Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
Users Online Now: 1,998 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,073,446
Pageviews Today: 1,382,371Threads Today: 343Posts Today: 6,106
12:21 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

 
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 612979
United States
08/25/2009 09:04 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nope, not scared, just watching.

Better to be prepared then get caught watching with my pants down.
 Quoting: User # 78/68

BS! If you were truly watching, which means neither believing or disbelieving, then you wouldn't have a problem with someone presenting valid arguments disagreeing with Nancy. Instead, even when the person is polite, you swoop in and attack. Yeah, you're watching alright...watching for someone else you pounce on and try to scare away so your master isn't proven wrong.
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 756517
United Kingdom
08/25/2009 09:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Nope, not scared, just watching.

Better to be prepared then get caught watching with my pants down.

BS! If you were truly watching, which means neither believing or disbelieving, then you wouldn't have a problem with someone presenting valid arguments disagreeing with Nancy. Instead, even when the person is polite, you swoop in and attack. Yeah, you're watching alright...watching for someone else you pounce on and try to scare away so your master isn't proven wrong.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


EXACTLY! Luser 78/68 has been running around in a funk for years over Nancy's crap. Talk about a coward! Afraid of the bogeyman, that's our Luser! Nancy has him dangling on a string banana2
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 612979
United States
08/25/2009 09:41 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
In her thread, one of his last comments for today was that he simply believes there's nothing wrong with reading what she says, watching and being prepared.

That's fine...there's absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. And I don't think any "debunker" has ever stated otherwise. They've only stated there's no sense in being prepared for a "pole shift" caused by some "Planet X" because 1) this "rogue planet" doesn't exist nor is there any evidence to suggest it does. Therefore, this dreadful "pole shift" isn't going to happen. 2) If "Planet X" did exist and it did cause a "pole shift," based on Nancy's own ramblings, there's no way anyone would survive it.

To reiterate - there's nothing wrong with being prepared for a disaster. It makes perfect sense. There's just no sense in being prepared for something that isn't going to happen. Why go to the trouble of quitting your job, severing ties with your family (as one person on GLP did), and moving to your "safe spot" if the predicted "pole shift" isn't going to happen? It's real easy to do all that...but it's more difficult to get everything back. What do you tell a potential employer when they ask why you quit your last job? "Well, I thought a rogue planet was coming to wipe out 90% of life on Earth because a woman in Wisconsin who sees signs in pieces of unwrapped candy told me so." How do you convince your spouse to take you back? How do you show your face around your friends again after you claimed they were all "debunkers" or "paid for shills" simply because they didn't see your point of view and ended up being right?
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
***ZetaMax***

User ID: 659599
United States
08/25/2009 09:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Anyways Circuit Fool, you never wanted rational discuss. You get what you give!

Yes, I have...but it is you that isn't capable of it. End of story. Here's a list of examples:

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away.
27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away.
28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away.
30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.

There was a truce between us and I even defended you once. But it was YOU that went back to spewing insults. Proving once and for all, that attacks and insults is all you know. Let's see how long it takes to add a few more to this list.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker


CB can't resist _spam_ming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.

Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 08/25/2009 09:52 PM
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.

ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
 [link to www.zetatalk.com] 

ZetaMax
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 612979
United States
08/25/2009 10:05 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***

ZetaMax can't resist _spam_ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence sitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping. Or, maybe you should tell User to quit being such a coward. If he had simply chosen to answer the questions and enter into rational debate instead of spewing insults and running away, this list wouldn't have gotten as far as it has. The only reason you consider it to be SPAM is because it shows what kind of people support Nancy. It's as simple as that. No one makes you come here. Or do they?

bunky

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 08/25/2009 11:10 PM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 02:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Anyways Circuit Fool, you never wanted rational discuss. You get what you give!

Yes, I have...but it is you that isn't capable of it. End of story. Here's a list of examples:

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away.
27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away.
28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away.
30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.

There was a truce between us and I even defended you once. But it was YOU that went back to spewing insults. Proving once and for all, that attacks and insults is all you know. Let's see how long it takes to add a few more to this list.


CB can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***

nothing but silly gifs and silly accusations?
Typical for your spamming mentality.

Nancy ace will tell rueful of being historic as moon renders or receiver traces almighty popcorn trips monday night to Zetamax Mercury swing repulsions
#-------------------------------
And WHOEVER solves this, he may NOT publish the solution, but just tell he got it, and may supply a proof by coding something the same way.
125 days ZT not solved
1 debunker solvers accepted (Oldsmobile)
#-------------------------------
Hints will be provided every 25 days
Hint No. 1: The riddle CAN be solved, and you WILL know if your solution is right. (everybody doing it can be proud)
Hint No. 2: Where did the riddle appear first? (everybody doing it should be proud)
Hint No. 3: Its no chiffre. It IS decribed in encryption history - but not available on the net (everybody doing it was diligent)
Hint No. 4: The riddle is easy. (everybody doing it can think)
Hint No. 5: The riddle is stegano. (everybody doing it may cry)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 02:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

screw that to your head, dripster.
***ZetaMax***

User ID: 755147
United States
08/26/2009 06:09 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist _spam_ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17230

Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.
The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations.

ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997.
 [link to www.zetatalk.com] 

ZetaMax
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 06:48 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.

Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***

the baiter baited.

talking about yourself, eh?


silly gifs.... from

General:
The Culties
The Stupids
zetadrool
zetadrollers
Zetards
Zetasquish
Zetatards
Zidiots

Specific:
Agent Max
Bullshitter
DRIPster
Fence Shitter
Nanny
Minimax
Maxi
Maxinanny
Maxipads
Melf
Melfster
Melfy
Nannymax
Nellemax
Nelliemax
ShitTalker
Sockster
Socky
Zetamin
Zetaquark
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 06:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.

Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***

btw, the first page is zetafree.....

debunkers to mods!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 756752
United Kingdom
08/26/2009 07:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Looks like this thread is proving a lot more popular than any of Nancy's.

:5:
Circuit Breaker

User ID: 612979
United States
08/26/2009 07:31 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***

Then perhaps you should stop lying. Then you wouldn't have to worry about being liar. Funny how a supposed "lawyer" doesn't even know how to spell the word. I'll assume it was a typo...even though it was twice.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 08/26/2009 07:32 AM
A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 07:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Lies are WRONG - even in a "Lier's" home - filled with Liers.

Then perhaps you should stop lying. Then you wouldn't have to worry about being liar. Funny how a supposed "lawyer" doesn't even know how to spell the word. I'll assume it was a typo...even though it was twice.
 Quoting: Circuit Breaker

hmmmm - i suppose its just the "D"char of her keybaord which is stuck (and some typos corrected):


Lieders are WRONG - even in a "Lieder's" home - filled with Lieders.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 679804
Finland
08/26/2009 07:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17230


You guys are starting to sound just like zetacultists sounded before boycott. I'm pretty sure you don't see it yourselves, CB and 17230, and you may just get angry with me from pointing that out for you (that's what cultists and liars do, btw), but the truth is you're repeating the exact ways that you're supposed to be debunking in Nancy's threads/Zetatalk/cult. Just saying.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 679804
Finland
08/26/2009 08:03 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Looks like this thread is proving a lot more popular than any of Nancy's.

:5:
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 756752


Yeah. And so? Nancy's zetathreads used to be very popular and that argument was used by the cultists as proof that they were right. Now the same model or form is used in the Debunkers thread. What changed? Nothing. You guys seem to be fighting just of power positions. What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 08:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Fom Melfy:
CB can't resist spamming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
----------

ZetaMax can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" posts at every opportunity. He continues to claim he's a "fence shitter" when it's obvious to all he's a Nancy believer, through and through.

This is a "debunker" thread. If you don't like what is posted here, don't come in here and start griping.

screw that to your head, dripster.


You guys are starting to sound just like zetacultists sounded before boycott. I'm pretty sure you don't see it yourselves, CB and 17230, and you may just get angry with me from pointing that out for you (that's what cultists and liars do, btw), but the truth is you're repeating the exact ways that you're supposed to be debunking in Nancy's threads/Zetatalk/cult. Just saying.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

nice try.

next time better distinguish between "Truth" and your humble "opinion".
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 08:25 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.


So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.

You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 08:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17230

hmmmmmm -
"as long as i NOT stand corrected....."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 679804
Finland
08/26/2009 09:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17230


Really? In my country there is a saying "se koira älähtää johon kalikka kalahtaa" (loose translation: that dog cries who gets hit by a wooden stick) meaning: he who sees himself in an argument yells out loud. I was talking to both sides of this oppositional situation (bunkers vs. debunkers) but you, 17230, were the one who reacted first, and reacted in a very stupid manner in addition, btw.

You, 17230, have made a statement (of your truth) that I, writing here as AC679804, am Nancy Lieder herself or a zetacult follower. I asked you to provide proof for your assertion but all you could come up with was that "I smell like Nancy" and other feelings completely made by your ego. There is nothing true in what you believe, 17230. The ego thinks that it knows the truth, and it's pretty ruthless in telling everyone that "truth" which is actually a LIE, like your LIE that I'm Nancy or her follower.

You simply didn't bother to look for yourself, you simply didn't bother to do any research (that would have been very easy to do at that time, btw, just by using the GLP search engine and reading, and paying attention). You were too lazy for any of that. Or too stupid. Or: you just wanted to hold on to your groundless beliefs that you call facts - but your facts are just your blind faith in your beliefs or whatever shit your ego spouts at you. Your ego is no different than what you so much despise in Nancy, her cult or in her followers. Your hatred towards those people - who are mislead or misguided somewhat, I agree - is your ego hating everything it cannot understand or control. Your hatred, 17230, is the most blatant expression in your posts at GLP all in all. I have no idea why there is so much hatred in you, dear fellow person, but what we need to do is to get rid of that ego activity.

You, 17230, are always so quick to call zetafollowers stupid and ignorant but you don't see those same characteristics in your own behavior and your belief system (which, btw, is just as bullshit as theirs :))

But, the good news is, that You, in reality, are not your ego. Someday you'll realize that you indeed were wrong while going with your ego. You can start changing that situation right now! I give you an easy task to do, or actually you have given it to yourself. Just look at my posts at GLP. Do the research. Pay attention. Notice. Discern real from fantasy or misguidande.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 09:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
someday. soon.


But not now.

as i already said.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 09:14 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.


Really? In my country there is a saying "se koira älähtää johon kalikka kalahtaa" (loose translation: that dog cries who gets hit by a wooden stick) meaning: he who sees himself in an argument yells out loud. I was talking to both sides of this oppositional situation (bunkers vs. debunkers) but you, 17230, were the one who reacted first, and reacted in a very stupid manner in addition, btw.

You, 17230, have made a statement (of your truth) that I, writing here as AC679804, am Nancy Lieder herself or a zetacult follower. I asked you to provide proof for your assertion but all you could come up with was that "I smell like Nancy" and other feelings completely made by your ego. There is nothing true in what you believe, 17230. The ego thinks that it knows the truth, and it's pretty ruthless in telling everyone that "truth" which is actually a LIE, like your LIE that I'm Nancy or her follower.

You simply didn't bother to look for yourself, you simply didn't bother to do any research (that would have been very easy to do at that time, btw, just by using the GLP search engine and reading, and paying attention). You were too lazy for any of that. Or too stupid. Or: you just wanted to hold on to your groundless beliefs that you call facts - but your facts are just your blind faith in your beliefs or whatever shit your ego spouts at you. Your ego is no different than what you so much despise in Nancy, her cult or in her followers. Your hatred towards those people - who are mislead or misguided somewhat, I agree - is your ego hating everything it cannot understand or control. Your hatred, 17230, is the most blatant expression in your posts at GLP all in all. I have no idea why there is so much hatred in you, dear fellow person, but what we need to do is to get rid of that ego activity.

You, 17230, are always so quick to call zetafollowers stupid and ignorant but you don't see those same characteristics in your own behavior and your belief system (which, btw, is just as bullshit as theirs :))

But, the good news is, that You, in reality, are not your ego. Someday you'll realize that you indeed were wrong while going with your ego. You can start changing that situation right now! I give you an easy task to do, or actually you have given it to yourself. Just look at my posts at GLP. Do the research. Pay attention. Notice. Discern real from fantasy or misguidande.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

Start with CBs list for luser, you master-not-believer, and show us at ONE of these questions what a sound argumentation is.
as long as you dont, go playing with "soon, sometimes, stupid, ignorant, insight....." and dont bore grownups.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 09:18 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
...... What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

hu? reading, understanding, reality and sound arguments are not you strong sides, obviously.



So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

My donation to humanity is to give Nancy the washing she deserves.


You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.

That MAY happen, perhaps, in a far future. Chances are very small for that - next to nothing. Get caught by a lightning, being president of the united states or Nancy getting back to reality is much more probable.

UNTIL that i am right - as long as i stand corrected from FACTS.

Which you neither can present nor understand.


Really? In my country there is a saying "se koira älähtää johon kalikka kalahtaa" (loose translation: that dog cries who gets hit by a wooden stick) meaning: he who sees himself in an argument yells out loud. I was talking to both sides of this oppositional situation (bunkers vs. debunkers) but you, 17230, were the one who reacted first, and reacted in a very stupid manner in addition, btw.

You, 17230, have made a statement (of your truth) that I, writing here as AC679804, am Nancy Lieder herself or a zetacult follower. I asked you to provide proof for your assertion but all you could come up with was that "I smell like Nancy" and other feelings completely made by your ego. There is nothing true in what you believe, 17230. The ego thinks that it knows the truth, and it's pretty ruthless in telling everyone that "truth" which is actually a LIE, like your LIE that I'm Nancy or her follower.

You simply didn't bother to look for yourself, you simply didn't bother to do any research (that would have been very easy to do at that time, btw, just by using the GLP search engine and reading, and paying attention). You were too lazy for any of that. Or too stupid. Or: you just wanted to hold on to your groundless beliefs that you call facts - but your facts are just your blind faith in your beliefs or whatever shit your ego spouts at you. Your ego is no different than what you so much despise in Nancy, her cult or in her followers. Your hatred towards those people - who are mislead or misguided somewhat, I agree - is your ego hating everything it cannot understand or control. Your hatred, 17230, is the most blatant expression in your posts at GLP all in all. I have no idea why there is so much hatred in you, dear fellow person, but what we need to do is to get rid of that ego activity.

You, 17230, are always so quick to call zetafollowers stupid and ignorant but you don't see those same characteristics in your own behavior and your belief system (which, btw, is just as bullshit as theirs :))

But, the good news is, that You, in reality, are not your ego. Someday you'll realize that you indeed were wrong while going with your ego. You can start changing that situation right now! I give you an easy task to do, or actually you have given it to yourself. Just look at my posts at GLP. Do the research. Pay attention. Notice. Discern real from fantasy or misguidande.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

or, even better, you master-sometimes,

deal with the riddle and show me your solution (which would at least earn my acknowledgement of your intelligence):

Nancy ace will tell rueful of being historic as moon renders or receiver traces almighty popcorn trips monday night to Zetamax Mercury swing repulsions
#-------------------------------
And WHOEVER solves this, he may NOT publish the solution, but just tell he got it, and may supply a proof by coding something the same way.
125 days ZT not solved
1 debunker solvers accepted (Oldsmobile)
#-------------------------------
Hints will be provided every 25 days
Hint No. 1: The riddle CAN be solved, and you WILL know if your solution is right. (everybody doing it can be proud)
Hint No. 2: Where did the riddle appear first? (everybody doing it should be proud)
Hint No. 3: Its no chiffre. It IS decribed in encryption history - but not available on the net (everybody doing it was diligent)
Hint No. 4: The riddle is easy. (everybody doing it can think)
Hint No. 5: The riddle is stegano. (everybody doing it may cry)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 679804
Finland
08/26/2009 09:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

I have a question about your riddle (I'm a fanatic puzzle solver myself): Are you absolutely certain that your riddle is easy for anyone to solve? Does your riddle require knowledge in English language or not? I'm asking this because I've been trying to solve your riddle but I've been having difficulties because English is not my first language, and e.g. word "render" can be translated in sooooo many ways into my own language (I, btw, am a professional translator working at home doing translations). So, if you didn't already catch my question, I'll rephrase it: Can your riddle be solved only in English language OR Is it possible to translate to any other language? Do answer this, please.

Is the idea in your riddle to provide a synonym to a word, to place the word with another expression, to enter into another phrase that actually makes some sense? If so, then your riddle is not about intelligence or capacities, but it is very much based on cultural background which is not shared by all of humanity.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 09:59 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

how much do YOU know about what i do pay attention for the future?

I have a question about your riddle (I'm a fanatic puzzle solver myself): Are you absolutely certain that your riddle is easy for anyone to solve?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

Yes. I am absolutely certain about what i wrote in the hints. no doubt. about every word, down to every letter.

the riddle and the hints ar fair down to the bones.

Does your riddle require knowledge in English language or not?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

I would hardly like to give additional hints but the question is sound so you get an answer.

I must say - yes. but, the level of english for understanding the question qualifies for recognizing the solution.

Your level of English qualifies for about 100.000 %.
I'm asking this because I've been trying to solve your riddle but I've been having difficulties because English is not my first language, and e.g. word "render" can be translated in sooooo many ways into my own language (I, btw, am a professional translator working at home doing translations). So, if you didn't already catch my question, I'll rephrase it: Can your riddle be solved only in English language OR Is it possible to translate to any other language? Do answer this, please.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

I understand the question. you dont need the answer.
(But yes, it can basically be translated)

Is the idea in your riddle to provide a synonym to a word, to place the word with another expression, to enter into another phrase that actually makes some sense? If so, then your riddle is not about intelligence or capacities, but it is very much based on cultural background which is not shared by all of humanity.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

The riddle directly has an answer which makes sense. (hint no.1)

Theres no second level.
No cultural background needed.

All three couldnt be called "easy" for everyone. (hint no 4)

We may have an argument together, but if you solve you indeed get my serious compliment, and i would like you comply to the conditions then.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 679804
Finland
08/26/2009 10:16 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

how much do YOU know about what i do pay attention for the future?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17230


I don't know nor do I claim to know anything about your future, which I can only hope is for the better, but regarding communication at GLP I do pay attention and I do notice who posts what, when and where, and I do know after you've posted where you stand.

Thank you very much for your answers conserning your riddle. I've been having a real hard time with it, disparaging myself for not being able to get real sense into it. I will take your comments and advice into heart and ponder.. I'm sure I'll be able to solve it.. no problemo..
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 719433
United States
08/26/2009 10:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Anyways Circuit Fool, you never wanted rational discuss. You get what you give!

Yes, I have...but it is you that isn't capable of it. End of story. Here's a list of examples:

Challenges "User # 78/68" Continues To Run Away From
(also known as The Number Of Ways "User # 78/68" Continues To Embarrass Himself)

1) When asked for proof that "Planet X" exists, he simply spews insults and runs away.
2) When someone wanted to bet him money (something that's very important to him) on Nancy's accuracy, he disappeared. And each time it is brought up, he ignores it.
3) I provided photographic proof that the sun was NOT rising 20 minutes early. When I asked him to dispute this, he ran away.
4) I provided a diagram proving that constellations behind the sun cannot be made visible by simply tilting the Earth or lowering it in the ecliptic. Instead of providing charts of his own to show it would be possible, he simply threw out insults and ran away.
4) When I personally invited him to Tampa to prove that I am exactly who I say I am, he initially showed interest and then ran away.
5) Hap, ID 88145, invited "User" to call him at work or e-mail him, instead of doing so he threw out more insults and ran away.
6) When asked why GOTO telescopes continue to accurately track the moon if it were moving unpredictably (i.e. too far north, too far south), he spewed more insults and ran away.
7) Hap invited anyone who believes in "Planet X" to come view the skies with him to search for this elusive "rogue planet" that "believers" all claim is so easy to see at sunrise. Instead of taking up that invitation, "User" threw out more insults and ran away.
8) ID 74444 suggested that Nancy is NOT the most popular poster on GLP and explained how he came to this conclusion. Instead of providing any evidence to prove otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
9) When asked if he believed that Earth was halted in orbit, or if he believed that "Planet X" would cause a "pole shift" and wipe out 90% of Earth's population (both of which are claims made by Nancy) - "User" called them trick questions, refused to answer and ran away.
10) "User" claims that "debunkers" lie. When asked for examples of these lies, he spews insults and runs away.
11) He claims that "debunkers" are government agents. When asked for proof of this, he spews insults and runs away.
12) Since "User" refuses to take Hap up on his offer to search for "Planet X," it was suggested "User" contact a local astronomy club and view with them. "User" spewed insults and ran away.
13) "User" claims earthquake activity is increasing. But instead of providing data to support this claim, he spewed insults and ran away.
14) Nancy claimed that Adam Air Flight 574 crashed in an inland lake. "Debunkers" have provided several links showing that Nancy is wrong. Instead of providing evidence showing otherwise, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
15) "User" contends that "Debunkers" are always wrong. When asked for examples of when "Debunkers" have been wrong, he spewed insults and ran away.
16) When asked for examples of when Nancy was right, especially when pertaining to astronomical claims and predictions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
17) "User" has seen this list several times and has yet to dispute anything on it. Instead, he spewed insults and ran away.
18) "User" doesn't believe that vaporized water contaminated with arsenic was responsible for the illness in Peru after a meteor strike. When asked what HE thought caused it, he spewed insults and ran away.
19) Nancy claims that the Minneapolis bridge collapse was caused by some "stretch zone." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran way.
20) "User" claims that I lied about amateur radio operators using their equipment and the moon for EME communications. When asked for evidence to support his claim that I lied, he spewed insults and ran away.
21) "User" claimed that many, many people are seeing the moon "not right." When asked for links of these claims or some form of evidence to support the claim that the moon is "not right," he spewed insults and ran away.
22) "User" claimed that Menow lied when he said the sun is not setting further north each day during the fall months. When asked for supporting evidence, he spewed insults and ran away. (Prof-Rabbit supplied a link showing the sun does not move north during the fall months in the north hemisphere.)
23) "User" demands that "debunkers" provide evidence or, in his words, "to put up or shut up." When "User" is asked to do the same, he spews insults and runs away.
24) Hap sent some photos to Nancy. He never stated what they were or what he believed them to be, instead he asked her what she thought they were. Nancy, and Nancy alone, stated they were photos of "Planet X." When asked which photos are "Planet X" and which ones are just lens flare, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
25) "User" continues to say I've exposed my lies. He has been asked what lies those are and to provide supporting evidence. Instead, he spews insults and runs away.
26) "User" tasked Nighthawk to demonstrate some contradictions from "ZetaTalk." Nighthawk came up with four. "User" made a weak attempt to explain them away, then spewed insults and ran away.
27) Hap provided a link to a website with photos of his equipment. "User" claimed it was all fake, spewed insults and ran away.
28) Hap's contact information is provided on the website, but instead of using it to verify Hap is who he claims, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
29) Several weeks ago, Hap again extended his invitation for anyone to come look for "Planet X" using his observatory. "User" again spewed insults and ran away.
30) "User" claimed that Nancy predicted the current economic recession...when in reality, Nancy said the recession would happen in 2003 and that the DOW would be worth a quarter of its value. When this was pointed out, "User" spewed insults and ran away. 31) "User" implied that Hap shouldn't be taken seriously because he doesn't have any credentials in astronomy...even though none are needed to be an amateur astronomer. When asked what credentials Nancy had that makes her more believable, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
32) "User" claimed that the Zetas never said they were preventing asteroid strikes. When shown exactly what the Zetas said, proving they did say it, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
33) "User" claimed that "The Commentator" outed himself as a NASA shill. When asked to explain exactly how this was done, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
34) "User" once again claimed that "The Commentator" is a NASA shill. When asked to provide evidence to support this claim, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
35) "User" stated that "debunkers" spend thousands of hours on Nancy's threads. When asked for supporting evidence, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
36) "User" claimed that only NASA would hire "debunkers." When asked for evidence of this, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
37) "User" once again claimed that "debunkers" lie. When asked for evidence of this or examples of such lies, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
38) "User" claimed I was squirming. When asked for specific examples of how I was squirming, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
39) "User" presented an article describing how GPS satellites might fail within a year. He claimed that Nancy and the "Zetas" predicted this. However, "User" failed to post the whole article which stated the reason for the potential failure is due to neglect and failure to replace key satellites...not because of some "rogue planet" as Nancy claimed. When this was pointed out to him, "User" spewed insults and ran away.
40) "User" claimed that Hap was afraid to answer his questions. Hap said he would answer any question "User" had. Instead of asking any questions, "User" spewed insults and ran away.

There was a truce between us and I even defended you once. But it was YOU that went back to spewing insults. Proving once and for all, that attacks and insults is all you know. Let's see how long it takes to add a few more to this list.


CB can't resist :_spam_:ming with his "shameful" list at every opportunity.
 Quoting: ***ZetaMax***


The only thing that is "shameful" about it is that it is all true.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 10:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

how much do YOU know about what i do pay attention for the future?


I don't know nor do I claim to know anything about your future, which I can only hope is for the better, but regarding communication at GLP I do pay attention and I do notice who posts what, when and where, and I do know after you've posted where you stand.

Thank you very much for your answers conserning your riddle. I've been having a real hard time with it, disparaging myself for not being able to get real sense into it. I will take your comments and advice into heart and ponder.. I'm sure I'll be able to solve it.. no problemo..
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804

"sometimes" ?? (chuckle)

seriously, for even trying it you get a big + from me.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 17230
Germany
08/26/2009 10:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So you, 17230, decided not to pay any attention in the future. That's very sad. I hope your Real Self gets a better hold on you later..

how much do YOU know about what i do pay attention for the future?


I don't know nor do I claim to know anything about your future, which I can only hope is for the better, but regarding communication at GLP I do pay attention and I do notice who posts what, when and where, and I do know after you've posted where you stand.

Thank you very much for your answers conserning your riddle. I've been having a real hard time with it, disparaging myself for not being able to get real sense into it. I will take your comments and advice into heart and ponder.. I'm sure I'll be able to solve it.. no problemo..

"sometimes" ?? (chuckle)

seriously, for even trying it you get a big + from me.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17230

Ok, i tell you why - i solved it by myself long ago... so i absolutely know the despair you have now.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 757402
United Kingdom
08/27/2009 01:35 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Yeah. And so? Nancy's zetathreads used to be very popular and that argument was used by the cultists as proof that they were right. Now the same model or form is used in the Debunkers thread. What changed? Nothing. You guys seem to be fighting just of power positions. What happened to reason, logic, well made arguments and looking for truth - they were lost in the battle just like they always are.

 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804


Pointless. Nancy's followers are immune to reason. All you get if you post sense on a ZetaTalk thread is rabid accusations that you are a paid shill.

This is a much more sane thread.

The 'argument' over ZetaTalk has been won by the debunkers so many times that it's pointless reiterating it.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 757402
United Kingdom
08/27/2009 01:39 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
So, when either side is "winning", what's the prize? What do you get? You give out nothing but repetitions already made by the opposite side, you parrot their worst ways and call it "right" just because you have an enemy and you think you're winning something.

You lose. That method is a way to lose. You'll see, someday.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 679804


Not a single shred of evidence has been produced by the Zetards to counter the arguments against Nancy's stupid crap.

Prove Planet X exists and we might take you seriously. Prove the Zetas exist and we might take you seriously.

Until then you're just a kOOk who believes in imaginary planets of doom and aliens that are voices in a mad woman's head.

News