Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,936 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 160,174
Pageviews Today: 246,472Threads Today: 85Posts Today: 1,100
01:44 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/24/2010 01:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Rather than further complications about using the same words to talk of different actual motions, on different orders of magnitude (one "turn around its axis" relative to path, the other "turn around its axis" relative to another axis) ...
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Only YOU have that confusion, Clare. There is actually NO confusion about that AT ALL! One is ROTATION. One is REVOLUTION.

There is NO SUCH THING as your bolded statement. It is nonsense, Clare. It is only YOUR contrived confusion.

How can you expect knowledgeable people to be willing to discuss ANYTHING with you if you have not gotten that straight after this many corrections?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 01:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It's pretty obvious that Clare is either Nancy herself or one of the ignored trolls. The truth is that the only place they get attention is on the debunker thread. They say for some, bad attention is better than none at all. The ning experiment is doomed. How long can they lick her feet without question before they all get bored? Maybe they can have another edifying discussion on the merits of flush toilets like they did when the debunker boycott of her threads started.



I really don't think clunk is ninny LIEDer herself, LIEDer has never been this civil this long, of course she may have listened to the doctor when he mentioned haloperidol.....
 Quoting: The Commentator


Why thank you for your compliment re. the civility. I admit, I lost it once at one person and once at least with another. But yes, I try.

I also am clearly well educated overall, of course, which Nancy is not, it seems, at least formally educated as far.

By the way, Commentator fellow :) , I am finishing one of Koestler's books. Ever read any? They're wonderful.

As to the Moon thing, everyone, including Menow who wants to re-engage: the nomenclature for the total axial forward movement represented as if in one spot, is "spin on an axis". So yes, you and the astronomers are right in calling it that and imaging it that way.

But in order to understand the difference between the movement of Venus around the Sun and the movement of the Moon around the Earth, we must also talk of a spin around its axis (or lack thereof) RELATIVE TO ITS PATH. If none of the latter, then Venus and the Moon are clearly differing in what they're doing. And the term "spin around its axis" is also used for this phenomenon.

Since the phrase is used for both, but different aspects (levels of complexity or order of magnitude) are being described in each point we are making ... perhaps you will see the physical movement I wished to point out?

It is common, however, to conflate the movement on a path with the total movement around an axis and call it "turn" or "spin" or "rotation".

But "rotation" is also used to mean around another axis.

And when something stands on the spot, and turns on the spot, this is also called "rotation", but usually "spin."

I was merely trying to speak of a different item than you; yet of course, you are using one accepted set of meanings for the phrase. And as such, it turns on its axis, given what perameters you are using, that is perfectly fine to say.

Best wishes,
Clare
The Commentator

User ID: 587619
United States
05/24/2010 01:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It's pretty obvious that Clare is either Nancy herself or one of the ignored trolls. The truth is that the only place they get attention is on the debunker thread. They say for some, bad attention is better than none at all. The ning experiment is doomed. How long can they lick her feet without question before they all get bored? Maybe they can have another edifying discussion on the merits of flush toilets like they did when the debunker boycott of her threads started.



I really don't think clunk is ninny LIEDer herself, LIEDer has never been this civil this long, of course she may have listened to the doctor when he mentioned haloperidol.....


Why thank you for your compliment re. the civility. I admit, I lost it once at one person and once at least with another. But yes, I try.

I also am clearly well educated overall, of course, which Nancy is not, it seems, at least formally educated as far.

By the way, Commentator fellow :) , I am finishing one of Koestler's books. Ever read any? They're wonderful.

As to the Moon thing, everyone, including Menow who wants to re-engage: the nomenclature for the total axial forward movement represented as if in one spot, is "spin on an axis". So yes, you and the astronomers are right in calling it that and imaging it that way.

But in order to understand the difference between the movement of Venus around the Sun and the movement of the Moon around the Earth, we must also talk of a spin around its axis (or lack thereof) RELATIVE TO ITS PATH. If none of the latter, then Venus and the Moon are clearly differing in what they're doing. And the term "spin around its axis" is also used for this phenomenon.

Since the phrase is used for both, but different aspects (levels of complexity or order of magnitude) are being described in each point we are making ... perhaps you will see the physical movement I wished to point out?

It is common, however, to conflate the movement on a path with the total movement around an axis and call it "turn" or "spin" or "rotation".

But "rotation" is also used to mean around another axis.

And when something stands on the spot, and turns on the spot, this is also called "rotation", but usually "spin."

I was merely trying to speak of a different item than you; yet of course, you are using one accepted set of meanings for the phrase. And as such, it turns on its axis, given what perameters you are using, that is perfectly fine to say.

Best wishes,
Clare
 Quoting: mclarek 971744



In other words, you are still armwaving and talking bullshit.

Never read him. Have you ever read one I. Newton? Ever hear of Newton? He had lots to say you should know before getting in over your head.

Glad that haloperidol is working for you.
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
05/24/2010 01:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
As to the Moon thing, everyone, including Menow who wants to re-engage: the nomenclature for the total axial forward movement represented as if in one spot, is "spin on an axis". So yes, you and the astronomers are right in calling it that and imaging it that way.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Except that it's not 'imaginary'. The Moon rotates... ON ITS AXIS.

But in order to understand the difference between the movement of Venus around the Sun and the movement of the Moon around the Earth, we must also talk of a spin around its axis (or lack thereof) RELATIVE TO ITS PATH.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


For the umpteenth time.. NO WE DON'T. A body's rotation is NOT altered by other motions. The Moon rotates relative to the background stars. Or do you think the universe is revolving around the Moon?

If none of the latter, then Venus and the Moon are clearly differing in what they're doing. And the term "spin around its axis" is also used for this phenomenon.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


There is NO difference between Venus and Moon's rotational motion, other than RATE. Period.

Since the phrase is used for both, but different aspects (levels of complexity or order of magnitude) are being described in each point we are making ... perhaps you will see the physical movement I wished to point out?
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


The only complexity in this is in YOUR mind.

It is common, however, to conflate the movement on a path with the total movement around an axis and call it "turn" or "spin" or "rotation".
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


No such 'conflating' has occured. They are separate motions. Only YOU are trying to confuse the two.

But "rotation" is also used to mean around another axis.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


NO IT'S NOT. That is called ******REVOLUTION*****.

GET IT?????????????

YET?????????????????????

And when something stands on the spot, and turns on the spot, this is also called "rotation", but usually "spin."
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


Name an object, ANY object in the entire universe which "stands on a spot", Clare.

I was merely trying to speak of a different item than you; yet of course, you are using one accepted set of meanings for the phrase. And as such, it turns on its axis, given what perameters you are using, that is perfectly fine to say.

Best wishes,
Clare
 Quoting: mclarek 971744


See above. You are completely full of shit.
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 01:57 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
(Menow-style mercy snip)


As to the words ... "Spinning"? "Rotating"? As we've found, these words can refer to two different actions.


What? I have seen no confusion between 'spin' and 'rotation'. The confusion has been with YOUR mixing up 'rotation' and 'revolution', and you have not had the courtesy to acknowledge the correction, though it was repeated several times.


Yes, he is "spinning" around the racetrack centre.


I stand corrected... Only YOU could make that sort of confused statement. No, he is NOT 'spinning' around the race track center. He could be said to be REVOLVING around it, but we should be careful in applying orbital terms to non-orbital situations.

So... with your confused language, I don't know WHAT you are saying there.

 Quoting: Menow 935048



Yours does not handle this difference: mine can speak of what the Moon is doing even if it went straight.

Enough. Not going more into physical E-M momentum forces which make all this happen. The physical forces pull and push on the total body and spin it to accomplish the rotation. Yes.

However, it does not also have spin on it relative to its forward motion in total.

It turns on its axis as it moves forward, but does not spin in its own right relative to the movement forward in the new direction. We're both right, but describing different levels of the geometry.

On a force level, yes, the pull turns the axis as the momentum directs it straight away.

On a geometric level, there is another item we have to name: the possibility of a body to turn MORE than it is pulled forward on an orbit/turned on its axis around it on the orbit.

That is the spinning car on an orbital racetrack. And yes, I specified the racetrack was round.

It is this second type of "spin on its axis" geometrically which I am describing, a spin relative to the overall path the angular momentum physics cancels out at: the orbit.

More turn than it requires then a spin as I described can be seen.

Like Venus.

Now, PX. Any news?
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 02:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Oh -- before you get picayune in your sneer tactics, about "turns the axis" I mean, of course, turns the body around it.

But the point is, equal to the overall orbital path turn to take. No more.

If more, then we observe what most people call spinning in its own right.

What word would you like to give that? Hm? Venus' motion. What would you call it.

I call it "spinning on its axis" ... as it "rotates" ...

But you like to call the turning of its body on the rotation a "spin on its axis" which is totally legitimate.

So what do you call what I am referring to? Or shall we just specify, as I started to long ago:

Venus: relative to its path, spin, but Moon no.

Venus AND Moon: relative to a straight line, spin, from forces, pulling it to make the path.

:)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 977652
Canada
05/24/2010 02:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The Zeta shit will be wrong until Nancy dies.

You obviously haven't read it with an open mind.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***



An 'open mind' is a good way to allow your brain to slip out.
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 02:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hey, Commendator and Menow:

Since you are right it turns on its axis as it rotates,
what would you like to call the spin which Venus exhibits in addition to its orbital angular spin on its axis?

It is the latter I (and most people) call "spin on an axis" and it IS a separate and very real identifiable relationship of axis to path.

Would you say it just has more angle than momentum forward, instead of equal?

What would you like to call this, so we can agree there is a difference between the spin on the axis of the Moon from that of Venus?

They both spin on their axis in orientation around their orbits, but the latter one has a discernible extra spin while on its orbit.
The Commentator

User ID: 587619
United States
05/24/2010 02:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hey, Commendator and Menow:

Since you are right it turns on its axis as it rotates,
what would you like to call the spin which Venus exhibits in addition to its orbital angular spin on its axis?

It is the latter I (and most people) call "spin on an axis" and it IS a separate and very real identifiable relationship of axis to path.

Would you say it just has more angle than momentum forward, instead of equal?

What would you like to call this, so we can agree there is a difference between the spin on the axis of the Moon from that of Venus?

They both spin on their axis in orientation around their orbits, but the latter one has a discernible extra spin while on its orbit.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744



Care to explain how a Venusian sidereal day thus lasts longer than a Venusian year (243 versus 224.7 Earth days). However, because of Venus's retrograde rotation, the length of a solar day on Venus is significantly shorter than the sidereal day?


How about you tackle the 13:8 orbital resonance between Venus and Earth?

Didn't think so.

Best go back to your comic books, klunk. You are not ready for such advanced topics.

Oh yes, time for your meds, don't forget them this time, you need them badly.

Last Edited by The Commentator on 05/24/2010 02:55 AM
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 03:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hey, Commendator and Menow:

Since you are right it turns on its axis as it rotates,
what would you like to call the spin which Venus exhibits in addition to its orbital angular spin on its axis?

It is the latter I (and most people) call "spin on an axis" and it IS a separate and very real identifiable relationship of axis to path.

Would you say it just has more angle than momentum forward, instead of equal?

What would you like to call this, so we can agree there is a difference between the spin on the axis of the Moon from that of Venus?

They both spin on their axis in orientation around their orbits, but the latter one has a discernible extra spin while on its orbit.



Care to explain how a Venusian sidereal day thus lasts longer than a Venusian year (243 versus 224.7 Earth days). However, because of Venus's retrograde rotation, the length of a solar day on Venus is significantly shorter than the sidereal day?


How about you tackle the 13:8 orbital resonance between Venus and Earth?

Didn't think so.

Best go back to your comic books, klunk. You are not ready for such advanced topics.

Oh yes, time for your meds, don't forget them this time, you need them badly.
 Quoting: The Commentator


Klunk back. I asked you what you would call the daily rotation around its axis, of Venus, when the Moon has not daily rotation around its axis while going around the Earth.

So, what would you want to call that motion? Daily rotation instead of "spin on its axis"?

But the car, hit on the circular racetrack, but tethered to the centre point (like gravity), would have a special spin relative to the road, as it goes forward on it. This is like the day of Venus.

So, what do you call it so it can talk of both the daily rotation AND a car spinning on its axis, relative to the spin it takes forward on its rotation as well?

YOU answer this. Or you don't show you get the point. Besides, I would love to know what you would like to call this level of understanding, what I called spin, but when any object has it. A car it would not be called "daily" (spin or) rotation, as a planet would get called.

So, when you get off your cock-sure-nasty meds, please answer me what you would like to call this, so it applies to all bodies.
So, what do you want
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 03:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Besides, Commentator, YOU are the one with a comic-style avatar! LOL

So, rather than talk of OTHER things, why don't you answer the question?

What do you want to call the type of movement, which in a planet is called daily rotation around its axis, when it's not happening in a planet? It is THIS which I called spin on its axis relative to its path, which in planets is a closed path (ellipse, close to a circle), but can also happen to something standing in place (relative to other fixed points), or on any path, straight, wave, or whatever.

Why don't you comment, or should I say, "commentate" -- lol -- ?
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 04:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Commentator: re. my statement "So, what do you want" at the end of my post, 1 before the last one, it was meant to read, "So, what do you want to call it?"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
05/24/2010 04:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I haven't seen anyone post so many words and end up with a post that means- nothing...

meaningless word babble

What gets me is that clunk (nice nicename that, very appropriate) seems totally stuck on using words incorrectly, redefining words to mean something else and generally trying very hard to avoid being pinned down on what (if any) meaning she has herself applied instead of either the common or astronomical usage

What gets me is that the only viewpoint that the moon doesnt `spin' is from the earths surface, and that same viewpoint also shows that the sun rotates around the earth!!!

Stand on either of the moons axis points and the starfield clearly rotates
Stand on any point on the moon that receives sunlight and there will be a `sunrise' and `sunset'as the moons rotation causes an apparent rotation of the sun around the moon...

I was able to explain this to an eight year old, and she readily grasped the concept that not only was the moon spinning, but its spin rate had to be the same as its orbital period in order to show the same face to the earth at all times (didn't use words that big, but she readily grasped the concept when shown with a tennis ball and basket ball)
She even grasped the idea that if the moon didn't spin on its axis then it would indeed have a `dark side' and a `light' side (fun games can be had with a torch or table lamp and a basket ball and a tennis ball- we even managed to have an `eclipse' on the basketball/earth)

Learning can be fun clunk- ask your mummy or daddy to try this out with you (but dont touch the lightbulb- it's ouchie burnies hot ok- just like the sun!!!)
The Commentator

User ID: 587619
United States
05/24/2010 04:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hey, Commendator and Menow:

Since you are right it turns on its axis as it rotates,
what would you like to call the spin which Venus exhibits in addition to its orbital angular spin on its axis?

It is the latter I (and most people) call "spin on an axis" and it IS a separate and very real identifiable relationship of axis to path.

Would you say it just has more angle than momentum forward, instead of equal?

What would you like to call this, so we can agree there is a difference between the spin on the axis of the Moon from that of Venus?

They both spin on their axis in orientation around their orbits, but the latter one has a discernible extra spin while on its orbit.



Care to explain how a Venusian sidereal day thus lasts longer than a Venusian year (243 versus 224.7 Earth days). However, because of Venus's retrograde rotation, the length of a solar day on Venus is significantly shorter than the sidereal day?


How about you tackle the 13:8 orbital resonance between Venus and Earth?

Didn't think so.

Best go back to your comic books, klunk. You are not ready for such advanced topics.

Oh yes, time for your meds, don't forget them this time, you need them badly.


Klunk back. I asked you what you would call the daily rotation around its axis, of Venus, when the Moon has not daily rotation around its axis while going around the Earth.

So, what would you want to call that motion? Daily rotation instead of "spin on its axis"?

But the car, hit on the circular racetrack, but tethered to the centre point (like gravity), would have a special spin relative to the road, as it goes forward on it. This is like the day of Venus.

So, what do you call it so it can talk of both the daily rotation AND a car spinning on its axis, relative to the spin it takes forward on its rotation as well?

YOU answer this. Or you don't show you get the point. Besides, I would love to know what you would like to call this level of understanding, what I called spin, but when any object has it. A car it would not be called "daily" (spin or) rotation, as a planet would get called.

So, when you get off your cock-sure-nasty meds, please answer me what you would like to call this, so it applies to all bodies.
So, what do you want
 Quoting: mclarek 971744



Remember these simple questions?

Care to explain how a Venusian sidereal day thus lasts longer than a Venusian year (243 versus 224.7 Earth days). However, because of Venus's retrograde rotation, the length of a solar day on Venus is significantly shorter than the sidereal day?


How about you tackle the 13:8 orbital resonance between Venus and Earth?

Didn't think so.


You totally ignored them.

Look, kid, the best thing you could do is master high school physics and the elementary math that involves, learn the proper terms then come back to try to argue your case.

So far all you have done is armwave and behave like a troll.

What do you can the motion of a planet about its north south axis? What is the proper technical term?

What is the proper technical term for a planets motion around its parent star?

Start with those, clunk. Then perhaps there will be something to talk about, until you learn the proper nomenclature there is no communications possible with you.

Last Edited by The Commentator on 05/24/2010 04:32 AM
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 04:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
What would you like to call this, so we can agree there is a difference between the spin on the axis of the Moon from that of Venus?

They both spin on their axis in orientation around their orbits, but the latter one has a discernible extra spin while on its orbit.



Care to explain how a Venusian sidereal day thus lasts longer than a Venusian year (243 versus 224.7 Earth days). However, because of Venus's retrograde rotation, the length of a solar day on Venus is significantly shorter than the sidereal day?


How about you tackle the 13:8 orbital resonance between Venus and Earth?

Didn't think so.

So, what do you call it so it can talk of both the daily rotation AND a car spinning on its axis, relative to the spin it takes forward on its rotation as well?

YOU answer this. Or you don't show you get the point. Besides, I would love to know what you would like to call this level of understanding, what I called spin, but when any object has it. A car it would not be called "daily" (spin or) rotation, as a planet would get called.

So, when you get off your cock-sure-nasty meds, please answer me what you would like to call this, so it applies to all bodies.
So, what do you want



Remember these simple questions?

Care to explain how a Venusian sidereal day thus lasts longer than a Venusian year (243 versus 224.7 Earth days). However, because of Venus's retrograde rotation, the length of a solar day on Venus is significantly shorter than the sidereal day?


How about you tackle the 13:8 orbital resonance between Venus and Earth?

Didn't think so.


You totally ignored them. [...]

Start with those, clunk. Then perhaps there will be something to talk about, until you learn the proper nomenclature there is no communications possible with you.
 Quoting: The Commentator



No, Smarmee,

YOU answer. We have finally come to the point and you deflect.

What name for the motion of spin with no other motions considered, would you like to give?

I won't let you wiggle out of the question.

I have in fact identified the difference, and you wiggle out!

Do you even have a term you'd like to use, Smarmee?

See, I have itdentified that the motion needs identifying.

The terminology, "spin, rotation, turn" is used for BOTH your orbital path orientation of a body AND the action I have identified.

SO, the confusion here is yours, on this issue.

Name the item I identify. It is now clear it's different in relation to points at rest (relative), and you try to ignoe, saying I don't get deflected onto your other points, Smarmee.
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 05:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
What gets me is that the only viewpoint that the moon doesnt `spin' is from the earths surface, and that same viewpoint also shows that the sun rotates around the earth!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624


So, the fact that from ABOVE the rotation around the Earth, the Moon shows no other face to it doesn't make sense to you?

And if it did, would you understand the difference?

Venus shows rotation (daily) to the Sun. The Moon does not to the Earth.

The fact the Moon "only" shows one face to the Earth is a CRITICAL DIFFERENCE in the type of motion it exhibits.

If the Earth were the Sun, and the Moon were a planet, it would be different ...

So, see the difference? Or are you unable to realize relative motion is the key point here: to the Sun, Venus shows different faces, as does the Moon. But the Moon does not to the Earth.

Gobbledygook from a clunk? Or key perceptual difference?

In order to assess the difference, stop the Moon in forward motion and would the amount it turns be more than its forward motion required? No. Hence, no spin on the body except through forward "steps" along the path.

Venus spins MORE than its orbital path steps require. It spins on another level of understanding. The Moon does not.
mclarek
User ID: 971744
Canada
05/24/2010 05:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
 Quoting: anonymous coward 763624


"What I meant when I said this, "If the Earth were the Sun, and the Moon were a planet, it would be different ..." I mean different than Venus, in showing different faces to the Sun.

When you say that only from the Earth we notice that the Moon shows one face, and then bring in how the Sun seems to go around us, you are showing you do not understand the differences in peception all this requires. We can't compare apples and oranges, so to speak, here. The view of the Sun from the Earth is another motion relationship.

So...
If the Moon were going around the Sun as if the Sun were the Earth, and Venus were orbiting too around the Sun, Venus would show different faces to the Sun and the Moon would not.

And in this example, since the Sun is like the Earth in our comparison, the centre of the GALAXY would be seen to go around the Sun, from the Sun's viewpoint, just as the Sun seems to go around the Earth from the Earth's viewpoint.

My point is, from this mind experiment: Venus would show faces to the Sun and the Moon would not. Other outlying bodies (Sun, for Earth's viewpoint, and Galaxy centre for Sun in Sun's viewpoint) is a confusion of what motions we were discussing, and what is important.

The Moon always shows its face to WHAT IT ORBITS.
Venus doesn't.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
05/24/2010 05:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The Moon always shows its face to WHAT IT ORBITS.
Venus doesn't.
 Quoting: mclarek 971744



hint clunk- look up on google a thing call `tidal locking'

most moons in our solar system show it

eventually the earth will be tidally locked to the sun as well (don't worry, it wont be for billions of years yet- but it will happen eventually)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
05/24/2010 05:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
What gets me is that clunk (nice nicename that, very appropriate) seems totally stuck on using words incorrectly, redefining words to mean something else and generally trying very hard to avoid being pinned down on what (if any) meaning she has herself applied instead of either the common or astronomical usage

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624

Rather like Nancy herself.
andrew

User ID: 979903
Ukraine
05/24/2010 06:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I haven't seen anyone post so many words and end up with a post that means- nothing...

meaningless word babble

What gets me is that clunk (nice nicename that, very appropriate) seems totally stuck on using words incorrectly, redefining words to mean something else and generally trying very hard to avoid being pinned down on what (if any) meaning she has herself applied instead of either the common or astronomical usage

What gets me is that the only viewpoint that the moon doesnt `spin' is from the earths surface, and that same viewpoint also shows that the sun rotates around the earth!!!

Stand on either of the moons axis points and the starfield clearly rotates
Stand on any point on the moon that receives sunlight and there will be a `sunrise' and `sunset'as the moons rotation causes an apparent rotation of the sun around the moon...

I was able to explain this to an eight year old, and she readily grasped the concept that not only was the moon spinning, but its spin rate had to be the same as its orbital period in order to show the same face to the earth at all times (didn't use words that big, but she readily grasped the concept when shown with a tennis ball and basket ball)
She even grasped the idea that if the moon didn't spin on its axis then it would indeed have a `dark side' and a `light' side (fun games can be had with a torch or table lamp and a basket ball and a tennis ball- we even managed to have an `eclipse' on the basketball/earth)

Learning can be fun clunk- ask your mummy or daddy to try this out with you (but dont touch the lightbulb- it's ouchie burnies hot ok- just like the sun!!!)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624


so many words and a post that means nothing...

you are right about your own post -
meaningless word babble

Moon does NOT rotate around its own axis. It only rotates in an orbit around the Earth, with its one side always "glued" to Earth.

and this doesnt depend on what words you chose to attach to these things to decribe.
andrew

User ID: 979903
Ukraine
05/24/2010 06:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The Moon always shows its face to WHAT IT ORBITS.
Venus doesn't.

hint clunk- look up on google a thing call `tidal locking'

most moons in our solar system show it

eventually the earth will be tidally locked to the sun as well (don't worry, it wont be for billions of years yet- but it will happen eventually)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624


like there is someone on Earth to say this with confidence...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
05/24/2010 06:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
oh look its `handy andy' (older ozzies will remeber the ads)

suits this `let it swing free' young fella rather well..

he probably buys it in by the 44 gallon drumload for his sheets LOL


(whats wrong handy andy- the ning a bit slow since nancy took it over and kicked your smelly arse out on the street??)
andrew

User ID: 979903
Ukraine
05/24/2010 06:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
its spin rate had to be the same as its orbital period in order to show the same face to the earth at all times
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624


nice try by human science to concoct explanation to wht is observed.

I was able to explain this to an eight year old, and she readily grasped the concept that not only was the moon spinning, but didn't use words that big, but she readily grasped the concept when shown with a tennis ball and basket ball
She even grasped the idea that if the moon didn't spin on its axis then it would indeed have a `dark side' and a `light' side (fun games can be had with a torch or table lamp and a basket ball and a tennis ball- we even managed to have an `eclipse' on the basketball/earth)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624


sure, if that's the only opinion she hears, no wonder that she gasps it.
its called peer pressure - one adjusts his opinion to the rest of the group (popular opinion), considering himself wrong.

has been proven experimentally.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 753268
United States
05/24/2010 06:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!






Except that it's not 'imaginary'. The Moon rotates... ON ITS AXIS. MENOW quote


Menow, are you STILL on this thing? The moon does not rotate.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
05/24/2010 06:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
sure, if that's the only opinion she hears, no wonder that she gasps it.
its called peer pressure - one adjusts his opinion to the rest of the group (popular opinion), considering himself wrong.

has been proven experimentally.
[link to en.wikipedia.org]
 Quoting: andrew

now nandrew- care to show us all why nancy is wrong and that the earth ISNT halted in its orbit?
or why she is right and it is??

your link is the best case of showing experiments are usually right I have ever seen

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

has been proven experimentally by you in that post
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
05/24/2010 06:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Except that it's not 'imaginary'. The Moon rotates... ON ITS AXIS. MENOW quote


Menow, are you STILL on this thing? The moon does not rotate.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 753268



no it doesnt...

from the same viewpoint that the sun orbits the earth- your statement is quite correct....

......
andrew

User ID: 979903
Ukraine
05/24/2010 06:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
[link to en.wikipedia.org]

now nandrew- care to show us all why nancy is wrong and that the earth ISNT halted in its orbit?
or why she is right and it is??

your link is the best case of showing experiments are usually right I have ever seen

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

has been proven experimentally by you in that post
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624


that experiment puts scientific objectivity under serious question. scientists are just people, after all, you know.

and peer pressure (social/group conformity) often overrides ones own Independent Thinking and Objectivity, and critical thinking.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
05/24/2010 06:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
and peer pressure (social/group conformity) often overrides ones own Independent Thinking and Objectivity, and critical thinking.
 Quoting: andrew

something you have again proved on many occasions

(the first quote in ()- not the last 3- you have never shown any sign of the last three)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
05/24/2010 07:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

resolved....

13000 views in 1 week
back on target for 572000 views in 11 months
(that would be 13000 x 4 for posts for month)
and 13000 x 4 x 11 for 11 months = 572000 views in 11 months



`somebody enjoyed payday didn't they'



just a bump for `truth'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 795135
United States
05/24/2010 07:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Rather than further complications about using the same words to talk of different actual motions, on different orders of magnitude (one "turn around its axis" relative to path, the other "turn around its axis" relative to another axis) ...

Let's deal with PX. It's our purpose here.

N'est-ce pas?

:)

Refusing to look into the evidence on PX, no matter who brings it forward, or how unlikely you consider the postulate, is inadequate to actually having done due diligence.

So, is there a PX? Does the Vatican leak show it? Or the round-flare SOHO show it? Or what is going on with the damned magnetosphere -- magnetic fields don't just repel without another source, and NASA says it wasn't the Sun, because that was attracting us and giving more particles than usual, because the breaches from repulsion allowed even more attraction particles in from the Sun.

What is repelling us?



Nope, lets deal with your lack of understanding of lunar rotation before we go on to other subjects.

Serious suggestion: Get a copy of Physics for Dummies and Astronomy for Dummies. Read them until you understand them both. Then we can talk about more advanced topics.


Nope; let's deal with your lack of the difference between lunar rotation spin vs lunar spin around its rotation direction!

Or are you just deliberately being difficult?

And refusing to handle PX ... :)
 Quoting: mclarek 971744



Clare, you have yet to address ANY of my thought experiments. Why is that?

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!