I have wondered what had become of you and what your current opinion would be. I'm sure it will be of positive benefit for those who will accept what it means. Thanks for giving it.

The "saving face" point I raised was about your statement that something was found right at Nancy's coords. Such was NOT the case and played an important role in her ability to perpetuate her hoax. "objects" were found NEAR to her coordinates. However, they were, for the most part NOT OBJECTS AT ALL. There was one known asteroid, but the specks of fluff she pointed out were mainly things like hot pixels, etc, preserved in the final stack by summing the images instead of using a method which would eliminate such flaws in the individual images.


Any chance you will agree with this at this time?