Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,469 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 186,023
Pageviews Today: 296,960Threads Today: 102Posts Today: 2,160
03:09 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/18/2010 07:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
And on a lower level of knowing, I also don't PERSONALLY have a sextant and pendulum and so on.

Make one of your own and do your own observing:

 Quoting: DrPostman


Thank you! I believe you though. I "know" that the pendulums are normal. It was only admitting that we are all human, and even where we know, we MIGHT not know, that I was pointing out.

Einstein's work "corrected" Newton's ... but Newton's was fine and most things we come to see as "hints of Einstein's" were "just within a margin of error" -- until Einstein said, no, there's a whole bigger determinative structure of thought and reality going on here.

So I am saying that we never for sure can say we know, even when we do. This is an abject humility, NOT a dismissal of what you and I normally mean by knowing.

In ordinary terms, yes, I know there's no stoppage.
But radically speaking, I know I MIGHT be wrong, and so could all our perceptions.

That's all.

It keeps one humble; and in these circumstances, it's not important probably; but it keeps one's mind and humility limber ... for about other aspects of the PX claims it is important. Such as the images.

If you really listen to the ANALYSIS of the South Pole Telescope images -- JUST IN CASE THERE'S SOMETHING THERE THAT'S VALID --

And that's just the point! There are no "images" because
it isn't an optical scope. It measures the heat signaturs
from the earliest time of our universe. It's purpose isn't
to look for anything nearby. And anything South of the
Equator can see the same thing as the SPT does, it's just
that the humidity is so low that those heat images can be
seen better. Paranal in Chili would be able to view anything
that the SPT could. At one point Masters tried to claim
that the South Pole was the only location you could view
PX until it was pointed out to him how stupid that is.

Again...the South Pole Telescope is NOT a visual scope. It's a sub-millimeter RADIOtelescope.

You try telling them that and all they can do is lala
 Quoting: DrPostman


This in fact shows you have not done your research into the claims.

They talk of how it's false-colour.

They discuss the resultant COLOURED AND VISUAL images.

:)

The Vatican one I think was optical. But maybe not, I don't remember. Been a while since I looked into that issue.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 07:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Clare
 Quoting: mclarek 971744

You do realize that Nibirushock2012 admitted that he pulled a hoax, do you ?

[link to yowcrooks.wordpress.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/18/2010 07:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Clare

You do realize that Nibirushock2012 admitted that he pulled a hoax, do you ?

[link to yowcrooks.wordpress.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974395


Yes. You gotta do better than that! Lol.

The fact is, so have many people under pressure. You do know that Moussaoui was outfitted with a 10,000 volt belt and he said various things.

Think outside the box a bit and let's see about not only those images, but the SOHO ones (not fully handled by Phil Plait, as I outlined: the key tests of his claim that it's pixel flares, have not been done), and also the Vatican ones.

Enjoy.

"Moi" --- Love French! :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 07:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It is I.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974609

Ahhh ... cool ... hf
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/18/2010 07:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
IF PX is real, it might very well require covering up in some people's thinking,

so any claims of retraction (though possibly true retraction or hoaxing) must be even more thoroughly investigated than under hypothetically more normal circumstances.

We must handle the images themselves as well as the claims, and handle ALL of them, before we know with as much certainty as the pendulum test on the Earth stoppage/wobble questions.

Think this whole thing through guys -- the WHOLE thing. I know you can do it.

I'd love to see what you could turn up for/against these images if you really tried, regarding the *whole* arguments about them.

Every part.
Clare
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974609
Netherlands
05/18/2010 07:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nancy will retreat from this thread and declare victory for running.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 882391


Ms LIEDer knows, in her heart of hearts, that she and her zetaculties would never ever win jackshite against the glorious debunkers. There is no doomsday rogue planet out there in our inner Solar System for her to attain any form of victory over us. Only fools and the truly gullible amongst us believe such nonsense.

And simply due to this wittle fact we will always win every time over Ms LIEDer and her zetacultie nutters.

The real funny part of it all is though that in all her many other claims, on a variety of subjects, Nancy is still running at the low low success percentage of 0% on prediction claims. LOL!! And the woman even to this day is so delusional that she "shouts from the roof tops".....there is no one else who can claim to have the prediction success track record that zetababble possesses.

Too funny at times!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
"Moi" --- Love French! :)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 971744


Je ne parle le francais tres bon. Mais je vois ce tu cherches l'alibi de plus en plus.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974609
Netherlands
05/18/2010 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It is I.

Ahhh ... cool ... hf
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974395


Thank you kindly.

And you guys keep up the great work here on GLP.

I will be here watching and enjoying!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 07:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I'd love to see what you could turn up for/against these images if you really tried, regarding the *whole* arguments about them.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Is there a site where I can see these images as high resolution pics ? On the yowousa page you linked I only see an image with big blurry pixelised red something and I refuse to watch this 20 minute merchendising video my M. Masters.

And where so I find those SOHO images you mean ?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 07:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I will be here watching and enjoying!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974609

Hope you'll be back soon for real.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974408
United Kingdom
05/18/2010 07:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
She's giving up on GLP? I'm not surprised. She can only
handle sycophants and anyone with any independent thought
gets banned.
 Quoting: DrPostman

Yep, looks like :

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

^ see first comment by her

Hope she won't change her mind.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974609
Netherlands
05/18/2010 07:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I will be here watching and enjoying!!

Hope you'll be back soon for real.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974395


Possibly. But to use some of Ms LIEDer's nonsense......SOTLRT"it is in the hands of man"....EOTLRT.....lol!!
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 946069
United States
05/18/2010 07:30 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The stupid is strong with them.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 07:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I know why she's doing this. Next year her MANY statements
about 2012 being too far and that the pole shift has to
happen before then will begin to catch up with her and she
doesn't have an excuse. She doesn't want to face the pressure
of having to be honest, which I believe she's incapable of.


This thread will live on, especially as long as we can copy
the nonsense posted there and comment on it here.
 Quoting: DrPostman

I agree 100% .... and I bet the freak show over there will be much more entertaining than here on GLP ... as i posted before ... theres nothing more funny than to see complete retards in their natural habitat.
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 07:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
For those who are not so keen to think they know everything about what they know, I will say this one final time:
(snip vague equivocation)


Such as in the case of the South Pole Telescope and Vatican purported photos of PX ...
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Parroting of unsupported conspiracy rumors noted.

They may be fake or real, but no-one has properly handled all the issues raised about them by the pro-PX crowd. No, your debunking sites didn't.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Responses to your claims about the SPT were offered and your false premises challenged. It seems you are going to ignore them.

So, in being less sure to start with, i.e., remembering you are human and could be wrong even where it's unlikely, you might find an interesting set of issues. And if any among you want to see if there is any evidence for PX and where it might be -- minus the stopped-Earth or wobbly-Earth of Nancy -- you will want to doubt your positon enough to look hard at the arguments about these photos and the SOHO photos.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


This would be you, pretending that we have not looked into those items.

The debunkers do not have complete answers here. I have checked.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


You mean we haven't rambled on about vague, needless minutia in page after tedious page for/like you.

You have been challeged on things like your pronouncements that the Moon does not 'spin on its own axis' and that there are images showing a new planet from the SPT... but you brush these off, secure in a convenient delusion that is it only WE who are not thorough. How droll.

(snip)

No-one has handled the photo evidence here thus far in these pages. Someone should take the time and effort, and not rely whole-hog on the debunker sites. They have not handled all objections.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


YOU have been challenged to discuss those very images! It is YOU who is running away and dropping the investigation!

Good luck. Have fun. Question ... and let's see if anyone can FULLY argue about the many points raised by these photos.

Clare
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


What points would those be? You've done little but toss out vague, unsubstantiated innuendo, based on what seems to be false information. And now you waltz away, pretending that WE have not performed adequately??

What a piece of work...

Buh bye, Clare..



PS: Why don't you go and hang out at the 'ning? I'm sure they'll be more impressed by you than were we. Just be sure to lie and not admit you don't believe, anymore, that Earth is abnormally wobbling! You'll be gone like a fart on a windy day. ----------->
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 07:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I just visited the poleshift site linked above. Have you folks read the first two rules of the site?

1. No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to a ban.
2. The existence of Planet X and ZetaTalk are not debatable.


Are you kdding me? This is like saying no logic allowed. It is a plea for bunk.

<shaking head>

Wow! This explains Nancy's move!

Yep, basically it means you either believe everything Nancy tells you or you're out.


I think she believes it is known to be true, and so wants to move the discussion on to other aspects: aspects of preparation and so on (action).

You want to be philosophically doubtful here and she does not.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


****WE**** want to be philosophically doubtful??? NO, dear, that would be YOU. WE want to be FACTUALLY doubtful.

I thought you were leaving...

(snip)
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 08:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
She's giving up on GLP? I'm not surprised. She can only
handle sycophants and anyone with any independent thought
gets banned.

Yep, looks like :

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

^ see first comment by her

Hope she won't change her mind.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974408


Please quote stuff from there you want to talk about. I don't want to have to go there and bump their numbers just to follow your point.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 08:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Please quote stuff from there you want to talk about. I don't want to have to go there and bump their numbers just to follow your point.
 Quoting: Menow 935048

Your right, good point.
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/18/2010 08:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I'd love to see what you could turn up for/against these images if you really tried, regarding the *whole* arguments about them.


Is there a site where I can see these images as high resolution pics ? On the yowousa page you linked I only see an image with big blurry pixelised red something and I refuse to watch this 20 minute merchendising video my M. Masters.

And where so I find those SOHO images you mean ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974395


There are 3 sites with the SOHO images. I already posted them.

There is the debunker site Bad Astronomy (which no longer has good versions on it), there is also the place which quotes the BA site as authorities, i.e., Yowcrooks, and there the original close-ups are still up.

And the overall pics are available on the Zetatalk site.

The links are in a previous post.

As to the Yowusa site, they have 4 articles about it. I posted them. They have multiple arguments around them, and their provenance, and the circumstances subsequent to the initial posting of the images. All this is important to understand about the images.

And yes, if you're serious, you'll also listen to annoying videos (I do, from all perspectives), because they also contain information and pics. Otherwise one might miss some key piece: you gotta take gold where you find it: pro-PX AND debunk-PX gold. I would not be here if I didn't also have patience; and same with going to Nancy's site, which has much silliness mixed with possible info.

(Personally, I don't like MM's voice; but the attempt to be thorough, by him, about these images, is admirable. He talks of various negative issues AND suggestive evidence about the images and provenance, over time.)

Be a detective. Check out ALL leads, is my motto.
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/18/2010 08:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I just visited the poleshift site linked above. Have you folks read the first two rules of the site?

1. No debunking and disruption. Debunking and disruption will lead to a ban.
2. The existence of Planet X and ZetaTalk are not debatable.


Are you kdding me? This is like saying no logic allowed. It is a plea for bunk.

<shaking head>

Wow! This explains Nancy's move!

Yep, basically it means you either believe everything Nancy tells you or you're out.


I think she believes it is known to be true, and so wants to move the discussion on to other aspects: aspects of preparation and so on (action).

You want to be philosophically doubtful here and she does not.


****WE**** want to be philosophically doubtful??? NO, dear, that would be YOU. WE want to be FACTUALLY doubtful.

I thought you were leaving...

(snip)
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Radical philosophical doubt doubts even what you "know" to be true, IN SPITE OF factual clarity.

Others were suggesting that when I said, "I am not sure even though I know the pendulums indicate no stoppage" -- that I meant somehow I thought realistically that there could be stoppage and pendulums don't indicate it.

I meant no such thing: I am NOT an uncareful thinker, as should be obvious.

I of course know that things are just fine, at last count, with our pendulums and sky maps and Moon. However, RADICAL philosophical doubt doubts even that, SOMEWHAT, just as a personal reminder to stay open IN CASE our science ever turned out to be off in some way.

That is the ONLY sense; it is a rigourous point, not a sloppy discounting of known science. And it most of the time is unnecessary, but sometimes it is key to learning. So I remind myself of it. But people misinterpreted me.

Stop calling me "dear". Unless it's in a genuine context of a compliment, dear.

(When I say, "dear Menow", I mean it. I didn't mean it this last time, though, in the last sentence. But you brought that on.)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 08:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You mean these SOHOs ?

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

And btw, I see nancy still has the Kid A images online:

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

In case you don't know ... Kid A hoaxed these pictures and sent them to nancy and she bought it. Kid A then came clear that he was faking the images. Happened all here on GLP a few years back ... the thread where Kid A admitts it was then deleted as far as I know.
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 08:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!



I am NOT an uncareful thinker, as should be obvious.
{/quote]

Right... then why do you think the Moon doesn't spin on its axis?
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 08:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I am NOT an uncareful thinker, as should be obvious.

 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Right... then why do you think the Moon doesn't spin on its axis?
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You mean these SOHOs ?

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

And btw, I see nancy still has the Kid A images online:

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

In case you don't know ... Kid A hoaxed these pictures and sent them to nancy and she bought it. Kid A then came clear that he was faking the images. Happened all here on GLP a few years back ... the thread where Kid A admitts it was then deleted as far as I know.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974395


Yep. Nancy took the same tack as Clare on that(with the SPT thing)... that somebody must have GOT to them.

It is to laugh! They just make up whatever conspiracy component is needed to keep the story alive.

Clare just doesn't have the outside, loooong-term, experienced point of view of all this stuff like we do. She, like most people can't bring themselves to believe that Nancy would be that chronically disingenuous!
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 08:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Be a detective. Check out ALL leads, is my motto.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Then why don't you check out the statistical probablity of the idea that the world's astonomers are covering up the existence of a new planet in our Solar System?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974395
Germany
05/18/2010 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Be a detective. Check out ALL leads, is my motto.


Then why don't you check out the statistical probablity of the idea that the world's astonomers are covering up the existence of a new planet in our Solar System?
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Indeed ... and it are quite a few:

Estimates of the total number of amateurs in the U.S. range from 200,000 to 500,000, often depending on how exactly you define the term. In any case, this figure, 40 to 100 times the number of professional astronomers, represents a tremendous population with potential in astronomy education.
 Quoting: astrosociety


[link to www.astrosociety.org]

And that article is only talking about the USA. Nancy basically claims all of them are lying, or paid to lie or are under pressure so they lie. In my opinion this is even more ridiculous as her claim we here are paid for what we do.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/18/2010 08:39 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
For those who are not so keen to think they know everything about what they know, I will say this one final time:
(snip vague equivocation)
 Quoting: Menow 935048


So fond of thinking that carefully worked out philosophical stances, are "equivocation". What they are is an antidote to fanaticism, which leads, even in its milder forms -- of overweening surety in debunking, not only in proposing -- leads to possibly missing a key point.

:)

Such as in the case of the South Pole Telescope and Vatican purported photos of PX ...


Parroting of unsupported conspiracy rumors noted.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Parroting? Ha ha. Merely mentioning that IF PX were real, it might very well be covered up, hence, to be honest with the materials we get, that is ONE of the lines we must consider.

You know this, surely. :)

They may be fake or real, but no-one has properly handled all the issues raised about them by the pro-PX crowd. No, your debunking sites didn't.


Responses to your claims about the SPT were offered and your false premises challenged. It seems you are going to ignore them.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


I responded with how they are inadequate, for they are. We must think more fully about the issues than to be pat and so self-assured. There are plenty of "responses" which are NEVER adequate. Be reasonable about the issues and take them ON, or fall away from contributing.

You have handled none of the points. I have shown WHY. If there were no WHY, I would be at fault. In this case, you are. :(


So, in being less sure to start with, i.e., remembering you are human and could be wrong even where it's unlikely, you might find an interesting set of issues. And if any among you want to see if there is any evidence for PX and where it might be -- minus the stopped-Earth or wobbly-Earth of Nancy -- you will want to doubt your positon enough to look hard at the arguments about these photos and the SOHO photos.

This would be you, pretending that we have not looked into those items.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Clearly no-one has deeply enough to present the full case. In fact, the debunking links have not either. Look into it more and you'll see.

One response here was "he said he hoaxed it", which hypothesis does not cut it: anyone can say a retraction, especially IF they're real images!

Another suggested that they were colour images, but the South Pole telescope is not visual-image-producing, and oh how silly all these proponents are, who miss that. I pointed out that Marshall Masters mentions several times that the telescope would give a false-colour image set, not direct images (even if THESE are hoaxed, that shows he knows that).

In fact, there's no indication with any deep familiarity with these issues, or that anyone has thought deeply about the SOHO images. In fact, *I* was the skeptic who presented key tests for the SOHO images and the "debunker skeptics" (skeptics with a pre-set agenda) never answered that. So those images LITERALLY REMAIN undecidable as to whether they're fake or simple "pixel flare" evidence.

The debunkers do not have complete answers here. I have checked.


You mean we haven't rambled on about vague, needless minutia in page after tedious page for/like you.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


I mean the links put up to "answer" the issues with the SOHO images have not handled the complete issues. Nor have those who claim to have "done away with" the South Pole purported images (false colour).

And NO ONE is handling here or there the complicated questions around the Vatican Telescope purported leaks.

As to the "rambling" charge, it only proves that you are not capable or willing to follow truly cautious reason methods. This is bad on you, not me. I have laid it out so that it was on RECORD here, how to proceed NEUTRALLY and fully.

To consider this "rambling" shows no facility with the issues of HOW we know what we know. It also keeps you safe in your own mind from having to keep to a standard, by appeals to that standard.

And it also demonstrates a LIKELY incapacity to actually DO the standard ... though I will be radically honest, you could DO the standard and not KNOW the standard, of course. However, PROVE YOU CAN follow careful, cautious, full and NOT off-the-cuff reasoning in ALL these issues.

You have been challeged on things like your pronouncements that the Moon does not 'spin on its own axis' and that there are images showing a new planet from the SPT... but you brush these off, secure in a convenient delusion that is it only WE who are not thorough. How droll.

(snip)

No-one has handled the photo evidence here thus far in these pages. Someone should take the time and effort, and not rely whole-hog on the debunker sites. They have not handled all objections.


YOU have been challenged to discuss those very images! It is YOU who is running away and dropping the investigation!
 Quoting: Menow 935048


This is the funniest you've been so far!

I presented the material for debunking. Do your job HONESTLY and FULLY, which means I can ask questions and point out anything you've missed yet. Let's help each other get to the bottom of these images.

But we may end up inconclusive or change our minds, both of us. We should, however, concur, as reasonable people, if indeed we follow full and calm reason on all hypotheses around these images.

This has not been done yet; I am waiting.

As for me, I think they seem genuine, but I'd like really good cross-referential discussion of any flaws, and any indications of genuineness.

Is it that, more than you, I wish really to know the whole truth about PX?

Good luck. Have fun. Question ... and let's see if anyone can FULLY argue about the many points raised by these photos.

Clare


What points would those be? You've done little but toss out vague, unsubstantiated innuendo, based on what seems to be false information. And now you waltz away, pretending that WE have not performed adequately??

What a piece of work...

Buh bye, Clare..
 Quoting: Menow 935048


If you cut off from discussing the images, claiming my presenting them is "innuendo", I would welcome your leaving the discussion. :)

Of course, you meant me. Well, I WANT a discussion on the images and have claimed no "innuendo" ... only startling lack of testing on the images by the Bad Astronomy crowd (I was, in fact, the one who presented the debunking science to them and they didn't answer.)

All the rest of what you called "innuendo" (in a sloppy-minded use of "innuendo" towards me), was, as others have seen, already, merely keeping the questions going, since they had not adequately been responed to yet.

The German fellow came closest to LOOKING at the issues involved.

Lol.
Clare


PS: Why don't you go and hang out at the 'ning? I'm sure they'll be more impressed by you than were we. Just be sure to lie and not admit you don't believe, anymore, that Earth is abnormally wobbling! You'll be gone like a fart on a windy day. ----------->
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Ah, how nice. To be free of your nonsense about reason.

I have no reason to "go" there or anywhere. I check out both.

I have never said I believed in the "wobble" except for that one photo which I thought might mean that, and came on strong about that ... and which we've handled, you and I.

Are you yet getting some idea why so many people have given you slight? You are so dismissive even when offered comradeship in discovery.

:)

Clare
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/18/2010 08:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Be a detective. Check out ALL leads, is my motto.


Then why don't you check out the statistical probablity of the idea that the world's astonomers are covering up the existence of a new planet in our Solar System?


Indeed ... and it are quite a few:


Estimates of the total number of amateurs in the U.S. range from 200,000 to 500,000, often depending on how exactly you define the term. In any case, this figure, 40 to 100 times the number of professional astronomers, represents a tremendous population with potential in astronomy education.


[link to www.astrosociety.org]

And that article is only talking about the USA. Nancy basically claims all of them are lying, or paid to lie or are under pressure so they lie. In my opinion this is even more ridiculous as her claim we here are paid for what we do.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 974395


Indeed! And do you know the numbers of people in the FBI, Police in Dallas, Mob scene, New Orleans Anti-Castro Scene, Montrealers who knew Bronfman and Lansky, and pepople in the secret service, and image manipulators in Hollywood? Just to name a few? Of course ALL of them would have to know of JFK's death to pull it off.

:)

But fair enough, if PX were visible big enough beyond the Sun and if amateurs had good enough filters to block the entire corona -- Nancy's claims that it's right in front right now, notwithstanding -- then sure, maybe others would be able to see it.

But if the filters have to be that strong, and only professional institutions be able to see it, that makes cover-up possible.

I don't know if this is the case -- not wiggle-room, as if everything is fearful ego, who has to "win". I really don't know enough about whether small-time astronomers would have powerful enough telescopes to see into the corona of the Sun.

I DO know however that for a long time, PX was supposedly just beyond, out of sight to anyone in direct line of sight.

So, what about the images from the satellites and Vatican & South Pole?

Let me know what you find. A few toss-offs will not do, unless they stand on their own with no other possibilities. This is not MY standard; it is reason.

Otherwise, you are NOT debunkers and detectives on this issue.

:(

Clare
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/18/2010 08:47 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Be a detective. Check out ALL leads, is my motto.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Here's the thing, Clare... You are doing the same thing that all of Nancy's believers do. It's just that you are, er... wordier about it. You want to point out each and every tiny thing you think miiiiiight indicate something remotely related to the PX thingy and have it debunked for you, or you will declare it positive evidence that it DOES exist and add it to the pile. There is NO END to that exercise! We debunkers have been around and around and around and around and around that block. Every time we debunk something, those who 'believe' ignore it and add it to the steaming pile of 'evidence' and it gets regurgitated again some months later along with a large ration of NEW, but similar, BS.

It's getting OOOOOOOOOLLLDDD!!![/color]

And then, Clare, you also ignore points made to you about the very subjects you claim to want to discuss in favor of continued wallowing in that unlimited pool of minutia where you can find any number of reasons to continue BELIEVING in PX. It NEVER ends! It CAN never end if you insist that the PX thingy COULD be hiding someplace you/we have forgotten to look thoroughly enough.

Think about it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 974108
Canada
05/18/2010 08:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Look s like you guys won't have Nancy to push around anymore.