Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
Prof_Rabbit User ID: 808303 Australia 11/05/2009 07:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Prof_Rabbit User ID: 808303 Australia 11/05/2009 07:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 11/05/2009 09:06 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Max, I too am waiting for a single example of the 'lives' your pal Nancy is saving. Oh wait -- are these lives she will be saving *soon?* We all know what 'soon' means to you Zidiots, but just in case a definition is required, here goes: ZT soon = NEVER. |
George B Extinct But Not Forgotten! User ID: 758858 United States 11/05/2009 12:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This is my first post on this sight. I have been following it for awhile now and read almost every post nancy has done since 2001. I never wanted to post i really didnt but there is a time that some people just cannot hold back anymore. After reading zetamax say that nancy is saving lives i just thought id finally register and tell allittle story. I was adopted when i was a baby to 2 loving parents that took me in and raised me like i was there blood. When i 6 they decided to adopt a baby girl they named sarah. I being the only child ended up taking the big brother roll and always looking out for her and treid to protect her at all costs. Everything was going well until early 1999. My sister Sarah had a bit of a anxiety disorder that doctors could not completly fix. Y2K scared the shit out of her but we were able to calm her down and stop her from panicing to much. In 2000 my sister stumbled across allittle websight called zetatalk which caused alot of fear for her and she was scared shitless. My mother passed away shorty after of cancer from a unknown primary source all the doctors could say is it spread to the liver and there was nothing they could do. After that it was just me who turned to alcholism with the death of my mom my dad and her. My sister after that really turned and got scared thinking really the worst was gonna happen. She seculded herself from everyone worrying constantly the end was coming in 2003 to were she barely talked to me and my dad and completely stopped talking to her freinds. On Nov 22 2002 i woke up to my dad screaming for me to wake up. He was screaming because my sister ended up hanging herself in her room. She killed herself because she didnt want to face the "horrors" that planet x was about to bring. My dad turned to cocaine and heroine and alchol right after and ended up ODing on may 20 2003. Zetatalk saves lifes...... its the oppiste. It strikes fear into peoples lives and fear makes them do irrational things. Nancy is in this for the money and fame. And I know zetamax soledad User and nancys other tolls will say she makes no money. But it doesnt take a genious to go to her sight look at her vidoes and realize shes got them on Rever which pays the person a small amout for each veiw Quoting: baluckicause of adds. She needs to be stopped. Im sure Im not the only person who had this tradegy happen to them cause of her. Thank you everyone of you "debunkers" for spending so much of your personal time to bring lodgic to her claims. Because now that is is her main source of talking people come here to read her ramblings and im sure for many people you have helped to ease the fear she brings. What you said was very powerful. Sorry, for the loss of your sister. I have younger relatives who are fascinated and scared senseless also . . . they have so far not reacted by ceasing to live but they are obsessed by the continual negativity from all sources the worst of which is Nancy and her Zetas. Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter! "Email: [email protected]" All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them. Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642) The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 12:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 809549 New Zealand 11/05/2009 12:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nancy is saving lives! Quoting: ***ZetaMax***Are you nuts, Melfy? :pinhead: Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 11/05/2009 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 803785 New Zealand 11/05/2009 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Nancy is saving lives! Quoting: Prof_RabbitSo what did Nancy do, pour the goldfish back in the pond? That would probably be about the extent of any act of "life saving" performed by Ms LIEDer. Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 03:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I guess Max has to consult with Nancy about all these lives she's saving. I wonder if any of them are celebrities? Maybe she can save Tom Cruise from Scientology. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 11/05/2009 03:01 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 11/05/2009 03:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Hmm -- CB you may be on to something! $cientology is a bullshit religion based on the silliest theological precepts this side of Pie Plate Reformed Islamic Orthodox Frisbeeanism. But it survives because of brain-damaged doofi such as Tom Cruise. What Nancy needs are CELEBRITIES! A-list celebs, that is. Nancy, it's no good snagging some obscure child actor as your spokespuppet. you need some Hollywood clout! Who's career is really in the toilet right now? A religious experience may be just what they need. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 03:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Anyway, Loser just got caught in a big lie. Watching the debunker rabid pile on is telling. They don't even want anybody looking OR preparing. They say if Nancy is correct then nobody would survive anyways. Kind of sick shit they are into. Karma will be a bitch for them, if you are right. Quoting: User # 78/68I dare him to come up with just one example of a "debunker" telling someone they shouldn't look or be prepared for a disaster. I know he won't...because he can't. No "debunker" has ever told people not to look. In fact, quite the opposite. "Debunkers" have been telling people for years to do so. Hap even offered the use of his telescope and viewing site so they could search for and photograph "Planet X." None of them ever took him up on it and what did User do? He spewed nothing but insults. In addition, no "debunker" has ever said that people shouldn't be prepared for a disaster. We've only stated that "Planet X" and a resulting "pole shift" is a scenario that won't happen. I'd also like him to present some evidence that people would survive such an event since he thinks "debunkers" are wrong about that. Since he won't, I'll just have to add these items to the growing list of ways he embarrasses himself. Apparently, lying is all he knows...other than throwing insults. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 11/05/2009 03:35 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 11/05/2009 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 244744 United States 11/05/2009 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | How many hundreds of times have we seen the debunkers challenge folks to look for themselves and see that Nancy's claims of the earth being stopped is pure BS? Anyone can look, so the research for themselves and see that she's nothing but pure bullshit. |
KeepingItReal User ID: 553451 Canada 11/05/2009 03:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The truth is not something Nancy and her faithful care about. They have all told lies that can easily be exposed. No debunker ever said not to look at the sky. Quite the opposite. We say it all the time = it's one of our major beefs with them. We ask them to look instead of just taking Nancy's word for it. Hap offered his equipment, and instead of accepting his offer, they call him a fake astronomer and attack him on a personal level. So that's a lie, not even a white one. No debunker ever said not to prepare for a disaster. I have worked on community preparedness brigades. If you live in an earthquake zone, you SHOULD be prepared to go it alone for at least 72 hours. If you live in a place like Canada, you should be prepared for a power outage in the winter. If you live on a flood plain, you need to be aware that floods can and will happen, and be prepared. That's just common sense. I just think it's futile preparing for a disaster of the magnitude Nancy suggests. Nobody would survive it, so what's the point? Preparedness is big business. There is a reason why most new age gurus and cults have ads for survival gear on their websites. It's big money, and how better to promote it than to come up with end times scenarios and play on your fear. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
KeepingItReal User ID: 553451 Canada 11/05/2009 04:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | SavING - lives that would be lost. Quoting: DrPostmanShe is saving lives everyday. Name one. Saving from what? No one has been saved from a damned thing actually. In fact, Zetatalk crows often about the deaths of others. Why not save those people that will die in plane crashes she claims to accurately predict? She can't even save her own credibility. How can she be "saving lives". BTW, nice hedging on the wording. You are learning from her. Yep, Max is learning to go back and edit his mistakes to save face. Instead of coming back at me for nit picking over a typo, he edited his post after the fact and tried to make it look like I changed the content of the quote. Another example of the depths to which zetards will stoop to avoid admitting their mistakes, no matter how trivial. And they wonder why we find it so hard to respect them. Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 11/05/2009 04:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 11/05/2009 05:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 06:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good catch on the Freudian slip. I love how GLP registers Quoting: DrPostmanwhen a post is edited. Keeps them more honest in spite of their best efforts. Like when Grant got busted for arguing with himself. And isn't it funny that Grant hasn't been here since. Come to think of it, wasn't it shortly after that when User showed up? Could User actually be Grant? The language and insults are somewhat similar...it just lacks a lot of the Star Trek science that Grant was so famous for. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 11/05/2009 07:03 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
User # 78/68 User ID: 681262 Canada 11/05/2009 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good catch on the Freudian slip. I love how GLP registers Quoting: Circuit Breakerwhen a post is edited. Keeps them more honest in spite of their best efforts. Like when Grant got busted for arguing with himself. And isn't it funny that Grant hasn't been here since. Come to think of it, wasn't it shortly after that when User showed up? Could User actually be Grant? The language and insults are somewhat similar...it just lacks a lot of the Star Trek science that Grant was so famous for. Oh, Circuit Breaker, dear dear. Why must you lie so readily? I've been here at GLP longer than YOU and longer than Grant. I was here when he was here as well. Nice try! You've been here that long and mostly on Nancy threads .... how obsessed are you? Do you think anybody considers this normal? You're right, they don't, because it simply doesn't make sense. You are either paid to be doing this outrageous shit OR you are as nutty as squirrel shit ... my guess is that somebody very afraid of this information is feeding you and your family. |
KeepingItReal User ID: 553451 Canada 11/05/2009 07:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good catch on the Freudian slip. I love how GLP registers Quoting: User # 78/68when a post is edited. Keeps them more honest in spite of their best efforts. Like when Grant got busted for arguing with himself. And isn't it funny that Grant hasn't been here since. Come to think of it, wasn't it shortly after that when User showed up? Could User actually be Grant? The language and insults are somewhat similar...it just lacks a lot of the Star Trek science that Grant was so famous for. Oh, Circuit Breaker, dear dear. Why must you lie so readily? I've been here at GLP longer than YOU and longer than Grant. I was here when he was here as well. Nice try! You've been here that long and mostly on Nancy threads .... how obsessed are you? Do you think anybody considers this normal? You're right, they don't, because it simply doesn't make sense. You are either paid to be doing this outrageous shit OR you are as nutty as squirrel shit ... my guess is that somebody very afraid of this information is feeding you and your family. As usual, Luser will accuse us of lying whenever he thinks he can. CB didn't lie, he just expressed his suspicion. He didn't say you and Grant are the same person, just that he has suspected it, and it sounded more like he is not convinced, it has just crossed his mind. So how is he lying? His suspicions may be wrong, but he isn't lying. Of course, you would never express suspicions about the identity and motives of others or make unfounded accusations, would, you? Oh wait. Of course you would. That is all you contribute to any discussion. Last Edited by KeepingItReal on 11/05/2009 07:42 PM Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak. |
User # 78/68 User ID: 681262 Canada 11/05/2009 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good catch on the Freudian slip. I love how GLP registers Quoting: KeepingItRealwhen a post is edited. Keeps them more honest in spite of their best efforts. Like when Grant got busted for arguing with himself. And isn't it funny that Grant hasn't been here since. Come to think of it, wasn't it shortly after that when User showed up? Could User actually be Grant? The language and insults are somewhat similar...it just lacks a lot of the Star Trek science that Grant was so famous for. Oh, Circuit Breaker, dear dear. Why must you lie so readily? I've been here at GLP longer than YOU and longer than Grant. I was here when he was here as well. Nice try! You've been here that long and mostly on Nancy threads .... how obsessed are you? Do you think anybody considers this normal? You're right, they don't, because it simply doesn't make sense. You are either paid to be doing this outrageous shit OR you are as nutty as squirrel shit ... my guess is that somebody very afraid of this information is feeding you and your family. As usual, Luser will accuse us of lying whenever he thinks he can. CB didn't lie, he just expressed his suspicion. He didn't say you and Grant are the same person, just that he has suspected it, and it sounded more like he is not convinced, it has just crossed his mind. So how is he lying? His suspicions may be wrong, but he isn't not lying. Of course, you would never express suspicions about the identity and motives of others or make unfounded accusations, would, you? Oh wait. Of course you would. That is all you contribute to any discussion. That's the problem with you healer-man, you lie to YOURSELF so readily ... what person that considers himself a "healer" does this? Busted eh? Circuit Breaker KNOWS damn well I am not Grant. He just said that to stir up the pot a bit. That makes it a LIE. And he knows it! You should be ashamed of yourself. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Why must you lie so readily? Quoting: User # 78/68How is it a lie, User? I didn't say you ARE Grant. I wondered IF you are. There's a difference. Besides, you didn't register with "User # 78/68" name until well July 14, 2005, so how do I or anyone else know how long you've really been here? The only one lying is you...as I highlighted above. No "debunker" has EVER told anyone not to look up in the sky and no "debunker" has ever told people not to prepare for disaster. Do you want to dispute that? If so, then provide evidence showing that any such statements were made. Otherwise, you've been caught in yet another lie. Nice! You've been here that long and mostly on Nancy threads .... how obsessed are you? Quoting: User # 78/68And you spend your time attacking anyone who disagrees with Nancy. Even following them to this thread. How obsessed are you? Do you think anybody considers this normal? Quoting: User # 78/68Please explain how it isn't normal? Care to do that? What is so wrong with pointing out how Nancy is wrong? What is wrong with discussing it? What is it that scares you so much? You're right, they don't, because it simply doesn't make sense. Quoting: User # 78/68I didn't say that. Show us where people think this is abnormal behavior. While we're on the subject, do you think anybody considers it normal to support Nancy so hard? Do you think anybody considers it normal that all you know how to do is attack and spew insults? You're right...they don't. You are either paid to be doing this outrageous shit OR you are as nutty as squirrel shit Quoting: User # 78/68Blah, blah, blah...same shit different day with you. This is a public forum after all. I suggest you try reading the disclaimer at the bottom that says this website exists for entertainment purposes. I'd say the fact that you can't grasp any of this shows you're the one that's as nutty as squirrel shit. ... my guess is that somebody very afraid of this information is feeding you and your family. Quoting: User # 78/68You'd be wrong of course...you usually are. But, it's my guess that someone is very afraid of the information we post that shows how and why Nancy's claims are wrong...that same person is feeding you and...well, probably just you. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 11/06/2009 07:35 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 07:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That's the problem with you healer-man, you lie to YOURSELF so readily ... what person that considers himself a "healer" does this? Quoting: User # 78/68You tell us Mr. Know-it-all. Circuit Breaker KNOWS damn well I am not Grant. He just said that to stir up the pot a bit. That makes it a LIE. And he knows it! Quoting: User # 78/68You should be ashamed of yourself. How would I know? I've never met either one of you. Both of you are behind a keyboard and monitor. So, what's to say you aren't Grant? You very easily could be. As I said, I only wondered if you were possibly Grant. Therefore, it is not a lie. A lie would be if I said you ARE Grant...which I didn't say. You really have a twisted form of logic. You think that wondering if you're Grant is a form of lying. Hmmm, if we use your logic wouldn't you be lying by saying that I might be paid to be here? Why, yes, it would be. Wouldn't you also be lying when you guessed that someone is afraid of the information and is feeding me and my family? Oh, yes, it would be because you know it isn't true. You simply said both of those things to stir up the pot. Wow, that's two lies in a row! You should be ashamed of yourself. BTW, I see you're doing your best to try to steer everyone away from the other lies you told today by accusing me of being the one that lies. Nice try, User, but you fail again. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 11/05/2009 08:00 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 08:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From (also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself) 1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away. 2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it. 3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away. 4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away. 4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away. 5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away. 6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away. 7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away. 8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away. 10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away. 11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away. 12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away. 13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away. 14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away. 16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away. 18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away. 19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way. 20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away. 21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away. 22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.) 23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away. 24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away. 26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away. 27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away. 28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away. 30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away. NEW to the list: 41) Nancy said, via the "Zetas", that the firestorms associated with the "pole shift" wouldn’t happen until the atmosphere had been stripped away. When it was pointed out that fire can’t burn without oxygen, "User" tried to claim that Nancy said only some of the atmosphere would be stripped away. He then spewed insults and ran away. 42) "User" claimed the "debunkers" tell people not to look in the sky for signs of "Planet X." This is false...see item 7. When asked to show where any "debunker" has told people not to look, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 43) "User" claimed that "debunkers" tell people not to be prepared for disasters. This is also false. When asked to show where any "debunker" has said any such thing, "User" spewed insults and ran away. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 11/05/2009 08:15 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 11/05/2009 08:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Commentator User ID: 587619 United States 11/05/2009 09:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Wow, he's up to 43. I wonder how long it will be before he's up to 50. Considering his attitude of late, probably not very long. Quoting: Circuit BreakerDepends on what script his handlers order him to read from. So far they only trust him with a script to debunk zetadrool and behave like a complete asshole. Of course for luser that isn't much of a stretch. non sufficit Orbis Being a zetatard means never having to make sense. "Nancy pays me to post on Her threads" Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill NO max/bridget EVER!!!!! NO luser EVER!!! NO clunker EVER!!!!! |
balucki User ID: 810783 United States 11/06/2009 06:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know im about as anti zetatalk as they come. For the longest time though im just sitting bashing my head thinking y do you "debunkers" just sit and constantly respond to the likes of these ignorant people. I understand they are really set in there believes which everyone is entitled to. But just wow at how far they will go. Finally it hit me im not sure if you are all on the same page as I am, but baiting them and responding there just digging there own grave. If someone came on this sight and was truely on the fence looking for answers simply just reading this thread could easily sway them into not beiliving the zetatalk material. You guys continue to bring lodgic into all the stuff nancy says while her followers just bring crap. Anyone with a open mind could easily look at this thread and nancys weekly threads and realize this is nothing more then a brainwashed cult. If it wasn't then nancy and her followers would not be so inclined to taunt and bash you all. This boycott and the actions all of you are taking was a great thing. You are showing all the people that truely are looking for a answer the lodgical side of things. Each and everyone of you might not realize it but sitting here day after day debunking nancys claims truely makes you all heros in my books. Keep up all of your good work and just know that somewhere down the line peoples lives might be saved (or just made less stressful) just cause of your determination. |
Prof_Rabbit User ID: 808303 Australia 11/06/2009 08:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Each and everyone of you might not realize it but sitting here day after day debunking nancys claims truely makes you all heros in my books. Keep up all of your good work and just know that somewhere down the line peoples lives might be saved (or just made less stressful) just cause of your determination. Quoting: baluckiWell thank you!, however do not overlook the fun side also, the bunkers make so many wild and crazy statements you can get a belly laugh almost every day, and laughing is good for you! "Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind" |
***ZetaMax*** User ID: 811787 United States 11/06/2009 09:02 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You know im about as anti zetatalk as they come. For the longest time though im just sitting bashing my head thinking y do you "debunkers" just sit and constantly respond to the likes of these ignorant people. I understand they are really set in there believes which everyone is entitled to. But just wow at how far they will go. Finally it hit me im not sure if you are all on the same page as I am, but baiting them and responding there just digging there own grave. If someone came on this sight and was truely on the fence looking for answers simply just reading this thread could easily sway them into not beiliving the zetatalk material. You guys continue to bring lodgic into all the stuff nancy says while her followers just bring crap. Anyone with a open mind could easily look at this thread and nancys weekly threads and realize this is nothing more then a brainwashed cult. If it wasn't then nancy and her followers would not be so inclined to taunt and bash you all. This boycott and the actions all of you are taking was a great thing. You are showing all the people that truely are looking for a answer the lodgical side of things. Each and everyone of you might not realize it but sitting here day after day debunking nancys claims truely makes you all heros in my books. Keep up all of your good work and just know that somewhere down the line peoples lives might be saved (or just made less stressful) just cause of your determination. Quoting: balucki>> you might not realize it but sitting here day after day debunking nancys claims truely makes you all heros in my books The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations. ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997. [link to www.zetatalk.com] ZetaMax |
Returner User ID: 997 United States 11/06/2009 09:04 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You really are increasingly tedious and boring thse days, Max. Can't trouble yourself to actually type a few words of your own? Even by sock-puppet standards, you're a disappointment. You asserted yesterday that Nancy's claptrap was 'saving lives.' We're still waiting for you to expound on that. What lives, exactly? But of course you don't have a lame cut-n-paste image for that... |