Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

And I think you're paid as well. Why else would you, ZetaMax, User, Free Store and Nancy still be here trying to convince people that some "rogue planet" was coming to wipe out 90% of life on Earth when no evidence for it exists and it has failed to show up for six years? For the fun of it? Well, I guess that's possible. So maybe you aren't getting paid. You just enjoy trying to scare people. Is that it?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/01/2009 02:07 PM

No i don't enjoy scaring people or inducing fear.


This is what i wrote last week

[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Whatever. But you do know that claiming someone is paid to be here is a sign of weakness just like name calling, right?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/01/2009 02:55 PM

Do you even know what the mass of the earth is? Do you know how to calculate how much force it would take to cause it to "wobble"? Where would the rotational energy go when it changed it's direction of motion and what makes it return to its original state...in EXACTLY the right location and speed to make GOTO telescopes accurate to within a few arc-seconds? That you even would consider a "wobble" means that you simply don't understand the physics involved. And don't give us any bullcrap about how science doesn't know everything...this is very simple Newtonian physics that any junior high student could calculate.

Hmmm, I guess the bunkers ran away again.

Exactly. Only someone pretty ignorant could take ZetaTalk/Planet X seriously, because if you have the smallest knowledge of physics you would know it is impossible.

Therefore, you are definitely quite stupid.

Notice how as soon as they are asked to offer some rational explanation of their imagined 'wobble' they run away.

Judgemental again. We have lives too you know. Something i can't say of some of the debunkers. Who spend hours in a row to debunk zetatalk and Nancy.

No need to....

One can automatically assume that anything between SOZT...EOZT is 100% Grade-A pure unadulterated BULLSHIT!!!

And something we can say of some bunkers.


Really? Such as? Provide supporting data to back up your claim.

No attempt at an explanation, I see.

It's not illegal you know. You should spend a bit more time questioning how these things you think you see can be possible.

Hmmm, if you're bored, you can always check out this website:

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Last Edited by ***ZetaMaX*** on 09/01/2009 06:00 PM

Please tell us why anyone would want to wasted time reading pure BS?

I've checked it out enough. It's utter nonsense. Something you'd know if you took the time to read it yourself instead of blindly supporting it. Oh, that's right...you aren't paid to read it, only support it.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/01/2009 09:36 PM

and still no clue about

Nancy ace will tell rueful of being historic as moon renders or receiver traces almighty popcorn trips monday night to Zetamax Mercury swing repulsions
#-------------------------------
And WHOEVER solves this, he may NOT publish the solution, but just tell he got it, and may supply a proof by coding something the same way.
132 days ZT not solved
1 debunker solvers accepted (Oldsmobile)
#-------------------------------
Hints will be provided every 25 days
Hint No. 1: The riddle CAN be solved, and you WILL know if your solution is right. (everybody doing it can be proud)
Hint No. 2: Where did the riddle appear first? (everybody doing it should be proud)
Hint No. 3: Its no chiffre. It IS decribed in encryption history - but not available on the net (everybody doing it was diligent)
Hint No. 4: The riddle is easy. (everybody doing it can think)
Hint No. 5: The riddle is stegano. (everybody doing it may cry)

Hmmm, GLP is by far more stimulating and informative than that defunct website.

Hence the great epic fail these days of the zetachat threads.

:boycott1:

Yes agreed. But the whole exercise for me in quoting anything from Ms LIEDer or her bunker elite is for pure entertainment purposes only.

Who spend hours in a row to debunk zetatalk and Nancy.

Nancy LIEDer and her zetatalk doomsday crapola was completely debunked in 2003

Even today, six years on, that same fact remains.......

This morning conditions weren't exactly what I was looking for...but they were pretty close. I took two photos of the rising sun 12 minutes apart. The first at 7:00 a.m., the second at 7:12 a.m. Now, we've been told that "Planet X" or some kind of "second sun" is visible at sunrise and sunset. Can someone point them out to me in either of these two photos?

[link to www.flickr.com]

I didn't see a tornado in my backyard either this morning. I should conclude - according to YOUR logic - that tornadoes don't exist.

technically yes.

However, there is verifiable and repeated evidence for the existence of Tornadoes. There is not However repeated and verifiable evidence enough for a "second sun/planet x" in the alleged sunrise and sunset. most evidence is anecdotal and or mundanely explainable.

Last Edited by Mysterysoul on 09/02/2009 09:43 AM

Flawed logic, as usual. No one has said there was a tornado in your back yard, have they? So making a conclusion that they don't exist because there is not one in that specific location is non-sensical However, Nancy has claimed over and over again that px is by the sun...which it isn't. But with your lack of reasoning ability, I guess you don't see the difference.

Yes, you suffered a major brain fart with that response. Your response is extremely lame...even for you. People KNOW that tornadoes exist. There are dozens of photographs and videos showing both the tornado and the damage they inflict. They are a known weather event. Simply because you don't see one in your backyard and then concluding that they don't exist is flawed logic. You're truly grasping at straws.



Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/02/2009 09:57 AM

I guess Max must be consulting with Nancy on how to address why "Planet X" doesn't appear in the photos.

That's what you say CB. While i know for sure it's otherwise.

How can you explain this picture from 2006?

[link to www.fiskesnack.com]

[link to poleshift.ning.com]


Gerard
[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Sun reflecting off clouds.

Produce an image like that without the clouds for the sun to reflect off.

You are continuing to prove yourself very stupid indeed.

The debunkers also have the funniest pictures!

But then doomsday cults are not known for their sense of humor.