Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,738 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,156,668
Pageviews Today: 1,848,339Threads Today: 580Posts Today: 12,466
04:00 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 06:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Then work on your commas Clare. You sprinkle them atop your posts like nuts on ice cream.
 Quoting: Setheory 869850

Yes. It's not actually the commas, but rather the interspersing of sub clauses, which does that. I do think in complex sub clauses.

It is the pause-to-interject tendency of my writing which generates the commas and correctly so. It happens fine in speech, with tone shift. But where I place my commas is not grammatically incorrect.

I will try not to interject so much for you, Setheory. But sometimes it's necessary: it pauses you to recall a side issue or a pre-issue while you consider the current issue.

Most people don't know where commas go. I do -- "I just have, as George B pointed out a while back, an awkward way, for reading style, not spoken style. In speech, if you go to the effort of translating my words into speech, it works fine. TONE is what's changing in the second use of commas."

And just I did it deliberately in this paragraph. Do you see how that works now? Tone shifts with interjection splices?

The commas themselves are accurate grammatically, but it can make for hard reading if you wish to read quickly without any TONE change in the words.

So I'll try not to interject as much. I can't promise, though.

Coffee break. Kast time they came over my sky with crap to make it rain. What will happen today?! :)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/09/2010 06:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Take it to another thread Clare. Anyone who wants to follow you will. Or maybe you know that the only way you can get attention is by trolling an unrelated thread and pissing people off. Maybe you're afraid that you'll throw a party and nobody will show up.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 06:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
George B: This is further to the news on those horrible sprays yesterday: I sent yesterday where I watched AND compared all trails and timings. I also watched to 5 in the morning when the smeary crap became misty. Now we've had downpours and bleary skies, but some light through them.

I think they want rain to a) rain out the protesters, but start ahead to create a rainy week. b) block people seeing the preparatory sky operations and spyplanes/ bots ...
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 06:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Look at the source video with the claim before you ask please ... dear who loves furry hats. :)


The point is, YOU don't have the slightest idea what YOU are looking at or talking about in the images or the sky.

You haven't handled the anomalies.
The positions are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE for each planet.

Try again.

Why Saturn -no Saturn- Saturn?
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


You mean why does Nancy SAY that Saturn dissappears?

Nancy lies.

And why Venus -Venus in to the right- Venus?

Inconsistent motions.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


You mean, why does Nancy SAY there are inconsistent motions?

Nancy lies.

It's not MY hoops; it's your own claim to know stuff. What made the anomalies?
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


You mean ALLEGED anomolies.

Nancy lies.

If you don't want to watch the video first, and justify that as getting back at me, it's still sloppy of you.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


I did watch it. It's the usual Nancy crap. Seen it for 15 years.

Nancy lies.

But even if you're uncharitable, now that I've RE-POSTED it -- when you watch, I'm not the issue and handle the ISSUE of the NASA claims here.

They are incompatible planets. Your self-wanking is reprehensible. What caused this in the images?
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


Fuck you. You just made up my mind for me to NOT address YOUR issues FOR you.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 06:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Then why don't YOU fucking ****do**** that, Clare!?!?!
 Quoting: Menow 935048



Because I know it from the mutual exclusion of the image properties. I don't actually need to fiddle with the test. But Astronut was, and did it improperly.

I tested it visually: all objects far away that are also far away from you, occur in layers which become less and less moving relative to each other (at a constant speed).

The bridge has so much movement for such a faraway object, we'd have to be nearer to the towers ... but then the towers would show more change.

The only reason Astronut didn't see that, is his objects weren't THEMSELVES far away enough from each other.

If they had been, the nearer one, to show so little change, would also require being far away from us. And then they're both far away and show little change, along with the buildings in front.

:)
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 06:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You mean why does Nancy SAY that Saturn dissappears?

Nancy lies.


And why Venus -Venus in to the right- Venus?

Inconsistent motions.


You mean, why does Nancy SAY there are inconsistent motions?

Nancy lies.

[...]

I did watch it. It's the usual Nancy crap. Seen it for 15 years.

Nancy lies.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Well, Menow, Nancy may or may not lie at times.

But IN THE IMAGES, then, who moved Saturn? Or did Nancy fake the images? One way or another, Saturn is there, is not, is there.

And then Venus is near the edge, is in from the edge, is near the edge.

Nancy "saying" it's so is meaningless unless you mean she faked the images. The images are all I'm dealing with. And the planets are moving about IN THOSE IMAGES.

So either Nancy moved them, or someone else did ... or some kind of weird compression? (Don't think so.)

Check again. Your prejudices are blinding you to the IMAGES.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 06:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Coffee.

Mm. rockon
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/09/2010 06:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
feedtroll
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
06/09/2010 06:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
George: I've seen the chemtrails! I'd wondered at the streaks we've been having but never caught it in the act.



Good observations . . . makes you wonder doesn't it?

TY. Yes, I was careful to observe comparisons.
I really tried.


I discovered, George, a main reason. It smeared over from clear to crap-smear in different phases, at one point like oil, and from a perfectly low-humid day we "got rain". Lots of wind and rain. It was building this morning like fine mist but didn't FEEL heavy.

You know what I mean? Now it's raining. But there was no feeling of it all night -- just misty by 4 in the morning and building clouds but still see-through to the sky in some parts through the smear.

They want to rain out the protests. Not only those who would protest anyway, but also those who now won't go, won't join from the street. People look more blinders-on when they're in the rain ... hunker down. Hope to comment/protest another day.

(Among other things, like hide their bots, maybe.)

Nice to hear from ya.

...................

Now, what do you think of those (non-putative PX) NASA image problems. Are they controlling most images and sometimes getting the recreation wrong? Transmission errors wouldn't move whole planets only, and move them without edges (Venus), or make whole sections smudge out a planet, and looks like some background with it (Saturn). And there's cut-and-paste in some.

Maybe PX is there and our nice telescopes confuse it with a flare, but Nasa's covering it up?

Or maybe there are spy satellites going near and they are cutting planets out to cover. Very strange.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233

Your question on satellite imaging is totally out of my league . . . I listen to both sides and beyond common sense I don't have a clue. Is there a coverup? I don't know.

Last Edited by George B on 06/09/2010 07:00 PM
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 946069
United States
06/09/2010 06:55 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Did you see this prediction by Gerard?:

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

The world has not yet been shocked, but those who follow ZetaTalk know that it will involve "one of more" of the following by the end of 2010, when arrival at a 7 has been predicted by the Zetas. This is the holographic presentation attended by Nancy in November, 2009:

"The Mediterranean is shown, while Africa rolls somewhat. This opens up the southern Mediterranean above Algeria such that the Mediterranean floor there is a crumble, not supported. Over to S America the Andes are shown doing mountain building, while some islands in the Caribbean are sinking, their plate pushed under as S America rolls. Then over to India where the western side of India sinks significantly, the plate tipping sideways a bit, raising eastern India during this process. Then islands in Indonesia sink, the plate supporting them sinking more than the surrounding area. Southeastern US is pulled down slightly, while the land just to the west of the Mississippi drops slightly. As the Atlantic rips open, this causes water adjustments. First water rushes from elsewhere to fill the void, then piles up, clashing in the middle, so that a tide rushes toward Europe, assaulting the lowlands there."
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 969583


We'll have to remember this so we can dredge it up at the start of 2011. Then I can ask Gertard on ning using my account over there why none of this stuff happened.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 06:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
"Clare" is no doubt unattractive and unaccomplished and craves the attention of men however she can get it.

Note the exchange with Returner.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 969583

Not all men -- lol.

As to the exchange -- he was hurt badly and he'd been nice. :)

And this "Clare" thing is stupid by now. Unless I've given as little for you to go on as the vicsims have -- a family member (unproven), some obvious fake photos, and a name in a row with other morphs ... LOL!

No, all my photos are different.

And my name isn't morphed into an intelligence op databank.

And I'm consistently me.

And so on. If you checked, *I*'d be real. Lol
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 946069
United States
06/09/2010 07:00 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
She can't. She's got to be right about everything and the
whole world is wrong.
 Quoting: DrPostman

That's typical of all conspiracy theorists (aka woo-woos)...they're never wrong. Well, they like to pretend they aren't.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 07:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Now, what do you think of those (non-putative PX) NASA image problems. Are they controlling most images and sometimes getting the recreation wrong? Transmission errors wouldn't move whole planets only, and move them without edges (Venus), or make whole sections smudge out a planet, and looks like some background with it (Saturn). And there's cut-and-paste in some.

Maybe PX is there and our nice telescopes confuse it with a flare, but Nasa's covering it up?

Or maybe there are spy satellites going near and they are cutting planets out to cover. Very strange.

You question on satellite imaging is totally out of my league . . . I listen to both sides and beyond common sense I don't have a clue. Is there a coverup? I don't know.
 Quoting: George B


It IS weird. And Saturn- nada- Saturn.

and Venus- moved Venus relative to edge- Venus.

So, we're down to unknowns:

if the Zeta-Nancy people hoaxed this ...
of if NASA had a glitch then what kind? ...
NASA is faking something (again -- lol) ...

And if the last, then what to cover up?
PX? Satellites? UFOs? What?

Someone MADE these images in layers, to get Venus moving with no other changes in the background, it seems to me. If we could analyze the images more in depth, maybe we'd find smudge lay-in of the area instead.

And why?

xo

Re. "again" on Nasa fakes ... even if you don't see that a flap can't be up in a Photo and down in a TV feed of the same instant (Apollo 11) ... at least maybe you know of what I posted a while back on the climategate equations that NASA was busted for absolutely -- though few notice these things outside the special interest group. I post these here not to change the thread but back up my charge again re. NASA -- like any organization it can be used for ill:
Tiny intro blurb: [link to climaterealists.com]
Actual document article: [link to climaterealists.com]
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 07:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Then why don't YOU fucking ****do**** that, Clare!?!?!



Because I know

 Quoting: mclarek 986233


Fuck right off, Clare.
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 07:10 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You mean why does Nancy SAY that Saturn dissappears?

Nancy lies.


And why Venus -Venus in to the right- Venus?

Inconsistent motions.


You mean, why does Nancy SAY there are inconsistent motions?

Nancy lies.

[...]

I did watch it. It's the usual Nancy crap. Seen it for 15 years.

Nancy lies.


Well, Menow, Nancy may or may not lie at times.

But IN THE IMAGES, then, who moved Saturn? Or did Nancy fake the images? One way or another, Saturn is there, is not, is there.

And then Venus is near the edge, is in from the edge, is near the edge.

Nancy "saying" it's so is meaningless unless you mean she faked the images. The images are all I'm dealing with. And the planets are moving about IN THOSE IMAGES.

So either Nancy moved them, or someone else did ... or some kind of weird compression? (Don't think so.)

Check again. Your prejudices are blinding you to the IMAGES.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233



Fuck thyself, Clare.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 07:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
She can't. She's got to be right about everything and the
whole world is wrong.

That's typical of all conspiracy theorists (aka woo-woos)...they're never wrong. Well, they like to pretend they aren't.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

Many aren't.

...............


Some are wrong, in whole areas and not in others.

Others just make smaller mistakes but are generally right.

I suppose one might be right "all the time" but that's pretty perfectionistic.

And you -- your generalization is, in fact, generally wrong.

I have known people who had one whole area of expertise and were good in it, but knew nothing of another and were not interested. So no, some are wrong about one thing while being very right about another. :)

I have also known those who know a LOT about one field but they are very uncareful and have a high confirmation bias PLUS outright silliness mixed in, but where the basic points they go on about stand.

So ... <shrug> to your claim.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 998160
Australia
06/09/2010 07:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
spock


This Nancy sounds like a real fruitloop crazy
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/09/2010 07:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
spock


This Nancy sounds like a real fruitloop crazy
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 998160

She is queen of fruitloops, chosen by imaginary aliens through an unwrapped starburst candy.
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 07:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
But IN THE IMAGES,


the images?



the images.


The images


IN THOSE IMAGES.


the IMAGES
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


Funny how you have been asked to supply the original images, but have not.

Be fucking yourself, over and over, Clare.
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 07:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, Menow, Nancy may or may not lie at times.

But IN THE IMAGES, then, who moved Saturn? Or did Nancy fake the images? One way or another, Saturn is there, is not, is there.

And then Venus is near the edge, is in from the edge, is near the edge.

Nancy "saying" it's so is meaningless unless you mean she faked the images. The images are all I'm dealing with. And the planets are moving about IN THOSE IMAGES.

So either Nancy moved them, or someone else did ... or some kind of weird compression? (Don't think so.)

Check again. Your prejudices are blinding you to the IMAGES.



Fuck thyself, Clare.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


You didn't handle them, Menow. So it is your emotions about Nancy -- and now me -- which are getting in the way. I am sorry I called your behaviour wankery; you've done far worse to me but it was only to jostle you out of your resistance to the fact that THESE IMAGES ARE IMPOSSIBLE PHYSICALLY. Do you have any explanation OTHER than fakery, and if not, WHY and BY WHOM were they faked?

That stands. You dislike Nancy so much and believe it's lies (which is uncritical because many people don't know they're actually wrong, or believe it's unimportant if they are on major issues) ... but even if she lies THESE IMAGES MAKE NO SENSE>

so someone (Nancy?/Nasa?/Someone else?) had to do them?
or some computer glitch did them?

Or Saturn disappeared and also, not to be outdone, Venus went in one direction and for ONE FRAME went in a different direction, and then went back to its original point and continued.

So, fakery? If so, by whom? Your lying Nancy?

Computer problem? (I submit, no.)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/09/2010 07:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
But IN THE IMAGES,


the images?



the images.


The images


IN THOSE IMAGES.


the IMAGES


Funny how you have been asked to supply the original images, but have not.

Be fucking yourself, over and over, Clare.
 Quoting: Menow 935048

She is an attention whore. She doesn't discuss. She invited herself and won't take the hint that nobody wants to play with her. She has been asked to start her own thread, but she won't. She is disrespectful of the dead, families of the dead and the regulars on this thread. She is a piece of shit, just like Nancy. I wish she would just leave.
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 07:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Well, Menow, Nancy may or may not lie at times.

But IN THE IMAGES, then, who moved Saturn? Or did Nancy fake the images? One way or another, Saturn is there, is not, is there.

And then Venus is near the edge, is in from the edge, is near the edge.

Nancy "saying" it's so is meaningless unless you mean she faked the images. The images are all I'm dealing with. And the planets are moving about IN THOSE IMAGES.

So either Nancy moved them, or someone else did ... or some kind of weird compression? (Don't think so.)

Check again. Your prejudices are blinding you to the IMAGES.



Fuck thyself, Clare.


You didn't handle them, Menow. So it is your emotions about Nancy -- and now me -- which are getting in the way. I am sorry I called your behaviour wankery; you've done far worse to me but it was only to jostle you out of your resistance to the fact that THESE IMAGES ARE IMPOSSIBLE PHYSICALLY. Do you have any explanation OTHER than fakery, and if not, WHY and BY WHOM were they faked?

That stands. You dislike Nancy so much and believe it's lies (which is uncritical because many people don't know they're actually wrong, or believe it's unimportant if they are on major issues) ... but even if she lies THESE IMAGES MAKE NO SENSE>

so someone (Nancy?/Nasa?/Someone else?) had to do them?
or some computer glitch did them?

Or Saturn disappeared and also, not to be outdone, Venus went in one direction and for ONE FRAME went in a different direction, and then went back to its original point and continued.

So, fakery? If so, by whom? Your lying Nancy?

Computer problem? (I submit, no.)
 Quoting: mclarek 986233



Gimme an F...!
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 07:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Funny how you have been asked to supply the original images, but have not.

Be fucking yourself, over and over, Clare.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


ExQUEEEZE me?

Now you're disingenuous
about what you asked for AND for speaking to me like that for weeks! LOL! I finally call you a wanker and you say that? It's not the first time you've been like this. So ... WhaTEVER on #2.

As to #1 -- the issue at hand:

You said, Where are the images. I said, On the Video. Now you're pretending like it's the originals you want.

No, originally you were just suggesting they didn't have anything wrong with them. You SO distrust Nancy and now me -- lol -- that a simple visual won't do even when it is enough to see something's wrong, as in a simple case like this. So ... first you see it's impossible -- in this case it's easy;

then you do more work on HOW it came to be wrong. But wrong it is!

Now you want the originals. Well, the originals are unknown to me but they are in Nancy's collection. That being so ...

You suggest Nancy faked them, is that it?

At least you are suggesting they're fakes. LOL.


Someone, it SEEMS, captured them and they were fake or were faked after. But something is WAY off here.

Oh, that's right, your emotions are NOT so high that you didn't give up and won't look for it ...

so here is one for your NON-emotional response to the Nancy, then the images, then me --

Saturn [link to www.zetatalk.com] (1/2 way down)

the Venus one I'm still searching. I'd have to watch back to find it. Why don't you just watch, since the Saturn one is there and clearly a problem too.

Who faked 'em -- how? Or what computer glitch is it, Menow?

Anyway ... I never did get my coffee I so desired. So ... ciao for now.

peace
mclarek
User ID: 986233
Canada
06/09/2010 07:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So, fakery? If so, by whom? Your lying Nancy?

Computer problem? (I submit, no.)



Gimme an F...!
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Momentary fun sarcasm:


I do give you an "F". Ha ha -- only on not looking, though. Because I try to be fair even to people who are annoying me, unlike you sometimes.

................

Anyway, now that you know these planets are wrong -- not "bouncing in space" but the PHOTOS don't add up in relation to one another ...

Why is Saturn missing? And why is Venus not in the right spot to the edge?

Did Nancy or an acolyte fake them?
Did NASA? Why?

Did a computer do this?

There are other images in that vid which do have problems, too, of different types.

If one is okay, fine. But all? And these planets?

I say cut-paste or layers (for Venus).
By whom?

Please be reasonable.
Clare
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 07:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Funny how you have been asked to supply the original images, but have not.

Be fucking yourself, over and over, Clare.




You said, Where are the images.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


I said no such thing.

I said, On the Video. Now you're pretending like it's the originals you want.
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


I 'pretend' no such thing. You are simply baiting. I didn't ask you for images, because I wasn't willing to play your game. Astronut asked you for images and told you that what was on the vids was useless for any serious analysis.

YOU find the originals if you want him to offer an opinion. It's YOUR issue, but if you weren't such an irretrievable CRACK he might lend his expertise to your questions.

As far as I am concerned, you can hump yourself from where you are to Toledo and back again.
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 07:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Ha ha -- only on not looking, though. Because I try to be fair even to people who are annoying me, unlike you sometimes.

 Quoting: mclarek 986233


I have looked at Nancy's presentations for nearly 15 years. She is a chronically lying manipulator of details to support her hoax. I don't need to look at each new bit of blather she vomits onto the internet to know what it will consist of.

I took time to show you what she had done with the 2002 images. She lied, over and over and over again. You apparently don't think that means anything to her general veracity. You are a hopelessly paranoid, Clare.
***ZetaMaX***

User ID: 998306
United States
06/09/2010 08:02 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
She can't. She's got to be right about everything and the
whole world is wrong.

That's typical of all conspiracy theorists (aka woo-woos)...they're never wrong. Well, they like to pretend they aren't.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

So you're a "co-incidence" theorist?
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.

ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
 [link to www.zetatalk.com] 

ZetaMax
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 969583
United States
06/09/2010 08:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
many people don't know they're actually wrong
 Quoting: mclarek 986233


lmao
Menow
User ID: 935048
United States
06/09/2010 08:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Repeat:





You can simply LOOK at the sky and see that Saturn and Venus are right where they belong. I should say that MOST people can, excluding YOU. You just want to wallow in this minutia and pack of transparant lies and drag others into doing so with you.

Nancy's claims are simply ridiculous, but you are too uneducated to know that.
 Quoting: Menow 935048


Note how Clare 'overlooked' this post because it doesn't suit her purpose. Her purpose is to get us to debate the minutia of Nancy's claims as if they merit debate. They don't. It is absurd to believe that the world's astronomers would not know that NASA was faking images of the sky.

It lends credibility to Zetatalk to 'debate' it, even when there is no real debate, ala Clare. Nothing but voluminous verbage with no real content. I repeat:

You can simply LOOK at the sky and see that Saturn and Venus are right where they belong. I should say that MOST people can, excluding YOU. You just want to wallow in this minutia and pack of transparant lies and drag others into doing so with you.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 998337
United Kingdom
06/09/2010 08:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
If anyone is taking posting on this thread as a 'full-time job', it's Mclarek! Paid shill!

News