LUNAR eclipse only possible on a Flat Earth.

What does your comment have to do with this thread?

You can't defend yopur belief, just like most religious fanatics when confronted with contradictions in their faith.


SCIENCE is a Religion = SCIENCE is false!!!

Not at noon.

Punisher...the only poster at GLP too stupid to realize that "noon" means the Sun is ABOVE you.

Hey fawk-head, look above your reply!!!

Greek science is a religion older then Christianity and Islam, and still Posters like you believe blindly!!!

Glp hasn't been the same without you .

Ahhhh....old school trolling


The "Flat-Earthers" were the pre-cursor to today's forum trolls

They were a group formed back in the 60's by several academics to ridicule people who treat science as a religion.

The basic plot was, they would pretend the world was flat and watch the Geeks have a nearly psychotic reaction to the "heresy" against the religion of Science.


The Geeks fell for it hook line and sinker.


It was obvious that the "Flat-Earthers" didn't believe the world was flat ,one of the members was a Gemini astronaut, yet the Geeks held rallies to denounce the members, filed law-suits to try to silence them and circulated petitions to get their tenures terminated....and all along the rest of the country laughed at the Geeks for not getting the joke.


Finally , in the early 90's , with the founding members dying of old age ,the original "Flat-Earthers" finally decided to let the Geeks in on the joke and disbanded.

Did this embarrass the Geeks? No , the Geeks declared "victory" ....they were so self-righteous they couldn't believe the had actually been made fools of for DECADES , so they claim that the "Flat-Earthers" had really believed the world was flat and disbanded because they had lost the argument.

(Remember...one of the members was an astronaut who actually orbited Earth)

Nicholas Copernicus (1473-1543)
Copernicus was the Polish astronomer who put forward the first mathematically based system of planets going around the sun. He attended various European universities, and became a Canon in the Catholic church in 1497. His new system was actually first presented in the Vatican gardens in 1533 before Pope Clement VII who approved, and urged Copernicus to publish it around this time. Copernicus was never under any threat of religious persecution - and was urged to publish both by Catholic Bishop Guise, Cardinal Schonberg, and the Protestant Professor George Rheticus. Copernicus referred sometimes to God in his works, and did not see his system as in conflict with the Bible.
Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1627)
Bacon was a philosopher who is known for establishing the scientific method of inquiry based on experimentation and inductive reasoning. In De Interpretatione Naturae Prooemium, Bacon established his goals as being the discovery of truth, service to his country, and service to the church. Although his work was based upon experimentation and reasoning, he rejected atheism as being the result of insufficient depth of philosophy, stating, "It is true, that a little philosophy inclineth man’s mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion; for while the mind of man looketh upon second causes scattered, it may sometimes rest in them, and go no further; but when it beholdeth the chain of them confederate, and linked together, it must needs fly to Providence and Deity." (Of Atheism)
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
Kepler was a brilliant mathematician and astronomer. He did early work on light, and established the laws of planetary motion about the sun. He also came close to reaching the Newtonian concept of universal gravity - well before Newton was born! His introduction of the idea of force in astronomy changed it radically in a modern direction. Kepler was an extremely sincere and pious Lutheran, whose works on astronomy contain writings about how space and the heavenly bodies represent the Trinity. Kepler suffered no persecution for his open avowal of the sun-centered system, and, indeed, was allowed as a Protestant to stay in Catholic Graz as a Professor (1595-1600) when other Protestants had been expelled!
Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
Galileo is often remembered for his conflict with the Roman Catholic Church. His controversial work on the solar system was published in 1633. It had no proofs of a sun-centered system (Galileo's telescope discoveries did not indicate a moving earth) and his one "proof" based upon the tides was invalid. It ignored the correct elliptical orbits of planets published twenty five years earlier by Kepler. Since his work finished by putting the Pope's favorite argument in the mouth of the simpleton in the dialogue, the Pope (an old friend of Galileo's) was very offended. After the "trial" and being forbidden to teach the sun-centered system, Galileo did his most useful theoretical work, which was on dynamics. Galileo expressly said that the Bible cannot err, and saw his system as an alternate interpretation of the biblical texts.
Rene Descartes (1596-1650)
Descartes was a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher who has been called the father of modern philosophy. His school studies made him dissatisfied with previous philosophy: He had a deep religious faith as a Roman Catholic, which he retained to his dying day, along with a resolute, passionate desire to discover the truth. At the age of 24 he had a dream, and felt the vocational call to seek to bring knowledge together in one system of thought. His system began by asking what could be known if all else were doubted - suggesting the famous "I think therefore I am". Actually, it is often forgotten that the next step for Descartes was to establish the near certainty of the existence of God - for only if God both exists and would not want us to be deceived by our experiences - can we trust our senses and logical thought processes. God is, therefore, central to his whole philosophy. What he really wanted to see was that his philosophy be adopted as standard Roman Catholic teaching. Rene Descartes and Francis Bacon (1561-1626) are generally regarded as the key figures in the development of scientific methodology. Both had systems in which God was important, and both seem more devout than the average for their era.
Isaac Newton (1642-1727)
In optics, mechanics, and mathematics, Newton was a figure of undisputed genius and innovation. In all his science (including chemistry) he saw mathematics and numbers as central. What is less well known is that he was devoutly religious and saw numbers as involved in understanding God's plan for history from the Bible. He did a considerable work on biblical numerology, and, though aspects of his beliefs were not orthodox, he thought theology was very important. In his system of physics, God is essential to the nature and absoluteness of space. In Principia he stated, "The most beautiful system of the sun, planets, and comets, could only proceed from the counsel and dominion on an intelligent and powerful Being."
Robert Boyle (1791-1867)
One of the founders and key early members of the Royal Society, Boyle gave his name to "Boyle's Law" for gases, and also wrote an important work on chemistry. Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "By his will he endowed a series of Boyle lectures, or sermons, which still continue, 'for proving the Christian religion against notorious infidels...' As a devout Protestant, Boyle took a special interest in promoting the Christian religion abroad, giving money to translate and publish the New Testament into Irish and Turkish. In 1690 he developed his theological views in The Christian Virtuoso, which he wrote to show that the study of nature was a central religious duty." Boyle wrote against atheists in his day (the notion that atheism is a modern invention is a myth), and was clearly much more devoutly Christian than the average in his era.
Michael Faraday (1791-1867)
Michael Faraday was the son of a blacksmith who became one of the greatest scientists of the 19th century. His work on electricity and magnetism not only revolutionized physics, but led to much of our lifestyles today, which depends on them (including computers and telephone lines and, so, web sites). Faraday was a devoutly Christian member of the Sandemanians, which significantly influenced him and strongly affected the way in which he approached and interpreted nature. Originating from Presbyterians, the Sandemanians rejected the idea of state churches, and tried to go back to a New Testament type of Christianity.
Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Mendel was the first to lay the mathematical foundations of genetics, in what came to be called "Mendelianism". He began his research in 1856 (three years before Darwin published his Origin of Species) in the garden of the Monastery in which he was a monk. Mendel was elected Abbot of his Monastery in 1868. His work remained comparatively unknown until the turn of the century, when a new generation of botanists began finding similar results and "rediscovered" him (though their ideas were not identical to his). An interesting point is that the 1860's was notable for formation of the X-Club, which was dedicated to lessening religious influences and propagating an image of "conflict" between science and religion. One sympathizer was Darwin's cousin Francis Galton, whose scientific interest was in genetics (a proponent of eugenics - selective breeding among humans to "improve" the stock). He was writing how the "priestly mind" was not conducive to science while, at around the same time, an Austrian monk was making the breakthrough in genetics. The rediscovery of the work of Mendel came too late to affect Galton's contribution.
William Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907)
Kelvin was foremost among the small group of British scientists who helped to lay the foundations of modern physics. His work covered many areas of physics, and he was said to have more letters after his name than anyone else in the Commonwealth, since he received numerous honorary degrees from European Universities, which recognized the value of his work. He was a very committed Christian, who was certainly more religious than the average for his era. Interestingly, his fellow physicists George Gabriel Stokes (1819-1903) and James Clerk Maxwell (1831-1879) were also men of deep Christian commitment, in an era when many were nominal, apathetic, or anti-Christian. The Encyclopedia Britannica says "Maxwell is regarded by most modern physicists as the scientist of the 19th century who had the greatest influence on 20th century physics; he is ranked with Sir Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein for the fundamental nature of his contributions." Lord Kelvin was an Old Earth creationist, who estimated the Earth's age to be somewhere between 20 million and 100 million years, with an upper limit at 500 million years based on cooling rates (a low estimate due to his lack of knowledge about radiogenic heating).
Max Planck (1858-1947)
Planck made many contributions to physics, but is best known for quantum theory, which revolutionized our understanding of the atomic and sub-atomic worlds. In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft," Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. Planck was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"
Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Einstein is probably the best known and most highly revered scientist of the twentieth century, and is associated with major revolutions in our thinking about time, gravity, and the conversion of matter to energy (E=mc2). Although never coming to belief in a personal God, he recognized the impossibility of a non-created universe. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of him: "Firmly denying atheism, Einstein expressed a belief in "Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the harmony of what exists." This actually motivated his interest in science, as he once remarked to a young physicist: "I want to know how God created this world, I am not interested in this or that phenomenon, in the spectrum of this or that element. I want to know His thoughts, the rest are details." Einstein's famous epithet on the "uncertainty principle" was "God does not play dice" - and to him this was a real statement about a God in whom he believed. A famous saying of his was "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."

Think I put forward the theory that Punisher is a troll, bot, science experiment, joke, committee, or something else a time or two. Or four. Or eight. Or sixteen.

I don't BOTHER intellectually engaging him any more. He is unreachable.

But if you were paying attention, you might have noticed a poster or two that wasn't Punisher and might be interested in learning something. Those, I am willing to spend time on. Even if that time is sometimes reflected in material in a post that appears to be directed to the Self-Punished One.

-- Why does the MOON remain on the ecliptic plane only an hour during the Lunar eclipse?


-- How does the MOON mysteriously rise the 5° above the Earth and begin anew to receive the "sunlight" as seen on this link?

[link to www.metacafe.com]


The FULL MOON can only receive the "sunshine" when the MOON is orbiting 5° above the ecliptic plane unobstructed by the Earth as seen in this link (B).
[link to www.freewebs.com]


HOW THEN DOES THE MOON MANAGE TO RECEIVE THE SUNSHINE (5° above the ecliptic plane) WHILE STILL PARTIALLY IN EARTH'S SHADOW (Umbra-ecliptic plane) WHEN THE MOON ENTERS AND EXITS THE UMBRA STAGE OF THE ECLIPSE.!?!?!?!!!!!!!!

Come on you soulless rejects, answer the above if your intelligence allows you too!!!

Come on you brainless science-turds, come on out of the closet and share with us all your Greek knowlegde ha ha ha!!!!

You're right, OP. Flat Earth does truly exist:

[link to www.fritolay.com]

The Moon and the Sun look flat to me, so the Earth must be flat.

Here's the secret to understand all this thread:
[link to kecy.roumen.cz]

If the Earth is flat, why are there time zones?

You must be one of the most stupidest people on this planet. How the fuck do you seriously believe the earth is still flat?

Seriously?

SERIOUSLY?

FCK and you people here call Christians backwards.

geez!

- Can't answer the question,

- Can't defend your belief,

- Can't debate on the spirit in "trying" to find the truth,

- Can't believe that mankind doesn't have all the answers,


Can only ridicule those trying to better themselves and others in the process. Hey fawktarts, you guys probably laugh and ridicule those who eat wholesome, or those who exercise, heck you two hill-billies must get a chuckle at joggers while riding in you pick-up,

GET BENT!!!!

"..who eat wholesome, or those who exercise, heck you two hill-billies must get a chuckle at joggers while riding in you pick-up."

1). I eat "wholesome".
2). I exercise daily.
3). I'm a hillbilly, and proud of it.
4). Joggers look like douchebags.
5). I don't own a pick up. I drive a Formula.

I've read your posts, and you don't agree with anyone because you feel science is a lie. To tell the truth, I somewhat agree with you.

But as to this topic, you're completely insane, and you need mental help. That, or if I ever win the lottery, I will personally fly you into space so you can see for yourself that you have done nothing but waste your time.

You have an agenda, and nobody is buying it.

Oh, whoops..

If you put this much effort into something worth while, you might make a difference.

Stop deviating and dodging this thread with it legitimate finds, there is a Time Zone thread available under 'Punisher' this one nails your Greek Moon bullcrap on your forehead!

Total eclipse of the Brain!!


Answer the following or you just incapable of free thinking and your brain has been Pretzelized by the Greek institutions, everything you've learned is backwards.


-- Why does the MOON remain on the ecliptic plane only an hour during the Lunar eclipse?


-- How does the MOON mysteriously rise the 5° above the Ecliptic and begin anew to receive the "sunlight" as seen on this link?

[link to www.metacafe.com]


The FULL MOON can only receive the "sunshine" when the MOON is orbiting 5° above the ecliptic plane unobstructed by the Earth as seen in this link (B).
[link to www.freewebs.com]


HOW THEN DOES THE MOON MANAGE TO RECEIVE THE SUNSHINE (5° above the ecliptic plane) WHILE STILL PARTIALLY IN EARTH'S SHADOW (Umbra-ecliptic plane) WHEN THE MOON ENTERS AND EXITS THE UMBRA STAGE OF THE ECLIPSE.!?!?!?!!!!!!!!

It sounds like you know about that nomuse.


It takes one to know one, it does seem strange that any time, day or night, that a moon hoax thread is posted, very shortly after nomuse turns up derided everyone and spamming clavius all over the place.

So do you ever sleep or do anything else besides waiting for a moon hoax thread to be posted? Don't answer, I already know.


So he is unreachable for your abusive and vitriol disinformation indoctrinating, how sad for you.


Ah yes, your always paying attention aren't you nomuse, to the easily led gullible people out their that you can be a right royal bullshit artist too. It is not about learning something, more about those you can scam and bamboozle with your nonsensical science.

You have yet to produce one post on this thread addressing the O-P, its never too late, try, and I'll expose you for the fraud you represent.



-- Why does the MOON remain on the ecliptic plane only an hour during the Lunar eclipse?


-- How does the MOON mysteriously rise the 5° above the Ecliptic and begin anew to receive the "sunlight" as seen on this link?

[link to www.metacafe.com]


The FULL MOON can only receive the "sunshine" when the MOON is orbiting 5° above the ecliptic plane unobstructed by the Earth as seen in this link (B).
[link to www.freewebs.com]


HOW THEN DOES THE MOON MANAGE TO RECEIVE THE SUNSHINE (5° above the ecliptic plane) WHILE STILL PARTIALLY IN EARTH'S SHADOW (Umbra-ecliptic plane) WHEN THE MOON ENTERS AND EXITS THE UMBRA STAGE OF THE ECLIPSE.!?!?!?!!!!!!!!

The conspiracy goes very deep, and wide.

OP, you strike me as a person that is open minded, has it ever stuck you as strange that for thousands of years, mankind's scientists preached the truth of the Geocentric model? Then this scientific belief was superseded in the heliocentric model, by the modern gods of science, Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler.

In astronomy, the geocentric model or the Ptolemaic worldview of the universe is the superseded theory that the Earth is the center of the universe and other objects go around it. Belief in this system was common in ancient Greece. It was embraced by both Aristotle and Ptolemy, and most Ancient Greek philosophers assumed that the Sun, Moon, stars, and naked eye planets circle the Earth. Similar ideas were held in ancient China.

The geocentric model held sway into the early modern age; from the late 16th century onward it was gradually replaced by the heliocentric model of Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler. Today, geocentric cosmology survives as a literary element within alternate history and science fiction.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

Perhaps this is why 'No' real live video feed of space from 'any' satellites is allowed to be streamed to the general public. And what is shown, is not real, and is all faked to hide the 'truth' of outer space.

Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,

1.00794 + 1.00794 - (some mass) = 4.002602

Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,

1.00794 + 1.00794 - (some mass) = 4.002602

Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,

Hydrogen — Atomic Mass: 1.00794

Helium — Atomic Mass: 4.002602

Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,

1.00794 + 1.00794 - (some mass) = 4.002602

Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,

"The fusion of the sun is the reaction in which two atoms of hydrogen combine together, or fuse, to form an atom of helium. In the process some of the mass of the hydrogen is converted into energy."

Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,

THE MATH

1.00794 + 1.00794 - (some mass) = 4.002602

Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,
Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,Ha,H​a,Ha,Ha,Ha,

----------------------------------

"'OP, you strike me as a person that is open minded, has it ever stuck you as strange that for thousands of years, mankind's scientists preached the truth of the Geocentric model? Then this scientific belief was superseded in the heliocentric model, by the modern gods of science, Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler.'"

Thank-you, and yes it has occurred to me, it was prophesied long ago in a very old book that has definitely changed my life. Hope you never stop questioning A/C 679277. There is more to life then meets the eye!

Fake Colors in Hubble Photos of Outer Space

We are often dazzled by the beautiful color photographs, taken by the Hubble orbital telescope, of vast stellar structures in outer space. The problem is, the colors in the photos are fake. The Hubble takes digital images in black and white--a gray scale. Then NASA artists add colors to the different bandwidths on the b&w images. If we were in space and had super powerful eyes, we would not see the colorful images presented in the NASA photos. Space is mostly black with white light (look at the night sky), except for some white light that has been refracted through some space lens or reflected by some space surface and except for rare, single element emitters that have a radiation frequency that can be perceived by our eyes.
[link to shroudedindoubt.typepad.com]

Most of the Hubble photos that are presented to the public, are images created by fantasy space artists, none of it is real.

All the Hubble does is make larger, a very distant blurry image of stars or space locations. The blurriness is still in the enlarged image. So the NASA space artists give the images more 'imagination' by taken away any blurriness and fuzziness. They make the images more solid, add in all the color, and also add in depth, shadowing, ect. In the end they are only unreal fantasy made images of something that is still unclear and blurry.

The Asteroid Belt is non-existent --- PROOF!
Thread: The Asteroid Belt is non-existent --- PROOF!

Misleading. Black is the absence of all colors; white is the presence of all (visible) colors. The correct term is "monochromatic". Idiot.

NASA takes color images (sometimes "false-color" images using non-visible wavelengths) and boosts the contrast and saturation so people can see what's going on in the photo.

And NASA carefully hides their manipulation of the public-release images. The fact that they have been manipulated, that they are false-color, is only available to those who know how to read.