Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,773 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 846,664
Pageviews Today: 1,211,728Threads Today: 370Posts Today: 7,171
10:55 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."

 
Michael Lee Hill
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 04:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
By Thomas O'Toole, Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, December 30, 1983 ; Page A1

"Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."



A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth
that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation
Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite.


So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a
nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that
it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the
light cast by its stars ever gets through.

"All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is," Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, IRAS chief
scientist for California's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and director of the Palomar Observatory
for the California Institute of Technology, said in an interview.


The most fascinating explanation of this mystery body, which is so cold it casts no light and
has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, is that it is a giant gaseous
planet as large as Jupiter and as close to Earth as 50 trillion miles. While that may seem like a
great distance in earthbound terms, it is a stone's throw in cosmological terms, so close in fact
that it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto.

"If it is really that close, it would be a part of our solar system," said Dr. James Houck of
Cornell University's Center for Radio Physics and Space Research and a member of the
IRAS science team. "If it is that close, I don't know how the world's planetary scientists
would even begin to classify it."


The mystery body was seen twice by the infrared satellite as it scanned the northern sky from
last January to November, when the satellite ran out of the supercold helium that allowed its
telescope to see the coldest bodies in the heavens. The second observation took place six
months after the first and suggested the mystery body had not moved from its spot in the sky
near the western edge of the constellation Orion in that time.

"This suggests it's not a comet because a comet would not be as large as the one we've
observed and a comet would probably have moved," Houck said. "A planet may have moved
if it were as close as 50 trillion miles but it could still be a more distant planet and not have
moved in six months time."

Whatever it is, Houck said, the mystery body is so cold its temperature is no more than 40
degrees above "absolute" zero, which is 456 degrees Fahrenheit below zero. The telescope
aboard IRAS is cooled so low and is so sensitive it can "see" objects in the heavens that are
only 20 degrees above absolute zero.

When IRAS scientists first saw the mystery body and calculated that it could be as close as
50 trillion miles, there was some speculation that it might be moving toward Earth.

"It's not incoming mail," Cal Tech's Neugebauer said. "I want to douse that idea with as much
cold water as I can."

Then, what is it? What if it is as large as Jupiter and so close to the sun it would be part of the
solar system? Conceivably, it could be the 10th planet astronomers have searched for in vain.
It also might be a Jupiter-like star that started out to become a star eons ago but never got hot
enough like the sun to become a star.

While they cannot disprove that notion, Neugebauer and Houck are so bedeviled by it that
they do not want to accept it. Neugebauer and Houck "hope" the mystery body is a distant
galaxy either so young that its stars have not begun to shine or so surrounded by dust that its
starlight cannot penetrate the shroud.

"I believe it's one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe
before," Neugebauer said.

"If it is, then it is a major step forward in our understanding of the size of the universe, how the
universe formed and how it continues to form as time goes on."

The next step in pinpointing what the mystery body is, Neuegebauer said, is to search for it
with the world's largest optical telescopes. Already, the 100-inch diameter telescope at Cerro
del Tololo in Chile has begun its search and the 200-inch telescope at Palomar Mountain in
California has earmarked several nights next year to look for it. If the body is close enough
and emits even a hint of light, the Palomar telescope should find it since the infrared satellite
has pinpointed its position.

(ITEM 123)December 31, 1983, Saturday, Final Edition
(ITEM 127)The distance from earth of a mysterious object in space was reported incorrectly
in some editions yesterday. The correct figure is 50 billion miles.

Articles appear as they were originally printed in The Washington Post and may not
include subsequent corrections.

Last Edited by Michael Lee Hill on 05/19/2009 04:59 AM
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Ancient Sumerian texts indicate that the Earth (" Tiamat ") was struck by a large planet, which moved it into its present orbit, and created the Moon and the Asteroid Belt. In his books, The Twelfth Planet and The Cosmic Code, Zecharia Sitchin outlines this "celestial battle" as described in the Babylonian text called Enuma elish. The planet "Marduk" (the Sumerian " Nibiru "), as it came into the solar system on its clockwise elliptical course, struck Tiamat, which was moving in its ordained counterclockwise orbit. One of Marduk's satellites struck Tiamat first, followed by two more of Marduk's moons. Then Marduk itself, an enormous planetary body, struck Tiamat, smashing one half of the planet into pieces, which became the Earth's Moon and the "Great Band" (Asteroid Belt). The other half of the planet, which was struck by a smaller moon of Marduk, was moved into a new orbit, along with a chunk of material which became its moon. The new planet was then called "KI," meaning "cleaved one." The Earth's original moons were dispersed, many changing the direction of their orbits.


Sitchin has also written in Divine Encounters, the planet where God the creator resides is referred to in the Bible as Olamin, the plural of Olam. The meaning of "olam" in the ancient world was a measure of a really long time, specifically related to the span of time between the periodic disappearance and reappearance of the planet Marduk/Nibiru on its vast 3,600 year elliptical orbit. The domain of Olamin was described as a kingdom which encompasses many worlds. According to Robert Temple, in The Sirius Mystery, the Dogon tribe of Mali call this planet "the egg of the world," and they say it is the origin of all things. They say of this planet that it is "the center of all things and without its movement no other star could hold its course." They say it is made of a heavy metallic compound called "sagala." The Sumerians also wrote that this planetary "god," Nibiru, "remade our solar system and remakes the Earth on its near passages."


According to the web site [link to wwwxfacts.com] the 12th Planet's periodic appearance and disappearance from Earth's view confirms the assumption of its permanence in solar orbit. In this it acts like many comets. The writers ask, why are our astronomers not aware of the existence of this planet? Even an orbit half as long as that of the comet Kohoutek (7,500 years) would take the 12th Planet about 6 times further away from us than Pluto. At this distance, the planet would not be visible from Earth. The ancient tale of Nibiru's Celestial Battle is actually scientifically sophisticated, and current advances in astronomy have recently corroborated certain aspects of the Sumerian cosmogony, among them the following:
The March 16, 1999 announcement by NASA at the 30th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference in Houston of the theory of the origin of Earth's Moon as a catastrophic collision with a "Mars-size planet."


Hubble's recent discovery of 18 (at last count) stars, and numerous Jupiter-size planets (last count 9) with highly elliptical orbits and retrograde (counterclockwise) orbits. Such orbits are now understood to be quite the norm in nearby solar systems, although they are considered peculiar in our own.
The 1994 announcement by NASA of a one-mile wide moon orbiting the 33-mile wide asteroid Ida, which follows the expectation that if a planetary body in this solar system exploded (or collided), the debris will be gravitationally bound in orbits around a primary body.


The discovery of water, atmosphere and perhaps previous life on Mars, the Moon and Europa.


Why there is a strange gravitational "pull" on Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, which indicates there is another body of significant size beyond it.
Planet X - Myth or Fact?
In an article entitled "A History of Planet X - From the Present Day Search to the Seeding of Life on Earth" (www2.eridu.co.uk/eridu/minisites/planetx.html), Alan Alford writes that the discovery of new planets in the last two hundred years owes more to mathematics than to bigger telescopes. Mathematical irregularities in the orbits of the outer planets, in particular, strange wobbles and gravitational anomalies noted in the orbits of Uranus, Neptune and Pluto, have prompted astronomers over the past hundred years to search for a large planetary body in the outer solar system. Based on mathematical evidence, astronomers have been so sure of the reality of this planet that they named it Planet X. The name stands for the tenth planet, as well as the mathematical symbol for an unknown quantity.


On June 17, 1982, a NASA press release from Ames Research Center officially recognized the possibility of "some kind of mystery object" beyond the outermost planets. Various press releases around this time confirmed that scientists were indeed looking for the infamous Planet X. For instance, Astronomy magazine published an article in December of 1981 entitled "Search for the Tenth Planet," and another article in October of 1982 entitled "Searching for a Tenth Planet." In addition, Newsweek covered the story of Planet X on June 28, 1982 in an article entitled "Does the Sun Have a Dark Companion?" This article implied that the tenth planet actually orbits a two sun (binary star) system, but we cannot see the other sun because it is a "dark" star. The article stated:
"A 'dark companion' could produce the unseen force that seems to tug at Uranus and Neptune, speeding them up at one point in their orbits and holding them back as they pass. The best bet is a dark star orbiting at least 50 billion miles beyond Pluto. It is most likely either a brown dwarf, or a neutron star. Others suggest it is a tenth planet since a companion star would tug at the other planets, not just Uranus and Neptune."
The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered." This story reported that the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) detected heat from an object about fifty billion miles away. A report of an interview with chief scientist Gerry Neugebauer from Jet Propulsion Laboratories appeared in the story. The article stated:
"A heavenly body possibly as large as the giant planet Jupiter and possibly so close to Earth that it would be part of this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation Orion by an orbiting telescope aboard the U.S. infrared astronomical satellite. 'All I can tell you is that we don't know what it is,' said Gerry Neugebauer, chief IRAS scientist."
The Post article went on to explain that this mysterious object has never been seen by optical telescopes on Earth or in space, but its infrared heat signature was detected twice by IRAS as it scanned the northern sky between January and November of 1983. The second infrared observation of the body, which is so cold it casts no light, noted that the body appeared not to have moved in six months. This suggested that the object is not a comet, since it probably would have moved. The article also explained that the infrared telescope aboard IRAS, which is able to detect very cold objects, calculated that the heavenly body was so cold that its temperature is about 459 F below zero.
Astronomers suggested it was a "giant gaseous planet, as large as Jupiter," and is so close that "it would be the nearest heavenly body to Earth beyond the outermost planet Pluto." This would make it part of our solar system. The article explained that there had been some speculation that the object "might be moving toward Earth." However, Cal Tech's Neugebauer was careful to "douse that idea with as much cold water as I can." He pronounced with certainty that this object "is not incoming mail." The US News World Report on September 10, 1984 published an article called "Planet X - Is it Really Out There?" This article had the following to say about Planet X:
"Shrouded from the sun's light, mysteriously tugging at the orbits of Uranus and Neptune, is an unseen force that astronomers suspect may be Planet X - a 10th resident of the Earth's celestial neighborhood. Last year, the infrared astronomical satellite (IRAS), circling in a polar orbit 560 miles from the Earth, detected heat from an object about 50 billion miles away that is now the subject of intense speculation."
The article went on to say that scientists are hopeful that the Pioneer 10 and 11 space probes will locate the object, which they noted was possibly a "brown dwarf," a protostar that never got hot enough to become a star. Others astronomers, however, argue that the object is a "dark, gaseous mass that is slowly evolving into a planet." The article quoted Neugebauer as stating: "If we can show that our solar system is still creating planets, we'll know that it's happening around other stars, too." Contrary to this information, according to the ancient Sumerian texts, our solar system is not still creating planets, and this planet has been with us all along. It would appear that the media spin being put on Planet X is a clear attempt to call it something else besides "incoming mail."


The media was quiet on the subject of Planet X for the next few years. Finally, an article by R. Harrington in The Astronomical Journal dated October 1988 supplied the details of continuing mathematical modeling of this planet. The article suggested the mysterious planet was three to four times the size of Earth, and its position was three times further from the Sun than Pluto. Mathematical modeling also suggested that Planet X had an extreme elliptical orbit of 30 degrees. A NASA/ARC press release published in Newsweek on July 13, 1987 disclosed that "an eccentric 10th planet may - or may not - be orbiting the Sun." The article stated that NASA research scientist John Anderson "has a hunch Planet X is out there, though nowhere near the other nine." The article concluded, "if he is right, two of the most intriguing puzzles of space science might be solved: what caused mysterious irregularities in the orbits of Uranus and Neptune during the 19th Century? And what killed off the dinosaurs 26 million years ago."


The reference to killing off the dinosaurs seems to indicate that something more is known about this planet than NASA is letting on. Is this in fact a reference to the planet Nibiru of ancient infamy, the planet which, according to ancient sources, did in fact strike the Earth (Tiamat) in ancient times, and gave us a moon for a thank you? Regardless of what NASA really knows, silence is golden, and, for the most part, mum was the word on the issue of Planet X during the 1990s. Instead, scientific journals began to debunk the issue of a tenth solar system planet. In the 1990s, news stories began to dwell on "runaway planets" and "rebel planets" discovered in other solar systems. The issue of Planet X has now become entirely befuddled with recent discoveries of 18 nearby stars with Jupiter-class planets orbiting them (last count as of October, 1999). (see astron.berkeley.edu) Locating any new developments regarding a tenth solar system planet is akin to finding a needle in a haystack, since it's difficult to know which "new planet" they are talking about. For instance, an October 23, 1996 AP article entitled "New rebel planet found outside the solar system," disclosed the following:
A new planet that breaks all the rules about how and where planets form has been identified in orbit of a twin star about 70 light years from Earth in a constellation commonly known as the Northern Cross. The new planet has a roller coaster like orbit that swoops down close to its central star and then swings far out into frigid fringes, following a strange egg-shaped orbit that is unlike that of any other known planet.
Thus, the issue of Planet X became lost in the information shuffle. Due to the Hubble space probe, many distant galaxies, stars, planets and brown dwarfs are suddenly being discovered all at once. This situation affords NASA the opportunity to attempt to avoid the societal chaos that will surely ensue once everybody realizes that a sizable planet somewhere out there is actually destined to circle our own sun in the next couple of years (2003 according to one web site). After all, who would bother to go to work, go to school, pay their bills, play the stock market, be a loyal, taxpaying John and Jane "Doe," if they thought the end of civilization was near?
Planet X - The Cover-Up
Contrary to what happens in Hollywood movies, where the government comes clean about comets (actually, in Deep Impact they waited almost a year after official knowledge to announce it to the public), wouldn't it rather make sense that such an announcement would not be made public, at least too far in advance of D-day? Tom van Flandern of the U.S. Naval Observatory, who was quoted in the 1982 Newsweek article, admits that a tenth planet is possible, but argues that it would have to be so huge that it should have been observed by now. We must admit that there is a serious possibility that more details regarding Planet X are in fact known, but we are not being informed. Is there a major cover-up of Planet X ? This possibility was actually discussed in an article in the CCNet Digest on May 18, 1998 entitled "The Secrets of Asteroid Peril, British Media Smells a Rat." This article claimed that a report in the London Daily Mail accused US astronomers of trying to cover up scientific data until NASA has a chance to look at the information. The report indicated that "earth-shattering" information, such as the discovery of incoming comets or asteroids, has been ordered to go through NASA first. The Daily Mail report of May 15, 1998 entitled "Delayed Impact, or the Secrets of Asteroid Peril," stated the following:
"If a giant asteroid is hurtling in the general direction of our planet, we will be the last to know about it. For astronomers have decided that the news would be too earth shattering for ordinary mortals to handle, and would likely cause widespread panic. In a week that sees the release of the film Deep Impact, a fictional account of just such a catastrophe, astronomers funded by the American space agency NASA have now agreed to keep asteroid and comet discoveries to themselves for 48 hours while more detailed calculations are made. The findings would then go to NASA, which would wait another 24 hours before going public."
A Los Angeles AP article on May 19, 1998 also reported on this 72 hour delay rule imposed by NASA on announcements to the public of asteroids or comets by astronomers. The report indicated that these measures were undertaken to avoid the "doomsday alert" which occurred in March of 1998 with regard to an asteroid which was due to collide with Earth in 2028, and which was "soon found to be a mistake." These new procedures, the article stated, are "not an attempt to hide anything but to make sure the information is accurate." How can we be sure that if the information is found to be accurate, NASA will not (a) find it to be a "mistake," or (b) withhold the message for a longer period of time?
X Marks the Spot
In February, 1999, J.B. Murray presented a paper to the Royal Astronomical Society entitled "Arguments for the Presence of a Distant Large Undiscovered Solar System Planet." ( [link to www.blackwell-synergy.com).] Murray's paper explored various explanations for what he called a "non-random clustering of long-period comets," which his research concluded are "aligned along a great circle inclined to both the elliptic and the Galactic plane." His paper examined the possibility that this non-random clustering was due to "orbital perturbations by an undiscovered object orbiting within the distances of 30,000 to 50,000 au from the Sun." Murray's mathematical modeling predicted that the object would have a retrograde orbit inclined at 120 degrees.
In an October 16, 1999 Economist article entitled "X Marks the Spot," Drs. Murray and Matese, after looking at the orbits of approximately 300 long-period comets, have separately concluded that too many of them are coming from the same regions of space. They suggest that the galaxy's "tidal wobble" is "being modulated by the gravity of something big within the Oort Cloud itself."


The new object must be very faint, these astronomers suggest, or it would have been spotted. This means it's not a star. They predict that the object is three times the size of Jupiter. They also suggest that the object is not a "proper planet," because, take note: "its orbit appears to run in the opposite direction from those of the nine known planets." This is another factoid we can add to the above "anomalous" findings regarding the existence of Marduk/Nibiru. As the Enuma elish tells us, the planet Marduk entered the solar system on its "clockwise, elliptical orbit," and struck the Earth, which was moving in its "ordained counterclockwise orbit." So the planet we are looking for will have an orbit which runs in the opposite direction from those of the nine known planets in our solar system. (Chalk another one up for Sitchin.)


According to the above Economist article, the orbit of this object also appears to be so unstable that it is unlikely that it could have maintained this orbit for the 4.5 billion year history of the solar system. Therefore, these astronomers suggest, it is more likely that the object is an extra-solar body that was captured by our sun's gravity only "recently," in astronomical terms. (Otherwise, it would have wreaked virtual havoc throughout the history of the solar system. Of course, we are presuming that our neck of the galactic woods is serene because we've been left here in peace to "evolve" for so long that Planet X would have to be a relative newcomer to fit into this preconceived scenario.) In any case, these astronomers predict we should be detecting Planet X soon, even if we have to wait for the next generation of infra-red space telescopes.


It's interesting to note that many of the newly discovered extra-solar planets recently discovered have extremely "eccentric" orbits. It is suggested in "New Discoveries, A Planetary Mystery" (astron.berkeley.edu) that circular orbits may actually not be the rule in nearby solar systems. Nine of the extra-solar objects recently discovered travel in unusually elliptical orbits, "several of them plunging in relatively close to their stars and then swinging far out again." Several of these planets may be three times as massive as Jupiter, and one is estimated at eleven times the mass of Jupiter. What these new discoveries are teaching us is that our own solar system may be very unlike others. Even considering our catastrophic past, we may inhabit a relatively peaceful end of the cosmos, as far as galaxies go. As Dr. Geoffrey Marcy explains, powerful gravitational forces exerted over smaller planets by huge planets or passing stars are capable of upsetting their orbits. Likewise, two or more huge planets orbiting in close proximity can generate a "gravitational slingshot" effect, which could fling one of the objects off on an elongated orbit into the inner planetary system, while the other could at the same time fly off in the other direction, perhaps escaping into interstellar space. In another possible scenario, the planet's own star (sun) could be part of a binary star system, locked in a gravitational embrace.


Although this discussion is being avoided in what little news there is on Planet X, the existence of a mysterious outer solar system planet suggests that we could be living in a two star solar system. What distant gravitational body is causing this planet to make such an enormous wayward loop? One thing is sure, such a companion star would be very capable of exerting a catastrophic influence on the orbits of the outer solar system planets. As Dr. Marcy writes: "We are realizing that most of the Jupiter-like planets far from their stars tool around in elliptical orbits, not circular orbits, which are the rule in our solar system." Why our largest planets remain in circular orbits is, therefore, a mystery. As Dr. Marcy notes:
"Jupiter sized bodies plunging toward and away from their stars are likely to sweep aside smaller worlds, sending them crashing into their star or flying out of orbit into interstellar space. Current technology is incapable of detecting Earth-size planets around other stars, but they almost certainly could not exist near their star's warmth in a system so unsettled by large planets in wrecking orbits."
A huge planet on an elliptical orbit would probably scatter or destroy smaller planets as it crosses their paths time and again. As Dr. Marcy writes, "if our Jupiter were in an eccentric orbit, the Earth and Mars would likely be gravitationally scattered out of the solar system." Therefore, our very existence, he writes, is dependent upon both Jupiter and Earth being in mutually stable and circular orbits. Lucky for us, we have no big bullies, no freewheeling wrecking balls, in our solar system. Or do we?
Enter Planet X
Interestingly, astronomer Tom Van Flandern wonders if Planet X has actually exploded. In his book, Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets, Van Flandern wonders if this planet was responsible for disruption to the moons of Neptune. In his 1995 paper entitled "Origins of Trans-Neptunian Asteroids," Van Flandern notes that a new asteroid belt has been discovered beyond Neptune, suggesting that Planet X may have exploded. (On the other hand, why wouldn't this be the result of one of Planet X's fly-bys?) In his book The Phoenix Solution, Alan Alford asks, if Planet X has exploded, why do the Mesopotamian texts imply that it was seen by the Sumerians during the 4th-3rd millennia BC? Alford suggests that the planet Nibiru was not actually seen, and is a "metaphysical" planet. He believes that the descent and ascent of the Egyptian 'gods' was metaphysical, and that the Egyptian religion was "an exploded planet cult." The story of Osiris was based on this exploded planet; the deity Osiris had been mythologically "dismembered" and his body distributed among the other gods in the solar system. The resurrection of Osiris [continued in the Jesus myth] was based on his metaphysical journey to the stars, which restored the exploded planets to their primeval and pristine form; essentially a metaphysical trip back to "The First Time."


Alford charges that Sitchin has misinterpreted the gods as interplanetary astronauts, and that Planet X actually did not come into the Earth vicinity, but was essentially a "play" or metaphysical replay of an even more ancient event. He also tries to incorrectly establish a Darwinian evolutionary trajectory that implies human evolution was "quickened" by this explosion of planets. This is in fact an anti-Darwinian thesis. More importantly at this juncture, do I understand correctly that what IRAS spotted in 1983 was a metaphysical planet? So that means that what NASA officials mistook as a heavenly body in the direction of the constellation Orion, which they claimed was possibly as large as Jupiter, and close enough to Earth to be part of this solar system, was a mythological planet? And so the mysterious heavenly orb which mathematicians now predict may be three times the size of Jupiter, with a highly elliptical orbit that runs opposite the other nine planets in the solar system, and a retrograde orbit inclined at 120 degrees, is just the replay of an ancient event in the solar system? As the famous line in Oliver Stone's JFK goes, "people, we're through the looking glass here."
The Hyper-D Physics Connection
In his paper entitled "Hubble's New Runaway Planet," (www.enterprisemission.com), Richard Hoagland explains the forgotten 19th Century scientific theories of hyperdimensional physics. These theories were initially proposed over a hundred years ago by various scientists, and were updated in this Century by Faraday and Maxwell. In a nutshell, what hyperdimensional physics tells us is that three dimensional physical phenomena, perhaps including human consciousness itself, are dependent upon higher dimensional realities for their existence.


Hyper-D physics hypothesizes that the basic laws of the three-dimensional world are united in four dimensional space, but merely "look different because of the resulting crumpled geometry of 3-D reality." This is a major break with Newtonian laws of "action at a distance." Instead it proposes that such "forces" are a "direct result of objects moving through 3-D space geometry distorted by the intruding geometry of 4-D space." In essence, the laws of nature become simpler in higher dimensions because of the effect of geometric spatial distortions in the 3-D world.
The implications stemming from this model - the dynamic hyperspace foundations of reality - completely demolish our current view of reality. For, according to Hoagland's research, the "tail wags the dog." Hyper-D physics is the only model that can explain how the planets are completely capable of exerting a determinant influence on the Sun and on each other through their disproportionate ratio of total solar system angular momentum. Suffice to say, according to Hoagland, we are simply entering once again, after 13,000 years (which incidentally is equal to the Mayan "Baktun" cycle) "a phase of this recurring, grand solar system cycle of renewed hyperdimensional restructuring of reality." And, as Hoagland notes, this may even be due to the presence of a particularly enormous solar system body which has just recently come into view, thanks to the Hubble telescope.


As Hoagland notes, something strange is indeed happening in the solar system. One of the effects is that the official Cesium Atomic Clock has had to be adjusted by over 20 seconds in the last two decades; approximately a full second every six months. The official atomic clock is supposedly theoretically stable to plus or minus one second in a million years. To Hoagland, this suggests that a progressive phase-shift is occurring between the Earth's rotation and the atomic-level constants that govern the quantum standards of the atomic clock. The growing difference between dynamic time and atomic time is compelling evidence of large scale changes in the hyperspatial physics of the solar system. It is possible, Hoagland explains, that hyperspatial stresses are due to the progressive orbital movement of as-yet undiscovered outer planets, which are causing increasing scalar potential changes across the entire solar system at the atomic level. The reason the clocks are changing, however, is because the Earth's rotation is changing. It is essentially slowing down due to changing phase relationships between undiscovered outer planets in the outer solar system! There can be no doubt that something is out there! And this something is quite capable of "making and remaking" the Earth, including seriously affecting the orbital rotation time of the planet.


It's also interesting to note in this regard that if orbital revolution is directly related to the passage of time, does this affect the aging process of the life forms on the planet? Could the presence of Marduk/Planet X be a possible explanation for the longer ages of the Old Testament patriarchs? Also, does "making and remaking the Earth" refer to a higher vibrational consciousness referred to as 4th dimensional consciousness? Is there then a relationship between the end of the Mayan Baktun cycle and the coming of Planet X? In any case, these bizarre "new age" concepts seem to be making more and more scientific sense.


Such a distant and large solar system body will also have a huge effect on total solar hyperdimensional energy generation, Hoagland notes. He explains, unknown "worlds," or planets, can produce long-term cyclical changes in solar output lasting thousands of years [i.e. a "World Age"?]. In fact, such a geometrical relationship has already been established between the changing positions of Jupiter and Saturn relative to each other. Hoagland wonders, if the known changes in solar output are due to hyperdimensional effects of the largest known planets, what might be the effect of the magnitude of "aether stress" produced by these newfound planets, which have angular momentum contributions hundreds of times greater? He notes that the long-term cyclic increase in solar energy created by those cyclic phasings could measure as much as several percent above current solar output. Needless to say, this could trigger profound climatic changes on Earth.


In short, the idea that advanced extraterrestrial space travelers could apply hyperdimensional technology to engineer orbital catastrophic management projects is actually within the realm of possibility. After all, we must consider the type of technology that would be important to an intelligent civilization living on what constitutes a runaway wrecking ball. Might the technology of such a society be based on the altruistic behavior of running ahead and moving objects out of its path, and running back to tidy up the bowling alley afterward? Might the technology also be based on placing and replacing the genetic stock of life forms on planets on its course? Even more far-fetched, could hyperdimensional technology use light and sound vibrational levers to lift the Earth globe right out of the 3rd dimension in order to avoid a head-on collision with the oncoming planet? Could this be a hint as to the meaning behind the message: "makes and remakes the Earth on its near passage?"


In light of information regarding hyperspace reality, it appears we have come full circle. Human knowledge has a way of biting itself on the ass. For, as the pioneering work of 19th Century physicists tells us: "The existence of unseen hyperspatial realities, through information transfer between dimensions, are the literal 'foundation substrate' maintaining the reality of everything in this dimension."


In assimilating this information into our world view, we have to realize that our science is missing large areas of information with regard to geometric interplanetary relationships in our solar system's cosmic dance, and the peculiar physics of a shared outer solar system planet or twin sun scenario, and the connection this might have on both Earth's climate and rotation, and also, as strange as it may sound, on space-time reality and human consciousness.
How much meaning can we, in our modern secular world view, place on the distant effects of interplanetary hyperspace gematria? In our blindness to important scientific discoveries of only a hundred years ago, there is no context to explain these compelling synchronicities. Conceptually speaking, we have nowhere to put this bizarre information. But we need to become aware that a Glass Bead Game of enormous importance is beginning to take shape, and all hands are needed on deck to decipher the mathematical codes of this information. We are being spoken to in a forgotten ancient language, and we've got to wake up fast to the meaning of the message.

Last Edited by Michael Lee Hill on 05/19/2009 05:02 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 176293
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
bsflag

This is so lame it makes me sick. It was not a planet, it was a distant galaxy. ffs.
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Why do you guys persist with that crap? Here is more that
Micheal doesn't want people to see:
[link to spider.ipac.caltech.edu]

Here's what they actually found:
[link to adsbit.harvard.edu]

Why do these people keep bringing up ancient articles, but
never anything recent from any scientist? And since when
do journalists become experts on astronomy?

BTW, please note the use of the word "IF" in those quotes. They
weren't sure of what they had found yet.
 Quoting: DrPostman


What are you going on about? This article was printed by the Washington Post, I didn't add anything or even comment on the article, Even the link you posted had a link to the actual article...
[link to spider.ipac.caltech.edu]

That is the article, That is what it said, There is nothing to debunk...Isn't that great?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 276706
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
and what if it was a hoax, or they made a mistake, they got it wrong, it was a scam, someone playing a joke etc etc?
There are millions of articles written all the time that turn out to be junk. Why are you holding on to this one as FACT?

I am in UK and in 1983 i was in university. I remember the BBC news on that day because i was in my room and radio was on. Yes indeed you are correct. They said that a planet has been spoted and will be here with us within 20 year.
1983+20= 2003
Nothing happened in that year and now we are in middle of 2009. This is 6 years later.
If they truly spotted it when it was that far away then it would be no problem seeing it now.
You must realise that there are 1000's of amature astronomers around the world , specially in countries that can not be controlled. With advent of Internet , it is 100% certain that any observations will be reported on the net with proof within minutes. If not in USA certainly in Iran, North Korea, China, Japan, India etc etc.
Do you see how your theories regarding this just does not stand? You totally ignore the fact that skies are not limited to USA only.
I know you so much want it to happen but you must live in reality.
If there was such a thing as PX then there would be 1000's of astronomers all over the world reporting it. It would be impossible to keep a lid on it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 682448
United States
05/19/2009 05:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Why can't the hubble telescope, which can see across the universe NOT see planet X in our own galaxy?


Oh I know why...

Because its BULLSHIT.

bsflag
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
and what if it was a hoax, or they made a mistake, they got it wrong, it was a scam, someone playing a joke etc etc?
There are millions of articles written all the time that turn out to be junk. Why are you holding on to this one as FACT?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276706


It's the freaken Washington Post?
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
And now Michael trots out an economist who has been refuted
by every Sumerian scholar who has bothered to take the time
to review his work:

[link to www.ianlawton.com]
[link to jcolavito.tripod.com]
[link to www.ianlawton.com]
[link to web.archive.org]
[link to www.sitchiniswrong.com]
 Quoting: DrPostman


what does anti-sitchen websites have to do with the fact this was a front page article in the Washington post?


Ohhh Nothing
Fail
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Why do you guys persist with that crap? Here is more that
Micheal doesn't want people to see:
[link to spider.ipac.caltech.edu]
Here's what they actually found:
[link to adsbit.harvard.edu]
Why do these people keep bringing up ancient articles, but
never anything recent from any scientist? And since when
do journalists become experts on astronomy?
BTW, please note the use of the word "IF" in those quotes. They
weren't sure of what they had found yet.


What are you going on about? This article was printed by the Washington Post, I didn't add anything or even comment on the article, Even the link you posted had a link to the actual article...
[link to spider.ipac.caltech.edu]
That is the article, That is what it said, There is nothing to debunk...Isn't that great?


What's great is that there is NO mystery now, so the premise of
your subject line is bogus.

No heavenly body was discovered.

Are you feeling stung over supporting the claim that the
History Channel show on the 25 was going to be more important
than a show on human evolution?
 Quoting: DrPostman


Man, can you make stuff up, The only thing I ever said about the May 25th show is that I have no idea what it is about?

Prove me wrong because you can't.

Actually how telling that you have to resort to Lying, tell's much about your character no?
Dominus Recti

User ID: 554406
Denmark
05/19/2009 05:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Is this OP on drugs?
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
what does anti-sitchen websites have to do with the fact this was a front page article in the Washington post?
Ohhh Nothing
:Fail


YOUR SECOND POST ON THIS THREAD!!! What's wrong with you?

The fail is all yours.
 Quoting: DrPostman


That we were discussing the Washington post article, that's all.

Sitchen is not wrong by the way, which you will learn soon enough.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 276706
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
and what if it was a hoax, or they made a mistake, they got it wrong, it was a scam, someone playing a joke etc etc?
There are millions of articles written all the time that turn out to be junk. Why are you holding on to this one as FACT?

It's the freaken Washington Post?
 Quoting: Michael Lee Hill

My God what do you mean by that?
Are you actually saying that you are putting your total theory and faith in an article in a paper that is called WP?
Did this paper aso not print articles regarding WMD in Iraq? And about nuclear bombs in Iran?
Are you totally mad?
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Is this OP on drugs?
 Quoting: Dominus Recti

Because I posted an article from the Washington Post? What does that have to do with drugs?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 337658
United States
05/19/2009 05:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
what does anti-sitchen websites have to do with the fact this was a front page article in the Washington post?
Ohhh Nothing
:Fail


YOUR SECOND POST ON THIS THREAD!!! What\'s wrong with you?

The fail is all yours.


That we were discussing the Washington post article, that\'s all.

Sitchen is not wrong by the way, which you will learn soon enough.
 Quoting: Michael Lee Hill



Its always soon with you idiots. Why is that?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 672861
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
You're delusional.
 Quoting: DrPostman


sherlock
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
and what if it was a hoax, or they made a mistake, they got it wrong, it was a scam, someone playing a joke etc etc?
There are millions of articles written all the time that turn out to be junk. Why are you holding on to this one as FACT?

It's the freaken Washington Post?

My God what do you mean by that?
Are you actually saying that you are putting your total theory and faith in an article in a paper that is called WP?
Did this paper aso not print articles regarding WMD in Iraq? And about nuclear bombs in Iran?
Are you totally mad?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276706


I'm saying it was on the front page, nothing more, nothing less.

Make of it what you will.

Attacking the messenger is the sign of a young soul.

Last Edited by Michael Lee Hill on 05/19/2009 05:16 AM
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
You're delusional.


sherlock
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 672861


I am not delusional, this article was on the front page of the Washington times, Your delusional if you are saying otherwise.

See, that is reality, It happened. See how FACTS have that extra oooommmfffffff behind them?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 276706
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Is this OP on drugs?

Because I posted an article from the Washington Post? What does that have to do with drugs?
 Quoting: Michael Lee Hill

No, not because of what you posted but because of your attitude towards it. No one is targeting the article for we all know it was not true, but they do think you are on drugs because you are totally out of you head in reason, sense and logic.
Where is your solid proof regardin PX being here.
It may or may not exist according to old text but you can not claim its true based on an article by a paper regardless of what it is called and known for a fact for printing lies.
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Man, can you make stuff up, The only thing I ever said about the May 25th show is that I have no idea what it is about?
Prove me wrong because you can't.
Actually how telling that you have to resort to Lying, tell's much about your character no?


The first page of this thread isn't a lie:
Thread: REAL TRUTH ABOUT 25TH MAY 2009 GLOBAL EVENT pin!!!

Please note how in response to the OP claiming that it's just
a TV show you write: "I think you are wrong, It is time"

Not only that you called Hoaxland a "hero". It is to laugh.
 Quoting: DrPostman


What I said and it's clear to anybody who follows that link you posted, here is what I said


By the way, Yes I have some connections with the History channel and still do but I know nothing about this new show, just so you know.

Do you think the people here at GLP are that stupid that they will not realize you are lying?

Why?
Planet X Mysterian
User ID: 681809
United States
05/19/2009 05:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
I was in the DC areas at the time, and I remember when this story came out. And then you heard nothing, it was like, "We made a mistake, it was just some dust on the lens of the telescope, sorry."
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
There is no lie. Your words show your support for it being
something it isn't.
 Quoting: DrPostman



Again, here are my words on the subject...
By the way, Yes I have some connections with the History channel and still do but I know nothing about this new show, just so you know.

Do I think they will be releasing something of great import?

Yes, I believe it is time.
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
I was in the DC areas at the time, and I remember when this story came out. And then you heard nothing, it was like, "We made a mistake, it was just some dust on the lens of the telescope, sorry."
 Quoting: Planet X Mysterian 681809

Ya, And imagine bringing this WP Planet X article up on a conspiracy message board? How dare me. :-)

Last Edited by Michael Lee Hill on 05/19/2009 05:32 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 276706
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:32 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
OP, you must understand this:
26 years ago, no one ever thought about near miss objects. No one ever worried about comets etc. When the article appeared in the paper and on the news in UK, no one was worried about it. No one tohught "my God, we are doomed" because in those days no one was interested in such things as it is today. The article was not viewd as a doom or a warning. People just read it and thought nothing of it. No one thought for a moment that this planet is going to come near and cause problems for the world, because in those days they did not think as today.
So the reason for the article being pulled the following day was not because of fear of doom etc. No one gave a shit. I remember in UK, not a single person ever talked about it, because it was not an issue.
The article was pulled because it was a mistake and not true. Not because it was doom and they didn't want anyone to know.
I suspect you were not around in those days or were very very young and have no idea of how people thought in those days.
This PX thing only became famous because of Stichin, Nancy and a few other cooks.
Stichin has some ideas regarding certain events that might have taken place but you must not take this as gospol, otherwise you run the risk of becoming the number one sheeple on the planet.
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
The article was pulled because it was a mistake and not true. Not because it was doom and they didn't want anyone to know.
I suspect you were not around in those days or were very very young and have no idea of how people thought in those days.
This PX thing only became famous because of Stichin, Nancy and a few other cooks.
Stichin has some ideas regarding certain events that might have taken place but you must not take this as gospol, otherwise you run the risk of becoming the number one sheeple on the planet.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276706



Again, none of you sitchen, Nibiru debunkers/shills have a clue, I was contacted by NSA black ops, That is fact, I don't care if you believe me or not, I know it.

They supplied me with the whole Sitchen Library.

That speaks more to me than you folks saying it's so.....Crazy.

Why did they supply me with Sitchens work?

Why is James of the Wingmakers now speaking on the Anunnaki, Why is Bob Dean?

There is some way more "with it" people supporting Nibiru than you debunkers....Sorry.

Peace,
Michael

Last Edited by Michael Lee Hill on 05/19/2009 05:38 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 276706
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
OP, no disrespect to you but i would really like to know how old you are?
I am over 50 years old and live in UK. I know what it was like before internet, before cable TV, before cell phones and before video games, and i have seen how it has all changed and with the change how much doom , planet this and planet that has become the fashion. Believe me, in a few year it will change in to some other hobby and comets, Aliens and end of the world stuff will be the thing of the past.
This is just a phase and a new toy the Western world is playing with. Too much info, too quickly in the wrong hands can have this effect. It will settle eventually.
20 years from now you will be looking back and quietly be embaressed about your old thoughts.peace
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
OP, no disrespect to you but i would really like to know how old you are?
I am over 50 years old and live in UK. I know what it was like before internet, before cable TV, before cell phones and before video games, and i have seen how it has all changed and with the change how much doom , planet this and planet that has become the fashion. Believe me, in a few year it will change in to some other hobby and comets, Aliens and end of the world stuff will be the thing of the past.
This is just a phase and a new toy the Western world is playing with. Too much info, too quickly in the wrong hands can have this effect. It will settle eventually.
20 years from now you will be looking back and quietly be embaressed about your old thoughts.peace
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276706



I have met the Anunnaki face to face

I have filmed the Anunnaki over lake erie, My black ops buddies confirmed they are the Anunnaki, And the incoming, not those who are here. My UFO footage has been featured on Fox News, CBS news, Coast to Coast, Rense.com, hbccufo.org and in the feature films UFO's Unplugged with Dan Aykroyd, and David Sereda's latest UFO film From Here to Andromeda which i also Co-Produced.

I was most recently on the History Channels "UFO Hunters" where they also proved my blood is not even "Normal" Human Blood.

I will be embaressed over nothing I have done or said because it's all the truth.

I just turned 41 BTW

Last Edited by Michael Lee Hill on 05/19/2009 05:48 AM
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Ya, And imagine bringing this WP Planet X article up on a conspiracy message board? How dare me. :-)


Yea, like it's NEVER been posted before. How many hundreds of
times is enough for you?
 Quoting: DrPostman

It's the perfect amount of times being posted right now. That's why I needed to post it. Just one more time. hf
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 05:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
Again, none of you sitchen, Nibiru debunkers/shills have a clue, I was contacted by NSA black ops, That is fact, I don't care if you believe me or not, I know it.
They supplied me with the whole Sitchen Library.
That speaks more to me than you folks saying it's so.....Crazy.
Why did they supply me with Sitchens work?
Why is James of the Wingmakers now speaking on the Anunnaki, Why is Bob Dean?
There is some way more "with it" people supporting Nibiru than you debunkers....Sorry.
Peace,
Michael


Why would the NSA do that? Do you know what the NSA does?
 Quoting: DrPostman


Of coarse I know what they do?


I know because of very real "Behind the scenes" folks have contacted me, The ACIO and Labyrinth Group are very real.

Within the ACIO, there are 14 distinct levels of security clearance. Those who are at level 12 and above are aware of the ET Technology Transfer Program (TTP), and they, according to Dr. Neruda, are about 120 in number, and are primarily in India, Belgium, and the United States. There are only 7 who have level 14 clearance, and they are the Directors of Intelligence, Security, Research, Special Projects, Operations, Information Systems, and Communications.

These Directors report to the Executive Director, who is known simply as “Fifteen”, which is the unique classification that is reserved for the head of the ACIO. Fifteen, in the eyes of Dr. Neruda, is the most powerful human on the planet, and what I think he meant by “powerful” is that Fifteen is able to deploy technologies that are well in advance to any that our world’s governments have access to. However, Dr. Neruda portrayed Fifteen and his seven Directors as a benevolent force, not a hostile or controlling force.

The eight people who comprise this inner sanctum of the ACIO are in possession of radical technologies that have been part of the Corteum TTP. However, there were also other extraterrestrial technologies that had been derived from recoveries of spacecraft or other alien artifacts, including various discoveries contained in ancient texts that had never been revealed before. All of this information and technology has been collected and developed within the ACIO scientific core – all of whom possess clearances of level 12 or higher.

This scientific core is called the Labyrinth Group, and consists of both men and women who have utilized the Corteum intelligence accelerator technologies to their advantage, and have created a secret organization within the ACIO. When Dr. Neruda was explaining this to me, it got so complicated that I asked him if he could draw me a visual diagram of how all of these organizations worked. (Click here to see a rendering of this diagram.)

The Labyrinth Group consists of all the personnel within the ACIO that qualify for levels 12, 13, and 14 clearance. Fifteen is the leader of this most secret organization. It was split from the ACIO to enable secrecy from the NSA and lower ranking members of the ACIO, which would facilitate the Labyrinth Group’s agenda to create its own applications of the Corteum TTP. The Labyrinth Group is in possession of the pure technologies derived from the Corteum TTP. It takes these technologies and dilutes them to the point where the ACIO or Special Projects Laboratory will sell them to private industry and government agencies, (which includes the military).

This secret organization is the most powerful organization on earth in Dr. Neruda’s opinion, but they do not choose to exercise their power in a way that makes them visible. Thus, their power is only discernible to their members. For about 40 years they have accumulated considerable wealth apart from the NSA’s oversight. They have managed to build their own security technologies that prevent detection from intelligence agencies like the CIA or MI5. They are, for all practical purposes, in total control of their agenda – perhaps this is what makes them a unique organization.

Dr. Neruda had a clearance of level 12 and was still kept from vital information that only the Director level was aware. And it was assumed that even Fifteen kept vital information from his Directors, though this was never a certainty. The symbol used by the Labyrinth Group is four concentric circles. Each circle representing a clearance level (12, 13, 14, 15), and each circle had a unique insight into the agenda of the Labyrinth Group, and its coordination with the Corteum.

Fifteen was an enigma to everyone within the Labyrinth Group. He had been a physicist before he became the Executive Director of the ACIO. He was a renegade because he never interacted with the protocols and the political environment of academia. He operated outside of the institutions and was selected to be part of the ACIO because of his combination of brainpower, independence, and relative obscurity within scientific circles. He was one of the first to make contact with the Corteum and establish communication with them. The Corteum essentially appointed Fifteen as their liaison to the ACIO, and Fifteen became the first to utilize the intelligence accelerator technologies that the Corteum initially offered.

These technologies not only enhance cognitive abilities, memory, and higher order thinking skills, but also enhance the consciousness of the individual so that they can utilize the newly gained intelligence in a non-invasive manner. Meaning, they don’t exploit their intelligence for personal gain at the expense of others. This apparent increase in both Fifteen’s IQ and ethical consciousness caused him to create the Labyrinth Group in order to retain the pure-state technologies of the Corteum TTP from the NSA.

What technologies are released to the NSA are diluted forms of the pure-state technology, which are significantly less potent in their military and surveillance applications. What I expected to hear from Dr. Neruda was a secret organization of intelligent, evil elitists – individuals intent on exploitation and control. Why else would they want to hide beneath the cloak of such incredible secrecy?

The answer, according to Dr. Neruda, was surprising. The Labyrinth Group view themselves as the only group with sufficient intellect and technology to develop a specific form of time travel technology. They are essentially focused on this agenda because they desire to prevent future hostilities that they believe will occur unless this technology is developed. The Corteum is assisting, but despite their considerable intellects, they have been unable to develop this technology.

What I’m about to tell you will seem impossible to believe, but again, I’m only reporting what my notes say based on my initial conversations with Dr. Neruda. He explained to me that there are as many as 12 different extraterrestrial races currently involved in the past, present, and future of earth and its destiny. The ACIO, because of its mission with the NSA, is the most knowledgeable group about the various agendas of these 12 alien races.

Peace,
Michael

Last Edited by Michael Lee Hill on 05/19/2009 05:58 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 276706
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 05:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
I have met the Anunnaki face to face

I have filmed the Anunnaki over lake erie, My black ops buddies confirmed they are the Anunnaki, And the incoming, not those who are here. My UFO footage has been featured on Fox News, CBS news, Coast to Coast, Rense.com, hbccufo.org and in the feature films UFO's Unplugged with Dan Aykroyd, and David Sereda's latest UFO film From Here to Andromeda which i also Co-Produced.

I was most recently on the History Channels "UFO Hunters" where they also proved my blood is not even "Normal" Human Blood.

I will be embaressed over nothing I have done or said because it's all the truth.

I just turned 41 BTW
 Quoting: Michael Lee Hill

OP, again with all due respect you are only thinking from an American point of view and not a globaly minded human.
Everything you said above does not make your credentials any better.(for American mind yes, but not for a global mind). All the networks and programmes you mentioned have no credibility in UK/Europe or the rest of the world. They are all regarded as a light hearted or highly propeganda channels.
For God's sake, how can you possibly use a silly programme such as C2C to give yourself credit?
I am somewhat sad to know that you tend to mix fantasy with reality, so much so that you are not able to tell which is which.
You list so many credentials and yet all you have to do is sit and ponder for a moment with a little bit of logic, sense and reason. That is all its needed to tell the truth from fantasy.
These programmes airing your views by no means are proof of your knowingness. At least not outside American fantasy.peace
Michael Lee Hill (OP)

User ID: 677224
United States
05/19/2009 06:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
I have met the Anunnaki face to face

I have filmed the Anunnaki over lake erie, My black ops buddies confirmed they are the Anunnaki, And the incoming, not those who are here. My UFO footage has been featured on Fox News, CBS news, Coast to Coast, Rense.com, hbccufo.org and in the feature films UFO's Unplugged with Dan Aykroyd, and David Sereda's latest UFO film From Here to Andromeda which i also Co-Produced.

I was most recently on the History Channels "UFO Hunters" where they also proved my blood is not even "Normal" Human Blood.

I will be embaressed over nothing I have done or said because it's all the truth.

I just turned 41 BTW

OP, again with all due respect you are only thinking from an American point of view and not a globaly minded human.
Everything you said above does not make your credentials any better.(for American mind yes, but not for a global mind). All the networks and programmes you mentioned have no credibility in UK/Europe or the rest of the world. They are all regarded as a light hearted or highly propeganda channels.
For God's sake, how can you possibly use a silly programme such as C2C to give yourself credit?
I am somewhat sad to know that you tend to mix fantasy with reality, so much so that you are not able to tell which is which.
You list so many credentials and yet all you have to do is sit and ponder for a moment with a little bit of logic, sense and reason. That is all its needed to tell the truth from fantasy.
These programmes airing your views by no means are proof of your knowingness. At least not outside American fantasy.peace
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 276706


I don't give a shit if you believe me or not, I really don't care.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 276706
United Kingdom
05/19/2009 06:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: The Washington Post covered the story of Planet X on the front page on December 31, 1983 called "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered."
I don't give a shit if you believe me or not, I really don't care.
 Quoting: Michael Lee Hill

Its not a question of believing you regarding the credit claims you make. Its nither here or there if you were on those programmes or not. That is not the point.
What i am asking you is , on what basis are you making all these claims about PX. Not just on this thread but many other threads you have posted on this subject.
I have no doubt what you have seen you believe to be true and for that matter it is true for you in your reality. But that is your own personal reality that you have created around yourself. Good for you but not any one else.

If you want your reality to become other people's reality then you have to come up with reason, logic and proof. After all, that is the reason for you posting here, isn't it? To offer what you think to be real to others.
1000's of amature astronomers all over the world who post every single find on the net within minutes. How is it that none have offered any info regarding PX?