No plausible reason was ever given. It was simply an excuse to cover up a failed prediction and I can prove it with one a statement taken directly from ZetaTalk:

""As explained on Gentile last evening, but repeated here as many will not be able to hear this streaming audio, we have given the dates out because the US and Indonesian governments can no longer succeed with their plans. We had held the date close, to put these governments in the same position the common man they planned to murder are in, so that rotation stoppage would happen suddenly and prevent a smooth blockading of the city dwellers. As Nancy has been able to be interviewed in the US, the message of these plans replayed around the world, cooperation by the military or locale police in such blockades are unlikely to happen. Given such orders, they would object, refuse, allow escape, as they know the true agenda. Thus, the number of people injured by withholding the date outnumbered the number that would be murdered, the balance scale tipped."
ZetaTalk: Dates, Why Now?

Read that first sentence again. It clearly states the "Zetas" gave out the dates because the U.S. and Indonesian governments would not succeed with their plans...which means they would be unable to enact Martial Law and enslave any survivors. All because their warnings had gotten out thanks to Nancy. And then the statement clearly says that the military and local police would not cooperate. They would allow people to flee. So, we’re left with the following question - why would there need to be a "white lie?" The "Zetas" just said the "balance scale tipped" and withholding the date would harm more than those it would help. It's obvious to everyone (except you, User and Max) that the "white lie" is nothing but an excuse.



You need to come out of your bunker more often. Is Saddam still in control? No. In fact, he's dead. A new government has been put in place. There are still problems to be worked out, but overall the objectives of the U.S. have been met. None of this should have happened in the first place according to the "Zetas"...in fact, they said the invasion wouldn't even be allowed and that they would stop it. What happened? Did they get lost?


Yet, here we are...six years later and you're still waiting for "Planet X" to show up. And you won't realize these predictions failed and Nancy is wrong even when 2012 comes and goes without even so much as a hint of your "rogue planet."


WRONG! Caught lying again. We're looking for something that shows "Planet X" does exist. This is something you have failed to do every year since 2003.


First of all, "debunkers" aren't out to stop ZetaTalk. We simply ask that you provide evidence to show that any of it is real. This is something that Nancy, User, ZetaMax and you have failed to do time and time again. Second, I don't take consolation in Dell's statement. Why should I? However, it doesn't help you or Nancy when a member of her own imaging team comes forward and states point blank that Nancy is wrong. We wish you well in your attempts to ignore Nancy's mounting failures. And we wish you well in your weak attempts to discredit "debunkers." Too bad for you that you haven't even come close to doing so.


What are you using as a baseline or comparison to say that Earth hasn't been "normal for 200 years?" Exactly what is "normal?" Can you explain? I doubt it...we can't even get you to show us that the sun isn't yellow....meanwhile, I and others provided several photos that show it is. Here are some examples:

[link to image07.webshots.com]
[link to upload.wikimedia.org] (also note no sign of "Planet X" hoovering anywhere nearby)
[link to thebluetwin.files.wordpress.com]

As you can see, the sun is clearly yellow in those photos. The only person having a problem admitting anything is you - you couldn't even admit that you were wrong when "Planet X" failed to show up in September 2007 as you said it would.


Sure, they could see that the sun was white...if it were true. See the photos above. And here are some from the 70s:

[link to static.panoramio.com] (taken in 1975)
[link to img2.allposters.com] (taken in 1976)
[link to www.michaelwaynejones.com] (taken in 1977)
[link to static.panoramio.com] (taken in 1978)

As you can see, sunsets today look no different than sunsets 30 years ago. Now, care to present some evidence showing the sun is different? I thought not.


Such as? You keep saying the moon isn't in the right place...and yet you can't tell us where it should be. Nor have you bothered to document any of your claims and prove that the moon's position is incorrect. Meanwhile, loads of evidence has been presented to show the moon is exactly where it should be...such as the eclipse on July 22.


It does? Please explain and be specific. As demonstrated above, it is you that lacks any credibility to begin with.


Of course she isn't. She knows you'll buy whatever lie she has to come up with to explain why "Planet X" didn't show up when 2012 rolls around. And why are "debunkers" worried? Please explain...be specific and provide evidence to back up that statement.


Thanks...although it's you that needs the luck. And perhaps some professional help.