
Quote:
Energy can certainly radiate through a vacuum. How do you think we receive the suns energy?
Yes, it can, but not in the form of heat energy. The sun heats the earth because emr is converted to heat when it is absorbed by matter. No heat energy exists in a vacuum. |
| | Page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105 | |
|
