Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,769 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 93,236
Pageviews Today: 142,331Threads Today: 40Posts Today: 874
01:13 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 08:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Not if the putative Zetas have FIXED ALL ELSE


What a stupid hypothysis... and you think *I* should worry about testing for THAT? Not a chance, dear.
 Quoting: Menow 1003573


Yes, a stupid hypothesis but it is what you are up against.

You can never actually defeat this claim by Nancy.

I wouldn't try.

So, what do you think, other than ANOTHER MAGNET, such as PX could cause holes of repulsion when the Sun is attracting us?



Maybe you will READ this THIS time:


Menow: The "Zeta" claim is that the repulsion force rises to equal the force of gravity at the point of contact between large bodies like PX and the Sun. So, Clare, how does that keep PX allegedly hovering near the Sun for 7 years and slow PX from near lightspeed as it allegeldy careened toward the Sun?
 Quoting: Menow


So?

What do you think of that? I already said, it might have to do with electromagnetism or unknown force potentials in our system. If it's true at all.

And AGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIN: you think what?

............................

And what, AGAIN SINCE YOU CAN'T READ do you think is causing our repulsion holes in the magnetosphere IF NOT ANOTHER MAGNET LIKE A CHARGED PX?
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 08:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Hey 74444 -- did you realize I replied and have anything to say on the e-m issue?

Again, sorry 74444 that I missed your posts during that flurry with Astronut about the SOHO images.

Do not hold grudges for such small things, please.

:)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/16/2010 08:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You may be interested in this
Re: Chemtrail Poll . . . do you think chemtrails are real? See the Results NOW!

Cool, George.

I am interested. I am sick of these clunkers ... :)

By the way, they started again; we had 4 hours without and now this again. I saw one of the big jet-like tankers (not huge, but pretty big) clearly in low altitude with the side tanks on its midriff, between the wings and the tail. Saw it from below; the tank areas were really obvious.


Rain smear blear then windy/cloudy blue clearing out, but now building blear and cloud again. They are not going to give us a summer this time, I guess.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307

Off topic spam. This is not a chemtard thread. Please get a room and keep this thread on topic. Respectfully, Clunk, enough is enough. Piss off. Please.
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 08:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
wthread

What's it about? It used to be about debunking ridiculous claims of Nancy Lieder and her imaginary Zetas. However for more than a hundred pages now, we have an utter retard attention seeking troll who can't read thread titles and insists on spamming the thread with off topic 911 conspiracy nut drivel and chemtrailtard ravings, despite the fact that we all just want her to shut up and start her own thread. That's about it in a nutshell.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953


Drivel: not.
"We": not.
Nutshell: not.

And the point was: what's this part of the thread about? It was about attacking me with such misnomers as "drivel" and so on.

And because of that, I replied to the a-holes who attacked me.

Have a nice day anyway!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/16/2010 08:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
wthread

What's it about? It used to be about debunking ridiculous claims of Nancy Lieder and her imaginary Zetas. However for more than a hundred pages now, we have an utter retard attention seeking troll who can't read thread titles and insists on spamming the thread with off topic 911 conspiracy nut drivel and chemtrailtard ravings, despite the fact that we all just want her to shut up and start her own thread. That's about it in a nutshell.


Drivel: not.
"We": not.
Nutshell: not.

And the point was: what's this part of the thread about? It was about attacking me with such misnomers as "drivel" and so on.

And because of that, I replied to the a-holes who attacked me.

Have a nice day anyway!
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307

You kick down the door, spraypaint vulgar graffiti on the walls and when asked to leave, you escalate instead of getting a thread of your own. I haven't seen one person here say they want you here, but lots that want you to just shut up and fuck off to a thread we can choose to ignore. But you are still here, you refuse to leave and continue to disrespect the topic and the people that started this thread. And we are the ones attacking you? Fuck you are the most arrogant person I have encountered in a while.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 815642
Taiwan
06/16/2010 08:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I detest INCESSANT TALKERS!
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 09:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Drivel: not.
"We": not.
Nutshell: not.

And the point was: what's this part of the thread about? It was about attacking me with such misnomers as "drivel" and so on.

And because of that, I replied to the a-holes who attacked me.

Have a nice day anyway!

You kick down the door, spraypaint vulgar graffiti on the walls and when asked to leave, you escalate instead of getting a thread of your own. I haven't seen one person here say they want you here, but lots that want you to just shut up and fuck off to a thread we can choose to ignore. But you are still here, you refuse to leave and continue to disrespect the topic and the people that started this thread. And we are the ones attacking you? Fuck you are the most arrogant person I have encountered in a while.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953


I did no such thing. I joined. And others maligned me and the content of my posts. I rebutted and on major points am correct.

You are the arrogant one. I happen to be right. And I am also trying to be nice and discuss the issues without nastiness. There has always been assumptive nastiness on this thread -- and Menow just admitted he baits and resents when it's answered -- so it's part of what I've pushed through.

You misidentify arrogance with self-esteem to fight bullies and get to the interesting stuff anyway. :)

So tounge

And -- for 1001905, that's not sexual. LOL!
Menow
User ID: 1003573
United States
06/16/2010 09:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
F-u: Clare thinks the Zetas can do anything!

Clare: Never said that.


No one ever SAID that about you either. You can only react emotionally to what you THINK people say, not what they REALLY DO say.



Bullshit, Menow. YOU don't read all their posts to me, then, or you misrepresent them to yourself, and some of the implictions of what you've been saying to me about this putatve Zeta ability to fix all phenomena so they're untestable.

Several times you and others have implied (and some have stated) that I believe the Zetas ad the fairy-like abilities attributed to them -- and that I believe the earth could be stopped and nothing would change, and ignoring how I keep saying that's not true.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


OK... have it YOUR way. So if you DON'T believe that or care to be discussing it, why do you KEEP on talking about it as if it is a REAL possibility which ought to be considered? Clearly none of the REST of us think it needs to be 'tested' for.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1005684
United States
06/16/2010 09:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Drivel: not.
"We": not.
Nutshell: not.

And the point was: what's this part of the thread about? It was about attacking me with such misnomers as "drivel" and so on.

And because of that, I replied to the a-holes who attacked me.

Have a nice day anyway!

You kick down the door, spraypaint vulgar graffiti on the walls and when asked to leave, you escalate instead of getting a thread of your own. I haven't seen one person here say they want you here, but lots that want you to just shut up and fuck off to a thread we can choose to ignore. But you are still here, you refuse to leave and continue to disrespect the topic and the people that started this thread. And we are the ones attacking you? Fuck you are the most arrogant person I have encountered in a while.


I did no such thing. I joined. And others maligned me and the content of my posts. I rebutted and on major points am correct.

You are the arrogant one. I happen to be right. And I am also trying to be nice and discuss the issues without nastiness. There has always been assumptive nastiness on this thread -- and Menow just admitted he baits and resents when it's answered -- so it's part of what I've pushed through.

You misidentify arrogance with self-esteem to fight bullies and get to the interesting stuff anyway. :)

So tounge

And -- for 1001905, that's not sexual. LOL!
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


The request for those who frequent this thread is to keep to the subject of the thread - debunking Nancy and zetatalk.

It's not about 9/11

If you can't get that through your head, go somewhere else.
Menow
User ID: 1003573
United States
06/16/2010 09:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The constellations are in the correct places (minus parallax) with a tilt change;


And you STTTTIIIIIILLLLLLLLL apply parallax to Earth-tilt, when it does not.


No, jerk attitude.

I suggest here only that WITH (i.e., in addition) a tilt change, a STOPPAGE would stop the parallax ...
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


The two things are mutually exclusive. One does NOT depend upon or affect the other. Why would you glom them together like that?

I was speaking in shorthand in this place and the context (and which I have repeated even more than you and your nonsense about it) ... is that the STOPPAGE is the issue for parallax; but since the tilt is claimed by Nancy in the same breath, the two are combined in her picture; and .....

THUSSSSSSSSSSS

as I've stated again and again
the parallax would be ALL that's left for you to test for a stoppage (cum tilt, since supposedly both are going together in Nancy's claim).
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Just silly. Your 'logic' is unintelligible to everyone but you. I wonder if that means everyone is 'off' but you, or the other way around... No I don't.
Menow
User ID: 1003573
United States
06/16/2010 09:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The constellations are in the correct places (minus parallax) with a tilt change; but any that are behind the Sun at that point we stopped, would have to be "shown" by real bent weird light or holographs or whatever, as the Sun's light would be also ---- a ridiculous major movement of the Sun's light by the Zetas.



Oh... I know what you are saying now. It's still wrong, but in a different way than I thought. The position and role of the Sun is irrelevant. The constellations will NOT be in the correct positions in the sky if Earth is tilted away from the norm. Period.



They will be okay RELATIVE TO EACH OTHER ...
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Well, duh... And?

and they will roughly show in winter-summer from a tilt-change ...
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


I can only guess that "roughly show in winter-summer" means that they will be in the right places. NO, THEY WILL NOT. Not at all.

so
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Your above premise is totally faulty, SO what follows is useless.

only parallax to show STOPPAGE is the thing you haven't bothered to test -- among all the other things which are/seem normal re. stoppage and tilt.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


See above.

Let me REEEEPPEEEEAAATT:

ALL LOOKS NORMAL> all therefore is normal unless these Zetas have the abilities Nancy posits for them -- not I.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Why don't you stop fucking talking about this ridiculous notions?

The only thing which you have not tested yourself is ... parallax.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Absolutely absurd. You have no idea what I may or may not have 'tested', yet you KEEP repeating that you do.

Thus, that is it. And if you do and it's fine, too, the tautological aspect of Nancy's claim precludes your success in "debunking" that aspect, yes, like a religion in that way. But only in that way, since there are things you MIGHT be able to test in it: if the Zetas let you see their handiwork (in the claim, not mine).
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Stop bringing it up. It's absurd, as is your 'explanation' of how it should be thought about by others.
Menow
User ID: 1003573
United States
06/16/2010 09:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
MENOW:

Remember when I thought beifly you had joined in the others claiming I was a sexual jerk?
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Remember when you didn't respond to the corrections of that mistake?

(snip unendurable blather)
Menow
User ID: 1003573
United States
06/16/2010 09:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You're misrepresenting again. My offering did NOT support what YOU claim Nancy said.


she may think tilting would do the whole deal

Nancy's claims vary on this issue: she has the earth stopped and the Zetas tilting it AND manipulating whatever changes that would entail in other things.


I see you are avoiding your claim that the Sun and some stars would be affected differently.


ALL things would be different. I've said so again and again. The tilting would HELP the constellations,

 Quoting: mclarek 1004307



It would do no such thing, as has been explained to you maybe 18 times now.

(snip unendurable blather)
Menow
User ID: 1003573
United States
06/16/2010 09:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Not if the putative Zetas have FIXED ALL ELSE


What a stupid hypothysis... and you think *I* should worry about testing for THAT? Not a chance, dear.

Yes, a stupid hypothesis but it is what you are up against.

You can never actually defeat this claim by Nancy.

I wouldn't try.


So, what do you think, other than ANOTHER MAGNET, such as PX could cause holes of repulsion when the Sun is attracting us?



Maybe you will READ this THIS time:


Menow: The "Zeta" claim is that the repulsion force rises to equal the force of gravity at the point of contact between large bodies like PX and the Sun. So, Clare, how does that keep PX allegedly hovering near the Sun for 7 years and slow PX from near lightspeed as it allegeldy careened toward the Sun?


So?

What do you think of that? I already said, it might have to do with electromagnetism or unknown force potentials in our system. If it's true at all.

And AGAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIN: you think what?

............................

And what, AGAIN SINCE YOU CAN'T READ do you think is causing our repulsion holes in the magnetosphere IF NOT ANOTHER MAGNET LIKE A CHARGED PX?
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


You are cleary unable to comprehend the utter contradiction in that "Zeta" claim, since you said it would explain slowing of PX as it allegeldy approached the Sun at high speed.

You are an idiot about things like that.
The Commentator

User ID: 587619
United States
06/16/2010 09:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Earth stoppage? Yes.

Me? No.

LOL!

banana2

Yet another thing you deluded about.

The subject matter of this thread is Zetas 100% Wrong Yet Again!!,
NOT YOU.
book


[...] with the clunk nonsense had ballooned and become disruptive inane ganging, babbling on and on.

Take a hint will ya?

There is only one person here who is disruptively and inanely babbling on and on.

We would like you to go away and bother other people.

book
 Quoting: Halcyon Dayz, FCD



+ 1E10^7

Just to confuse the clunk....
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
The Commentator

User ID: 587619
United States
06/16/2010 09:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Attacking me and all evidence and hypotheses I have shown them.
Plus, confusing me and Nancy.

Please come down off that cross. We need the wood for better uses.
 Quoting: DrPostman



One has to wonder whether they are one and the same troll....
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/16/2010 10:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I did no such thing. I joined. And others maligned me and the content of my posts. I rebutted and on major points am correct.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307

You were maligned because you insisted on spamming the thread with off topic blather and ignored requests to keep it on topic. What did you expect? And why can't you take it to a thread of your own where you can blather on to your hearts content without being maligned?


You are the arrogant one. I happen to be right.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Oh the fucking irony. ROFLMAO
You misidentify arrogance with self-esteem to fight bullies and get to the interesting stuff anyway. :)

 Quoting: mclarek 1004307


Self esteem is knowing when to shut up instead of making a fool of yourself in a room full of people who didn't invite you and wish you would leave.
Catseye
User ID: 1005747
Dominican Republic
06/16/2010 10:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I have been unable to read clare's posts for the previous few dozen pages. I've been skimming through them a bit, but it's like a virtual nightmare at speed reading class. It is already nonsensical taken word for word, but try to chop it up and it's just a bunch of . . . well, clunk! For heaven's sake, clare, fifty pages back I was crawling with embarrassment for you and you have kept on!

Oooh, that was funny, biefly and sexual in the same sentence. Wow, more Freudian slips abound! And the insults are growing in intensity. I think someone's coming unglued and now it's getting fun to watch.

You do have a gift: you can speak 200 words per minute with gusts up to 300. But you have verbal diarrhea and mental constipation.

I said before your cheese slid off your cracker, clare, but it's obviously much more than that. I'll just bet that by now, some college professor has printed out your posts and has given them to his students as an assignment - like point out the specific psychological characteristics of this poster. Maybe it's just for extra credit, but you are better than any made-up example!

And just when I thought the looniness was limited to Planet X and 911, you come up with this:

"They say it's a gas explosion in a weak area of Mexico City -- which means the ground shifted and the explosion was secondary."

This is how your mind works! Everything has some sinister, mysterious, known-only-to-you force behind it and you are doing your best to try to get this across from your home Planet Loony to us here on earth. And you said Menow was confused!


you guessed it, quiz time!


mclarek:


a) lala

b) blahblah

c) girl_happy_red but screwball


Contemplation of vision of parallax earth constant that magnetoholes of repulsion are ascending through and causing earthquakes and retrograde hemorrhoids:


a) stars

b) tp

c) gaah


Everyone's reaction to this quote by mclarek:

"I wouldn't bother, though, but then again just because I don't believe putative Zetas are doing physical light-bending "magic" on us doesn't mean they may not in fact be -- for it's untestable."


a) scream

b) another do

c) weirdo


The only help for mclarek at this point:


a)
bonghit

b) readup

c) drunk


What you have to be to believe that earth has a dark twin hiding on the other side of the sun and that a rogue planet has invaded the inner solar system:


a) alien

b) ops

c) girl_happy_red


Yeah, I know, this quiz was lame but so is the subject matter. lol
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 10:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
OK... have it YOUR way. So if you DON'T believe that or care to be discussing it, why do you KEEP on talking about it as if it is a REAL possibility which ought to be considered? Clearly none of the REST of us think it needs to be 'tested' for.
 Quoting: Menow 1003573

It does IF you take the claim seriously enough to test it fully to "see if" the Zetas left any clues. It's the only thing you haven't tried, is all.

I wouldn't bother but it is the logical conclusion of your efforts on the issue; and if you do, and all's well, it doesn't mean all's well and you've debunked THE FULL CLAIM, because the FULL claim includes the idea that if all SEEMS well it's only excellent foolery by Zetas. So I drew that out for you and you got all confoodled about why I would do so (I did so for mere exactitude on the state of your tests about the stoppage/tilt); plus confoodled about what I meant, and what I believe on the matter. Anyway ...

At least I thought of it -- somebody had to, eventually. :)

So -- and much more interesting with OR without PX (unless you like magical claims):

what, other than a 2nd magnet such as PX, would give REPULSION to us when the Sun is attracting us, the last few years?

And no, I'm not idiotic for asking, as you last said. It's a valid scientific question, as you know.
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 10:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Off topic spam. This is not a chemtard thread. Please get a room and keep this thread on topic. Respectfully, Clunk, enough is enough. Piss off. Please.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953



Talk to George. He brought it up originally and now.
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I have been unable to read clare's posts for the previous few dozen pages.

[...]

Yeah, I know, this quiz was lame but so is the subject matter. lol
 Quoting: Catseye 1005747



Apply your statements to the idiotic drivel spewed at me to which I was replying and you'd have your head on right.

By muddying all points and dragging them out into nonsense, these a-holes have made everything I said hard to gather together. Also, it was their attacks to which I was replying; so don't blame me for the inanity of basic content.

But your nasty humour is -- for such things -- sort of clever in how to misrepresent something and make that misrepresentation nasty.

It does not represent anything much of substance about the subject matter.

By the way, I don't know why you brought up the Dark Twin idea. I don't bring that up. Only once that I recall did I comment on the Dark Twin. I brought up that odd photo which, when enhanced, did seem to show it. And because it was a guy's personal astro photo page and he seemed shocked, it may be genuine (but may not).

Some on this thread just thought it ridiculous. On the DT, though, I keep an open mind because I really don't know much about it, but I find it a fascinating idea. Why not?

Such a major item on our own orbit would probably scare a lot of people, so maybe if it's there it would be unmentioned. -- However ... you and I don't know either way for certain. So I figure it's not really worth discussing until we do have some clearer insight one way or another. Maybe the guy's photo will turn out to be a Dark Twin! That could be cool, not scary -- to me, anyway.
Menow
User ID: 1003573
United States
06/16/2010 10:44 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
It does IF is all.

I wouldn't bother but if you do it doesn't mean all's well


 Quoting: mclarek 1004307



All is NOT well, Clare. LOOK! The Bat-signal is shining over Gotham City! There are people there who don'tunderstand things!

Your work is finished here.

Fly, fly away...
George B

User ID: 976283
United States
06/16/2010 10:47 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You may be interested in this
Re: Chemtrail Poll . . . do you think chemtrails are real? See the Results NOW!

Cool, George.

I am interested. I am sick of these clunkers ... :)

By the way, they started again; we had 4 hours without and now this again. I saw one of the big jet-like tankers (not huge, but pretty big) clearly in low altitude with the side tanks on its midriff, between the wings and the tail. Saw it from below; the tank areas were really obvious.


Rain smear blear then windy/cloudy blue clearing out, but now building blear and cloud again. They are not going to give us a summer this time, I guess.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307

Welcome again to the Thread Wars! Good Evening Clare . . . how are you?
Martin Luther King . . . Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter!

All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.
Galileo Galilei, Italian astronomer & physicist (1564 - 1642)

The only thing guaranteed in life is deception. . . everything else is optional . . . George B
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/16/2010 10:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You may be interested in this
Re: Chemtrail Poll . . . do you think chemtrails are real? See the Results NOW!

Cool, George.

I am interested. I am sick of these clunkers ... :)

By the way, they started again; we had 4 hours without and now this again. I saw one of the big jet-like tankers (not huge, but pretty big) clearly in low altitude with the side tanks on its midriff, between the wings and the tail. Saw it from below; the tank areas were really obvious.


Rain smear blear then windy/cloudy blue clearing out, but now building blear and cloud again. They are not going to give us a summer this time, I guess.

Welcome again to the Thread Wars! Good Evening Clare . . . how are you?
 Quoting: George B

Please George, I like you, but please don't encourage her. Couldn't you two take it to another thread and let this one get back on topic?
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 10:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
... this quote by mclarek:

"I wouldn't bother, though, but then again just because I don't believe putative Zetas are doing physical light-bending "magic" on us doesn't mean they may not in fact be -- for it's untestable."
 Quoting: Catseye 1005747


By the way, Catseye:

My statement is absolutely honestly scientific and logical:

Logic knows what it CAN and CAN't test.

Anything untestable (at present) is TECHNICALLY SPEAKING unknowable (at present).

A God hypothesis is the ultimate example.

No-one has to BELIEVE in such untestable claims, but some:

a) have become testable (as instruments get better, certain "wild" hypotheses do in fact show up as correct)

b) will never become testable but people believe them anyway (God)

So ...
My statement about what the claim implies was absolutely rigourous and sane. I don't have to believe the claim to know what its testable and untestable factors are. ... As you and all here should know, if you THINK about it.

Thus ... if you laugh at my statement (not the claim itself) YOU have a lack of true rigour about the nature of reason and what it can and cannot do at a given point in time.
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 10:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Please George, I like you, but please don't encourage her. Couldn't you two take it to another thread and let this one get back on topic?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 908953


I'm not "encouraged" -- it was merely a response to his statement, a one-off. I don't bring up chemtrails very often myself.

Only when I woke up a few days ago to the whole thing in one long sitting, yes, I went into it, because it was something which had come up here at one point. I was shocked, I got it, I shared, and I dropped it.

My point about George was merely: don't PICK ON ME FOR THE SUBJECT. It is one of many on this thread, and though a side issue, I am within my rights to reply.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/16/2010 10:55 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
My point about George was merely: don't PICK ON ME FOR THE SUBJECT. It is one of many on this thread, and though a side issue, I am within my rights to reply.
 Quoting: mclarek 1004307

Fucking idiot twat! It's a topic on this thread only because you insist on talking about it on a thread about something entirely different. I pity the man that ends up with you.
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 10:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Welcome again to the Thread Wars! Good Evening Clare . . . how are you?
 Quoting: George B


FINE!

:)

Hi, friend. I always look foward to your hello. They were really caustic today! AWFUL!

At least Menow finally admitted he's a shit to me deliberately.

:)

Well, you know I know it's not all the time. But mostly -- i.e., so often.

The weather's AWFUL here. It's really pissing me off. We have (naturally) an incredible day but then they start and this brings bleary wind and rain ... it's AWFUL. Starting again to rain. PISSING ME OFF. I hope your debate goes well. When is it?

What's new with you, Tricey?

{>:-)
mclarek
User ID: 1004307
Canada
06/16/2010 10:58 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
MENOW:

Remember when I thought beifly you had joined in the others claiming I was a sexual jerk?


Remember when you didn't respond to the corrections of that mistake?

(snip unendurable blather)
 Quoting: Menow 1003573


I did respond. Find it.

Blatherer!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 908953
Canada
06/16/2010 11:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
BTW, zetasquawk is back and what a hoot!

I don't think the Ningcompoops have noticed that yet.
 Quoting: DrPostman

I can't wait to see Nancy try to twist her previous statements about the demise of zetasquawk to cover yet another gaffe. The good thing about the new format is that she can just pretend she never said what she did and ignore or ban anyone that brings it up.

They didn't even get the joke, and I agree with our friend at zetasquawk, the reaction of the ningcompoops regarding the site's untimely demise due to lack of government funding far exceeded everyone's expectations. Great stuff! Keep it coming, friend!

News








Proud Member Of The Angry Mob