Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,833 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 511,578
Pageviews Today: 693,130Threads Today: 167Posts Today: 3,113
07:24 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 02:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
That's not how it works you fucking lunatic, you're accusing them of faking their fucking dead relative and demanding that they prove they're not faking it. The burden of proof is on you to prove that they ARE faking it. You haven't done anything of the sort, just handwaved to bullshit you're wrong about. I demand you confront the family of Terence Adderley.
 Quoting: Astronut

I have.

Pasted face, moved features to right slightly.

"Different shoot time" (unlike your claim!) per clothing -- but it's a fake, so that's not a problem.

Photos demonstrate likely non-reality of the character. If he's real, then he's been framed with fake photos -- a complication in the sub-hypothesis.

Now it's up to a DA.
We don't have one, so just WAKE UP for yourselves.

ALL of these duplicates and the FDNY morphs are co-incidences?

Sheesh.

Fletcher and Glascoe? HA HA HA
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
DEAR Astronut, there is a smudgy left side and a bit on the right. Not enough. Honestly. Do you realize how much the bridge has moved? Not IN THE TOTAL FRAME but RELATIVE TO THE BUILDINGS?

That's because the helicopter is flying around the buildings while tracking them instead of the background you stupid idiot, which is why it shows far more parallax than the buildings.
 Quoting: Astronut


No. If the helicopter circled or flew that much, the other buildngs would shift. They DON'T.

Think of it, Astro. Get out of your emotions here.

The far zoom out in the video (one version of the shot goes way back with the camera) shows how the camera has NOT tracked close up -- that's just an impression.

But if it were closer and really flying far enough with a closer-up angle, tracking the buildings, there would be movement in the other buildings.

So, Astronut. You've been fooled by a slightly blurred still frame (the evidence of the blurring adjustments are even left -- sloppy work! -- at the bottom of the frame in your link).

Cheerio.
AstronutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
06/08/2010 03:01 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I have.

Pasted face, moved features to right slightly.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

The features are different because they're two different photos you fucking lunatic, you can see the damn 3d shape of his head when you compare them side by side!!!
Photos demonstrate likely non-reality of the character.
 Quoting: clare

No, they do not.
Now it's up to a DA.
 Quoting: clare

No, you're the one making the claim, it's up to you confront them and expose them if you really believe this shit.
astrobanner2
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I recall seeing her post on the ZetaTalk thread before.

I was referring to recently. Other than a thread about air
travel she has posted exclusively to Zetatalk threads.
 Quoting: DrPostman

I knew what you meant. I did post to one other place, but mostly I browsed daily top posts. I don't know if I was logged in when I posted.

I only heard of GLP from the Zeta issue, which I heard through a friend and looked into it.

Nighty night.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I have.

Pasted face, moved features to right slightly.


The features are different because they're two different photos you fucking lunatic, you can see the damn 3d shape of his head when you compare them side by side!!!
 Quoting: Astronut


Isolate the features. Same. With DIFFERENT HEAD RELATIONSHIP: they put the features over a bit so the glasses would show a bit more of one "side". Otw, same.

TOO MANY with this kind of "near perfection". Wanio is a great example.
AstronutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
06/08/2010 03:03 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So, Astronut. You've been fooled by a slightly blurred still frame (the evidence of the blurring adjustments are even left -- sloppy work! -- at the bottom of the frame in your link).

 Quoting: mclarek 986233

Look you fucking moron, the "blurring adjustment" in the bottom of my image is ME ROTATING THE GODDAMN IMAGE TO BE ROUGHLY THE SAME ANGLE FOR BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT EYE IMAGE; the result is that the layer beneath is exposed showing the original background layer for the image. It's got nothing to do with the video being fake you lunatic.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 996418
United Kingdom
06/08/2010 03:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So, Astronut. You've been fooled by a slightly blurred still frame (the evidence of the blurring adjustments are even left -- sloppy work! -- at the bottom of the frame in your link).


Look you fucking moron, the "blurring adjustment" in the bottom of my image is ME ROTATING THE GODDAMN IMAGE TO BE ROUGHLY THE SAME ANGLE FOR BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT EYE IMAGE; the result is that the layer beneath is exposed showing the original background layer for the image. It's got nothing to do with the video being fake you lunatic.
 Quoting: Astronut


Don't give her the satisfaction of getting you worked up. She's a troll, plainly.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
No, you're the one making the claim, it's up to you confront them and expose them if you really believe this shit.

Dude, she WANTS to get us worked up. Don't give her the
satisfaction.
 Quoting: DrPostman

No, I don't want you "worked up". I wanted to defend what was implied as being not true. You can be calm and also see that there should be building shifts for any major shift in background. ALL buildings in foreground shift. And majorly, even if tracked -- the towers would shift quite a bit if we were close up. The "stereo view" implies we are closer than the zoom out in one of the otherwise SHARED TV clips showed.

Even if closer and tracking the towers, we'd see more shift in the foreground right away than we do. This "stereo" has cut out much of the foreground so you don't notice so much.

There were no planes and few victims on 9/11. As to the rest of the issues, we needn't go there.

Night.
The Commentator

User ID: 587619
United States
06/08/2010 03:13 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I vote troll. And I think I've seen this style before.
 Quoting: DrPostman



Chew toy troll.

I know, I know, I am being pedantic....;-)
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 996418
United Kingdom
06/08/2010 03:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I vote troll. And I think I've seen this style before.



Chew toy troll.

I know, I know, I am being pedantic....;-)
 Quoting: The Commentator


The more she is ignored, the more shrill she gets. If we can all ignore it it will spin up to a crescendo of bullshit emission, then explode nova-like in yet another Troll melt-down.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So, Astronut. You've been fooled by a slightly blurred still frame (the evidence of the blurring adjustments are even left -- sloppy work! -- at the bottom of the frame in your link).


Look you fucking moron, the "blurring adjustment" in the bottom of my image is ME ROTATING THE GODDAMN IMAGE TO BE ROUGHLY THE SAME ANGLE FOR BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT EYE IMAGE; the result is that the layer beneath is exposed showing the original background layer for the image. It's got nothing to do with the video being fake you lunatic.
 Quoting: Astronut

Oh you did it?

Okay. I retract that. Blurrier image.

Still, the foreground buildings do not move. Now DO THEY?

No.

Hence, where's all this movement in back coming from?

How much % did the bridge move in relation to the buildings?
SAME % (not same AMOUNT) should be the movement in the buildings, including the towers.

Check it.

Width of front tower being 100%. Now track to original placement of bridge. Now what?

And how much movement in EVEN MORE FOREGROUND BUILDINGS?


HMM?

Have you seen: 2:58 to 9:59?

No. Go back. Change in towers -- which Commentator thought was unnecessary -- lolol -- but WAY MORE in bridge. So much it's laughable. It's even on the opposite side, way over!

How much is THAT percentage?!

Do wake up please.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:21 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Chew toy troll.

I know, I know, I am being pedantic....;-)
 Quoting: The Commentator

No, Commentator: at least you're dethroned on your self-imposed dungeon chair of insisting the building behind shouldn't move if the background moves ...

or that you need equations to know it!

LOL!

.................

You don't seem to know what pedantic means, by your use of it here: it means knowing fine points and lording it over others; it does not mean being supercilious (condescending) and brutish, which you imply.

I can see where you'd get that impression, though, because pedants do lord it over others, but the word refers to their picayune (picky) sophistry as well as their lording it over others -- at the same time.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The more she is ignored, the more shrill she gets. If we can all ignore it it will spin up to a crescendo of bullshit emission, then explode nova-like in yet another Troll melt-down.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 996418

Nonsense. I am emphasizing.

It looks shrill, maybe, because of the red.

I don't want the point to be missed by Astronut in his probably tired glossy eyes.

The percentage is wrong. Way wrong.

The impressions created are complex by cut-off video segments, zooms and pans. But the actual problems are there.

Hub. Fake. :(
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 996418
United Kingdom
06/08/2010 03:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would suggest, and strongly support, a total boycott of all its posts.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:30 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would suggest, and strongly support, a total boycott of all its posts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 996418

Ooo -- just as Astronut is going to wake up to the fact (as you all can -- that the PERCENTAGE OF MOVEMENT in the bridge far outdoes any blur change or actual change in the towers, and all OTHER buildings ...

which is NOT okay whether you're tracking the towers or not.

:)

Don't do that to him. LOL! He'll need support when he gets this.

So will some of you, it seems.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
mclarek is fake.


 Quoting: DrPostman

Very funny.

:)

At least my photos are not near or complete duplicate heads, even IF they didn't represent ME.

LOL!

And my cousins don't look like morphs of me, either. :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 996418
United Kingdom
06/08/2010 03:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
mclarek is fake.



:Zidiotalk:
 Quoting: DrPostman


See how shrill it gets when it fears it will be ignored?
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
mclarek is fake.


See how shrill it gets when it fears it will be ignored?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 996418

Shrill? A little "ooo" is shrill?

LOL.

You don't know shrill then.

Just as you don't see the "Colaios" and so on are SHILLS (well, shells, with the odd spook relative).
AstronutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
06/08/2010 03:36 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would suggest, and strongly support, a total boycott of all its posts.

Ooo -- just as Astronut is going to wake up to the fact (as you all can -- that the PERCENTAGE OF MOVEMENT in the bridge far outdoes any blur change or actual change in the towers, and all OTHER buildings ...
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

Which is exactly what you should expect given that the camera is tracking the towers.
[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]
Note the far lower "percentage of movement" of the glass vase compared to the refrigerator and other background objects. A simple demonstration, the tracking by hand isn't perfect, but the point is clear.

Last Edited by The Deplorable Astromut on 06/08/2010 03:36 AM
astrobanner2
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:38 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


So, Astronut, get it yet?

Still, the foreground buildings do not move. Now DO THEY?

No.

Hence, where's all this movement in back coming from?

How much % did the bridge move in relation to the buildings?


SAME % (not same AMOUNT) should be the movement in the buildings, including the towers.

Check it.

Width of front tower being 100%. Now track to original placement of bridge. Now what?

And how much movement in EVEN MORE FOREGROUND BUILDINGS?


HMM?

Have you seen: 2:58 to 9:59?

No. Go back. Change in towers -- which Commentator thought was unnecessary -- lolol -- but WAY MORE in bridge. So much it's laughable. It's even on the opposite side, way over!

How much is THAT percentage?!

Do wake up please.
 Quoting: Astronut

Soon you might be able to deal with Colaios with no memorials from 2003-2009 (and only one from 2003) who now get back-dated hellos on line?

Or copy-paste Wanios?

Or morphed name samples in bunches?

Or FDNY inflated existences -- some real with a morph from them? I dunno. But there should be NONE of these irregularities, or, if one, only a very inconclusive one. Not multiple ones. Some with same angle on every shot, etc.

Get it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 996418
United Kingdom
06/08/2010 03:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would suggest, and strongly support, a total boycott of all its posts.

Ooo -- just as Astronut is going to wake up to the fact (as you all can -- that the PERCENTAGE OF MOVEMENT in the bridge far outdoes any blur change or actual change in the towers, and all OTHER buildings ...

Which is exactly what you should expect given that the camera is tracking the towers.
[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]
Note the far lower "percentage of movement" of the glass vase compared to the refrigerator and other background objects. A simple demonstration, the tracking by hand isn't perfect, but the point is clear.
 Quoting: Astronut


You've made excellent points, well documented and explained. This mclarek thing is obviously not in the least interested in trying to understand anything. It simply wants to argue with everything you post, no matter how much sense you make!
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would suggest, and strongly support, a total boycott of all its posts.

Ooo -- just as Astronut is going to wake up to the fact (as you all can -- that the PERCENTAGE OF MOVEMENT in the bridge far outdoes any blur change or actual change in the towers, and all OTHER buildings ...

Which is exactly what you should expect given that the camera is tracking the towers.
[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]
Note the far lower "percentage of movement" of the glass vase compared to the refrigerator and other background objects. A simple demonstration, the tracking by hand isn't perfect, but the point is clear.
 Quoting: Astronut

No, you would expect same PERCENTAGE, not same AMOUNT.

Know the difference?

And you would also get big shifts in buildings nearer to you.

Any luck?!
AstronutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
06/08/2010 03:40 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I would suggest, and strongly support, a total boycott of all its posts.

Ooo -- just as Astronut is going to wake up to the fact (as you all can -- that the PERCENTAGE OF MOVEMENT in the bridge far outdoes any blur change or actual change in the towers, and all OTHER buildings ...

Which is exactly what you should expect given that the camera is tracking the towers.
[link to video.godlikeproductions.com]
Note the far lower "percentage of movement" of the glass vase compared to the refrigerator and other background objects. A simple demonstration, the tracking by hand isn't perfect, but the point is clear.
 Quoting: Astronut

bump can't wait to see you bitch about this. Did I fake this video, troll, or were you fucking wrong about the 'percentage of movement' the distant bridge should have displayed?
astrobanner2
AstronutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
06/08/2010 03:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
No, you would expect same PERCENTAGE, not same AMOUNT.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

I didn't use the word "amount" anywhere in my post. My video demonstrates the same effect seen in the WTC video.
astrobanner2
AstronutModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 922113
United States
06/08/2010 03:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You've made excellent points, well documented and explained. This mclarek thing is obviously not in the least interested in trying to understand anything. It simply wants to argue with everything you post, no matter how much sense you make!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 996418

Clearly you're absolutely right about this. I could argue the color of the sky and she would disagree with me just to disagree.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 996418
United Kingdom
06/08/2010 03:46 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You've made excellent points, well documented and explained. This mclarek thing is obviously not in the least interested in trying to understand anything. It simply wants to argue with everything you post, no matter how much sense you make!

Clearly you're absolutely right about this. I could argue the color of the sky and she would disagree with me just to disagree.
 Quoting: Astronut



This is what trolls do. Any sensible argument will be ignored and more ridiculous bullshit will be thrown into the mix, along with persistent mangling of the English language to make it even more difficult to work out what the hell 'she' is trying to say. Forget it, and let it wither away!

We all know what Zetards have to say about the colour of the sky/sun/etc.! Don't go there!
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I made a mistake in saying the percentage is OF THE TOWER as 100%.

Simon Shack made the same error technically.

The percentage is from the centre point of the putative TRACKING.

So, percentage of bridge movement relative to centre point.


That should clarify the issue for you.

Test it.

AND test 8:53-9:59.

MAJOR bridge movement there. Same movement in towers?


Clare
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 03:52 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
TEST IT ASTRONUT or anyone with cojones.

Do it -- I dare you to prove me wrong here.

Lemme know.

:)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 996418
United Kingdom
06/08/2010 03:54 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
feedtroll
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/08/2010 04:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You've made excellent points, well documented and explained.
 Quoting:

The points are excellent on the surface.

But you guys couldn't grasp that the Colaio entries are NOW saying back to 2001 and weren't as of last year. You guys got confused because when I said there were none "from 2003-2009" (though I explained the point they have added back-posts now), you still thought that meant the current posts are only from 2009-2010 dated.

I was saying they were PUT UP in this past year.

Also, the percentage of change in the bridge (from central tracking point) is not okay.

AND foreground buildings don't shift.

AND we have morph names.

AND we have same-orientation faces or flip-flops in different colouration. Which repeat and repeat. So all evidence of newspaper articles and (in some lucky "victims'" cases) families is not sufficient to say in a GIVEN case that the person is real. In the case of any duplicate photo or near-duplicate, or never-updated page (as of last year, when the simulation was written up), we must ask IF the person is real and if they are, why the lack of photos, memorials, or why the fake photo in addition to (maybe) a real one?

AND we have no engine air pressure, it seems, for no-one handled that one to show we do.

Etc.


News