Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 3,370 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,983,900
Pageviews Today: 2,898,235Threads Today: 857Posts Today: 16,599
09:24 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
walt

User ID: 14525614
South Africa
04/16/2012 01:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
This new entry by Astrogal is priceless:

***********************

[link to poleshift.ning.com]


"Comment by astrogal50 28 minutes ago

@Martin GD: Whatever the Canadian Establishment may be claiming about geology and earthquakes, it is important to remember that the cover up of Planet X and the pending pole shift is massive and widespread. No one is going to admit the truth about the real cause of the increase in frequency and magnitude of quakes, including in unusual locations. ANY explanation is better, including the Establishment Lie going around now that somehow melting glaciers are causing earthquakes.

 Quoting: Menow 14092435


In fact, it's so good (the cover-up) that not a single person has seen it...LOL!
my rugby website at [link to www.lionsworld.co.za]
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/16/2012 01:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Then I was right and Nancy has it backward. Everything Nancy and "Zetas" say about the location of the "Dark Twin" from that image is just right out the window. Now I wonder... will anybody there read this and tell her?
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


No. Because if they did, she'd delete their post and ban them...even if they were a die harder supporter simply trying to point out a mistake.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Interesting little observation. On both the 04/09/2012 and 04/13/2012 images that show the supposed dark twin, the Moon was at an azimuth of roughly 90°.

Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that what we have is a classic lens flare caused by an off-side image (i.e., the Moon).

Of course, Nancy spins this into light bending and other bullshit she doesn't understand.

I'm surprised that the ning moderators haven't deleted the post saying it's a lens flare.

Of course, as before, I've done a PDF capture of that thread on the nigh to preserve things for posterity.
 Quoting: bob_909


So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error.
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 14541857
New Zealand
04/16/2012 06:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So... the ningers have found a moment in a vid from Neumayer where the "object" is seen overlapping the building, proving that it's a flare. I'm not sure how Nancy is going to spin that.

OMG. Nancy has CHANGED the "Zetatalk" since last night to reflect what I/we pointed out here- that the camera is FACING THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. In other words, she has reversed her previous statement that the came was FACING NORTH and just added some incomprehensible gobbldygook to RE-"explain" things.

Did anyone get a capture from last night of that page?
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


"....and just added some incomprehensible gobbldygook to RE-"explain" things....


Something that Ms LIEDer has truly mastered enguard over the years to fool the gullible. Lol, it's ALL she's got!!
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 14541857
New Zealand
04/16/2012 06:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hi everybody,
Just dropped in to wish everyone a happy April 17th, did Hap get his steak dinner ?

Keep up the good work Melfey !
 Quoting: prof-rabbit nli 14522853


Hi there, Prof-rabbit.

Yes; Hap did indeed receive his "steak dinner"......well eventually.

Loneranger
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7468171
United States
04/16/2012 07:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Then I was right and Nancy has it backward. Everything Nancy and "Zetas" say about the location of the "Dark Twin" from that image is just right out the window. Now I wonder... will anybody there read this and tell her?
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


No. Because if they did, she'd delete their post and ban them...even if they were a die harder supporter simply trying to point out a mistake.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Interesting little observation. On both the 04/09/2012 and 04/13/2012 images that show the supposed dark twin, the Moon was at an azimuth of roughly 90°.

Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that what we have is a classic lens flare caused by an off-side image (i.e., the Moon).

Of course, Nancy spins this into light bending and other bullshit she doesn't understand.

I'm surprised that the ning moderators haven't deleted the post saying it's a lens flare.

Of course, as before, I've done a PDF capture of that thread on the nigh to preserve things for posterity.
 Quoting: bob_909


So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


To my amusement, that post is still on the ning!

Tom
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 7468171
United States
04/16/2012 07:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on
the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above
the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view,
in fact, but would require a solid west view."


Here's what is posted now:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction."

Second paragraph (original):

"The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base."
At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space behind the dark side of the
Earth. DT is behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking north from the station would see it on their left, which is what the photo showed."

...and what is posted now:

"The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base." At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space from the dark side of the Earth. Dark Twin is now rising in the cam from the west, seen more distinctly as the cam turns with the rotation of the Earth to look toward the West. Almost behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking South from the station at about Latitude 60 would see it passing from right to left, which is what other photos show.

As for her image from skymap, she is obviously unable to use it properly. She's probably got it set for Wisconsin and is incapable of figuring out how to change it to the coordinates for the Neumayer Station and set the correct time zone (Neumayer has no offset for GMT).
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on
the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above
the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view,
in fact, but would require a solid west view."


Here's what is posted now:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction."

Second paragraph (original):

"The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base."
At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space behind the dark side of the
Earth. DT is behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking north from the station would see it on their left, which is what the photo showed."

...and what is posted now:

"The cam shot that matches the capture states "View from the communications radome to the north side of the base." At midnight GMT the station is positioned such that the cam is looking out into space from the dark side of the Earth. Dark Twin is now rising in the cam from the west, seen more distinctly as the cam turns with the rotation of the Earth to look toward the West. Almost behind the Earth in its orbit and also falling outside the orbit to be a bit behind the Earth. Thus someone (cam) looking South from the station at about Latitude 60 would see it passing from right to left, which is what other photos show.

As for her image from skymap, she is obviously unable to use it properly. She's probably got it set for Wisconsin and is incapable of figuring out how to change it to the coordinates for the Neumayer Station and set the correct time zone (Neumayer has no offset for GMT).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7468171


Yes. What about the actual "Zetatalk" below that? The crucial issue is that she has altered the bit between the official "SOZT" and "EOZT" markers.

Can all this be made to appear as a screenshot on that Zetasquawk site or somewhere?
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 12:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...


No. Because if they did, she'd delete their post and ban them...even if they were a die harder supporter simply trying to point out a mistake.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Interesting little observation. On both the 04/09/2012 and 04/13/2012 images that show the supposed dark twin, the Moon was at an azimuth of roughly 90°.

Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that what we have is a classic lens flare caused by an off-side image (i.e., the Moon).

Of course, Nancy spins this into light bending and other bullshit she doesn't understand.

I'm surprised that the ning moderators haven't deleted the post saying it's a lens flare.

Of course, as before, I've done a PDF capture of that thread on the nigh to preserve things for posterity.
 Quoting: bob_909


So, Bob, will you post that capture? I think it will show that Nancy altered the Zetatalk on that page the next morning to hide her error.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


To my amusement, that post is still on the ning!

Tom
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7468171


Right, it is. Nancy just used it as an example for the flock as to what will happen if you question anything the almighty "Zetas" proclaim. Heh.
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 01:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on
the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above
the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view,
in fact, but would require a solid west view."


Here's what is posted now:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction."

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7468171


I think Nancy actually had one bit right the first time, but then reversed it to being wrong the second time. It's in red. She clearly has no idea what she is talking about.
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 01:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's the original text from the capture I did on 4/13:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on
the left) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above
the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a north view,
in fact, but would require a solid west view."


Here's what is posted now:

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction."

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 7468171


I think Nancy actually had one bit right the first time, but then reversed it to being wrong the second time. It's in red. She clearly has no idea what she is talking about.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


Wait... now *I'm* concused- I think what I just posted is wrong... at least I will ADMIT it!
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
"Concused". Pretty funny. Of course I meant confused.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
04/17/2012 04:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Pretty red handed nabbing of changing prophecy after the fact.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 2457378
Canada
04/17/2012 04:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And then there's Free Store....who moved his family, built a bunker and prepared for the end. Then - nothing happened. But instead of realizing the error of his ways, he continued to cling to his belief that "Planet X" was coming. His wife, on the other hand, did come back to reality. She tried to get Free Store to give up on "Planet X" but he wouldn't - so she left.

:free:

Free Store is so dedicated to Nancy and "Planet X" that, in August 2007, he declared he would commit suicide in September if it didn't show up. Fortunately, he didn't...but only because he claimed "Planet X" did show up. When "debunkers" tried to discuss the situation with him, he claimed to have called the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and filed a report with them that if anything should happen to him they should investigate the "debunkers" on this thread. What a laugh. Not ONE "debunker" ever threatened him...if anything, the RCMP would find that the only one who threatened him harm was himself.

Now, here we are several years later...and instead of admitting the errors of his ways, he has simply disappeared. Pretty much like we predicted he would.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker
Free Store
User ID: 2457378
Canada
04/17/2012 05:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And then there's Free Store....who moved his family, built a bunker and prepared for the end. Then - nothing happened. But instead of realizing the error of his ways, he continued to cling to his belief that "Planet X" was coming. His wife, on the other hand, did come back to reality. She tried to get Free Store to give up on "Planet X" but he wouldn't - so she left.

:free:

Free Store is so dedicated to Nancy and "Planet X" that, in August 2007, he declared he would commit suicide in September if it didn't show up. Fortunately, he didn't...but only because he claimed "Planet X" did show up. When "debunkers" tried to discuss the situation with him, he claimed to have called the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and filed a report with them that if anything should happen to him they should investigate the "debunkers" on this thread. What a laugh. Not ONE "debunker" ever threatened him...if anything, the RCMP would find that the only one who threatened him harm was himself.

Now, here we are several years later...and instead of admitting the errors of his ways, he has simply disappeared. Pretty much like we predicted he would.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift.....
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
04/17/2012 06:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Yes. What about the actual "Zetatalk" below that? The crucial issue is that she has altered the bit between the official "SOZT" and "EOZT" markers.

Can all this be made to appear as a screenshot on that Zetasquawk site or somewhere?
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


Original from 04/13/2012 9:14pm

SOZT 4/13/12
Clearly not the Moon (which was nearly Full and in any case behind the cam) nor the Sun (as the object appears in the middle of the night just before and after midnight), this is a capture of the Dark Twin. The cam is on the S Pole, looking North, and as such the cam, or a human viewer, would be looking at midnight directly out into space on the dark side of Earth. Looking to the left is looking West, which is where the Dark Twin rides.

We had warned that the twin would tend to move BEHIND the Earth as these planets are squeezed in the cup, and thence escape by moving back into space behind the Earth. There are also other possibilities, one of which is to have the twin pass the Earth and attempt to escape by moving forward in their shared orbit. At present, the twin is caught slightly behind the Earth in their shared orbit, and moving outside of their orbit back into space.
EOZT

Current:

"SOZT 4/13/12

Clearly not the Moon (which was nearly Full and in any case behind the cam) nor the Sun (as the object appears in the middle of the night just before and after midnight), this is a capture of the Dark Twin. The cam is near the S Pole, looking at the North facing side of the structure, and as such the cam, or a human viewer, would be hanging upside down looking directly out into space on the dark side of Earth. Where the Dark Twin should be riding to the West, behind the Earth in their shared orbit, it appears to be almost overhead, directly behind and somewhat to the South of the Earth.



We had warned that the twin would tend to move BEHIND the Earth as these planets are squeezed in the cup, and thence escape by moving back into space behind the Earth, passing the Earth in their shared orbit. We mentioned these possibilities, that the Dark Twin would pass the Earth and attempt to escape by moving forward in their shared orbit. At present, the twin is caught behind the Earth in their shared orbit, and moving along outside of their orbit behind the Earth out in space. It is trying to evade conflict with the Earth by dropping below the Ecliptic somewhat, as it attempt to slide past the Earth.

EOZT

Significant changes between the original and what is currently posted. I should note, however, that I have not highlighted all the differences between the two versions of the post.

As for the pdf capture that I copied the original post from, it has not been altered in any way except to extract the one page from the original nine page document.

capture: [link to www.zetasquawk.com]

I should also note that she has a big problem with directions. The camera is not facing WEST, it is facing EAST. I will be providing an image capture from the camera that shows the Moon in the sky with a comparison image from Cartes du Ciel for the same position, date and time.

Last Edited by bob_909 on 04/17/2012 08:00 PM
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 14481685
United States
04/17/2012 06:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
What is this "cup" Nancy keep talking about?
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 14608467
New Zealand
04/17/2012 08:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift.....
 Quoting: Free Store 2457378


lolatu

Yes it was quite obvious that you had a longtime burning desire to "bed" and eventually "marry" your doomsday "wetdream", aka Ms Nancy LIEDer, before the geographical poleshift that never was.

lol4me fortunately for Ms LIEDer her sole "handmaiden" desires were towards her glorious Overlords, The Zetas, thus preventing her from ever having to address your pathetic attempts, Mr FrEaKy, to persuade Nancy to move in with you in your secluded "doomsday" bunker way out there in the dense woods of Canada.

Now crawl back from whence you came you freaken loon

Mexcited
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 14608467
New Zealand
04/17/2012 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I think Nancy actually had one bit right the first time, but then reversed it to being wrong the second time. It's in red. She clearly has no idea what she is talking about.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


100percent
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
04/17/2012 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's the rather quickly put together page showing which way the Neumayer Station III camera is facing.


[link to www.zetasquawk.com]
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
04/17/2012 09:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift.....
 Quoting: Free Store 2457378


This is proof positive that either Nancy or her minions monitor what goes on here. Free Store hasn't been around here in a long time. Someone must have told him.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 04/17/2012 09:32 PM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
04/17/2012 10:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Thanks for all them years of laughs, turkey. Never married but maybe after the Pole Shift.....
 Quoting: Free Store 2457378


This is proof positive that either Nancy or her minions monitor what goes on here. Free Store hasn't been around here in a long time. Someone must have told him.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Freaky probably never left, and even one as rock hard stupid as he is must get tired of his manifest shortcomings being pointed out at such great length.
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 10:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's the rather quickly put together page showing which way the Neumayer Station III camera is facing.


[link to www.zetasquawk.com]
 Quoting: bob_909


I think Nancy NOW says the cam faces south, but also says that as Earth rotates the cam looks west. As usual, what she says is pretty confusing- intentionally so, I suspect.
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
04/17/2012 10:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's the rather quickly put together page showing which way the Neumayer Station III camera is facing.


[link to www.zetasquawk.com]
 Quoting: bob_909


I think Nancy NOW says the cam faces south, but also says that as Earth rotates the cam looks west. As usual, what she says is pretty confusing- intentionally so, I suspect.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


Nancy is always confused.

"The shot was taken on 4/10 at 22:00 GMT, so from the dark side of the Earth, looking slightly toward the WEST (on the right) but basically out into space. The Moon is to the West also, but SW at 240 degrees, is supposed to be above the Ecliptic (confirmed with Skymap) and 3/4 full, so this is not the Moon. The Moon would not be in a South view, in fact, but would require the cam to be looking in the other direction."

Based on a quick comparison with the image I posted and Cartes du Ciel, the camera faces roughly 125° azimuth.

As for her claiming that the Moon would be in the west, on 4/09/12 (that's the timestamp on her posted image, not 4/10/12), the Moon at Neumayer Station III would be at roughly 89° azimuth with an altitude of roughly 21 altitude (Cartes du Ciel numbers).

Obviously, she doesn't even know how to use a simple program like Skymap.

I have no idea where she's coming up with the "...as the Earth rotates the cam looks west...". Does she think in Antarctica directions change because it's so far south?

Last Edited by bob_909 on 04/17/2012 11:00 PM
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 11:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's the rather quickly put together page showing which way the Neumayer Station III camera is facing.


[link to www.zetasquawk.com]
 Quoting: bob_909


I think Nancy NOW says the cam faces south, but also says that as Earth rotates the cam looks west. As usual, what she says is pretty confusing- intentionally so, I suspect.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435



[link to poleshift.ning.com]

"Zetas" say(now, since Nancy changed it):


"...and as such the cam, or a human viewer, would be hanging upside down looking directly out into space on the dark side of Earth. Where the Dark Twin should be riding to the West, behind the Earth in their shared orbit, it appears to be almost overhead, directly behind and somewhat to the South of the Earth."

WTF does that even mean?
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 11:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
OMG. Look at this!


"Conceptual Diagram of Dark Twin Positioning"

[link to poleshift.ning.com]
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
04/17/2012 11:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's the rather quickly put together page showing which way the Neumayer Station III camera is facing.


[link to www.zetasquawk.com]
 Quoting: bob_909


I think Nancy NOW says the cam faces south, but also says that as Earth rotates the cam looks west. As usual, what she says is pretty confusing- intentionally so, I suspect.
 Quoting: Menow 14092435



[link to poleshift.ning.com]

"Zetas" say(now, since Nancy changed it):


"...and as such the cam, or a human viewer, would be hanging upside down looking directly out into space on the dark side of Earth. Where the Dark Twin should be riding to the West, behind the Earth in their shared orbit, it appears to be almost overhead, directly behind and somewhat to the South of the Earth."

WTF does that even mean?
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


Makes absolutely no sense. West, overhead, behind, South?

Pray that no one in North Freedom asks her for directions to the local supermarket, they'd find themselves in Canada.
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
04/17/2012 11:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
OMG. Look at this!


"Conceptual Diagram of Dark Twin Positioning"

[link to poleshift.ning.com]
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


That makes no sense either. The first image on that has a sunset image to the right which would be East - don't they know that the Sun sets in the West?
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Menow
User ID: 14092435
United States
04/17/2012 11:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
OMG. Look at this!


"Conceptual Diagram of Dark Twin Positioning"

[link to poleshift.ning.com]
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


That makes no sense either. The first image on that has a sunset image to the right which would be East - don't they know that the Sun sets in the West?
 Quoting: bob_909


Yeah. I looked further into that one. It was taken in Taxas last fall or so, supposedly after the sun went down. It obviously *IS* the sun, through some clouds. Point being- they had the "Dark Twin" somewhere in the same direction as the sun last fall and now they have it the opposite direction.

Funny how the neither of the two people who try to show where things were during this latest "capture" show the location of the moon. It would be obvious that it wasn't behind the cam, as Nancy tries to claim. Heh.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
04/18/2012 06:34 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
[link to poleshift.ning.com]

"Zetas" say(now, since Nancy changed it):


"...and as such the cam, or a human viewer, would be hanging upside down looking directly out into space on the dark side of Earth. Where the Dark Twin should be riding to the West, behind the Earth in their shared orbit, it appears to be almost overhead, directly behind and somewhat to the South of the Earth."

WTF does that even mean?
 Quoting: Menow 14092435


I have no idea - but Nancy's brain dead followers believe it.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Ironhearts
User ID: 14639248
Canada
04/18/2012 09:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
What you see on these pictures of the Neumayer station are obviously lense flares. You can even look through the objects and they manifest in front of a building.

Nancy`s lame excuse that the earth would bend the light of an object somehow are pretty weird because we can not see such an effect with the naked eye (and of course not with a camera). We would need a phenomenon like a big black hole to be able to do a visible bending of light. Nancy has no idea what she is talking about, as she has not even basic astronomic skills.

But what do you want to expect from nobrainers who run around with old floppy disks to find non-existing planets. Of course they create a lot of lenseflares with this again. Nancy should rename her project in "Lensflaretalk" ...5a

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!