Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Even though the point has been made quite clearly that the Zeta threads "popularity" is primarily generated by the Debunkers participation. my question is once the boycott is over. Why even bother participating? again. The outside threads seem to be the best option for discussion of her and her claims.

I agree, and with the exception of Melfy's trolling for attention it is much better laughing at Nancy over here.

For the most part, the regulars have stayed out of there.

Yep...more proof that what you want is censorship.

Just more attention seeking, even the zetas are watching Michael Jackson tributes!

Ooops! Wrong!




Wrong again!

That's a pretty concrete incorrect prediction from Nancy.

Wonder if she'll own up to that today...

Nahhh...what am I thinking? She'll say its the mainstream media covering up to make her prediction APPEAR wrong...

which is why it is a good idea to just refrain from ever posting on her threads again. She will have nobody to ban if we all stay away. I don't think she would dare hunting us down over here and banning us, but I may be wrong. Perhaps her ego needs the rush of exercising the power to censor and ban. Remember Max and Luser when they got caught in the auto ban? They both admitted that their secondary IPs had been banned, and Luser automatically accused Dr. P of banning him. they both whined about it. It just shows that in their minds its ok to post as sockpuppets on separate IPs if you are a bunker, but if they found any evidence that debunkers were doing it they would cry foul. They whine if they get caught in an auto ban, but think its good to ban others if they disagree with Nancy. Typical double standard from Max.

Poor bunkers. Last week they were crowing about how Nancy's thread had more views than this one. Well, now they can't claim that. If you add up the thread views to her June 13 and June 20 threads, the total is less than 17,000, compared to this thread with over 21,000 views. That was the last straw they could clutch at to try and claim immense popularity of Nancy and the Zetas, and now it too has fallen.

Contrary to what Nancy and her little entourage would like to believe, Poo threads are more popular on GLP than the Zetas.

Well, YEAH. They're POO threads!

You GOTTA look at the POO threads!

:)

For the record, here is the first insult posted to Nancy's chat thread tonight. Nice way to encourage new comers. Notice the first nasty is a Nancy "fan", not a debunker as Soledad claimed earlier today:


bsflag

First time I used it. LOL You gotta be kidding me. People believe this shit. WOW!!!
Quoting: Chili Fries 663058

To which one of the bunkers replied:

it could go this way...

SOZT
You have incorrectly quoted us. In the northern hemisphere, Planet X precedes the Sun along the line of the Ecliptic both rising and setting. If this confuses you, get a planetarium program and study where the Ecliptic is during sunrise and sunset, for various locations. Do your homework in this regard.
EOZT
Quoting: Nancy Lieder

So, if it precedes the Sun along the Ecliptic, PX should set before the Sun sets, but rise before the Sun rises. Am I correct, Zetas?

NancyTalk: this is correct.

And there you have it........????

If the contradiction with past statements that is posted above weren't enough, how about the irony of this one?

SOZT
Why are you concerned about Neptune’s mass? How is this pertinent in your life? You are going to have your life turned upside down, shortly, with immense physical and emotional pain to those around you. How are you planning to help your fellow man?
EOZT

Accordingly, if planet x is going to wipe us out, what is the point of playing head games with the powers that be, with political and economic commentary?

I was sorely tempted to ask the Zetas why, historically, during times of great stress, charlatans come out of the woodwork and, rather than attempt to comfort and empower people, instead tell them THERE'S A FUCKING PLANET ABOUT TO HIT YOU.

Instead, I refreshed the main page and came here ;)

Yup.

SOZT
Why are you concerned about Neptune’s mass? How is this pertinent in your life? You are going to have your life turned upside down, shortly, with immense physical and emotional pain to those around you. How are you planning to help your fellow man?
EOZT

Wow - for one, maybe the best search attempt to date for Planet-X was based on Harrington's work and Neptune's mass. Since there is obviously still issues with mass, wouldn't this not lead one to believe that this missing mass is, according to you, Planet-X?

bwhahahahahahah

That kind of logic is foreign to Nancy though. In her universe, the only evidence of anything is the voices in her head. I am sure the comments about the relevance of Neptune in the Planet X discussion went right over her head. Again, tact and civility is not Nancy's strong suit. Also worthy of noting is that insult #2 was also posted by a bunker, Max.

A trimester is a long time, and 4 of them is a year. It would have just as much meaning if you say the shift will happen on a Tuesday. Could you narrow it down a bit better like for example in October. That way we know to prepair for a cold one. So when we run outside to avoid a house collaps in the cold we can have some warm clothing on. Thanks!

SOZT
There are three trimesters in a year. You’ve obviously not done your homework. Trimesters end in December, April, or August. If you were SMART about this you would be thinking about your target climate, and preparing for that. One would assume you to be prepared for your current climate. If you were SMART you would have researched what the pole shift involves, and how much warning you will have during the last weeks. Let us give you a hint. It’s more than the few minutes you would need to put on some warm clothing.
EOZT

Looks like Nancy is the one short on smarts:

trimester
One entry found for trimester.
Main Entry: tri·mes·ter
Pronunciation: (")trI-'mes-t&r, 'trI-"
Function: noun
Etymology: French trimestre, from Latin trimestris of three months, from tri- + mensis month -- more at MOON
1 : a period of three or about three months; especially : any of three periods of approximately three months each into which a human pregnancy is divided
2 : one of three terms into which the academic year is sometimes divided

She's barely got 5 pages this week, and the two hours are nearly up.

Good.

I am speechless! ROFLMAO!!!! She sure can spin!!

Shot. They're onto us. The boss ain't gonna like this.

I notice that while the mass of Neptune is not important, Astrology is important enough to elicit a reply from the mighty Zetas.

Depends on who is asking, and what they are seeking.

Debunkers are getting increasingly desperate. The thought of losing even more ground is HATEFUL to them.

Go ahead! Laugh while you can! It's gonna be hell in the Debunker Boiler Room come Monday!

Trolling Max?