Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

From Nancy's current chat thread:

Join us for week 2 of the boycott of Nancy's threads.
ZetaTalk Debunkers Live Chat June 20 2009:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Sorry folks, thread got deleted. Don't know what rule I broke, posting continues on last week's thread.


Someone thought you were trolling. Just keep posting updates
on this thread. Perhaps LR can change the title to reflect
today's date.

At the end of her chat I will post the reminder for people to
see that we are still conducting a boycott.

From Nancy's current chat thread:

Join us for week 2 of the boycott of Nancy's threads.
ZetaTalk Debunkers Live Chat June 20 2009:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Sorry folks, thread got deleted. Don't know what rule I broke, posting continues on last week's thread.


Someone thought you were trolling. Just keep posting updates
on this thread. Perhaps LR can change the title to reflect
today's date.

At the end of her chat I will post the reminder for people to
see that we are still conducting a boycott.

Join us for week 2 of the boycott of Nancy's threads.
ZetaTalk Debunkers Live Chat June 20 2009:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

They mean "please join our circus"

Join us for week 2 of the boycott of Nancy's threads.
ZetaTalk Debunkers Live Chat June 20 2009:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

They mean "please join our circus"


You like the circus I take it?

From Nancy's current chat thread:

Join us for week 2 of the boycott of Nancy's threads.
ZetaTalk Debunkers Live Chat June 20 2009:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Sorry folks, thread got deleted. Don't know what rule I broke, posting continues on last week's thread.


Someone thought you were trolling. Just keep posting updates
on this thread. Perhaps LR can change the title to reflect
today's date.

At the end of her chat I will post the reminder for people to
see that we are still conducting a boycott.

Since when does one post with the words "Week 2" constitute trolling? It would have been the only post I made to that thread. Oh well, it just makes the bunkers look more desperate.

You've done that before. Go ahead and do it again. This thread
has way too many replies to simply delete.

melfy has been offered several olive branches, he has rejected them all in favor of trolling.


Yep Melfy is nothing more than a troll

You've done that before. Go ahead and do it again. This thread
has way too many replies to simply delete.



Thanks.

You've done that before. Go ahead and do it again. This thread
has way too many replies to simply delete.



Thanks.

The desperation is showing. I guess its easier to hide the fact that this thread had more than 3 times the posts than Nancy's thread last week if. By keeping us on the same thread, they can spin it in Nancy's favor, saying this thread is bigger because it is a two week old thread.

Nancy can't chat and click on the ban/remove button at the
same time so her thread is becoming one hell of a mess. It's
going to run off people with all the nasty comments but I'm
sure she doesn't want me moderating her thread so I will just
sit back and watch it get bigger. It will take her quite a
while to clean it up when all she had to do was click once and
the disruptor would have been gone.

You are wise to stay away from that mess, Dr. P. No good could come of it. I don't want to assume that Nancy was the one that deleted the new thread, that is what the bunkers do,jump to conclusions. As you say she is busy, so I am giving her the benefit of the doubt. It does piss me off that the thread was deleted, while that idiot is still trolling and using a word that I thought was an offense that gets you banned, but its just words on the screen, and it really only makes Nancy look bad. By the time she cleans up the thread she will have half as many pages.

Nancy can't chat and click on the ban/remove button at the
same time so her thread is becoming one hell of a mess. It's
going to run off people with all the nasty comments but I'm
sure she doesn't want me moderating her thread so I will just
sit back and watch it get bigger. It will take her quite a
while to clean it up when all she had to do was click once and
the disruptor would have been gone.

Nancy claims that Ahmedinejad is "STO". Funny how her STO
hero is sending the Basij into the streets to kill fellow
citizens, just like she claims would happen during the "Pole
Shift".

What a hypocrite.

She'll have to come up with another Great White Lie.

You are wise to stay away from that mess, Dr. P. No good could come of it. I don't want to assume that Nancy was the one that deleted the new thread, that is what the bunkers do,jump to conclusions. As you say she is busy, so I am giving her the benefit of the doubt. It does piss me off that the thread was deleted, while that idiot is still trolling and using a word that I thought was an offense that gets you banned, but its just words on the screen, and it really only makes Nancy look bad. By the time she cleans up the thread she will have half as many pages.

but in the mean time..we are having a serious debates on puppies, deer get hammered, A-JAB & GOD, and bitch slappin'...which means absolutely nothing in the meaning of life...

This has got to be one of the stupidest things she has said tonight.

2) Would a Service-to-Other repel a Service-to-Self? Would a Service-to-Self attracted to a Service-to-Other?

SOZT
Those in the STS do not want to be around those in the STO, as it reminds them of times in their long distant past when they had a grain of empathy. They lose their focus. One way to drive a STS individual out of the room is to have a lot of love vibes in the room. Try it! It works!
EOZT

Loved this answer!

This has got to be one of the stupidest things she has said tonight.


The night is young.

You are wise to stay away from that mess, Dr. P. No good could come of it. I don't want to assume that Nancy was the one that deleted the new thread, that is what the bunkers do,jump to conclusions. As you say she is busy, so I am giving her the benefit of the doubt. It does piss me off that the thread was deleted, while that idiot is still trolling and using a word that I thought was an offense that gets you banned, but its just words on the screen, and it really only makes Nancy look bad. By the time she cleans up the thread she will have half as many pages.

but in the mean time..we are having a serious debates on puppies, deer get hammered, A-JAB & GOD, and bitch slappin'...which means absolutely nothing in the meaning of life...


Hey there, Nator.

From Nancy's current chat thread:

Join us for week 2 of the boycott of Nancy's threads.
ZetaTalk Debunkers Live Chat June 20 2009:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Sorry folks, thread got deleted. Don't know what rule I broke, posting continues on last week's thread.


Someone thought you were trolling. Just keep posting updates
on this thread. Perhaps LR can change the title to reflect
today's date.

At the end of her chat I will post the reminder for people to
see that we are still conducting a boycott.

Since when does one post with the words "Week 2" constitute trolling? It would have been the only post I made to that thread. Oh well, it just makes the bunkers look more desperate.


I'm afraid that Nancy banned KeepingItReal for nothing more
than posting the part above in bold. She very cold and
ruthless and very afraid of anyone who disagrees with her

I would love to see ANY of her supporters defend a ban for
nothing more than that!

Zetas, you haVE stated that PX is to the right of the Sun, and sets before the Sun, yet rises after the Sun, and to the right of the Sun, correct?

How is this possible? Let us say that a person it witnessing the Sun set while on the equator. At the same moment, on the other side of the Earth, yet still on the equator, someone is watching the Sun rise.

Is PX below the horizon for BOTH observers? Is PX to the right of the Sun for BOTH observers?

SOZT
You have incorrectly quoted us. In the northern hemisphere, Planet X precedes the Sun along the line of the Ecliptic both rising and setting. If this confuses you, get a planetarium program and study where the Ecliptic is during sunrise and sunset, for various locations. Do your homework in this regard.
EOZT

I'm afraid that Nancy banned KeepingItReal for nothing more
than posting the part above in bold. She very cold and
ruthless and very afraid of anyone who disagrees with her
I would love to see ANY of her supporters defend a ban for
nothing more than that!


so was nancy that banned her...?


I didn't know KIR was a she but yes, Nancy banned her for just
posting that reminder. That's true paranoia in action.

*****Debunker Boycott Reminder*****

This is not part of the discussion. This is a reminder that
the majority of debunkers have agreed to stop posting to
Nancy's threads for one month. No amount of taunting or
lies about us will force us to post until July 18th. Not
all the debunkers have agreed on this but we hope they will.
It's only one month, until the chat on July 18th. It is our
hope that anyone else who is considered a "debunker" will honor
this agreement and let Nancy's threads shrivel for one month.

That is all. Thanks to all who participate in this experiment. This
is the only form of communication that will be seen from most of us
until July 18th.

*****Debunker Boycott Reminder*****


You have no shame Dr Postscam!

Exit this thread, and go sell your wares in some other thread. You have been proven a liar way too many times at GLP this week. Sux to be U!

You know the drill ... door ... ass

Just research elevation to find what applies for those locales. Ozarks will be above, during the shift. Much of Oklahoma and Arkansas will be under water because the rivers (Mississippi and Missouri) will back wash and not drain! Read the Safe Locations info re this.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

2) Would a Service-to-Other repel a Service-to-Self? Would a Service-to-Self attracted to a Service-to-Other?

SOZT
Those in the STS do not want to be around those in the STO, as it reminds them of times in their long distant past when they had a grain of empathy. They lose their focus. One way to drive a STS individual out of the room is to have a lot of love vibes in the room. Try it! It works!
EOZT

Loved this answer!


Now seeing Ms LIEDer is definitely a STS individual, by her own definition, that means that Luser is also a STS individual due to his attraction to Ms LIEDer.

F A N T A S T I C!!