Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,732 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 193,371
Pageviews Today: 349,192Threads Today: 104Posts Today: 1,933
02:26 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
This is in the hands of man.



`Benign aliens of course would have other options, if allowed to intervene, which they are not allowed to do due to the Rule of Non-Interference.'

An `interesting' choice of words that she probably will regret later on....

Seeing how we already know that the zetas do not subscribe to the `Rule of Non-Interference' seeing as how they keep bobbling the earth to and fro to simulate the seasons, moving Venus and the moon to simulate various eclipses etc etc

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 763624


I called attention to the fact that "Zetas" say the effects of PX are a natural event and not to be interfered with, but 'they' are are interfereing like crazy. Just one more of the many, many contradictions.
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Go for it Menow.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 795135


Nah. The chemmies make my head hurt. Not nearly as entertaining as Clare-bear.
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
This particular post was just a quick and dirty to demonstrate that many people around world think what they are seeing in their sky is not normal.
 Quoting: George B



As witnessed on GLP, a bunch of people think the sun is not where it belongs in the sky.

Heh.
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
the lower one


the higher one


then another higher aircraft



no one will convince me otherwise.




In spite of what YOU just wrote!


Meaning the chemtrail was sandwiched between two regular contrails. It is highly unlikely there were three different humidity layers within the same column of air. Not impossible but unlikely. Almost every time I have observed what I consider to be chemtrails or persistent contrails I have seen normal contrails being left by aircraft in or near the same altitude and proximity.

Bullshit. Outright lie.

Since I cannot obviously show you what I saw . . . I did not and have not taken pictures . . . but I found a youtube clip which demonstrates much of what I have seen. I do not support all photographs or the implied message throughout this clip but I bring your attention to images found a 30 seconds, 2 minutes:29 seconds and again at 7 minutes and :22 seconds. I am sure you will most likely disagree with my interpretation but at least you have some idea of what I saw.

 Quoting: George B



Same crap, different day.
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Come on guys, don't be so hard on George. He's being civil
after all.

George, it would be a good idea to start a separate thread and
post the link here so anyone interested can go to it.

I will post no more here about Chemtrails . . . I was originally responding to Menow . . . I await his response to my challenge.
 Quoting: George B


Old, tired, regurgitated garbage... not worthy of response.
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Thank you for listening. And of course I'm not trolling. Trolls don't spend so much time explaining what they mean.
 Quoting: mclarek 981736


Or, they use your method... being so verbose and inserting so many false premises that no one can possibly keep up with all the corrections needed. Then, JUST WHEN it seems the troll might finally 'see the light', he starts all over again with repeats of 'mistakes' which drive people mad. Gee, Clare, that's EXACTLY what you did with your last 'explanation' about how the Moon behaves!
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
05/30/2010 10:18 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Come on guys, don't be so hard on George. He's being civil
after all.

George, it would be a good idea to start a separate thread and
post the link here so anyone interested can go to it.

I will post no more here about Chemtrails . . . I was originally responding to Menow . . . I await his response to my challenge.


Old, tired, regurgitated garbage... not worthy of response.
 Quoting: Menow 441617

So you don't think you can defend you position against a jury of your selection with rules of your choice? I personally think it would be entertaining and worthwhile because there is a limit to the duration of the argument and there is a judgment made by independent minds as to the strength of the evidence and power of the presentation. Sorry you refuse!
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I do have many thoughts at a time and interrupt my sentences to acknowledge those cross-points, and it can make for stilted reading.
 Quoting: mclarek 981736



Ya THINK??????????
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
05/30/2010 10:22 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
the lower one


the higher one


then another higher aircraft



no one will convince me otherwise.




In spite of what YOU just wrote!


Meaning the chemtrail was sandwiched between two regular contrails. It is highly unlikely there were three different humidity layers within the same column of air. Not impossible but unlikely. Almost every time I have observed what I consider to be chemtrails or persistent contrails I have seen normal contrails being left by aircraft in or near the same altitude and proximity.

Bullshit. Outright lie.

Since I cannot obviously show you what I saw . . . I did not and have not taken pictures . . . but I found a youtube clip which demonstrates much of what I have seen. I do not support all photographs or the implied message throughout this clip but I bring your attention to images found a 30 seconds, 2 minutes:29 seconds and again at 7 minutes and :22 seconds. I am sure you will most likely disagree with my interpretation but at least you have some idea of what I saw.

Same crap, different day.
 Quoting: Menow 441617

You know I used this only to demonstrate the photographs of the trails, I would not use this in any demonstration of anything else. Sorry, I have to go for now I know you won't miss me!

Last Edited by George B on 05/30/2010 10:27 AM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Menow
User ID: 441617
United States
05/30/2010 10:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Come on guys, don't be so hard on George. He's being civil
after all.

George, it would be a good idea to start a separate thread and
post the link here so anyone interested can go to it.

I will post no more here about Chemtrails . . . I was originally responding to Menow . . . I await his response to my challenge.


Old, tired, regurgitated garbage... not worthy of response.

So you don't think you can defend you position against a jury of your selection with rules of your choice? I personally think it would be entertaining and worthwhile because there is a limit to the duration of the argument and there is a judgment made by independent minds as to the strength of the evidence and power of the presentation. Sorry you refuse!
 Quoting: George B


Start yet another chemtrail thread and see if you can get anyone to wade through that same old inane crapola with you... AGAIN!

Good luck with that.
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
05/30/2010 10:57 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Come on guys, don't be so hard on George. He's being civil
after all.

George, it would be a good idea to start a separate thread and
post the link here so anyone interested can go to it.

I will post no more here about Chemtrails . . . I was originally responding to Menow . . . I await his response to my challenge.


Old, tired, regurgitated garbage... not worthy of response.

So you don't think you can defend you position against a jury of your selection with rules of your choice? I personally think it would be entertaining and worthwhile because there is a limit to the duration of the argument and there is a judgment made by independent minds as to the strength of the evidence and power of the presentation. Sorry you refuse!


Start yet another chemtrail thread and see if you can get anyone to wade through that same old inane crapola with you... AGAIN!

Good luck with that.
 Quoting: Menow 441617


The difference my friend would be that there would be a limitation of time, an endpoint and judgment (temporary as it would be). We could use this method to go through that list you or someone gave Clare. Rational debate versus Ranting! I would be willing to take either side of a debate except for the one on Chemtrails. I would be willing to take Nancy's position if that would make you feel better. I in no way wish to embarrass you or myself; I just think this format could be a gas! Think about it!

Last Edited by George B on 05/30/2010 01:56 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 02:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
George, I, too, have been being careful with people who can't deal with implications.

<snip>. That's the more important thing: we can think beyond the next Slurpee from a 7/11,

<snip>
some people's viciousness and anger about even saying the name "JFK" (without any other mention!) is stunning after all this time.



First of all, in my opinion there's at least as much if not more viciousness and anger coming from the side of the conspiracy theorists.

Secondly, your first two statements are straight out of the handbook and condescendingly annoying.

There are people who can "deal with implications," who are concerned with the larger problems facing the world, who have studied these subjects as much as you but who have come to different conclusions.

As far as your family is concerned, it might be your obsessiveness as much as the subject matter that causes friction. I know because I've been there.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 969583


Hi.

I actually was out for a Slurpee two days ago while on my way to "Ghostwriter", and had the thought, therefore. It was an incongruous situation: to talk with a friend about spies and sell-outs in gov't, while at an "ordinary" place. But both are truly going on.

One does not have to be condescending to be telling the truth about people who do not INTEGRATE their knowledge: they sit in a bar, say, and discuss politics, and vote -- so in that sense it's part of their life -- but to integrate the knowledge/feeling that the hell is going on right now and all the time, that's rarer, IN FACT.

A lot of people also are deliberately not informing themselves. There are some things which are not actually debatable any more. There is a lack of media pundits acknowledging these truths (issues which are for sure, like JFK's death's being a conspiracy with current implications). Because of this, people remain very often in a haze of uncertainty, or if they do bother, they can reach "different conclusions", having read "the sides" but not the analysis of the sides, to help them compare the mistakes.

Or they get furious just hearing of "that kooky stuff." Because it's been KEPT OFF-LIMITS, made off limits by official denouncements.

In fact, it's history, reality. Some of it is now KNOWN.

As to family or obsessiveness, this is true, it can be a problem. But there is a fact that when one wakes up it does become a constant fire to learn more and stop the insanity in the world. In time, this fire, if you're healthy, does diminish into a smoulder -- but it should NEVER go away entirely for importan applications.

As Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr, said (and I paraphrase): Don't go suggesting I shouldn't care. Rhere are some things which are important and I do care and I should always care.

Obsessiveness and deep care not only can look similar to those who resist the challenge of the latter, but in fact they overlap at times. And it is hard to stay more on the side of deeply caring.

No-one wants to be actually obsessive, of course. So it helps to remind ourselves that it is hard work and time to discover and be upset about these things, which can look like morbid obsession or turn to it sometimes. As long as we keep it to the mostly healthy "obsessive" side though and in the end, if we keep our spirit focussed on the caring aspect, we won't be obsessive, so much as active and caring -- even if others call demean that focussed and knowedgeable care as obsessive anyway.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 02:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
This is in the hands of man.



`Benign aliens of course would have other options, if allowed to intervene, which they are not allowed to do due to the Rule of Non-Interference.'

An `interesting' choice of words that she probably will regret later on....

Seeing how we already know that the zetas do not subscribe to the `Rule of Non-Interference' seeing as how they keep bobbling the earth to and fro to simulate the seasons, moving Venus and the moon to simulate various eclipses etc etc



I called attention to the fact that "Zetas" say the effects of PX are a natural event and not to be interfered with, but 'they' are are interfereing like crazy. Just one more of the many, many contradictions.
 Quoting: Menow 441617


"They" mean they will not interfere with it to STOP IT, as people keep asking -- whereas they are interfering to keep things calm as long as possible and give us a chance to prepare, supposedly.

Is that too hard for you, Menow, or Do "Ya THINK???" at all about what you write to insult?

[Quoting for literal meaning this time, what was originaly Menow's own sarcasm about my writing -- and his lack of comprehension, combined, though he didn't know the latter, of course.]
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 02:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Oh, and George, if you do want to be in touch, just post here a couple of letters in your e-mail name, in their order, so I can recognize it as you ... if he forwards it to me.

Thanks.

Sorry, I don't quite understand, you are a bit too terse for me to catch your meaning. Who is "he?"
 Quoting: George B


Jim Fetzer. I said in the previous post that u could send your e-mail to him and he'd forward it to me, I'm sure. He's listed at www.911scholars.org (Scholars for 9/11 Truth) and other places. Because his e-mail is public, I feel it makes sense to go through him if you want.

Love your Triceratops!

:) :) :) There's a trismiley!
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
05/30/2010 02:57 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Oh, and George, if you do want to be in touch, just post here a couple of letters in your e-mail name, in their order, so I can recognize it as you ... if he forwards it to me.

Thanks.

Sorry, I don't quite understand, you are a bit too terse for me to catch your meaning. Who is "he?"


Jim Fetzer. I said in the previous post that u could send your e-mail to him and he'd forward it to me, I'm sure. He's listed at www.911scholars.org (Scholars for 9/11 Truth) and other places. Because his e-mail is public, I feel it makes sense to go through him if you want.

Love your Triceratops!

:) :) :) There's a trismiley!
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

I will give it a try. The Triceratops is a good avatar . . . successful but extinct creature of the past but dangerous if resurrected!
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 02:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Old, tired, regurgitated garbage... not worthy of response.

So you don't think you can defend you position against a jury of your selection with rules of your choice? I personally think it would be entertaining and worthwhile because there is a limit to the duration of the argument and there is a judgment made by independent minds as to the strength of the evidence and power of the presentation. Sorry you refuse!


Start yet another chemtrail thread and see if you can get anyone to wade through that same old inane crapola with you... AGAIN!

Good luck with that.


The difference my friend would be that there would be a limitation of time, an endpoint and judgment (temporary as it would be). We could use this method to go through that list you or someone gave Clare. Rational debate versus Ranting! I would be willing to take either side of a debate except for the one on Chemtrails. I would be willing to take Nancy's position if that would make you feel better. I in no way wish to embarrass you or myself; I just think this format could be a gas! Think about it!
 Quoting: George B


Absolutely.

There's a reason there are limited rules for argument in law or debate. It's so that people can't just say "poppycock" and sway the audience without reasoned comment.

Many in the gov't won't debate; they just want to hire trolls (as Harper, our Pirme Minister was just revealed as doing, and Cass Sunstein has been calling for doing,because "conspiracy theories" must be like terrorism in their "anti-American" -- establishment, but he doesn't say that -- point of view, so they should be defeated by a conspiracy!).

The story of what happened when Allen Dulles came to Berkeley (I think it was Berkeley) but was not given lee-way by the students to weasel out of a question ... is fascinating. It's in Lifton's "Best Evidence".

The real creeps get away with their crap when you don't see that the citizens have to count their own debates as authoritative, since the "Imprimatur" (printing press approval by the Vatican, originally) will not be given willingly or in a timely manner.

Over time, many covert things are roughly "acknowledged" by the institutions. (Before that, they are acknowledged too, but not directly or consistently. So we have to look and be consistent in our research and trust of our common sense, in the best sense.)
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 03:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Or, they use your method... being so verbose and inserting so many false premises that no one can possibly keep up with all the corrections needed. Then, JUST WHEN it seems the troll might finally 'see the light', he starts all over again with repeats of 'mistakes' which drive people mad. Gee, Clare, that's EXACTLY what you did with your last 'explanation' about how the Moon behaves!
 Quoting: Menow 441617


Or, Menow, they never answer the key question asked: I asked one of YOU:

The Moon is rotating, which I acknowledged on day 2, as if you count the revolution around the Sun and the perspective of points other than the Earth, then yes. For sure. And in fact this is the case so the Moon has angular momentum from that bunch of factors.

But what YOU never understood or acknowledged -- and thus thought I was saying it isn't rotating (at all) -- is that the Moon is not rotating from the Earth's perspective, and if all motions are eliminated (forward around Sun, in a Planet X cup with earth, per Nancy, plus the Moon's orbit of the Earth), then WOULD IT START TO ROTATE RELATIVE TO EARTH -- or would it just be still, facing the Earth?

The Earth would still be rotating until a Pole Shift. The Moon, whose rotation is at the superposition level of solar orbit, not Earth orbit, would be merely stopped in the cup once its forward motion was stopped, n'est-ce pas?

You answer what you think. Love to hear it.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 03:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Love your Triceratops!

:) :) :) There's a trismiley!

I will give it a try. The Triceratops is a good avatar . . . successful but extinct creature of the past but dangerous if resurrected!
 Quoting: George B


True. I always liked triceratops. I had a stuffed one as a kid, which my Mom made. {>:-) There's sort of a triceratops smiley for ya: crest, double horns, eyes, nose-horn and smile.

As to dangerous: well, yes. They were the buffalo/cattle of the plains, in their day.

But more dangerous are the predators we have among us, at the top, and the unsuspecting people (or suspecting, but diminishers of the significance), who think most things are normal, or hope they are without really checking.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Right... I'm required to DISprove your anecdotal claim.

That's rich!

Number one I don't have to prove anything to you . . . I saw what I saw.


Abso-fucking-lutley CLASSIC chemmie-speak! A parody of itself!
 Quoting: Menow 441617 to George B


A mistake to assume that you guys are talking of the same thing. Of course without being there Menow, you would not know if something had happened, directly. However, you could know what events occurred as described. From the description, you could determine anomaly, in some cases.

And George, when you say "prove anything to you" you don't mean of course, prove you saw something. You mean prove the occurrence had characteristics which seemed not normal.

Of course.

Even Menow can understand that, right? That clouds which look like skywriting have distinctive quality and lasting effect, unlike contrails ... and in a layering effect, where other jets with ordinary contrails fly above and below -- if this happened -- then yes, it would be strong evidence they were skywriting or chem spraying.

BTW, some of the videos show the crap being turned ON AND OFF.

That's enough to know something's up -- or they were vids of crop dusters anywya, a similar concept. They cannot be contrails, however.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
05/30/2010 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
This is in the hands of man.



`Benign aliens of course would have other options, if allowed to intervene, which they are not allowed to do due to the Rule of Non-Interference.'

An `interesting' choice of words that she probably will regret later on....

Seeing how we already know that the zetas do not subscribe to the `Rule of Non-Interference' seeing as how they keep bobbling the earth to and fro to simulate the seasons, moving Venus and the moon to simulate various eclipses etc etc



I called attention to the fact that "Zetas" say the effects of PX are a natural event and not to be interfered with, but 'they' are are interfereing like crazy. Just one more of the many, many contradictions.


"They" mean they will not interfere with it to STOP IT, as people keep asking -- whereas they are interfering to keep things calm as long as possible and give us a chance to prepare, supposedly.

Is that too hard for you, Menow, or Do "Ya THINK???" at all about what you write to insult?

[Quoting for literal meaning this time, what was originaly Menow's own sarcasm about my writing -- and his lack of comprehension, combined, though he didn't know the latter, of course.]
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

Oh please! You don't think moving planets around to cover up imminent doom is interference? Don't you think that if they left everything alone so we could all see evidence of said imminent doom it would encourage everyone to prepare for the alleged arrival of planet x and the pole shift? By covering it up, they are doing the opposite. People see things are normal in the skies and carry on as usual. Those Zetas are sicko. Their interference is akin to pulling the wool over people's eyes so they are unprepared when TSHF. Of course, the more rational and logical answer is that Nancy is full of shit, the Zetas do not exist and nobody is moving planets around to hide planet x, because it doesn't exist. But that just makes too much sense for a doomtard that needs to believe that all our problems will be solved by some outside influence.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 03:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You really are Nancy, Clare. It's becoming more and more obvious.



Clare is Nancy.


WRONG! As proven by M. Clare K.


I think I agree. Clare is not really Nancy; however, if Clare isn't a troll, she is the most unintentionally effective troll ever.
 Quoting: Menow 441617


You didn't ever believe I was Nancy. But if you did, you are dumb. Nancy doesn't speak of philosophy, doubt, and science for real! Lol. Your blindness to me, and my sometimes stilted way of expressing, combined into your thinking I was Nancy? That's rich. There's no way I cuold be realistically confused with Nancy. I include familiarity with my sources, even if I mke the odd semantic error which you either don't recognize or deliberately do not help with ... and then, OMG!, you can't understand the point. No, Menow, I think you were mocking so much you ended up confusing the rest, too. You didn't help.
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
05/30/2010 03:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Right... I'm required to DISprove your anecdotal claim.

That's rich!

Number one I don't have to prove anything to you . . . I saw what I saw.


Abso-fucking-lutley CLASSIC chemmie-speak! A parody of itself!


A mistake to assume that you guys are talking of the same thing. Of course without being there Menow, you would not know if something had happened, directly. However, you could know what events occurred as described. From the description, you could determine anomaly, in some cases.

And George, when you say "prove anything to you" you don't mean of course, prove you saw something. You mean prove the occurrence had characteristics which seemed not normal.

Of course.

Even Menow can understand that, right? That clouds which look like skywriting have distinctive quality and lasting effect, unlike contrails ... and in a layering effect, where other jets with ordinary contrails fly above and below -- if this happened -- then yes, it would be strong evidence they were skywriting or chem spraying.

BTW, some of the videos show the crap being turned ON AND OFF.

That's enough to know something's up -- or they were vids of crop dusters anywya, a similar concept. They cannot be contrails, however.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

He knows very clearly what I said and what I was trying to demonstrate to him. I have shown the same situation in the sky to at least two individuals, one my spouse and one my neighbor . . . they had no problem with the concept.
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
"They" mean they will not interfere with it to STOP IT, as people keep asking -- whereas they are interfering to keep things calm as long as possible and give us a chance to prepare, supposedly.

Is that too hard for you, Menow, or Do "Ya THINK???" at all about what you write to insult?


Oh please! You don't think moving planets around to cover up imminent doom is interference? Don't you think that if they left everything alone so we could all see evidence of said imminent doom it would encourage everyone to prepare for the alleged arrival of planet x and the pole shift? By covering it up, they are doing the opposite. People see things are normal in the skies and carry on as usual. Those Zetas are sicko. Their interference is akin to pulling the wool over people's eyes so they are unprepared when TSHF. Of course, the more rational and logical answer is that Nancy is full of shit, the Zetas do not exist and nobody is moving planets around to hide planet x, because it doesn't exist. But that just makes too much sense for a doomtard that needs to believe that all our problems will be solved by some outside influence.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953


Whether Nancy and Zetas are full of shit is one thing, or if Zetas exist --

the point you are missing is that both are "interference" but whenever they say, "We cannot interfere" it is in context of "interfere to stop it" (as people keep asking). So it means INTERVENE in the sense of FIX IT ALL.

The other interference is mere MAINTENANCE OF IMPRESSIONS that the status quo is continuing.

"Interfere" is a vague term in this case and you have been confused, through Menow, clearly. Menow, stop it!

So, the "Zetas" are interfering (i.e., fixing appearances) but will not interfere (i.e., to save us from the PX disaster).

Get it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 969583
United States
05/30/2010 03:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
One does not have to be condescending to be telling the truth about people who do not INTEGRATE their knowledge:

<snip>
A lot of people also are deliberately not informing themselves. There are some things which are not actually debatable any more.

<snip>

Or they get furious just hearing of "that kooky stuff." Because it's been KEPT OFF-LIMITS, made off limits by official denouncements.

In fact, it's history, reality. Some of it is now KNOWN.

 Quoting: mclarek 986233



ZetaTalk and chemtrails, the notion that the Moon is not rotating, that planes didn't crash into buildings on 9/11, that the many witnesses in NYC are wrong, that Apollo didn't go to the Moon and that the Zapruder film is a fake are not "history" and are all certainly debatable.

Once again, there are many people, especially here, who have extensively informed themselves on these sorts of issues and have come to different conclusions than you.

If you are "integrating" information and theories that are not based on reality, you're only digging deeper and deeper rabbit holes for yourself.

I also question the premise that the "kooky stuff" has been kept off limits. Are you seriously suggesting that for example, JFK assassination theories haven't been widely accessible for years? Or 911 theories?

You are covering a lot of ground in your interview and touching on some things that I might consider valid.

However, anything real that you might discuss is discredited by association with the implausible. That's frequently mentioned as a strategy of deliberate disinformation.. I don't believe you are involved in anything like that, but the function is the same regardless of intent.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 03:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
mclarek: Even Menow can understand that, right? That clouds which look like skywriting have distinctive quality and lasting effect, unlike contrails ... and in a layering effect, where other jets with ordinary contrails fly above and below -- if this happened -- then yes, it would be strong evidence they were skywriting or chem spraying.

BTW, some of the videos show the crap being turned ON AND OFF.

That's enough to know something's up -- or they were vids of crop dusters anywya, a similar concept. They cannot be contrails, however.

George B: He knows very clearly what I said and what I was trying to demonstrate to him. I have shown the same situation in the sky to at least two individuals, one my spouse and one my neighbor . . . they had no problem with the concept.
 Quoting: George B


I was being sarcastic to Menow.
Not because I hate him but because inanity has its limits.

There are some people who do not WANT to know the connections that show conclusively that something is going on.

I live in Toronto, but I have NEVER seen criss-cross as in some of those photos, and some are not bad photos at all. They are appropriate in lighting, etc., and have some dispersal -- like normal skywriting.

We have had trails which last and disperse (chemtrails), but not the wild ones some of these people are getting.

Most of our trails are contrails.

I HAVE seen crop dusters and yes, sometimes they turn their jets on and off a bit, when starting, or if there's a change needed in which tank they're tapping. Some of these vids show that kind of behaviour.

The satellite pics are likely doctored. Maybe not all, but it would be easier to do that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
05/30/2010 03:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
"They" mean they will not interfere with it to STOP IT, as people keep asking -- whereas they are interfering to keep things calm as long as possible and give us a chance to prepare, supposedly.

Is that too hard for you, Menow, or Do "Ya THINK???" at all about what you write to insult?


Oh please! You don't think moving planets around to cover up imminent doom is interference? Don't you think that if they left everything alone so we could all see evidence of said imminent doom it would encourage everyone to prepare for the alleged arrival of planet x and the pole shift? By covering it up, they are doing the opposite. People see things are normal in the skies and carry on as usual. Those Zetas are sicko. Their interference is akin to pulling the wool over people's eyes so they are unprepared when TSHF. Of course, the more rational and logical answer is that Nancy is full of shit, the Zetas do not exist and nobody is moving planets around to hide planet x, because it doesn't exist. But that just makes too much sense for a doomtard that needs to believe that all our problems will be solved by some outside influence.


Whether Nancy and Zetas are full of shit is one thing, or if Zetas exist --

the point you are missing is that both are "interference" but whenever they say, "We cannot interfere" it is in context of "interfere to stop it" (as people keep asking). So it means INTERVENE in the sense of FIX IT ALL.

The other interference is mere MAINTENANCE OF IMPRESSIONS that the status quo is continuing.

"Interfere" is a vague term in this case and you have been confused, through Menow, clearly. Menow, stop it!

So, the "Zetas" are interfering (i.e., fixing appearances) but will not interfere (i.e., to save us from the PX disaster).

Get it?
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

Whoa, testy, aren't you. Leave Menow out of this. If I am confused it is about the gobbledygook you spew. How do you expect to have a civil discussion when you make assumptions and insult my intelligence right out of the gate?

It makes me think that you might be the shunned Luserboi trying to play nice, or maybe one of the other dumbfuck Canucks that do Nancy's bidding, like Agnes or Earth320 hiding behind a proxy.
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
05/30/2010 03:39 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
mclarek: Even Menow can understand that, right? That clouds which look like skywriting have distinctive quality and lasting effect, unlike contrails ... and in a layering effect, where other jets with ordinary contrails fly above and below -- if this happened -- then yes, it would be strong evidence they were skywriting or chem spraying.

BTW, some of the videos show the crap being turned ON AND OFF.

That's enough to know something's up -- or they were vids of crop dusters anywya, a similar concept. They cannot be contrails, however.

George B: He knows very clearly what I said and what I was trying to demonstrate to him. I have shown the same situation in the sky to at least two individuals, one my spouse and one my neighbor . . . they had no problem with the concept.


I was being sarcastic to Menow.
Not because I hate him but because inanity has its limits.

There are some people who do not WANT to know the connections that show conclusively that something is going on.

I live in Toronto, but I have NEVER seen criss-cross as in some of those photos, and some are not bad photos at all. They are appropriate in lighting, etc., and have some dispersal -- like normal skywriting.

We have had trails which last and disperse (chemtrails), but not the wild ones some of these people are getting.

Most of our trails are contrails.

I HAVE seen crop dusters and yes, sometimes they turn their jets on and off a bit, when starting, or if there's a change needed in which tank they're tapping. Some of these vids show that kind of behaviour.

The satellite pics are likely doctored. Maybe not all, but it would be easier to do that.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

When and if you see it . . . it will make a lasting impression on you. It hits you in the gut and you get angry.

Last Edited by George B on 05/30/2010 03:45 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 969583
United States
05/30/2010 03:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
the point you are missing is that both are "interference" but whenever they say, "We cannot interfere" it is in context of "interfere to stop it" (as people keep asking). So it means INTERVENE in the sense of FIX IT ALL.

The other interference is mere MAINTENANCE OF IMPRESSIONS that the status quo is continuing.

"Interfere" is a vague term in this case and you have been confused, through Menow, clearly. Menow, stop it!

So, the "Zetas" are interfering (i.e., fixing appearances) but will not interfere (i.e., to save us from the PX disaster).

Get it?
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


This premise is very close to the most ridiculous claim in all of ZetaTalk, which is saying quite a bit.

It's obvious to any rational person that has followed the saga from pre-2003 that this is all just a bizarre, completely illogical and impossible rationalization for events not happening as Nancy predicted.

No one but a handful of very deluded people will take you seriously about anything if you attempt to defend this nonsense.

I don't know if that's fair or not but it's the truth.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 969583
United States
05/30/2010 03:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It makes me think that you might be the shunned Luserboi trying to play nice, or maybe one of the other dumbfuck Canucks that do Nancy's bidding, like Agnes or Earth320 hiding behind a proxy.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953


No, she's who she says she is.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
05/30/2010 03:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
One does not have to be condescending to be telling the truth about people who do not INTEGRATE their knowledge:

<snip>
A lot of people also are deliberately not informing themselves. There are some things which are not actually debatable any more.

<snip>

Or they get furious just hearing of "that kooky stuff." Because it's been KEPT OFF-LIMITS, made off limits by official denouncements.

In fact, it's history, reality. Some of it is now KNOWN.




ZetaTalk and chemtrails, the notion that the Moon is not rotating, that planes didn't crash into buildings on 9/11, that the many witnesses in NYC are wrong, that Apollo didn't go to the Moon and that the Zapruder film is a fake are not "history" and are all certainly debatable.
[...]
I also question the premise that the "kooky stuff" has been kept off limits. Are you seriously suggesting that for example, JFK assassination theories haven't been widely accessible for years? Or 911 theories?

You are covering a lot of ground in your interview and touching on some things that I might consider valid.

However, anything real that you might discuss is discredited by association with the implausible. That's frequently mentioned as a strategy of deliberate disinformation.. I don't believe you are involved in anything like that, but the function is the same regardless of intent.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 969583


Get real. Of course the assassination theories have been around, but kept as "theory as a notion" not theory tht would stand in a court of law and yes, let's take it there. No -- the mendia have talking points and always present it as "no credible evience" whenever they can. This keeps good people believing there is no conclusion possible.

As to the Z-film it is debated but not "debatable" any longer. It was at issue before Costella's work on optics. Now, the case is done. It is only the after-party of debate teams which you are now listening to: where the losers keep sayng, "we didn't lose".

Regarding the video fakry AND the plane issue of 9/11, the former is also proven with conclusive optic evidence (not all evidence is of that calibre, but some is: the parallax issues are), and for the latter, there is conclusive lack of evidence: planes leave massive wire, parts, etc., and can only manoevre in certain ways.

The Moon hoax I said I am not as familiar with the total case, but it stinks to the stars because of the photo fakes (some are definitely), and like the Z film, they were presented on a continuous roll. They are studio prints and technically perfect ...

But also the Van Allen belts and the little LEM make the thing preposterous.

The Zeta thing is not at the same level of testability. Not unless they present themselves physically for testing. Or PX presents itself -- but in that case, this debate is moot.