Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,809 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,074,086
Pageviews Today: 2,960,018Threads Today: 934Posts Today: 15,177
06:43 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 07:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
no. pole shift is an uncompromised FACT, and all that pseudoscientific nonsense our **SCIENCE** has produced over the years is pathetic.

Really? Then present some of your "FACTS." These "FACTS" need to be from credible sources...which means sources OTHER than ZetaTalk. Can you do that? Can you also prove that "Planet X" exists?


[link to www.vimeo.com]

On a scale of 1-10 with 10 being Major Fail that video is a 10. You were asked for anything other than a Zeta video..and you linked to a Zeta video.
 Quoting: VestanPance


hehe...

this video is not even ABOUT ZetaTalk, and it quotes ZT only here and there. Most of it (90%) comes from other sources than ZT
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 07:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
these rocks only prove that crust, pieces of crust were moving to and fro, not magnetic poles.

lol So it has nothing to do with the fact the rocks are actually magnetically reversed from normal?
 Quoting: VestanPance


these rocks move along with the crust, pulled in many different directions in each new pole shift. this is what these rocks show
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 909859
Germany
03/08/2010 07:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
ha!
this is just hillarious!

and i remember seeing Dr.Postman being RRREALLY pissed at this poem being posted on debunker thread at GLP!

cool piece!
 Quoting: Andrew (tetard)


[link to poleshift.ning.com]

We already laughed together with Dr. Postman about this, it was a big fail ... and its a few months old ... VERY LAME.

To the tune of "The Christmas Song"

Pet dogs roasting on an open fire
Red dust nipping at your nose
You´ll tide barrels, burning lots of used tires
And folks, dressed up in raggy clothes
Everybody knows a shelter and those sticks that glow
Will help to make the season bright
Tiny tots, with their eyes all a glow
Will find it hard to sleep for weeks
They know that Nancy´s on her way
She´s claiming lots of death and mayhem is on its way
And every mother´s child, is goin´ spy
To see if Zetas really know how to fly
And so I´m off to ring this simple phrase
To dorks from 1 to 92,
Although it´s been said
Many times, many ways
Where´s this planet? Screw you.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker ?


Here are a few more:
Thread: ZETA PX XMAS CAROLS >>>>> BACK AGAIN!!!
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 07:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
these rocks only prove that crust, pieces of crust were moving to and fro, not magnetic poles.

lol So it has nothing to do with the fact the rocks are actually magnetically reversed from normal?


these rocks move along with the crust, pulled in many different directions in each new pole shift. this is what these rocks show
 Quoting: andrew

Your ignorance is stunning.
These rocks were erupted by volcanoes, hence VOLCANIC ROCK.
They were erupted at a time when the Magnetic Poles had swapped, which is why they are magnetically reversed normal.
They do not show any signs of Crustial Displacement.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 07:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
these rocks only prove that crust, pieces of crust were moving to and fro, not magnetic poles.

lol So it has nothing to do with the fact the rocks are actually magnetically reversed from normal?


these rocks move along with the crust, pulled in many different directions in each new pole shift. this is what these rocks show
 Quoting: andrew

If you want some more information Andrew I suggest you look on the internet for Geomagnetic Reversals.

However ill provide you with some.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 07:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
these rocks only prove that crust, pieces of crust were moving to and fro, not magnetic poles.

lol So it has nothing to do with the fact the rocks are actually magnetically reversed from normal?


these rocks move along with the crust, pulled in many different directions in each new pole shift. this is what these rocks show

Your ignorance is stunning.
These rocks were erupted by volcanoes, hence VOLCANIC ROCK.
They were erupted at a time when the Magnetic Poles had swapped, which is why they are magnetically reversed normal.
They do not show any signs of Crustial Displacement.
 Quoting: VestanPance


sure they do.
rocks acquired magnetic "stamp" when poles where in one place, then it shifted,and when volcanoe erupted and that rock solidified, it acquired a "stamp" of new magnetic lines
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 909859
Germany
03/08/2010 07:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It's strict, I can tell you that. Let me share that yesterday a professional debunker (with a technique much like Menow of GLP) had a ning-life of a nanosecond here. Alerted by his approach to everyone (that he knew what he was doing and everyone else was a clumsy or ignorant fool) we researched him on the Internet and found what looked to me like professional debunking track record. No telling what else was there under different screen names or email addys. Debunking the Norway spiral as HE was a professional on rocket emissions and everyone else was blind. On tt-watch in the past creating endless flaming arguments for no reason, as distraction. They try to hide, but like the wolf in sheep's clothing, the evil vibes are SO obvious.

The Shadow said:

I agree with Andrew. While we have no wish to stifle legitimate questioning or exchange of opinions, the line has to be drawn sharply. This ning is for people who accept the premise of PX and the pole shift and are interested in sharing info on how to prepare for it, not spending our time justifying our beliefs or convincing others. I hope Gerard will adopt a strict policy in this regard, particularly toward harrassive-type heckler/debunkers.
 Quoting: Fat ole Nancy LIEDer

lol
[link to poleshift.ning.com]
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 07:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
these rocks only prove that crust, pieces of crust were moving to and fro, not magnetic poles.

lol So it has nothing to do with the fact the rocks are actually magnetically reversed from normal?


these rocks move along with the crust, pulled in many different directions in each new pole shift. this is what these rocks show

Your ignorance is stunning.
These rocks were erupted by volcanoes, hence VOLCANIC ROCK.
They were erupted at a time when the Magnetic Poles had swapped, which is why they are magnetically reversed normal.
They do not show any signs of Crustial Displacement.


sure they do.
rocks acquired magnetic "stamp" when poles where in one place, then it shifted,and when volcanoe erupted and that rock solidified, it acquired a "stamp" of new magnetic lines
 Quoting: andrew

That stamp shows Magnetic reversal, doesnt show Crustial Displacement.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
***ZetaMax***

User ID: 909951
United States
03/08/2010 07:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
this post exists still, in huge quantities, but when tantalus says the same thing, he gets banned? what the fuck

Fletch, please explain....who is tantalus and what was he about exactly(as in subject/s)?

PS: And for what it's worth, Fletch, others that post here on this thread have been banned in different ways on GLP before. I suggest you take it up with our Moderators if you need an answer to why your friend received the ban you speak of.



its to no avail. we even tried a rational thread about it.

but i very much appreciate this thread ;) keep up the good work.
 Quoting: Fletch


rejected
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.

ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
 [link to www.zetatalk.com] 

ZetaMax
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 07:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
If you want some more information Andrew I suggest you look on the internet for Geomagnetic Reversals.

However ill provide you with some.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.
 Quoting: VestanPance


"current field weakening" is effect of Nibiru approach.

these are all human estimates.

what facts show is that field was twice as stronger 2000 years ago, and 3000-4000 years ago it was as weak as it is now. and no wonder, cuz that time was a time of last Passage, the same as now.

however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

the harsh truth is that we are nowhere near that. we do NOT control the situation. more over, we do NOT know for sure what collected data means. we suggest, estimate and make guesses.
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 07:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
If you want some more information Andrew I suggest you look on the internet for Geomagnetic Reversals.

However ill provide you with some.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.


"current field weakening" is effect of Nibiru approach.

these are all human estimates.

what facts show is that field was twice as stronger 2000 years ago, and 3000-4000 years ago it was as weak as it is now. and no wonder, cuz that time was a time of last Passage, the same as now.

however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

the harsh truth is that we are nowhere near that. we do NOT control the situation. more over, we do NOT know for sure what collected data means. we suggest, estimate and make guesses.
 Quoting: andrew

Please dont bring the fairy planet into it. You accuse me of using Pseudo Science yet your quite happy to do the same.

Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.

Your guesses have all been epic failure, and when I say your guesses I mean those of your High priestess Nancy Lieder.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 07:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
sure they do.
rocks acquired magnetic "stamp" when poles where in one place, then it shifted,and when volcanoe erupted and that rock solidified, it acquired a "stamp" of new magnetic lines

That stamp shows Magnetic reversal, doesnt show Crustial Displacement.
 Quoting: VestanPance


why preference is given to Magnetic reversal over Crustial Displacement?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 909859
Germany
03/08/2010 07:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
If you want some more information Andrew I suggest you look on the internet for Geomagnetic Reversals.

However ill provide you with some.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.


"current field weakening" is effect of Nibiru approach.

these are all human estimates.

what facts show is that field was twice as stronger 2000 years ago, and 3000-4000 years ago it was as weak as it is now. and no wonder, cuz that time was a time of last Passage, the same as now.

however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

the harsh truth is that we are nowhere near that. we do NOT control the situation. more over, we do NOT know for sure what collected data means. we suggest, estimate and make guesses.
 Quoting: andrew


Many things in nature are cyclic ... planetary movement is one of it probably ... I hear some people take a bath or a shower cyclic every day ... word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 909854
New Zealand
03/08/2010 07:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
our "dissenting voices"? bwahahaha! who do you "dissent from"? since its you, "debunkers", who oppose the original statement of ZetaTalk, you could be called "dissenters".

you are attached to ZetaTalk. your very existence (as a group) is due to ZetaTalk. without ZetaTalk there is no its debunkers
 Quoting: andrew


Andrew if you want to start talking about zetatalk's original statement or message then you lose boy.

Your beloved LIEDer put it all on the line during her March/May 2003 doomsday claims. Ms LIEDer was plainly wrong on all counts and was basically debunked when the so called Geographical Poleshift resulting from her no show rogue planet FAILED to materialize.

Your glorious LIEDer even said on the Lou Gentile radio programme, post the 2003 debacle, that people would be only too justified throwing tomatoes at her if her rogue planet did not show up within a certain time frame(weeks not months...if I remember correctly).

And when her rogue Planet X did not show up what did your LIEDer do....go quietly into the night....no she come up with that pathetic White LIE crap.

lol4me And it's no wonder the huge following that your beloved LIEDer had gathered dispersed rapidly soon thereafter.

Today all we see is the remnant of her zeatcult. A weaker version 2.0 if you like. Without the "debunkers", a term that Nancy coined because of her unwillingness to debate truthfully and sincerely with the astronomical experts and others on a factual and astronomical bases, your beloved zetacult would have lost its value years ago. You see Andrew the "debunkers" have become a necessary excuse for Ms LIEDer to invent a boogeyman to aid her self importance in her whole fraudulent charade.

Your beloved LIEDer excels only at FAILURE and 2012 will be the........ 2012_vic

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/08/2010 08:02 AM
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 07:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.
 Quoting: VestanPance


then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 07:49 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.


then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?
 Quoting: andrew

Most probably through the Chaotic motions of the liquid metal at the Earths core.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 07:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

Many things in nature are cyclic ... planetary movement is one of it probably ... I hear some people take a bath or a shower cyclic every day ... word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 909859


that's right. but cycles exist where there is an outside reason for it. even in what can seem an "inherent" variability, if one analyses all factors, one finds some external cause. that is because matter is inert by itself, if left alone. it only reacts when the area is "crowded' by other matter [be it objetcs or fields = particle flows].

tides exist because we have Moon.

biological rhythms in all life exist because of the Sun and Moon.

and so on.

why do people suppose Earth has a cycle of Magnetic Reversals? or, if we go in further detail, science says reversals occur at irregular intervals, why is that? then why do they happen at all?

you see, science is stating a guess as fact. and even more - basing further assumptions on that guess.

it is a scientific method - nothing wrong with that, but we have to remember that our guess is ... just a guess.
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 909854
New Zealand
03/08/2010 07:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
but i very much appreciate this thread ;) keep up the good work.
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***


yes_sir You know something I believe that you secretly admire our glorious debunker thread too there, Melfy.

I mean Melfy don't you feel quite satisfied after having gone to such HERCULEAN efforts!!!
to make our Debunker Thread one of the Top 20 Most Popular Threads on GLP.

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

fonehome Here's a free phone for ya, Melfy if you need to call me up so that you can join up with the winning team!!

:boycott1:

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/08/2010 07:57 AM
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 08:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
why do people suppose Earth has a cycle of Magnetic Reversals? or, if we go in further detail, science says reversals occur at irregular intervals, why is that? then why do they happen at all?

you see, science is stating a guess as fact. and even more - basing further assumptions on that guess.

it is a scientific method - nothing wrong with that, but we have to remember that our guess is ... just a guess.
 Quoting: andrew

The magnetic Reversals are not cyclical.
As I said the last one was 780,000 years ago

Here is the list,
780,000 Years ago
900,000
1,060,000
1,190,000
1,780,000
2,000,000

The list goes on, however there have been periods known as Superchrons where the poles dont reverse for upto 40 Million years.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 08:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

Many things in nature are cyclic ... planetary movement is one of it probably ... I hear some people take a bath or a shower cyclic every day ... word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right. but cycles exist where there is an outside reason for it. even in what can seem an "inherent" variability, if one analyses all factors, one finds some external cause. that is because matter is inert by itself, if left alone. it only reacts when the area is "crowded' by other matter [be it objetcs or fields = particle flows].

tides exist because we have Moon.

biological rhythms in all life exist because of the Sun and Moon.

and so on.

why do people suppose Earth has a cycle of Magnetic Reversals? or, if we go in further detail, science says reversals occur at irregular intervals, why is that? then why do they happen at all?

you see, science is stating a guess as fact. and even more - basing further assumptions on that guess.

it is a scientific method - nothing wrong with that, but we have to remember that our guess is ... just a guess.
 Quoting: andrew

Thing is Andrew, I have noticed how good you are at bending data to fir your deluded mindset, you bend everything to fit in with your fairy planet, in the same way you lke to think earthquakes are increasing because of PX when they arent and there is no PX.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 909859
Germany
03/08/2010 08:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.
 Quoting: andrew


I see.
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 08:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.


then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?

Most probably through the Chaotic motions of the liquid metal at the Earths core.
 Quoting: VestanPance


if left without outside influences Earth core would be almost placid. it would probably "boil" quietly as on slow fire.

why would these Chaotic motions appear? what outside cause?

while it may seem that all outside causes result in regular (cyclical) phenomena, it is not entirely true. outside factors, such as rogue asteroids or comets, present an irregular events.
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 08:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
why do people suppose Earth has a cycle of Magnetic Reversals? or, if we go in further detail, science says reversals occur at irregular intervals, why is that? then why do they happen at all?

you see, science is stating a guess as fact. and even more - basing further assumptions on that guess.

it is a scientific method - nothing wrong with that, but we have to remember that our guess is ... just a guess.

The magnetic Reversals are not cyclical.
As I said the last one was 780,000 years ago

Here is the list,
780,000 Years ago
900,000
1,060,000
1,190,000
1,780,000
2,000,000

The list goes on, however there have been periods known as Superchrons where the poles dont reverse for upto 40 Million years.
 Quoting: VestanPance


"magnetic Reversals are not cyclical"
and that is even more strange.

if it is not cyclical then it represents a "catastrophic" pattern, irregular.

Last Edited by andrew on 03/08/2010 08:15 AM
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 909854
New Zealand
03/08/2010 08:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.


I see.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 909859


Andrew you keep up that routine bro and you could end up looking like your mate, Melfy, with all kinds of skin problems.

No_makeup

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/08/2010 08:18 AM
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 08:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.


then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?

Most probably through the Chaotic motions of the liquid metal at the Earths core.


if left without outside influences Earth core would be almost placid. it would probably "boil" quietly as on slow fire.

why would these Chaotic motions appear? what outside cause?

while it may seem that all outside causes result in regular (cyclical) phenomena, it is not entirely true. outside factors, such as rogue asteroids or comets, present an irregular events.
 Quoting: andrew

Rogue asteroids and comets has no gravitation effect on the core of the earth whatsoever.

The moon does, and the sun to a lesser extent, as does Jupiter. Fairy planets do not.

Magnetic reversals are not regular or Cyclical, they are Chaotic, as I have shown you, I could go back a 2 Billion years with the list of reversals, some changed and then changed again within 10,000 years, others didnt change for 40,000,000 years, there is nothing cyclical about it.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 08:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.


I see.


Andrew you keep up that routine bro and you could end up looking like your mate, Melfy, would all kinds of skin problems.

 Quoting: The Lone Ranger


washing too much (too often) is damaging to skin and hair. it depletes it of natural fat that protects it, making it more susceptible for fungi and bacteria.

use your common sense
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 08:19 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
if it is not cyclical then it represents a "catastrophic" pattern, irregular.
 Quoting: andrew

No it represents a Chaotic pattern. I have not seen any catastrophic events linked with magnetic reversal.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
VestanPance

User ID: 884100
United Kingdom
03/08/2010 08:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.


I see.


Andrew you keep up that routine bro and you could end up looking like your mate, Melfy, would all kinds of skin problems.



washing too much (too often) is damaging to skin and hair. it depletes it of natural fat that protects it, making it more susceptible for fungi and bacteria.

use your common sense
 Quoting: andrew

Try using unperfumed soap that has moisturisers in them.
Cheers.
-----------------------------
"Shit, if this is gonna be that kind of party, I'm going to stick my dick in the mashed potatoes."

"The gene pool is stagnant and I am the minister of chlorine"

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence"
andrew

User ID: 909865
Ukraine
03/08/2010 08:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Rogue asteroids and comets has no gravitation effect on the core of the earth whatsoever.

The moon does, and the sun to a lesser extent, as does Jupiter. Fairy planets do not.

Magnetic reversals are not regular or Cyclical, they are Chaotic, as I have shown you, I could go back a 2 Billion years with the list of reversals, some changed and then changed again within 10,000 years, others didnt change for 40,000,000 years, there is nothing cyclical about it.
 Quoting: VestanPance


space trash falldown is irregular event and it repesents catastrophic pattern.

and so do Magnetic reversals - if its irregular (chaotic) then its most likely catastrophic.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 766491
United States
03/08/2010 08:21 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Really? Then present some of your "FACTS." These "FACTS" need to be from credible sources...which means sources OTHER than ZetaTalk. Can you do that? Can you also prove that "Planet X" exists?


[link to www.vimeo.com]
 Quoting: andrew

I said credible sources...that video does nothing to support your claims about "pole shifts." Welcome to fail. Again.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.

News