Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,941 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 2,857,358
Pageviews Today: 3,923,267Threads Today: 879Posts Today: 17,351
11:24 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 218281
United States
06/07/2010 08:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Sorry I'm feeding the Troll but it's totally fucking with my head.


She does it on purpose. She has managed to hijack this thread with her drivel, she accuses us of being blind and closed minded, but with every post, she shows that she is the one that has made up her mind and won't even consider that she is wrong. No amount of common sense or evidence will make her realize that youtube, Alex Jones, Lear and all the other dim wits she cites as sources may not be as credible as she thinks. I think she is looking for attention, and why she chose this thread is beyond me. I wish she would take it to a thread of her own and leave this one alone. She has no respect for the dead, for the grieving families, so it's no surprise that she has no respect for any of us. The only way she can get the attention she craves is by pushing our buttons with her insensitivity and illogical diatribes so we can't resist replying. I will do my best to ignore her and hopefully we can bring the thread back on topic. If we all refuse to play her game, maybe she will move on. It seems to have worked with Wankdrew, Luser, Maxipads and Freakshow.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953


Let's please dispense with this attention whore. She was fun at first, but has now grown into a huge bore with an unsupportable agenda.
Menow
User ID: 992236
United States
06/07/2010 08:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
BTW, guess who's resurfaced with the Ningcompoops - GRANT!

[link to poleshift.ning.com]


LOL!! The IQ level over there just took a nose dive then.


I can't even stand to read anything over there anymore. Without anyone being allowed to correct anything, it's too frustrating to wade through.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 969583


Yeah... they keep agreeing with themselves that the sunrise time is off, clocks are off, Moon is off, etc. It's really hard to watch without being able to comment.
Menow
User ID: 992236
United States
06/07/2010 09:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Sorry I'm feeding the Troll but it's totally fucking with my head.


She does it on purpose. She has managed to hijack this thread with her drivel, she accuses us of being blind and closed minded, but with every post, she shows that she is the one that has made up her mind and won't even consider that she is wrong. No amount of common sense or evidence will make her realize that youtube, Alex Jones, Lear and all the other dim wits she cites as sources may not be as credible as she thinks. I think she is looking for attention, and why she chose this thread is beyond me. I wish she would take it to a thread of her own and leave this one alone. She has no respect for the dead, for the grieving families, so it's no surprise that she has no respect for any of us. The only way she can get the attention she craves is by pushing our buttons with her insensitivity and illogical diatribes so we can't resist replying. I will do my best to ignore her and hopefully we can bring the thread back on topic. If we all refuse to play her game, maybe she will move on. It seems to have worked with Wankdrew, Luser, Maxipads and Freakshow.


Let's please dispense with this attention whore. She was fun at first, but has now grown into a huge bore with an unsupportable agenda.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 218281


Is anybody willing to deal with her 'parallax' issue? I know I'm not, but I do wonder wtf she is talking about, in a morbid curiosity sort of way.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 946069
United States
06/07/2010 09:37 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Yeah... they keep agreeing with themselves that the sunrise time is off, clocks are off, Moon is off, etc. It's really hard to watch without being able to comment.
 Quoting: Menow 992236


Still good for a laugh though. I am so looking forward to seeing what they do when "Planet X" fails to show up within the next year. I'm also looking forward to seeing what Nancy's next excuse will be.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
***ZetaMaX***

User ID: 659599
United States
06/07/2010 09:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Yeah... they keep agreeing with themselves that the sunrise time is off, clocks are off, Moon is off, etc. It's really hard to watch without being able to comment.


Still good for a laugh though. I am so looking forward to seeing what they do when "Planet X" fails to show up within the next year. I'm also looking forward to seeing what Nancy's next excuse will be.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

rightmug
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.

ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
 [link to www.zetatalk.com] 

ZetaMax
Menow
User ID: 992236
United States
06/07/2010 10:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Back to non-Clare business.

Ningcompoop watch:

When people finally ask reasonable questions, Nancy offers obvious bullshit, but they never challenge her on it. Example:

Question: Also when Planet X arrives, and since it generates its own heat, would it's 'yearly' passage by the sun mean it's summer time on planet x? How hot would it be?

Answer: And where things heat up during their passage by our Sun, it is a water planet and very shrouded so does not get to a boil during the passage.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]


But from that link, in direct reference to the question, is:

The passage through the Solar System is quick, occurring in a few short months [Note: see 2003 date explanation], so the combined warming from the Sun as well as the interior of the 12th Planet scarcely has a chance to begin before it ends. What warming that does occur simply results in more active winds.

The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 218281
United States
06/07/2010 10:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Is anybody willing to deal with her 'parallax' issue? I know I'm not, but I do wonder wtf she is talking about, in a morbid curiosity sort of way.
 Quoting: Menow 992236


The "parallex" issue she keeps bringing up has been debunked a hundred times over. She just wants to ignore the evidence and explanations.

[link to acebaker.blogspot.com]

[link to www.911forum.org.uk]
Menow
User ID: 992236
United States
06/07/2010 11:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Is anybody willing to deal with her 'parallax' issue? I know I'm not, but I do wonder wtf she is talking about, in a morbid curiosity sort of way.


The "parallex" issue she keeps bringing up has been debunked a hundred times over. She just wants to ignore the evidence and explanations.

[link to acebaker.blogspot.com]

[link to www.911forum.org.uk]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 218281


Oh yeah... I remember that stuff now.

Thanks.
Setheory
User ID: 869850
United States
06/07/2010 11:47 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Now, she had 3 identical photoheads; and a flip with a morph on one, and another identical head of that one in another.

 Quoting: mclarek 986233


Outright lie. I worked in a photo lab for three years and this is simply not true. However, I'm also aware that it will not prevent you from saying it over and over again.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/07/2010 12:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Is anybody willing to deal with her 'parallax' issue? I know I'm not, but I do wonder wtf she is talking about, in a morbid curiosity sort of way.


The "parallex" issue she keeps bringing up has been debunked a hundred times over. She just wants to ignore the evidence and explanations.

[link to acebaker.blogspot.com]

[link to www.911forum.org.uk]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 218281

Just like she ignores anything but the parts she can use to continue her rants. Like how she cherry picked through my post and quoted part of a sentence and challenged with more 911 tin foil hat lunacy, but chose to ignore the parts where I said she was an attention seeking troll hijacking this thread and disrespecting everyone in the process. She actually is a lot like Nancy, minus the "fan" base and power to censor and ban. Just as deluded, just as arrogant and just as self contradictory as Nancy.
Setheory
User ID: 869850
United States
06/07/2010 12:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
At the risk of taking this thread back on topic, have you guys seen the relaunch status of the Zetasquawk page?Hilarious. Looks like the government is getting ready to launch a new campaign against Nancy. ROFLMAO.
[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

So you're saying because its launch is delayed, it's not a gov't site?

 Quoting: mclarek 986233


putin

Why would the government bother with this lady?

For God's sake Clare...the woman claims the earth is halted in it's orbit...Aliens contacted her through a candy wrapper and now speak to her via a brain implant!

I'm speechless.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/07/2010 12:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Back to non-Clare business.

Ningcompoop watch:

When people finally ask reasonable questions, Nancy offers obvious bullshit, but they never challenge her on it. Example:

Question: Also when Planet X arrives, and since it generates its own heat, would it's 'yearly' passage by the sun mean it's summer time on planet x? How hot would it be?

Answer: And where things heat up during their passage by our Sun, it is a water planet and very shrouded so does not get to a boil during the passage.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]


But from that link, in direct reference to the question, is:

The passage through the Solar System is quick, occurring in a few short months [Note: see 2003 date explanation], so the combined warming from the Sun as well as the interior of the 12th Planet scarcely has a chance to begin before it ends. What warming that does occur simply results in more active winds.

The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.
 Quoting: Menow 992236

That's funny. I set a trap for her and made up a ludicrous story about the moon being way off. She answered that PX has been affecting the moon since 04. I said I only just noticed it, that before now the moon was hanging out in my bedroom window EVERY NIGHT (lol) for as long as I've lived here, but now I only see it in the bathroom, and I asked her why it hasn't moved around until now. The answer was that PX is still in it's "slow creep" past the sun. She can't keep her own bullshit straight and none of the ningcompoops dare point out these abundant self contradictions. It's pretty funny!
Setheory
User ID: 869850
United States
06/07/2010 02:03 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Second, these are "family members" and in a memorial non-commented-upon bio, from 2003-2009 (and only 1 in that whole period), these family members would most likely be plants. Hey, look at the faces in the portrait the old people ("grandparents") are holding: pasted faces. Can't you tell?

 Quoting: mclarek 986233


You are delusional or lying outright!

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing questionable about that photo…nothing that I could find on the surface or at the pixel level!

I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I spent 3 years in my younger days working as a lab manager for a Photography Company. I spent about 5 hours a day working with Photoshop. We cleaned up acne on senior portraits…omitted “the finger” from group yearbook photos, you name it. You are wrong and it is either due to delusion or outright deceit. The only thing I noticed about that photo was that the parents were not smiling and being a parent myself, I think I know why. I have no respect for you and you deserve none.
Menow
User ID: 995685
United States
06/07/2010 02:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Back to non-Clare business.

Ningcompoop watch:

When people finally ask reasonable questions, Nancy offers obvious bullshit, but they never challenge her on it. Example:

Question: Also when Planet X arrives, and since it generates its own heat, would it's 'yearly' passage by the sun mean it's summer time on planet x? How hot would it be?

Answer: And where things heat up during their passage by our Sun, it is a water planet and very shrouded so does not get to a boil during the passage.
[link to www.zetatalk.com]


But from that link, in direct reference to the question, is:

The passage through the Solar System is quick, occurring in a few short months [Note: see 2003 date explanation], so the combined warming from the Sun as well as the interior of the 12th Planet scarcely has a chance to begin before it ends. What warming that does occur simply results in more active winds.

The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.

That's funny. I set a trap for her and made up a ludicrous story about the moon being way off. She answered that PX has been affecting the moon since 04. I said I only just noticed it, that before now the moon was hanging out in my bedroom window EVERY NIGHT (lol) for as long as I've lived here, but now I only see it in the bathroom, and I asked her why it hasn't moved around until now. The answer was that PX is still in it's "slow creep" past the sun. She can't keep her own bullshit straight and none of the ningcompoops dare point out these abundant self contradictions. It's pretty funny!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953

Yeah, I saw that post. Your statement/question made no sense at all, since the Moon has NEVER been in the same place every night, but Nancy played it straight because she knew she could put it to good use.

Heh.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/07/2010 02:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
that fake family in the news article who never put up a message on the memorial page in all those years -- till now, lol).



[link to www.legacy.com]

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 969583
)

Right. These stories are all from (i.e., actually written) AFTER 2009. What of that do you not understand? There WERE NONE TYPED IN except 1 from 2003 before people exposed this.

Now there are records SAYING the comments are from before 2009, and LOTS of them. BACK DATED> Do you get that?

---------------

Plus TOO MANY perfect freeze-faces. Okay, one person maybe could have one freeze-face (almost, though not perfect like some of these people). And an almost-freeze-face could fool you once. But we have 50, 100 ...

And others with morph-faces.

And other names with no page at all. (Though they're updating that currently, I'm sure.)

And some, like the "Colaio"s had no memorial mentions until the spooks were caught. And then, whoops! A whole bunch (back dated) appear.

And I haven't even told you of the way we can know they did it: the generation of the Sim names by syllables which match and replicate into the next name, for name after name in the coding list. But that's coding. And the work to discover it is in progress by people who know that stuff in more detail. CNN split up the names in weird ways so it would be hard to sort alphabetically or numerically. However, you can understand the concept it even if you don't know the actual code writing.

Let's say (I'm making this one up as an example:

MARC CoLLIns
LYNN M. ARCher
ARroio LIMA [LI-MA}

and so on.
Menow
User ID: 995685
United States
06/07/2010 02:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
code writing.

Let's say (I'm making this one up as an example:

MARC CoLLIns
LYNN M. ARCher
ARroio LIMA [LI-MA}

and so on.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


meds
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/07/2010 02:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Second, these are "family members" and in a memorial non-commented-upon bio, from 2003-2009 (and only 1 in that whole period), these family members would most likely be plants. Hey, look at the faces in the portrait the old people ("grandparents") are holding: pasted faces. Can't you tell?



You are delusional or lying outright!

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing questionable about that photo…nothing that I could find on the surface or at the pixel level!

I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I spent 3 years in my younger days working as a lab manager for a Photography Company. I spent about 5 hours a day working with Photoshop. We cleaned up acne on senior portraits…omitted “the finger” from group yearbook photos, you name it. You are wrong and it is either due to delusion or outright deceit. The only thing I noticed about that photo was that the parents were not smiling and being a parent myself, I think I know why. I have no respect for you and you deserve none.
 Quoting: Setheory 869850

Actually, that photo is so small (in our view) which they're holding you and I can't tell for certain. I'll gant you that much.

They do have perfect face-forward faces though. They could be models instead.

But the point is the men have to be fake. The shills watch the researcher sites -- and realized it DID sound ridiculous for 2 execs to have 1 mention from a Desiree frend, each. (Plus it showed from 2003.)

....................

Now move to the close-up photos. Have a look at those. Freeze faces over and over and over and over.

Some are iffy (perhaps real), but some cannot be and there are too many overall with no significant difference in them.

The rest are morph faces (go to black-white FDNY).

By the way, there was only 1 photo each for the Colaio brothers and so nothing to compare; and the faces for them seem fine. They're not up now, though.

The 2009 memorial site screen shot (from [link to septemberclues.info] and the page now without photos for them at [link to www.legacy.com] .

Don't get stuck on the Colaio front-forward small-image portrait in grandparents' hands. You can't see the faces in the portrait well either! I can tell it's likely with the front-forward faces for the brothers, they were stiff paste-ins like the rest. They could have been models. But their id. makes no sense -- like hundreds of others.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/07/2010 02:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Second, these are "family members" and in a memorial non-commented-upon bio, from 2003-2009 (and only 1 in that whole period), these family members would most likely be plants. Hey, look at the faces in the portrait the old people ("grandparents") are holding: pasted faces. Can't you tell?



You are delusional or lying outright!

There is ABSOLUTELY nothing questionable about that photo…nothing that I could find on the surface or at the pixel level!

I’m somewhat embarrassed to say that I spent 3 years in my younger days working as a lab manager for a Photography Company. I spent about 5 hours a day working with Photoshop. We cleaned up acne on senior portraits…omitted “the finger” from group yearbook photos, you name it. You are wrong and it is either due to delusion or outright deceit. The only thing I noticed about that photo was that the parents were not smiling and being a parent myself, I think I know why. I have no respect for you and you deserve none.

Actually, that photo is so small (in our view) which they're holding you and I can't tell for certain. I'll gant you that much.

They do have perfect face-forward faces though. They could be models instead.

But the point is the men have to be fake. The shills watch the researcher sites -- and realized it DID sound ridiculous for 2 execs to have 1 mention from a Desiree frend, each. (Plus it showed from 2003.)

....................

Now move to the close-up photos. Have a look at those. Freeze faces over and over and over and over.

Some are iffy (perhaps real), but some cannot be and there are too many overall with no significant difference in them.

The rest are morph faces (go to black-white FDNY).

By the way, there was only 1 photo each for the Colaio brothers and so nothing to compare; and the faces for them seem fine. They're not up now, though.

The 2009 memorial site screen shot (from [link to septemberclues.info] and the page now without photos for them at [link to www.legacy.com] .

Don't get stuck on the Colaio front-forward small-image portrait in grandparents' hands. You can't see the faces in the portrait well either! I can tell it's likely with the front-forward faces for the brothers, they were stiff paste-ins like the rest. They could have been models. But their id. makes no sense -- like hundreds of others.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

offtopic
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 946069
United States
06/07/2010 02:47 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.
 Quoting: Menow 992236

There are hundreds of holes and contradictions in ZetaTalk. But, as you said, none of her brain dead followers question her on it. They simply believe whatever she tells them. If she ever does call for them to "drink the Kool Aid"...they'll happily do it.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/07/2010 02:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
code writing.

Let's say (I'm making this one up as an example):

MARC CoLLIns
LYNN M. ARCher
ARroio LIMA [LI-MA}

and so on.


meds
 Quoting: Menow 995685

Nope. They've figured out how it was done. It's how they're bunched in name-groups in the coding to this day. Maybe now they'll scatter it.

Here you go -- ignore the work-in-progress beginning part.

Try to get a sense of the overview point before locking in on mistakes. The work here starts about how they found names at ALL in the mess of the pages, how hard it is to get photos for some which are removed identities ("page not found" but it was, once, a name), etc. And from the split-up info an the coding level -- the spooks named these photos DEAdheads (yup, that's their coding for them) ... some researchers have put together roughly how they do it.

When YOU read though since so many of you are HIGHLY PREJUDICED not merely against the idea but also the people who would do the work to figure out the hypothesis and face the evidence ... when you read then, EXTRACT the info, the gist: how many problems there are and what kinds. Don't get hung up on some mistake or individual inconclusive aspect, as I mentioned.

[link to septemberclues.info]

pp. 4-7, pp. 9-47 (this is where the name problem is discussed AND the "commenter" names, too, for memorial log books). The gist, the repeatable problems with exact similar types of problems are what you will notice.

The rest of the paper isn't that good -- as I said -- because though she shows the method for the photos, her examples are poorer than at [link to septemberclues.info]

And here is the list of names, which they foun very hard to extract (it is sub-divided and incomplete, and pages are missing, and the databank boots you out so you can't do the full searching -- it only searches part at a time).

[link to septemberclues.info]

The list has been changing slightly, though, it seems. So they ask anyone doing comparative research to keep track of when they got their results.
Menow
User ID: 995685
United States
06/07/2010 02:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The cited Zetatalk actually shows the fallacy of Nancy's claim that PX could hover near the Sun for 7 years with a living population on it. But will anyone at the Ning challenge the contradiction? Of course not.

There are hundreds of holes and contradictions in ZetaTalk. But, as you said, none of her brain dead followers question her on it. They simply believe whatever she tells them. If she ever does call for them to "drink the Kool Aid"...they'll happily do it.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

They seem unable to connect the dots or exercise any real discernment. They will cite astronomical things, like about planets being in certain places or proximity, but that is from standard, charts and predictions which would never really take place if Nancy's claim of a halted Earth was true. But, on the other hand, they won't question Nancy's claim of a halted Earth, at least enough to actually check it out with any valid methods.

It's an amazing collection of suspension of disbelief.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/07/2010 02:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Where is Returner?

"Spooking" about? Creaking around the corners?

:)
Menow
User ID: 995685
United States
06/07/2010 03:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Where is Returner?

"Spooking" about? Creaking around the corners?

:)
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


Hey... I thought *I* was your special one... Now you like HIS attentive abuse better than mine? Slut.
Menow
User ID: 995685
United States
06/07/2010 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Ninging:

Nancy has now taken it into the realm where she can claim absolutely anything she desires and cover any contingency. It's pure magic, now, so anything goes. Katy bar the door!


Reply by Nancy Lieder

"Having said 7 of 10 by end of 2010, and having said at least one or more of those holographic presentation incidents will happen, they can say no more."
Returner
User ID: 997
United States
06/07/2010 03:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Returner had an accident Saturday afternoon, and is still in a fair degree of pain. Just got in to work to do some things that must be done injuries or no. Head is still pretty fuzzy so you'll all forgive me if I'm not up to my usual rate of posting.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/07/2010 03:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's an example of names (p. 32 of [link to septemberclues.info] where the work is on-going but they've made some headway with what was done):

Ana M. Cen]teno
Denise Crant
Mary D'Antonio
Elizabeth Ann Darling
Elena Ledesma
Luis Jimenez Jr.
William Lum Jr.
Arthur Warren Scullin

and another from a different section of the databank (p. 31 of [link to septemberclues.info] ):

Rajesh Khandelwal
Richard J. Klares
Dorota Kopiczko
Hamidou S. Larry
Klaus Sprockamp

And on it goes.

Note: the names in the databank are NOT all in alphabetical order. The code had to be extracted (as I said).

And when you do find a bunch, they have same-morph syllables.

THE WHOLE THING FOR 9/11 IS IRREGULAR: the photos, the names, the "memorial tributes", etc. HIGHLY irregular.

And we already have the absolute proof of video fakery in NYC: parallax impossiblities.


So, the rest is just figuring out how they did it all exactly. And that's coming along.
Returner
User ID: 997
United States
06/07/2010 03:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Clare, you did post pics! Thanks. You're very pretty.

Now give me some codeine.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/07/2010 03:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Here's an example of names (p. 32 of [link to septemberclues.info] where the work is on-going but they've made some headway with what was done):

Ana M. Cen]teno
Denise Crant
Mary D'Antonio
Elizabeth Ann Darling
Elena Ledesma
Luis Jimenez Jr.
William Lum Jr.
Arthur Warren Scullin

and another from a different section of the databank (p. 31 of [link to septemberclues.info] ):

Rajesh Khandelwal
Richard J. Klares
Dorota Kopiczko
Hamidou S. Larry
Klaus Sprockamp

And on it goes.

Note: the names in the databank are NOT all in alphabetical order. The code had to be extracted (as I said).

And when you do find a bunch, they have same-morph syllables.

THE WHOLE THING FOR 9/11 IS IRREGULAR: the photos, the names, the "memorial tributes", etc. HIGHLY irregular.

And we already have the absolute proof of video fakery in NYC: parallax impossiblities.


So, the rest is just figuring out how they did it all exactly. And that's coming along.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

awhore
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/07/2010 03:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Returner had an accident Saturday afternoon, and is still in a fair degree of pain. Just got in to work to do some things that must be done injuries or no. Head is still pretty fuzzy so you'll all forgive me if I'm not up to my usual rate of posting.
 Quoting: Returner 997


CRIPES!

SORRY TO HEAR THAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What happened? Rest up?! SOOO SOOORRRYY! Is it bad?

hf

I posted my pics. They're in a link a couple of pages back.

p. 621, 7:53 p.m.
Menow
User ID: 995685
United States
06/07/2010 03:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Returner had an accident Saturday afternoon, and is still in a fair degree of pain. Just got in to work to do some things that must be done injuries or no. Head is still pretty fuzzy so you'll all forgive me if I'm not up to my usual rate of posting.
 Quoting: Returner 997



Sorry to hear that, palomine!

Get well soon, Returner!

News