Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 2,222 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,989,590
Pageviews Today: 2,681,596Threads Today: 641Posts Today: 11,827
07:01 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 1217604
United States
01/17/2011 11:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Since Luser isn't around here anymore, I thought I would post this one last time...and add one last item.

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away.
27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away.
28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away.
30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
41) "User" claimed not to make assumptions. Yet, he assumes that people are paid to be here. He assumes that Hap is a fake and he assumes that Prof Rabbit works for NASA. When these assumptions are pointed out, he spews insults and runs away.
42) "User "attacked "debunkers" for calling Nancy crazy saying we had no business doing so, and yet he calls Candace crazy. When asked why, in his opinion, he considers Candace crazy but not Nancy, he spewed insults and ran away.
43) "User" claimed that Prof Rabbit is here on GLP all day and that the time stamps of his posts proved it. When asked how a time stamp shows someone is here all day, he spewed insults and ran away.
44) "User" said "the evidence is in the skies" and made some vague comment about fireballs. When asked questions about his claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
45) "User" claims I spend too much time on GLP and that people can see this with the time stamps. "User" fails to realize it doesn't take a lot of time to check the thread every now and then and post a response. When asked exactly how much time I spend here or how the time stamps prove that, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
46) "User" stated that "...Sing, I'll sway" has only been on GLP for two days. That's true - as a registered member. However, the poster could have been here for months posting as an Anonymous Coward. When asked how he knows for certain that "...Sing, I'll sway" has only been here for two days, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
47) I asked what MJ12 and the Puppet Master were. Instead of simply answering the question, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
48) "User" now claims I'm lying about not knowing what MJ12 and the Puppet Master are. When asked to back up those claims, he spewed insults and ran away.
49) "User" claimed I spent hours on GLP every single day. When asked to back up his claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
50) "User" claimed that Hap is a known NASA shill. Hap does not work for NASA and has never claimed to. When asked to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
51) "User" claims that Astronut works for NASA, something that Astronut has never said. When asked to prove his claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
52) "User" claims that NASA is always lying. When asked for examples of those lies, he spewed insults and ran away.
53) "User" claims that NASA is the most laughed at organization. When asked for evidence of that, he spewed insults and ran away.
New to the list:
54) After years of consistently being proven wrong, "User" spewed a few final insults and ran away... and hasn't been heard from in four months.

Perhaps we should start a list with all the things Max has done to embarrass himself.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


No way you can come up with 55 items - IMPOSSIBLE.
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 1233251
New Zealand
01/17/2011 11:12 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
New to the list:
54) After years of consistently being proven wrong, "User" spewed a few final insults and ran away...and hasn't been heard from in four months.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


chorus chorus chorus chorus


Perhaps we should start a list with all the things Max has done to embarrass himself.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


tlr26 ......that would be a list of endless events in Max's case. My goodness, CB, you would have to be here updating that "list" every bloody day!! tlr24
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 1233251
New Zealand
01/17/2011 11:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I think Luser was ultimately laid off. As funds grew tighter at Troubled Times, Inc., she had the hard decision of deciding who to keep around. It became apparent to her that Max did a far better job of supporting her than Luser did. She realized that his insults did more to discredit her than it did to support her. So, she got rid of him.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


Mexcited OH HAPPY DAYS!!........OH HAPPY DAYS!!
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 763624
Australia
01/17/2011 11:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I can't betray Nancy - that would make me look inconsistent.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**



So what you are saying is that if she is right- she is right...
and if she is wrong???
then according to your statement above she is still right???

THAT my dear maxipad is WHY..

YOU ARE A BELIEVER

which is exactly WHY it is a (failed) cult/religion

It doesn't require facts (LOL) or testing of possible hypothesis's (which is what science requires- repeatable testable facts)

IF (by some strange chance) planet X did show up- and it could be shown to exist (say by an eclipse/transit of the sun) or by its gravitational influence (effecting other planets orbits) or by any one of a dozen other methods of detecting new bodies in the inner solar system

and you could show me facts- and from those facts predict other things (say venus transit of the sun, lunar/solar eclipses etc etc) that all require that EVERYTHING is in its PRECISE position

IF you could say- because planet x is here- we can calculate its effect and this will cause such and such an effect and we can then see that that effect does cause such and such to happen- and it does happen- then I will certainly be looking into why your/nancys predictions match reality better than the classic newtonian predictions

THAT is why science has and will continue to be the final decider- because it works

when it doesn't, then people investigate to find out why

Often the discoverer of that why will become famous

(which is another reason why your nasa/professional/amateur astronomers/pilots/professional sailors/weekend sailors all being in on the `coverup' is so laughable


people that find stuff floating around in space often have it named after them (not that that is the reason they go looking) but if I did discover a new asteroid/comet and they named it after me- I would be pleased as punch!!

And if I found a new planet and could prove it- LOL- you couldn't shut me up



`newsflash newsflash'
`A recently newfound innersolar system planet was found by an aussie recently, and quickly confirmed by dozens of other amateur and professional astronomers. Originally called planet x, it has been named after its discoverer and has been called Dap'
`Dap was discovered by its gravitational influence and occasional occulting of stars and once its position was found, others quickly confirmed it's presence'

If there was a planet wandering around and it got found- THATS what would be on the front page of every paper worldwide within 2 days- and all over the www within minutes of it being found and confirmed....

not this incredible `coverup' by practically everyone else on the planet except nancys `true believers'.....
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1167715
United States
01/17/2011 11:31 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
No way you can come up with 55 items - IMPOSSIBLE.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**

Nice to see that you admit User was one of a kind when it came to embarrassing oneself.

I see "The One" is getting his ass handed to him on his thread. It's so obvious since all he can respond with is the usual "paid shill" argument found in Chapter 1 of the ZetaTalk Operations Manual.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 01/17/2011 11:33 AM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1167715
United States
01/17/2011 11:41 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Apparently, "The One" was getting slapped down so hard that he's now ignoring the "paid shills." I believe you'll find that maneuver in chapter 2 of the ZetaTalk manual.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Prof_Rabbit

User ID: 1232755
Australia
01/17/2011 11:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The wish for "doom" has been around since biblical times,

22:6 And he said unto me, These sayings are faithful and true: and the Lord God of the holy prophets sent his angel to shew unto his servants the things which must shortly be done.
22:7 Behold, I come quickly: blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this book.
22:8 And I John saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed me these things.



Some people have an innate wish to see death and destruction meted out to those around them in the hope to stand and scream "I told you so!", that is truly a sad thing.
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind"
aussie 763624
User ID: 763624
Australia
01/17/2011 11:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
No way you can come up with 55 items - IMPOSSIBLE.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**



Hmm- lets see
you embarrass yourself every second post (that being generous- personally I'd say you embarrass yourself every post)

on average you post 2-4 times a page (again its often more, but I'm trying to not embarrass you TOO much...)

you did go through a period of not posting too much- so say 1/3 of all pages only (in this thread) only- meet or exceed those (pretty tolerant) specs


866 pages divided by 1/3 of thread multiplied by 2 posts per page equals.....














571 posts by maxipad

lets be really generous and say that only 10% were actually embarrassingly rank stupidity posts (a very very low no. IMHO and certainly being far more generous than most people would be...)

Thats already right there with luser at 55 and you at 57



LOL @ your IMPOSSIBLE and raise it a `DENIAL OF FACTS'

;-)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
01/17/2011 12:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
In what way (and be very precise, please, and very specific)are you like a cornered animal?


I can't betray Nancy - that would make me look inconsistent.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


So, two things:

It is a "betrayal" to point out when someone is wrong, even if they truly are wrong?

and: Consistency is more important, in your philosophy, than fact?
Gazmik

User ID: 487277
United States
01/17/2011 12:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
There are a number of plates in this region, both large and small, the Pacific plate turns anti-clockwise while moving some what north west, hence the active "ring of fire".

[link to www.suite101.com]
 Quoting: Prof_Rabbit

Here's an interesting map:

[link to www.tectonics.caltech.edu] (PDF)

It has all the earthquakes worldwide of magnitude 4.0 and higher from 1998 to 2009. Lots of dots!
Henry Fnord

User ID: 1167045
United States
01/17/2011 03:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
The wish for "doom" has been around since biblical times,


 Quoting: Prof_Rabbit


My pet theory is that the Zetacult is Biblical mythology (specifically the Great Flood story) recycled for post-Christians.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1167715
United States
01/17/2011 05:40 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I suspect that as 2012 approaches, we'll be hearing more about these types of things:



Not to mention suicides.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 1217604
United States
01/17/2011 07:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
In what way (and be very precise, please, and very specific)are you like a cornered animal?


I can't betray Nancy - that would make me look inconsistent.


So, two things:

It is a "betrayal" to point out when someone is wrong, even if they truly are wrong?

and: Consistency is more important, in your philosophy, than fact?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 74444


You can't call someone "wrong" if there is a SLIM chance they are right!!!

>> Consistency is more important, in your philosophy, than fact?

Isn't it for MOST people?
Volar
User ID: 1233968
United States
01/17/2011 08:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Max writes:

"You can't call someone "wrong" if there is a SLIM chance they are right!!!"

There is no chance, slim or slimmer, that you or Nancy is right.

None whatsoever.

That's been proven.

Sucks to be you, doesn't it?
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1167715
United States
01/17/2011 08:32 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You can't call someone "wrong" if there is a SLIM chance they are right!!!
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**

Nope. You can call them wrong when they are or until they are proven right. Thus far, Nancy is wrong and has not been proven otherwise.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74444
United States
01/17/2011 09:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You can't call someone "wrong" if there is a SLIM chance they are right!!!

 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


You're wrong.

Please give an example you might have of someone (anyone!) being wrong, and I am sure a 'slim' excuse can be made up about their being right.

Thus: Am I right in paraphrasing your apparent philosophy, that no one is *ever* wrong?


>> Consistency is more important, in your philosophy, than fact?

Isn't it for MOST people?
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


No. To quote: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"

Nancy has been consistently wrong, as facts have continually borne out. Whatever will you do, sir?
The Commentator

User ID: 869448
United States
01/17/2011 09:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
No way you can come up with 55 items - IMPOSSIBLE.



Hmm- lets see
you embarrass yourself every second post (that being generous- personally I'd say you embarrass yourself every post)

on average you post 2-4 times a page (again its often more, but I'm trying to not embarrass you TOO much...)

you did go through a period of not posting too much- so say 1/3 of all pages only (in this thread) only- meet or exceed those (pretty tolerant) specs


866 pages divided by 1/3 of thread multiplied by 2 posts per page equals.....














571 posts by maxipad

lets be really generous and say that only 10% were actually embarrassingly rank stupidity posts (a very very low no. IMHO and certainly being far more generous than most people would be...)

Thats already right there with luser at 55 and you at 57



LOL @ your IMPOSSIBLE and raise it a `DENIAL OF FACTS'

;-)
 Quoting: aussie 763624 763624



Don't forget his posts as "bridget."
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
Prof_Rabbit

User ID: 1234210
Australia
01/18/2011 12:33 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
571 posts by maxipad

lets be really generous and say that only 10% were actually embarrassingly rank stupidity posts (a very very low no. IMHO and certainly being far more generous than most people would be...)

Thats already right there with luser at 55 and you at 57



LOL @ your IMPOSSIBLE and raise it a `DENIAL OF FACTS'

;-)



Don't forget his posts as "bridget."
 Quoting: The Commentator


Lets not forget the early posts such as "I'm a 9/11 survivor" ! I suggest it would be hard to just keep it to a "Top 100" :>
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind"
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
01/18/2011 02:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
No way you can come up with 55 items - IMPOSSIBLE.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**

You are right this one time.

55 will be exceeded by far.
The Commentator

User ID: 869448
United States
01/18/2011 02:45 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
571 posts by maxipad

lets be really generous and say that only 10% were actually embarrassingly rank stupidity posts (a very very low no. IMHO and certainly being far more generous than most people would be...)

Thats already right there with luser at 55 and you at 57



LOL @ your IMPOSSIBLE and raise it a `DENIAL OF FACTS'

;-)



Don't forget his posts as "bridget."


Lets not forget the early posts such as "I'm a 9/11 survivor" ! I suggest it would be hard to just keep it to a "Top 100" :>
 Quoting: Prof_Rabbit


good point! bridget is just a troll, and not even a very good one at that!
non sufficit Orbis

Being a zetatard means never having to make sense.

"Nancy pays me to post on Her threads"

Free Store admits to being a paid zetadrool shill

NO max/bridget EVER!!!!!
NO luser EVER!!!
NO clunker EVER!!!!!
KeepingItReal

User ID: 1038225
Canada
01/18/2011 06:29 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You can't call someone "wrong" if there is a SLIM chance they are right!!!

>> Consistency is more important, in your philosophy, than fact?

Isn't it for MOST people?
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**

I know I will regret engaging Max, but if we humor you and accept that you are, as you claim, "on the fence" about Nancy, then using the same "logic" wouldn't it follow that you can't call the debunkers wrong if there is a VERY GOOD chance they are right?
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 1167715
United States
01/18/2011 07:11 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I see "The One" hasn't been back on his thread since getting some really hard questions that he can't answer. No surprise there.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 96644
United States
01/18/2011 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
I can't betray Nancy - that would make me look inconsistent.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


That's some very lopsided "fence" you sit on Max. Would you ever say that about the debunkers?
walt

User ID: 1234728
South Africa
01/18/2011 11:29 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
5 days after the deadline for Indonesia to sink and it hasn't happened yet!
my rugby website at [link to www.lionsworld.co.za]
aussie 763624
User ID: 763624
Australia
01/18/2011 11:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
5 days after the deadline for Indonesia to sink and it hasn't happened yet!
 Quoting: walt

yes it has!!!
its just that the zetas have held it up so that TPB wont notice!!!

(or insert some other lame excuse here- the wackier the better...)



Sad part is that `would' be an acceptable excuse for the zetatards...

:-(
aussie 763624
User ID: 763624
Australia
01/18/2011 11:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
(has images of a bunch of zetas at the local Supercheap Automart)


`Hi we need 20 billion car jacks in a hurry'

`OH'

`We need to support nancy and hide the sinking of Indonesia to make everything appear normal'


`O....K......'
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 659599
United States
01/18/2011 02:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
(has images of a bunch of zetas at the local Supercheap Automart)


`Hi we need 20 billion car jacks in a hurry'

`OH'

`We need to support nancy and hide the sinking of Indonesia to make everything appear normal'


`O....K......'

wrotfl2
 Quoting: DrPostman

I'm pretty sure there are "powers" and "principalities" that are not to "impressed" with your attitude and behavior.
The Lone Ranger (OP)

User ID: 1234968
New Zealand
01/18/2011 03:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
(has images of a bunch of zetas at the local Supercheap Automart)


`Hi we need 20 billion car jacks in a hurry'

`OH'

`We need to support nancy and hide the sinking of Indonesia to make everything appear normal'


`O....K......'

wrotfl2

I'm pretty sure there are "powers" and "principalities" that are not to "impressed" with your attitude and behavior.
 Quoting: **ZetaMax**


tlrBan

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 01/18/2011 03:22 PM
Life Is But A Dream!!
Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all."
------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

DON'T​ BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!!
**ZetaMax**

User ID: 659599
United States
01/18/2011 04:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
You can't call someone "wrong" if there is a SLIM chance they are right!!!

>> Consistency is more important, in your philosophy, than fact?

Isn't it for MOST people?

I know I will regret engaging Max, but if we humor you and accept that you are, as you claim, "on the fence" about Nancy, then using the same "logic" wouldn't it follow that you can't call the debunkers wrong if there is a VERY GOOD chance they are right?
 Quoting: KeepingItReal


I haven't lately.
Prof_Rabbit

User ID: 1235284
Australia
01/18/2011 08:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
(has images of a bunch of zetas at the local Supercheap Automart)


`Hi we need 20 billion car jacks in a hurry'

`OH'

`We need to support nancy and hide the sinking of Indonesia to make everything appear normal'


`O....K......'
 Quoting: aussie 763624 763624


The zetas could capture some Earth farts and use the methane to hold up the plate!
"Anger is a wind that blows out the lamp of your mind"

News








We're dropping truth bombs like it's the end of days!