Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

No wonder!

they share the same "mentality"

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

BTW Lone Ranger, love the videos. I think Max is uncomfortable because it's one thing to read his words on a page, but when you hear it out loud you see just how stupid it sounds. You are holding up a mirror and Max doesn't like to face his own idiocies.

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

Max, I don't know why you even hang out here if you are so offended. Not that you aren't welcome here, but aren't you the one that whined for months about debunkers on Nancy's threads? Didn't you say that you wished the debunkers would stay off her threads so you and the other sockpuppets and supporters could discuss ZetaTalk in a debunker free environment? Didn't you complain that no meaningful discussion was possible because the debunkers disrupted the ZetaTalk threads? And we gave you what you asked for. We have stayed off Nancy's threads for months now, and instead of discussing Zetatalk with others that believe, you prefer to come here and bait the debunkers. A while back TLR even did a chart of your posts on this thread compared to your posts on Nancy's thread. It proved that you don't come here to discuss with like minded people like you claimed a few months back. You come here to banter with debunkers and support Nancy unconditionally. You say you never lied. I would say the above is pretty close to a lie. The nickname that you hate came about because you refused to lay off the paid debunker crap when asked to do so. You like to dish it out, but you are a wimp when the shoe is on the other foot.

I can think of another thing Maxi isn't truthful about. He says he is "on the fence". We all know that Maxi fell off the fence into Nancy's back yard a long time ago.

Lastly, by supporting the "white lie", you are participating in perpetuating a lie, Max, which would make you a liar.

BTW Lone Ranger, love the videos. I think Max is uncomfortable because it's one thing to read his words on a page, but when you hear it out loud you see just how stupid it sounds. You are holding up a mirror and Max doesn't like to face his own idiocies.

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???



Possible insofar as it would not violate any known law of physics, but by that logic you are an axe murderer only because it is possible.

Face reality, melfy, you are a worthless liar.

I an not WORTHLESS!!!

Face reality, melfy, you are a worthless liar.

I an not WORTHLESS!!!

And there is FAR MORE anecdotal, circumstantial and behavioral evidence on the part of debunkers to support the "charge" of "paid shill" than there is that I am one who facilitates human termination with a tree-felling device.

Oh, come on. NO person is worthless. You may not agree with their claims, you may not like their tactics and you may not like them personally. But that doesn't make them worthless. Everyone means something to someone.

Max, I don't know why you even hang out here if you are so offended. Not that you aren't welcome here, but aren't you the one that whined for months about debunkers on Nancy's threads? Didn't you say that you wished the debunkers would stay off her threads so you and the other sockpuppets and supporters could discuss ZetaTalk in a debunker free environment? Didn't you complain that no meaningful discussion was possible because the debunkers disrupted the ZetaTalk threads? And we gave you what you asked for. We have stayed off Nancy's threads for months now, and instead of discussing Zetatalk with others that believe, you prefer to come here and bait the debunkers. A while back TLR even did a chart of your posts on this thread compared to your posts on Nancy's thread. It proved that you don't come here to discuss with like minded people like you claimed a few months back. You come here to banter with debunkers and support Nancy unconditionally. You say you never lied. I would say the above is pretty close to a lie. The nickname that you hate came about because you refused to lay off the paid debunker crap when asked to do so. You like to dish it out, but you are a wimp when the shoe is on the other foot.

I can think of another thing Maxi isn't truthful about. He says he is "on the fence". We all know that Maxi fell off the fence into Nancy's back yard a long time ago.

Lastly, by supporting the "white lie", you are participating in perpetuating a lie, Max, which would make you a liar.

BTW Lone Ranger, love the videos. I think Max is uncomfortable because it's one thing to read his words on a page, but when you hear it out loud you see just how stupid it sounds. You are holding up a mirror and Max doesn't like to face his own idiocies.


>> BTW Lone Ranger, love the videos.

And if living in Rome 2000 years ago, you would probably have "loved" afternoons at the Colliseum watching the Chirstians get torn apart by lions.

Max, I don't know why you even hang out here if you are so offended. Not that you aren't welcome here, but aren't you the one that whined for months about debunkers on Nancy's threads? Didn't you say that you wished the debunkers would stay off her threads so you and the other sockpuppets and supporters could discuss ZetaTalk in a debunker free environment? Didn't you complain that no meaningful discussion was possible because the debunkers disrupted the ZetaTalk threads? And we gave you what you asked for. We have stayed off Nancy's threads for months now, and instead of discussing Zetatalk with others that believe, you prefer to come here and bait the debunkers. A while back TLR even did a chart of your posts on this thread compared to your posts on Nancy's thread. It proved that you don't come here to discuss with like minded people like you claimed a few months back. You come here to banter with debunkers and support Nancy unconditionally. You say you never lied. I would say the above is pretty close to a lie. The nickname that you hate came about because you refused to lay off the paid debunker crap when asked to do so. You like to dish it out, but you are a wimp when the shoe is on the other foot.

I can think of another thing Maxi isn't truthful about. He says he is "on the fence". We all know that Maxi fell off the fence into Nancy's back yard a long time ago.

Lastly, by supporting the "white lie", you are participating in perpetuating a lie, Max, which would make you a liar.

BTW Lone Ranger, love the videos. I think Max is uncomfortable because it's one thing to read his words on a page, but when you hear it out loud you see just how stupid it sounds. You are holding up a mirror and Max doesn't like to face his own idiocies.


>> BTW Lone Ranger, love the videos.

And if living in Rome 2000 years ago, you would probably have "loved" afternoons at the Colliseum watching the Chirstians get torn apart by lions.

Notice that Max doesn't address the points made in my post above. The part Max feels compelled to reply to is about the videos. Nothing about his untruthfulness, he doesn't want to touch the part about him originally wanting the debunkers off Nancy's threads so he could discuss there without disruptions. Nothing about how that wasn't true, because he spends his time seeking out debunkers on their own thread instead of hanging at Nancy's and discussing zetatalk. He doesn't try to defend himself about perpetuating a lie, however white (a lie is a lie). The comment he does make is silly. TLR hasn't thrown you to the lions, he took your own words and the words of others posted here in a public forum and put them in video form. Get a sense of humor, Max and lighten up. TLR can't help it if you post silliness, and I can't help it if what you say sounds so funny when you hear it out loud. As I said before, the videos make you uncomfortable because you hear the words you wrote out loud and know they sound silly.

Nothing about how that wasn't true, because he spends his time seeking out debunkers on their own thread instead of hanging at Nancy's and discussing zetatalk.

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???

Nothing about how that wasn't true, because he spends his time seeking out debunkers on their own thread instead of hanging at Nancy's and discussing zetatalk.


There's nothing to discuss on ZT threads - it's 'accept what Nancy writes or get lost!'.

They sound "silly" because they are strung together completely out of context. A form of "lie".

:melfy:

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???



Possible insofar as it would not violate any known law of physics, but by that logic you are an axe murderer only because it is possible.

Face reality, melfy, you are a worthless liar.

I an not WORTHLESS!!!

And there is FAR MORE anecdotal, circumstantial and behavioral evidence on the part of debunkers to support the "charge" of "paid shill" than there is that I am one who facilitates human termination with a tree-felling device.

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???



Possible insofar as it would not violate any known law of physics, but by that logic you are an axe murderer only because it is possible.

Face reality, melfy, you are a worthless liar.

I an not WORTHLESS!!!

And there is FAR MORE anecdotal, circumstantial and behavioral evidence on the part of debunkers to support the "charge" of "paid shill" than there is that I am one who facilitates human termination with a tree-felling device.



Yes you an, melfy. Get used to it.

Did Gandi "get used" to injustice?
Did Martin Luther King?

Did Gandi "get used" to injustice?
Did Martin Luther King?


Insufferably transparent baiting.

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???



Possible insofar as it would not violate any known law of physics, but by that logic you are an axe murderer only because it is possible.

Face reality, melfy, you are a worthless liar.

I an not WORTHLESS!!!

And there is FAR MORE anecdotal, circumstantial and behavioral evidence on the part of debunkers to support the "charge" of "paid shill" than there is that I am one who facilitates human termination with a tree-felling device.



Yes you an, melfy. Get used to it.

Did Gandi "get used" to injustice?
Did Martin Luther King?

Lies!


What's the matter Melfy a bit hot here in the kitchen for you?

I am recovering from the shock that you would stoop so LOW after I asked you nicely not to lampoon and ridicule me.



Yet you have no problem with pure lies like "paid shill" and "government agent."

You made your bed, melfy, now you get to lie in it. And lying is what you do best, right?

It can be said just as emphatically that no "proof" has been offered that would "prove" that many of the debunkers here are in fact "not" paid shills. I still assert that it is "possible".

Care to counter???



Possible insofar as it would not violate any known law of physics, but by that logic you are an axe murderer only because it is possible.

Face reality, melfy, you are a worthless liar.

I an not WORTHLESS!!!

And there is FAR MORE anecdotal, circumstantial and behavioral evidence on the part of debunkers to support the "charge" of "paid shill" than there is that I am one who facilitates human termination with a tree-felling device.



Yes you an, melfy. Get used to it.

Did Gandi "get used" to injustice?
Did Martin Luther King?



Has nothing to do with the fact you are a liar, melfy.

Has nothing to do with the fact you are a liar, melfy.

Am not!!!!

Has nothing to do with the fact you are a liar, melfy.

Am not!!!!


Yes you are, just like your guru Nancy. Full of lies and bullshit.