Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,735 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 251,258
Pageviews Today: 347,816Threads Today: 80Posts Today: 1,654
03:36 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 10422385
Canada
06/21/2012 04:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Clif is obviously not worried about the doom he predicts, but he's willing to scam money off others and sell them scary doom and survival gear to keep his boat in the water. The fact that Clif lives in a "danger zone" while encouraging others to flee should be a clue for you, Melfytroll, about his true intentions. After all, just a few months ago he admitted he makes this shit up.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/21/2012 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Ban melfy!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919


30 Days in the cooler for Melfey!!!

Ps. hi everybody !
 Quoting: prof-rabbit nli 17544463


Just 10 days of "normalcy" left!!!!

shocked
 Quoting: **melfy the weasel**


Make it 40 days and 40 nights !!
 Quoting: prof-rabbit nli 17544463


At the very minimum!!!
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
06/21/2012 07:57 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Just 10 days of "normalcy" left!!!!

shocked
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I think you meant to say:

Just 10 days until another failure!!!!

shocked
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
06/21/2012 09:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, today was the summer solstice...although it was cloudy and rainy at Stonehenge. No doubt Nancy will claim the government or the "Zetas" made it that way so no one would be able to see that the the sun didn't line up with the marker and, therefore, notice that the Earth is wobbling. After all, those pesky "Zetas" are just as guilty as the government at covering any evidence of "Planet X."

[link to www.washingtonpost.com]

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 06/22/2012 08:39 AM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 659599
United States
06/22/2012 11:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Just 10 days of "normalcy" left!!!!

shocked
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I think you meant to say:

Just 10 days until another failure!!!!

shocked
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


success
aussie 763624
User ID: 18387463
Australia
06/22/2012 01:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
you know- I am now firmly of the opinion that melfy should be banned from this thread

I know that TLR is the only one that can do it, as the op, but I think he has to be a paid member to do so??

I am willing to pay his fees if this is the case, just to see melfy denied his last trolling platform

melfy is both terminally in denial, and actively supporting people who have caused people to lose their money, friends, family and even their lives

enough is enough, I am willing to put up the $$ to have this sick little liar banned once and for all
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 659599
United States
06/22/2012 02:59 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
you know- I am now firmly of the opinion that melfy should be banned from this thread

I know that TLR is the only one that can do it, as the op, but I think he has to be a paid member to do so??

I am willing to pay his fees if this is the case, just to see melfy denied his last trolling platform

melfy is both terminally in denial, and actively supporting people who have caused people to lose their money, friends, family and even their lives

enough is enough, I am willing to put up the $$ to have this sick little liar banned once and for all
 Quoting: aussie 763624 18387463


And that would be my ultimate VICTORY! For then, I will have pushed the debunkers into doing the **ONE** thing that to date they have PRIDED themselves on --NOT-- doing; i.e., emulating the great villian Nancy Lieder and her penchant for

BanHim

voices that disagree with her - and without behaving in any manner that even begins to rise to the abusive behavior of the debunkers themselves.

BAN ME, and you prove yourselves the rabid hypocrites I have always maintained that from DAY ONE you actually are!!!

IT WILL BE MY LAST AND GREATEST VICTORY!!! I will have decidedly and undeniably unmasked you.

And I am sure there will be plenty of folks who will never tire of reminding you all of that.

For you will be banning me for simply DEFENDING myself in the face of the mountains of abuse that have been heaped on me since day one in this thread. Even that last smilie, which goaded an offer to compensate TLR, was in response to Circuit Breaker's mocking of me.

Apparently "self defense" and "free speech" are not rights to be enjoyed in the <sarcasm>GREAT DEBUNKER THREAD</sarcasm>. - just as they are fading in our greater society as a whole. (US, Canada, Australia, UK - take your pick).

(Of course the debunkers will say I am "paranoid" for saying that, without of course expressly denying that it was in any way an incorrect assertion - for of course IT IS. They'll just never admit it, or discuss it.)

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 06/22/2012 03:24 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/22/2012 05:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Just 10 days of "normalcy" left!!!!

shocked
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


I think you meant to say:

Just 10 days until another failure!!!!

shocked
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


:success:
 Quoting: **melfy the soon to be banned troll**


Nie to see you admit to trolling. Going to be nicer to see your sorry, lying ass BANNED!!!

Hey, i would contribute to a paid membership to TLR to ban this worthless trolling sack of shit too!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 13806508
United States
06/22/2012 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
you know- I am now firmly of the opinion that melfy should be banned from this thread

 Quoting: aussie 763624 18387463


I don't know.

What fun would the thread be without ZetaMax?

I'm fairly certain it would quickly die.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/22/2012 07:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
you know- I am now firmly of the opinion that melfy should be banned from this thread

 Quoting: aussie 763624 18387463


I don't know.

What fun would the thread be without ZetaMax?

I'm fairly certain it would quickly die.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508


I am willing to find out. And as long as liar LIEDer exists this thread will have plenty of comedy gold to laugh at!

BAN melfy!!!
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
06/22/2012 08:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
success
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


You're definitely a troll...but I wouldn't say successful.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/22/2012 09:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
you know- I am now firmly of the opinion that melfy should be banned from this thread

 Quoting: aussie 763624 18387463


I don't know.

What fun would the thread be without ZetaMax?

I'm fairly certain it would quickly die.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508


I am willing to find out. And as long as liar LIEDer exists this thread will have plenty of comedy gold to laugh at!

BAN melfy!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919


>> I am willing to find out.

Of course you are - because you are completely blinded by the need for REVENGE stemming from how you embarrassed yourself during our very first worded exchange. How old are you kid, eighteen, nineteen - twenty at the most? Believe me, your's is not the best way to go about winning friends and influencing people. (And I'm not referring to myself, either)

Get wise kid - not "even". You'll go a lot farther that way.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/22/2012 09:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
success
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


You're definitely a troll...but I wouldn't say successful.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


I'm afraid you're mistaking me for thyself.

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 06/22/2012 09:55 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/22/2012 10:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
you know- I am now firmly of the opinion that melfy should be banned from this thread

 Quoting: aussie 763624 18387463


I don't know.

What fun would the thread be without ZetaMax?

I'm fairly certain it would quickly die.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 13806508


I am willing to find out. And as long as liar LIEDer exists this thread will have plenty of comedy gold to laugh at!

BAN melfy!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919


>> I am willing to find out.

Of course you are - because you are completely blinded by the need for REVENGE stemming from how you embarrassed yourself during our very first worded exchange. How old are you kid, eighteen, nineteen - twenty at the most? Believe me, your's is not the best way to go about winning friends and influencing people. (And I'm not referring to myself, either)

Get wise kid - not "even". You'll go a lot farther that way.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


You talk big for a soon to be banned confessed liar, troll, shill and runner of sock puppets. Project much zippy? Why sure you do!!!

Ban melfy!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/22/2012 10:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Gee, melfy, a person would have to have a heart of stone to read your whine and not laught his ass of at your bleating, whining and crying!
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
06/22/2012 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I'm afraid you're mistaking me for thyself.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Nope.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/22/2012 11:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Gee, melfy, a person would have to have a heart of stone to read your whine and not laught his ass of at your bleating, whining and crying!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919


You really are blind to the whole game aren't you? For starters you're a latecomer. This "contest" between me and the debunkers goes back to at least 2006, and with Nancy well over a decade. The one theme that the debunkers have always boasted the most loudly about was how they would never ban anyone for merely expressing themselves in ways that did not violate GLP rules for the entire site. Surprisingly, they have stayed true to that. Not, in my opinion, because they are true lovers of "free speech", but because it gave them leverage over Nancy, and those who followed her material.

But **YOU** come along and out of a mindless and completely selfish desire for self-gratification, call loudly and repeatedly for my banning, just so you can feel somehow "superior" to me. You could care less about how ANYONE ELSE who visits or enjoys this thread feels about it. And indeed voices have come forward saying they are not in favor of me being banned. But YOU don't care about THEM - oh no. You just want to celebrate your own little personal victory, with no thought about how it might disappoint hundreds of other folks who visit and enjoy the banter of this thread. Just look at the viewcount you self-possessed gratification whore, and note that this thread gets HUNDREDS of views a DAY.

But you don't care about them, about the threads history, or the fact that your victory means the ultimate defeat of not only the debunkers one "claim to fame", but probably the very future of this thread itself.

Consider Menow - who dislikes me almost as much, if not as much as you do. He ignores me, and tries to persuade others to do the same. But he has never called for my outright BANNING. Mainly because he enjoys recounting all the banning activity going on over at the Ning. Calling for my banning would compromise his "moral high ground" - and he knows it.

But that's all lost on you - isn't it??

You are the ultimate hypocrite, and frankly I'm surprised the other debunkers have put up with you at all.

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 06/22/2012 11:50 PM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/22/2012 11:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Gee, melfy, a person would have to have a heart of stone to read your whine and not laught his ass of at your bleating, whining and crying!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919


You really are blind to the whole game aren't you? For starters you're a latecomer. This "contest" between me and the debunkers goes back to at least 2006, and with Nancy well over a decade. The one theme that the debunkers have always boasted the most loudly about was how they would never ban anyone for merely expressing themselves in ways that did not violate GLP rules for the entire site. Surprisingly, they have stayed true to that. Not, in my opinion, because they are true lovers of "free speech", but because it gave them leverage over Nancy, and those who followed her material.

But **YOU** come along and out of a mindless and completely selfish desire for self-gratification, call loudly and repeatedly for my banning, just so you can feel somehow "superior" to me. You could care less about how ANYONE ELSE who visits or enjoys this thread feels about it. And indeed voices have come forward saying they are not in favor of me being banned. But YOU don't care about THEM - oh no. You just want to celebrate your own little personal victory, with no thought about how it might disappoint hundreds of other folks who visit and enjoy the banter of this thread. Just look at the viewcount you self-possessed gratification whore, and note that this thread gets HUNDREDS of views a DAY.

But you don't care about them, about the threads history, or the fact that your victory means the ultimate defeat of not only the debunkers one "claim to fame", but probably the very future of this thread itself.

Consider Menow - who dislikes me almost as much, if not as much as you do. He ignores me, and tries to persuade others to do the same. But he has never called for my outright BANNING. Mainly because he enjoys recounting all the banning activity going on over at the Ning. Calling for my banning would compromise his "moral high ground" - and he knows it.

But that's all lost on you - isn't it??

You are the ultimate hypocrite, and frankly I'm surprised the other debunkers have put up with you at all.
 Quoting: **melfy the soon to be banned**


You do not have a clue who am, zippy.

But we all know who and what you are, you are the asshole who called everyone you disagreed with a shill, who claimed you were a fence sitter, and a shill for every crackpot idea and conman out there. AND, you are an admitted liar, troll, shill and sock puppet runner. Remember bridget, zippy? Sure you do.

BAN melfy!!!!
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/23/2012 12:05 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Gee, melfy, a person would have to have a heart of stone to read your whine and not laught his ass of at your bleating, whining and crying!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919


You really are blind to the whole game aren't you? For starters you're a latecomer. This "contest" between me and the debunkers goes back to at least 2006, and with Nancy well over a decade. The one theme that the debunkers have always boasted the most loudly about was how they would never ban anyone for merely expressing themselves in ways that did not violate GLP rules for the entire site. Surprisingly, they have stayed true to that. Not, in my opinion, because they are true lovers of "free speech", but because it gave them leverage over Nancy, and those who followed her material.

But **YOU** come along and out of a mindless and completely selfish desire for self-gratification, call loudly and repeatedly for my banning, just so you can feel somehow "superior" to me. You could care less about how ANYONE ELSE who visits or enjoys this thread feels about it. And indeed voices have come forward saying they are not in favor of me being banned. But YOU don't care about THEM - oh no. You just want to celebrate your own little personal victory, with no thought about how it might disappoint hundreds of other folks who visit and enjoy the banter of this thread. Just look at the viewcount you self-possessed gratification whore, and note that this thread gets HUNDREDS of views a DAY.

But you don't care about them, about the threads history, or the fact that your victory means the ultimate defeat of not only the debunkers one "claim to fame", but probably the very future of this thread itself.

Consider Menow - who dislikes me almost as much, if not as much as you do. He ignores me, and tries to persuade others to do the same. But he has never called for my outright BANNING. Mainly because he enjoys recounting all the banning activity going on over at the Ning. Calling for my banning would compromise his "moral high ground" - and he knows it.

But that's all lost on you - isn't it??

You are the ultimate hypocrite, and frankly I'm surprised the other debunkers have put up with you at all.
 Quoting: **melfy the soon to be banned**


You do not have a clue who am, zippy.

But we all know who and what you are, you are the asshole who called everyone you disagreed with a shill, who claimed you were a fence sitter, and a shill for every crackpot idea and conman out there. AND, you are an admitted liar, troll, shill and sock puppet runner. Remember bridget, zippy? Sure you do.

BAN melfy!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 4832919


>> You do not have a clue who am, zippy.

Someone without a strong command of English grammer? Or pride in his delivery?

>> who called everyone you disagreed with a shill

An opinion - some would categorize it as "political speech", which in the United States has historically been considered the "most protected" form of speech.

>> who claimed you were a fence sitter

I still claim it. Again, a form of "political speech" - you know, the most protected form?

>> a shill for every crackpot idea and conman out there

Gross exaggeration - but then was what got us off on the wrong foot to begin with, wasn't it?

>> AND, you are an admitted liar, troll, shill and sock puppet runner.

Links? Other than "Bridget"?? The statute of limitations has run on that one. But then you would be the first to abolish those - wouldn't you? (If you even know what they ARE - much less the historical purpose for them.)

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 06/23/2012 12:08 AM
AstromutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
06/23/2012 12:07 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
>> who called everyone you disagreed with a shill

An opinion - some would categorize it as "political speech", which in the United States has historically been considered the "most protected" form of speech.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Defamation is neither political nor protected speech.
astrobanner2
Forum issue? Email me: DrAstroGLP@gmail.com
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/23/2012 12:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
>> who called everyone you disagreed with a shill

An opinion - some would categorize it as "political speech", which in the United States has historically been considered the "most protected" form of speech.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Defamation is neither political nor protected speech.
 Quoting: Astromut


Given there is evidence in the form of mainstream articles that the "government" (read DOD) does indeed hire contractors (through public relations firms) to infiltrate and influence social media, how can such a "speculation" amount to defamation? In order to move forward on a claim of defamation, you have to actually show that you were DEFAMED. Has anyone denied you employment, a plane ticket, or soft toilet tissue because ZetaMax suggested you might have a secondary occupation as a shill? Can you show believable "emotional distress" as a result of such alleged "defamation" - beyond a hernia from laughing too much?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/23/2012 12:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
>> who called everyone you disagreed with a shill

An opinion - some would categorize it as "political speech", which in the United States has historically been considered the "most protected" form of speech.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Defamation is neither political nor protected speech.
 Quoting: Astromut


Given there is evidence in the form of mainstream articles that the "government" (read DOD) does indeed hire contractors (through public relations firms) to infiltrate and influence social media, how can such a "speculation" amount to defamation? In order to move forward on a claim of defamation, you have to actually show that you were DEFAMED. Has anyone denied you employment, a plane ticket, or soft toilet tissue because ZetaMax suggested you might have a secondary occupation as a shill? Can you show believable "emotional distress" as a result of such alleged "defamation" - beyond a hernia from laughing too much?
 Quoting: **melfy the soon to be BANNED**


Your whining, bleating and crying is getting funnier by the message, melfy.

Why do you shill for LIEDer the liar? (oh wait, do liars have to stick together like conmen?)

Why do you shill for cliff the drooling moron?

Why do you shift for crackpots?

cry us a river, melfy!!!

BAN melfy!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
06/23/2012 12:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hate to admit it, but I tend to agree with ZM, here. His banning would serve little purpose.

However, I do wish he wasn't so disingenuous and dishonest with his positions. He often posts things he doesn't believe, or just to inflame. That is contraindicated, if one is truly 'truth-seeking.'

So, apparently your purpose, ZM, is merely to stir the pot, to the point where you are annoying enough to get banned, so that you can claim 'victory.' That is a very good definition of a troll, my friend. And leads to no truth at all.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/23/2012 12:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hate to admit it, but I tend to agree with ZM, here. His banning would serve little purpose.

However, I do wish he wasn't so disingenuous and dishonest with his positions. He often posts things he doesn't believe, or just to inflame. That is contraindicated, if one is truly 'truth-seeking.'

So, apparently your purpose, ZM, is merely to stir the pot, to the point where you are annoying enough to get banned, so that you can claim 'victory.' That is a very good definition of a troll, my friend. And leads to no truth at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


melfy and truth? Mutually incompatible.

melfy is a simple liar and troll.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/23/2012 12:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hate to admit it, but I tend to agree with ZM, here. His banning would serve little purpose.

However, I do wish he wasn't so disingenuous and dishonest with his positions. He often posts things he doesn't believe, or just to inflame. That is contraindicated, if one is truly 'truth-seeking.'

So, apparently your purpose, ZM, is merely to stir the pot, to the point where you are annoying enough to get banned, so that you can claim 'victory.' That is a very good definition of a troll, my friend. And leads to no truth at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


>> So, apparently your purpose, ZM, is merely to stir the pot, to the point where you are annoying enough to get banned, so that you can claim 'victory.' That is a very good definition of a troll, my friend. And leads to no truth at all.

Touche. Point well made. Yes, I admit I have "whooped it up" a bit, but never "wholly" arbitrarily. And no, my "purpose" is not merely to stir the pot, though sometimes out of frustration, I may give it a shake or two. I really am "seeking the truth" in a world where such endeavors are HIGHLY discouraged, ridiculed, and even DEADLY in some cases.

But boy, you'd never know that from reading the posts of THIS thread now would you? (Other than mine of course).

This thread is the closest thing to the stifling suffocating conformity of the academic world that I have yet encountered - outside of academia. Since I couldn't unload and wholly REBEL in that environment, I'm doing so NOW in this one.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
06/23/2012 01:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hate to admit it, but I tend to agree with ZM, here. His banning would serve little purpose.

However, I do wish he wasn't so disingenuous and dishonest with his positions. He often posts things he doesn't believe, or just to inflame. That is contraindicated, if one is truly 'truth-seeking.'

So, apparently your purpose, ZM, is merely to stir the pot, to the point where you are annoying enough to get banned, so that you can claim 'victory.' That is a very good definition of a troll, my friend. And leads to no truth at all.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


>> So, apparently your purpose, ZM, is merely to stir the pot, to the point where you are annoying enough to get banned, so that you can claim 'victory.' That is a very good definition of a troll, my friend. And leads to no truth at all.

Touche. Point well made. Yes, I admit I have "whooped it up" a bit, but never "wholly" arbitrarily. And no, my "purpose" is not merely to stir the pot, though sometimes out of frustration, I may give it a shake or two. I really am "seeking the truth" in a world where such endeavors are HIGHLY discouraged, ridiculed, and even DEADLY in some cases.

But boy, you'd never know that from reading the posts of THIS thread now would you? (Other than mine of course).

This thread is the closest thing to the stifling suffocating conformity of the academic world that I have yet encountered - outside of academia. Since I couldn't unload and wholly REBEL in that environment, I'm doing so NOW in this one.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Have you told your employers you will be banned for your shilling, trolling and general assholery?


Whine some more melfy, you may make everyone die from laughing at you!

BAN melfy!
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
06/23/2012 07:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The one theme that the debunkers have always boasted the most loudly about was how they would never ban anyone for merely expressing themselves in ways that did not violate GLP rules for the entire site.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


There's a big difference between expressing yourself and shilling for people like Clif and Nancy.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/23/2012 08:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The one theme that the debunkers have always boasted the most loudly about was how they would never ban anyone for merely expressing themselves in ways that did not violate GLP rules for the entire site.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


There's a big difference between expressing yourself and shilling for people like Clif and Nancy.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


I'm not shilling for "people" but IDEAS. In Clif's case, I'm shilling for the idea that the future is made up of infinite timelines, but that some of those timelines have a much greater chance of manifesting than others. This notion was expressed by the farsight.org 2012 project. Courtney Brown asserted that they were not "making predictions" but simply reporting the results of their "experiments". With Clif recommending their material, he was essentially "shilling" for them - and I'm shilling for him shilling for them who are shilling for the idea that while predicting the future is "dicey" and fraught with hazards, some EVENTS are so massive in scale, and span so many timelines that they become "visible" enough to TAKE SERIOUS NOTE OF, and diligent steps to PREPARE FOR THEM are wise and warranted.

I'm shilling for IDEAS, which is another way of characterizing "expressing oneself".

You however are SHILLING for the establishment position that everything in academia is "true" (when it isn't), that "extremist" terrorism is the biggest threat to the planet, and black ops sponsored and manipulated terrorism "isn't", etc., etc. - even if just voluntarily. Which of course would be a shame, because there are others getting PAID to promote the very same identical positions and ideas that you are doing for FREE.

Sure - you're "expressing yourself" - stupidly and wrongheadedly of course - perhaps even "cowardly" as well. Because the big, bad truth is just too frightening to accept. Too bad there isn't a pill for that.

Lenin would have called you a "useful idiot".

I have to wonder if the "kid" calling for my banning even knows who "Lenin" is? (And no, he wasn't a member of the Beatles).

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 06/23/2012 08:38 AM
aussie 763624
User ID: 1382632
Australia
06/23/2012 09:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The one theme that the debunkers have always boasted the most loudly about was how they would never ban anyone for merely expressing themselves in ways that did not violate GLP rules for the entire site.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


There's a big difference between expressing yourself and shilling for people like Clif and Nancy.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


I'm not shilling for "people" but IDEAS. In Clif's case, I'm shilling for the idea that the future is made up of infinite timelines, but that some of those timelines have a much greater chance of manifesting than others. This notion was expressed by the farsight.org 2012 project. Courtney Brown asserted that they were not "making predictions" but simply reporting the results of their "experiments". With Clif recommending their material, he was essentially "shilling" for them - and I'm shilling for him shilling for them who are shilling for the idea that while predicting the future is "dicey" and fraught with hazards, some EVENTS are so massive in scale, and span so many timelines that they become "visible" enough to TAKE SERIOUS NOTE OF, and diligent steps to PREPARE FOR THEM are wise and warranted.

I'm shilling for IDEAS, which is another way of characterizing "expressing oneself".

You however are SHILLING for the establishment position that everything in academia is "true" (when it isn't), that "extremist" terrorism is the biggest threat to the planet, and black ops sponsored and manipulated terrorism "isn't", etc., etc. - even if just voluntarily. Which of course would be a shame, because there are others getting PAID to promote the very same identical positions and ideas that you are doing for FREE.

Sure - you're "expressing yourself" - stupidly and wrongheadedly of course - perhaps even "cowardly" as well. Because the big, bad truth is just too frightening to accept. Too bad there isn't a pill for that.

Lenin would have called you a "useful idiot".

I have to wonder if the "kid" calling for my banning even knows who "Lenin" is? (And no, he wasn't a member of the Beatles).
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


sadly, I think melfy is now only just grasping the idea that he is not only not necessary, but his behaviour by most `normal' people is considered borderline psychotic..

at the least...


TLR- I am now decided, melfy has outlived his (very minor) usefulness and has become a liability... I 2nd his banning and repeat my offer- if a paid membership is required for it, I am happy to pay for it
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 18381929
United States
06/23/2012 09:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The one theme that the debunkers have always boasted the most loudly about was how they would never ban anyone for merely expressing themselves in ways that did not violate GLP rules for the entire site.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


There's a big difference between expressing yourself and shilling for people like Clif and Nancy.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


I'm not shilling for "people" but IDEAS. In Clif's case, I'm shilling for the idea that the future is made up of infinite timelines, but that some of those timelines have a much greater chance of manifesting than others. This notion was expressed by the farsight.org 2012 project. Courtney Brown asserted that they were not "making predictions" but simply reporting the results of their "experiments". With Clif recommending their material, he was essentially "shilling" for them - and I'm shilling for him shilling for them who are shilling for the idea that while predicting the future is "dicey" and fraught with hazards, some EVENTS are so massive in scale, and span so many timelines that they become "visible" enough to TAKE SERIOUS NOTE OF, and diligent steps to PREPARE FOR THEM are wise and warranted.

I'm shilling for IDEAS, which is another way of characterizing "expressing oneself".

You however are SHILLING for the establishment position that everything in academia is "true" (when it isn't), that "extremist" terrorism is the biggest threat to the planet, and black ops sponsored and manipulated terrorism "isn't", etc., etc. - even if just voluntarily. Which of course would be a shame, because there are others getting PAID to promote the very same identical positions and ideas that you are doing for FREE.

Sure - you're "expressing yourself" - stupidly and wrongheadedly of course - perhaps even "cowardly" as well. Because the big, bad truth is just too frightening to accept. Too bad there isn't a pill for that.

Lenin would have called you a "useful idiot".

I have to wonder if the "kid" calling for my banning even knows who "Lenin" is? (And no, he wasn't a member of the Beatles).
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


sadly, I think melfy is now only just grasping the idea that he is not only not necessary, but his behaviour by most `normal' people is considered borderline psychotic..

at the least...


TLR- I am now decided, melfy has outlived his (very minor) usefulness and has become a liability... I 2nd his banning and repeat my offer- if a paid membership is required for it, I am happy to pay for it
 Quoting: aussie 763624 1382632


>> his behaviour by most `normal' people is considered borderline psychotic..

"Normal" huh? Normal means "status quo" - you think we have a "good" one? A lot of people think "normal" has become an acronym for "sheeple"?

Or would you dispute that?

No - of course not. You'd rather have me BANNED.

(Do *YOU* know who 'Lenin' was?)

It's a sad day indeed, if "banning" me is the only potent weapon left in the debunkers "vaunted" arsenal of "truth". The one weapon they BRAGGED they would never, ever USE like Nancy Lieder does.

Gee - and I thought the truth was unassailable?

But you probably subscribe instead to the Churchill maxim that the truth needs to be protected with a "bodyguard of lies".

So who's the "liar"?

(Do you even know who 'Churchill' was?)

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 06/23/2012 09:33 AM


News