Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,978 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,754,148
Pageviews Today: 2,597,025Threads Today: 658Posts Today: 15,861
11:39 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
07/23/2012 06:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Is this Planet X? Lurking Near Venus in our View?
[link to poleshift.ning.com]


Is she just extremely cautious or is she going to become rattled?

All her highlights were debunked:

Dark Twin Neumayer 3 in April
Solar eclipse in May
Venus transit in June
PX with moons in CFH-Telescope video
Dark Twin Neumayer 3 just now


.
 Quoting: Hydra


btw: Im watching "Osage Pete" for a while now,
[link to poleshift.ning.com]
Could be a fake-support.

And "xtcpctech",
[link to poleshift.ning.com]
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20081569


Yeah, there HAVE to be people there who are just playing Nancy.
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
07/23/2012 06:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I have to admit that the latest zeta talk Q and A has failed to impress. In fact I'm terribly disappointed. A video of the occultation of Jupiter being passed off by Nancy as a "hoax"... Even I could read the Youtube comments and do a quick google search to find out what was going on.

bsflag

[link to www.youtube.com]
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


omg.
I just went to look for her claims,
she's saying its a laser-pointer aimed at the moon (through a glass):

[link to www.zetatalk.com]
"...
This is not evident from the video, but this is the case, with a light laser pointed at the where the tip of the Moon crescent would appear. The distance between the cam and the Moon, and the cam and the window, differ. Thus in a zoom, there is an adjustment to one, but not the other. This is a fraud. "


Geez..she must be having a hard one these days... so many mistakes, this one even per the Zetas. (I instantly made a copy of it of course... we need to be savy).

Thanks for the notice Billy! Good one to work on..cool2
oridin
 Quoting: More about Tunnel-Vision 20117666



"When some objects move, and others remain solid, this indicates they have a different source."

This is bizarre, even for Nancy. It's really easy to see that both objects ARE equally affected by the camera's motions.
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
07/23/2012 11:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Classic!

Comment by Nancy Lieder 13 hours ago
Oh Benito! Look, there is NOTHING there, per Skymap. NOTHING. So what is that planet!!! Wow

Comment by Nancy Lieder 13 hours ago

We have been looking in the wrong place. NOT by Venus/Jupiter at all, but just to the right of the rising Sun. These objects are NOT lens flares!

Comment by Nancy Lieder 12 hours ago

Oops! Might be droplets dried on the lens. Here's at another hour, not sunrise.


That's from:

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Looks like she's getting real shy in stating that such-and-such shows planet eX and it's moons.

Once bitten, twice shy!
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/24/2012 06:44 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Hydra

User ID: 20365643
Germany
07/24/2012 09:34 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X.

But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com]
(Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?)

BTW: members down to less than 1500



.
If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 659599
United States
07/24/2012 09:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


>> And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault

That's rather obvious ...
Truther
User ID: 20442929
Germany
07/24/2012 12:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Their latest hoax is another picture of that weird Alberto Cardin. He even defeats Nancy Liar and Gerard Zwaan in being stupid. Like always he is presenting some lame lense flares and claims that this is a moon swirl.

This freaks have neither basic knowledge about photos nor about astronomy. Such an object would be visible to everybody on the our whole planet with the naked eye. Besides that the gravity of a planet of this size would have devastating effects on the sun and all the other planets. We would already be in the middle of Armageddon. Lense-flare-Albeto is a fascinating hoaxer. He must either be totally insane or a nobrainer. Well so he is a good assistance for Astrogal50 and Nancy Liar.

It is no shame to be stupid, but sooo stupid. And hey, if this was a moon swirl (a thing that for sure does not exist in reality) how big would their planet X be. Two times the size of the sun? Three times? And nobody could detect apart from some madmen with floppy disks and other funny objects they put in front of their cameras. Wake up. Nancy`s freak show has got a bunch of very bad hoaxes lately. Well, it always was a bunch of bad hoaxes, but now she produces them weekly and they are so evident.

IMAGE ( [link to api.ning.com] )
Menow
User ID: 1394150
United States
07/24/2012 02:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Comment by Nancy Lieder 4 hours ago
Not a lens flare nor a ghost, these Moon Swirls are so bright they have been seen and filmed lately, naked eye! This is a wake-up call, world! Thank you Alberto!


Gawd, Nancy... How do you "film" something, "naked eye"?!
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
07/24/2012 07:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X.

But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com]
(Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?)

BTW: members down to less than 1500



.
 Quoting: Hydra


Looks like she's going mealy-mouth - at one moment saying one thing then leaving the door slightly cracked.

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago

They appear to be water droplets dried on the lens. They stay stationary, despite the skyview rolling up continuously. So far we have discovered NO Planet X objects from this cam. I note that when the Sun rises, the cam is not overwhelmed. This means that they are suppressing the light received, overall, and this would eliminate the light from Planet X itself, I think.

An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect.

This is certainly a challenge!"
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
07/24/2012 07:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X.

But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com]
(Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?)

BTW: members down to less than 1500



.
 Quoting: Hydra


Looks like she's going mealy-mouth - at one moment saying one thing then leaving the door slightly cracked.

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago

They appear to be water droplets dried on the lens. They stay stationary, despite the skyview rolling up continuously. So far we have discovered NO Planet X objects from this cam. I note that when the Sun rises, the cam is not overwhelmed. This means that they are suppressing the light received, overall, and this would eliminate the light from Planet X itself, I think.

An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect.

This is certainly a challenge!"
 Quoting: bob_909


This is exactly the type of thing I was asking the guy from the ning about.

"...require sunlight to be funneled down them..."

It's pure gobbldygook- made up bullshit of the purest form- utter nonsense. How can anybody read that sort of thing and not have alarm bells go off? Nancy's story is comprised of layer after ridiculous layer of inane crapola like this which make no sense at all.

I once challenged a person at, I think TT-watch, about something like that and she said that she assumed that it didn't make sense to her because she wasn't as smart as the "Zetas". Sheesh!
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
07/24/2012 08:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

Yes, it's outrageous that they don't clean the webcam lenses on an hourly basis, so that poor Nancy mistakes the droplets for her eagerly awaited Planet X.

But "Benito Maray" gives new candidates on a per diem basis: [link to poleshift.ning.com]
(Just dumb, a troll or a trojan?)

BTW: members down to less than 1500



.
 Quoting: Hydra


Looks like she's going mealy-mouth - at one moment saying one thing then leaving the door slightly cracked.

"Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago

They appear to be water droplets dried on the lens. They stay stationary, despite the skyview rolling up continuously. So far we have discovered NO Planet X objects from this cam. I note that when the Sun rises, the cam is not overwhelmed. This means that they are suppressing the light received, overall, and this would eliminate the light from Planet X itself, I think.

An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect.

This is certainly a challenge!"
 Quoting: bob_909



"An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X."

Yet she has consistently pointed out images from various observatories which she says show her planet. Again... it makes NO SENSE AT ALL.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/24/2012 08:02 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault for jumping the gun. She'll blame someone else.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


>> And if it does turn out to be a dried water spot, naturally, it won't be Nancy's fault

That's rather obvious ...
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


But it IS her fault - she's the one that claimed it to be "Planet X." No one else.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/24/2012 08:24 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
"Comment by Nancy Lieder 6 hours ago

An observatory would not be allowed to display evidence of Planet X. Venus is a planet that reflects light, where Planet X is dust shrouded. The Moon Swirls are very close around the Sun, as they require sunlight to be funneled down them, therefore would be lost in the overall glare of the Sun, I suspect.
 Quoting: bob_909


I see she still thinks and claims that a planet shrouded in dust wouldn't reflect light and, therefore, wouldn't be visible. Apparently, her believers are stupid enough to believe it...and don't even see the MAJOR contradiction. If "Planet X" doesn't reflect any light - then how the f**k does it show up in all these images she claims show it?
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/24/2012 08:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Yet she has consistently pointed out images from various observatories which she says show her planet. Again... it makes NO SENSE AT ALL.
 Quoting: Menow 18943200


Another major contradiction.

+1000
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
_Billy Madison_

User ID: 20465085
New Zealand
07/25/2012 01:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them.

I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen.
aussie 763624
User ID: 20497330
Australia
07/25/2012 03:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them.

I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen.
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


I am quite sure that the `sceptics' aren't the ones with their heads buried in shitte LOL

And I have no interest in being intimate with imaginary grey aliens (or real ones either)- as most aliens seem to have a rather unhealthy interest in anal probing people.

And as for the pole shift `still gunna happen'...

We know that it is still not going to happen, never has, never will and if by some miracle it did happen as nancy described then the Earth would be a mass of molten lava...

Bit hard to survive that, unless you pack a pair of asbestos wellies along with your sheet of corrugated iron to hide under from those thousands of kilometer of hour winds, and your packet of fur flavoured gravox for dinner with man's best friend
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 20497993
New Zealand
07/25/2012 03:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them.

I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen.
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


A Pole is about to Shift somewhere?...anywhere?......brown_sung

Watch out for those freaken Poles I say.....they can sure be a dangerous thing!!......flick
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 20501811
United States
07/25/2012 05:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them.

I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen.
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


A Pole is about to Shift somewhere?...anywhere?......brown_sung

Watch out for those freaken Poles I say.....they can sure be a dangerous thing!!......flick
 Quoting: The Lone Ranger


siren2 on_way siren2

soonx

According to John Moore's "sources", as SOON as August 17th! (When Niburu makes it's closest passage to the sun!)

Thread: Ed Dames’ Killshot Solar Flare coming next month August 2012 due to Nibiru

Last Edited by **ZetaMax** on 07/25/2012 10:00 AM
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 4832919
United States
07/25/2012 04:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!BAN melfy!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1015670
United States
07/25/2012 05:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I hope your skeptical heads aren't so far up your skeptical asses that you fail to comprehend the direction the future of man kind is headed. Humans and beings from Zeta Reticuli are intimately linked, they need us and we need them.

I like the pole shift ning. Better than the news that's for damn sure at least any way. Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen.
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


No. It's not.
_Billy Madison_

User ID: 20539455
New Zealand
07/25/2012 06:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Since 2003 shits been getting fucked up

2004 - Sumatra tsunami

2009 - Samoa Tsunami

2011 - Japan tsunami

After the new Madrid and California faults go = European tsunami = big death toll, more than the 250 000 who died in Sumatra.

When did "planet x" supposedly enter the solar system? 2003?

Since then 3 significant tsunamis, How many do you recall before 03?? lol.

I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be right. Soon....
Hydra

User ID: 20478086
Germany
07/25/2012 07:46 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Since 2003 shits been getting fucked up

2004 - Sumatra tsunami

2009 - Samoa Tsunami

2011 - Japan tsunami

After the new Madrid and California faults go = European tsunami = big death toll, more than the 250 000 who died in Sumatra.

When did "planet x" supposedly enter the solar system? 2003?

Since then 3 significant tsunamis, How many do you recall before 03?? lol.

I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be right. Soon....
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


It's not the # of tsunamis that's of interest - it's the # of strong earthquakes:


Apr. 04, 1905 - 8.6
Jan. 31, 1906 - 8.8
Nov. 11, 1922 - 8.5
Feb. 01, 1938 - 8.5
Aug. 15, 1950 - 8.6
Nov. 04, 1952 - 9.0
Mar. 09, 1957 - 8.6
May 22, 1960 - 9.5
Oct. 13, 1963 - 8.5
Mar. 27, 1964 - 9.2
Feb. 04, 1965 - 8.7

Dez. 26, 2004 - 9.1
Mär. 28, 2005 - 8.6
Sep. 12, 2007 - 8.5
Feb. 27, 2010 - 8.8
Mär. 11, 2011 - 9.0
Apr. 11, 2012 - 8.7



What planet entered the solar system between 1950 and 1965?

Or could there be simply a 50 to 60 year EQ-cycle?

Seems to me more logical than an undetectable, immeasurable and invisible alleged Planet X.


I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be wrong. Soon....
(Fixed it for you)



.

Last Edited by Hydra on 07/25/2012 07:47 PM
If the Moon is off, if Earth wobbles or if there is a pole shift
how can things like this, predicted decades ago, happen?

aseindia
Annular Solar Eclipse - January 15, 2010 - Rameshwaram, India
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/25/2012 08:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Who cares if Nancy fucks up. The pole shift is still going to happen.
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


Um, certainly not in the way Nancy claims it will. There's a huge difference between a geological pole shift and a magnetic pole shift. One happens, the other does not.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/25/2012 08:01 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
siren2 on_way siren2

soonx

According to John Moore's "sources", as SOON as August 17th! (When Niburu makes it's closest passage to the sun!)

Thread: Ed Dames’ Killshot Solar Flare coming next month August 2012 due to Nibiru
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


Right...and yet no one can see this "planet?"

kmoron
failbewithyou
sinking

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 07/25/2012 08:01 PM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/25/2012 08:07 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Since 2003 shits been getting fucked up

2004 - Sumatra tsunami

2009 - Samoa Tsunami

2011 - Japan tsunami


After the new Madrid and California faults go = European tsunami = big death toll, more than the 250 000 who died in Sumatra.

When did "planet x" supposedly enter the solar system? 2003?

Since then 3 significant tsunamis, How many do you recall before 03?? lol.

I'm afraid ZetaMax might actually be right. Soon....
 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


Seriously - when HASN'T the world been fucked up? And how do all those events you listed prove the existence of some "rogue planet?" You're drawing a conclusion based on circumstantial evidence at best because all these events could have other causes.

As for ZetaMax - the definition for "soon" in his world is a measurement of time equal to now and never. He's been saying "soon" for years and hasn't been right yet. And neither has his master Nancy.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
07/25/2012 08:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Since 2003 shits been getting fucked up


When did "planet x" supposedly enter the solar system? 2003?


 Quoting: _Billy Madison_


You mean when did Nancy Lieder spin a bunch of obvious lies about a rogue planet entering the Solar System with absolutely no astronomical evidence to support it.
bob_909

User ID: 7468171
United States
07/25/2012 09:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nancy (Zetas) Wrong Again!

Her claim:

"In fact, the Sun should not even be visible, per Skymap, as it is Winter at the S Pole and they are within their 3 months of darkness there. "

Wrong - there is no three months of darkness at Mawson Station (67° 36'S/62° 52'E). The only time during this year the Sun does not come above the horizon is June 13 to 28.

As for the Sun here are the calculated rise/set times (all times are local (UTC+5)):

July 21 - 1053 1458
July 22 - 1049 1502
July 23 - 1044 1506
July 24 - 1040 1511
July 25 - 1036 1515
July 26 - 1032 1519
July 27 - 1028 1523

Learn how to use Skymap!

Here's a screen shot from Cartes du Ciel for Mawson Station on July 22, 2012

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

Notice the Sun?

Last Edited by bob_909 on 07/25/2012 09:10 PM
“Fear always springs from ignorance” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/25/2012 09:15 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I love it when the claim is made that earthquakes have increased since 2003. Have they really? Here's a breakdown of the number of earthquakes magnitude 7 or greater worldwide since 1900 - years with more than 20 magnitude 7 or greater earthquakes are in red.

1900 13
1901 14
1902 8
1903 10
1904 16
1905 26
1906 32
1907 27

1908 18
1909 32
1910 36
1911 24
1912 22
1913 23
1914 22

1915 18
1916 25
1917 21
1918 21

1919 14
1920 8
1921 11
1922 14
1923 23
1924 18
1925 17
1926 19
1927 20
1928 22
1929 19
1930 13
1931 26
1932 13
1933 14
1934 22
1935 24
1936 21
1937 22
1938 26
1939 21
1940 23
1941 24
1942 27
1943 41 OMG!! IT MUST BE "PLANET X" FOR SURE!!
1944 31
1945 27
1946 35
1947 26
1948 28
1949 36
1950 39
1951 21

1952 17
1953 22
1954 17
1955 19
1956 15
1957 34
1958 10
1959 15
1960 22
1961 18
1962 15
1963 20
1964 15
1965 22
1966 19
1967 16
1968 30
1969 27
1970 29
1971 23

1972 20
1973 16
1974 21
1975 21
1976 25

1977 16
1978 18
1979 15
1980 18
1981 14
1982 10
1983 15
1984 8
1985 15
1986 6
1987 11
1988 8
1989 7
1990 18
1991 16
1992 13
1993 12
1994 13
1995 20
1996 15
1997 16
1998 12
1999 18
2000 15
2001 16
2002 13
2003 15
2004 16
2005 11
2006 11
2007 18
2008 12
2009 17
2010 24
2011 20
2012 7 (to date)

What does the above data tell us? For one thing, it tells us there's no increase in magnitude 7 or greater earthquakes. In fact, when comparing the years from 2003 to present with the the years between 1934 and 1954, the number of earthquakes magnitude 7 or greater is rather tame. Are "Planet X" believers going to tell us that "Planet X" was hovering around the sun during the 30s and 40s? After all, we had the Great Depression along with the Dust Bowl followed by WWII...all of which, had they happened today, would surely be used as evidence or even proof that "Planet X" was here. Now, I realize that "Planet X" believers will say, "Ha! Your list ONLY lists quakes with a magnitude 7 or greater. Earthquakes lower in magnitude are on the increase!" True, at first glance the data may suggest that. However, the explanation provided by geologists seems FAR MORE LIKELY. They claim that the number of small magnitude quakes APPEARS to be on the rise because the sensor network has gotten both larger and more sensitive...which means more earthquakes are being detected than they were before. The reason this seems far more likely to be the truth is because if a "rogue planet four times the size of Venus" were truly lurking about the inner solar system - we wouldn't see just an increase in small magnitude quakes. We'd see an increase across the spectrum. And it should be noted that within the past 10 years the entire west coast of North America hasn't experienced ANY strong quakes at all. How could a "rogue planet" affect all these other fault zones without affecting the San Andreas and the other large faults up and down the west coast?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 07/26/2012 06:42 AM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1332648
United States
07/25/2012 09:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nancy (Zetas) Wrong Again!

Her claim:

"In fact, the Sun should not even be visible, per Skymap, as it is Winter at the S Pole and they are within their 3 months of darkness there. "

Wrong - there is no three months of darkness at Mawson Station (67° 36'S/62° 52'E). The only time during this year the Sun does not come above the horizon is June 13 to 28.

As for the Sun here are the calculated rise/set times (all times are local (UTC+5)):

July 21 - 1053 1458
July 22 - 1049 1502
July 23 - 1044 1506
July 24 - 1040 1511
July 25 - 1036 1515
July 26 - 1032 1519
July 27 - 1028 1523

Learn how to use Skymap!

Here's a screen shot from Cartes du Ciel for Mawson Station on July 22, 2012

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

Notice the Sun?
 Quoting: bob_909


Don't confuse Nancy with facts and logic.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Menow
User ID: 18943200
United States
07/25/2012 09:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nancy (Zetas) Wrong Again!

Her claim:

"In fact, the Sun should not even be visible, per Skymap, as it is Winter at the S Pole and they are within their 3 months of darkness there. "

Wrong - there is no three months of darkness at Mawson Station (67° 36'S/62° 52'E). The only time during this year the Sun does not come above the horizon is June 13 to 28.

As for the Sun here are the calculated rise/set times (all times are local (UTC+5)):

July 21 - 1053 1458
July 22 - 1049 1502
July 23 - 1044 1506
July 24 - 1040 1511
July 25 - 1036 1515
July 26 - 1032 1519
July 27 - 1028 1523

Learn how to use Skymap!

Here's a screen shot from Cartes du Ciel for Mawson Station on July 22, 2012

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

Notice the Sun?
 Quoting: bob_909


Yeah, a bunch of people are talking about the "south pole" and saying that specs about that location apply to the Antarctic stations, NONE of which are actually at the "south pole".

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob