Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!! | |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 02:28 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | CB--Just out of curiosity, what's with all the posts on the Zetatalk thread? That was the shortest ZetaTalk session yet until you started bumping it. Is the boycott over? Quoting: DrPostmanI was wondering the same thing. There was only 4 pages, now there is almost double that. Even if the boycott is over I'm still not going to post to her threads. It's a waste of time anyway and all they do is use it to crow about the attention they get. I am of the same conclusion. Nancy seeks GLP attention for her chat threads. Now since the start of our boycott that GLP attention has waned each and every week. Yep our boycott has been a complete success and Nancy's chat threads remain basically dead in the water after her two hour cut 'n' paste sessions. I refuse to waste any more effort and time at her stupid weekly threads. I do not mind locking horns with her resident followers on this thread or even quoting posts from her chat threads. But that is the extent of it for me. I finally came to the understanding that by posting and bumping Ms LIEDer's threads all that is really being achieved is giving Ms LIEDer the attention she so desperately craves. Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 09/14/2009 02:35 AM Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 02:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The debunker boycott is over??? Quoting: The Lone RangerNo Melfy the boycott is still in effect indefinitely. In saying that though.....Any poster is free to post in any thread they so desire. Unless you can give me some solid evidence to the contrary there is NO set rule on GLP about where one may post. :boycott1: I posted this over at that shitty zetababble thread just to reinforce to those bunker fools that it is business as usual. Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 09/14/2009 03:31 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | You're wrong. I sit on the train ride home at least three days a week with a Ph.D. micro-biologist who is doing vaccine research on the flu on a government grant/contract. Like most of these dudes (including my younger sister who is also a Ph.D. micro-biologist), he chose his field because he loves research and discovery, and dreamed of finding - or at least contributing to - a cure for cancer. He's not at all "thrilled" to be doing vaccine research - which he concedes is not a "silver bullet" even in the best of circumstances, but he's doing it because "nothing else is getting funded" these days. HIS WORDS. Quoting: ***ZetaMax***Yes - most people were, at one time in their youth, idealistic and ambitious. But then like most, they "grow up", have kids, get a BIG mortgage, and ... GO ALONG TO GET ALONG. Not the scientists I know. And that guy could easily find better work elsewhere if he really wanted to. I don't think I believe that you really know a person like that. Why don't you befriend a geologist. That way you might learn why you are so terribly wrong about the Earth. Yes it would be a nice change if Max could actually learn some real truth and some real knowledge on a particular subject for once. Thank you for not calling me that "other" name. Wich would have some of General: The Culties The Stupids zetadrool zetadrollers Zetards Zetasquish Zetatards Zidiots Specific: Agent Max Bullshitter DRIPster DRIPsterTroll Fence Shitter Nanny NannyTroll Minimax Maxi MaxiTroll Maxinanny Maxipads Melf Melfster MelfsterTroll Melfy Melfytroll Nannymax Nellemax Nelliemax ShitTalker Sockster SocksterTroll Socky SockyTroll Zetamin ZetaTroll Zetaquark |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 09/14/2009 03:47 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | this zeta shit is still going on? Isn't it a bit 2007 don't you think so? Quoting: ***ZetaMax***And yet we are still here... time and time again... Peace Yeah, six years AFTER Nancy said it would be all over. What does that suggest? We're getting closer. Soon. I vote for a permanent ban on bunkers for using the phrases soon may Its still incoming wait and see getting closer (will be continued) |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 07:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 09/14/2009 07:32 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Especially the word "soon." Other words could be: Quoting: Circuit BreakerEcliptic Wobble You could also suggest acronyms like: SOZT EOZT It's all just Nancy speak anyway. Ecliptic and wobble is only the stuttering of an old senile woman, SOZT/EOZT are not the word which make problems on the whole website - the bullshit is in between. ok, wobble may be the movement of my plumpudding - or of the head of an old woman. (LR, there is a nice task to produce amoving gif.....) |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 07:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I know, I cannot fucking believe Circuit Breaker said that! Quoting: User # 78/68It could be perhaps the most stupid thing he has said on GLP to date. Everything you write is pretty stupid. Tell us, how is Bush responsible for the meltdown in the financial sector? Can you do that? Here's your chance (again) to enter in to an honest and civil discussion...something you claimed you wanted just yesterday but any of us have yet to see. I bet you can't do it. Today, I also saw him defend the governments version of 911. Quoting: User # 78/68You liar. I didn't say a thing about 9/11 yesterday. Nor have I defended the "official" version of what happened. Prove that I did...otherwise, you've been proven a liar again...no surprise there really. Last week I saw him defend NASA??? Oooops! Everybody at GLP know NASA has never told us the truth about anything. Quoting: User # 78/68Another lie. You just can't help yourself can you? Now, he's a Bush apologist??? Quoting: User # 78/68And another lie. Bush was a lousy President. But he wasn't responsible for the financial meltdown. Again, if he was, explain how. And then explain how Obama is any better. Obviously, since you're such a Nancy supporter, that means you're an Obama apologist. Gee, wasn't it the "Zetas" who said he wouldn't win in the first place? This guy is just screaming he's a shill ... we get you CB, load and clear! Quoting: User # 78/68You scream of shilldom. All you do is attack. In that thread, I asked for someone to explain how Bush was responsible. To my surprise (sarcasm), no one came up with an explanation. We get you Loser....loud and clear! Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/14/2009 07:44 AM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 770734 United Kingdom 09/14/2009 08:16 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
***ZetaMax*** User ID: 659599 United States 09/14/2009 08:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's amusing that even the BUNKERS now spend far more time on this thread than they do on Nancy's! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 770734Guess we've actually won! :5: The best advice we can give on this matter is to read with your heart as well as your mind. Follow the flow, let the nuances lie unanswered and unchallenged in your mind. Treat this as a garden you are walking through for the first time, and experience it fully without trying to categorize it! Much of what you will learn will be processed in your subconscious, and influence your conscious mind later. If you must dissect each phrase, and correlate it with each piece of information taken from another source, you will trash much of what you could otherwise gain. Live in the gray, not always insisting on black and white and strict compartmentalizations. ZetaTalk: Oahspe Note: written Apr 15, 1997. [link to www.zetatalk.com] ZetaMax |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 770734 United Kingdom 09/14/2009 08:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 17230 Germany 09/14/2009 08:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 09:07 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | While it isn't a contest, "debunkers" are NOT wrong again. Did "Planet X" show up in 2003? No. Just like "debunkers" said it wouldn't. Is Earth halted in orbit? No. Just like "debunkers" said it didn't. Did Earth's "Dark Twin" collide with us in 2004? No. Just like "debunkers" said it wouldn't. Have earthquakes been increasing exponentially? No. Just like "debunkers" said they weren't. Is Earth wobbling? No. Just like "debunkers" said it wasn't. Has the moon's orbit changed? No. Just like "debunkers" said it hasn't. Is "Planet X" visible anywhere near the sun? No. Just like "debunkers" said it isn't. Nice try shill. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 770734 United Kingdom 09/14/2009 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems to me that the 'bunkers' spend far more time on Nancy's threads discussing (and ranting against) the 'debunkers' than they do discussing ZetaTalk. Odd that. They don't seem interested in attempting to verify what Nancy writes - all they wish to do is be involved in a kind of playground name-calling exercise. Further evidence of their infantile mentalities. They are perfectly happy to ignore the glaring discrepancies in Nancy's bullshit, as long as they can feel 'belonging' to a cult of similar imbeciles. Classic cult behaviour. Inadequates drawn to a surrogate family. |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 10:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The debunker boycott is over??? Quoting: ***ZetaMax***No Melfy the boycott is still in effect indefinitely. In saying that though.....Any poster is free to post in any thread they so desire. Unless you can give me some solid evidence to the contrary there is NO set rule on GLP about where one may post. :boycott1: I see that the fact that our boycott has been so successful has struck a raw nerve with you there Melfster. BRILLIANT!! Thankyou kindly for providing such great proof. Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 09/14/2009 10:47 AM Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 10:51 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems to me that the 'bunkers' spend far more time on Nancy's threads discussing (and ranting against) the 'debunkers' than they do discussing ZetaTalk. Odd that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 770734They discuss other things...but usually none of it is directed towards Nancy because they know that once Nancy is done for the night, she very rarely comes back...except to delete posts. They don't seem interested in attempting to verify what Nancy writes - all they wish to do is be involved in a kind of playground name-calling exercise. Further evidence of their infantile mentalities. They are perfectly happy to ignore the glaring discrepancies in Nancy's bullshit, as long as they can feel 'belonging' to a cult of similar imbeciles. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 770734Also notice how they never question Nancy about her astronomical, geologic or meteorologic claims. If they do, they're pretty vague questions for which Nancy can easily make something up. They never ask her direct or specific questions that would require proof or evidence. And they never question any "evidence" that Nancy does post. Instead, a majority of their questions are spiritual or political in nature...subjects that can't easily be proven right or wrong. This is probably because they don't want to upset the mother hen and then be excised from the group. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 10:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It seems to me that the 'bunkers' spend far more time on Nancy's threads discussing (and ranting against) the 'debunkers' than they do discussing ZetaTalk. Odd that. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 770734They don't seem interested in attempting to verify what Nancy writes The bunkers are unable to verify any of Ms LIEDer's claims because she is always wrong. That's why we get these fools like Max now trying to claim that the STO v STS is the essential message of Ms LIEDer's writings. Talk about Failure!! Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | It's amusing that even the BUNKERS now spend far more time on this thread than they do on Nancy's! Quoting: ***ZetaMax***Guess we've actually won! :5: Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 10:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I see that the fact that our boycott has been so successful has struck a raw nerve with you there Melfster. Quoting: The Lone RangerYeah, you can tell when someone has posted something that Max can't counter against...just look for the cute little cartoons. I'm waiting to see if User will respond to some of my points and actually enter into a civil discussion. After all, he claimed that's what he's looking for in one of his posts from yesterday. So far, it appears the only form of "honest discussion" he wants is from fellow supporters. How is that an honest or balanced discussion? It isn't...it's a biased one. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 10:59 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Especially the word "soon." Other words could be: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 17230Ecliptic Wobble You could also suggest acronyms like: SOZT EOZT It's all just Nancy speak anyway. Ecliptic and wobble is only the stuttering of an old senile woman, SOZT/EOZT are not the word which make problems on the whole website - the bullshit is in between. ok, wobble may be the movement of my plumpudding - or of the head of an old woman. (LR, there is a nice task to produce amoving gif.....) Yes I like that idea. I will see what I can come up with. Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 11:09 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I'm waiting to see if User will respond to some of my points and actually enter into a civil discussion. After all, he claimed that's what he's looking for in one of his posts from yesterday. So far, it appears the only form of "honest discussion" he wants is from fellow supporters. How is that an honest or balanced discussion? It isn't...it's a biased one. Quoting: Circuit BreakerLuser entering into a civil discussion? and with you, CB? Mate I cannot see that happening anytime soon. I mean the first thing Luser comes up with is to constantly accuse you falsely of being a liar. We all know that you are one of the most honest posters here and always bring true facts to the discussion table. Unfortunately Luser has never responded in kind so to me he is a lost cause. Hopefully, for his sake, he is not like this in real life and actually has some honest integrity outside this forum. Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
The Lone Ranger (OP) User ID: 760616 New Zealand 09/14/2009 11:12 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Let's see if you can back that up with some actual facts there Fence Shitter. Life Is But A Dream!! Therefore, "'Tis better to have dreamed and lost than never to have dreamed at all." ------------------------------------ Disclaimer: DON'T BELIEVE A DAMN WORD YOU READ ON THIS THREAD!....USE DISCERNMENT!! |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 12:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 12:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I found this thread interesting: Thread: The Sun is changing dramatically.... I wonder what User would say about it. After all, he claims the sun is getting brighter...not dimmer. The person who started the thread even provided some supporting information...something User hasn't done when claiming the sun is getting brighter...except for the time he provided something from the Max Planck Institute. The problem with the information was that it didn't really support his claims because the information stated the brilliance of the sun had increased by an amount undetectable by the human eye. With that in mind, I wonder who is right...the Max Planck Institute or the scientists who say the sun is getting dimmer. Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/14/2009 12:53 PM A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 04:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I've been doing a little research. We all know the hype about global warming...with Nancy claiming it's caused by "Planet X." We also know about User's claims about the sun being brighter and whiter. Well, it stands to reason that any global warming would be caused by this supposed "brighter and whiter" sun. Something supported by the comments made by a few anonymous cowards who claim that they can't stand in the sun like they used to without burning up. However, looking at the data for 2008 and 2009 (to present), the claims about the sun being "brighter and whiter" can't really be substantiated. In 2008, there were six months of above average temperatures. And, there were six months of below average temperatures. So far, for 2009, there have been five months of warmer temperatures and three months of cooler temperatures. If anything, I'd say it's kind of inconclusive. I'll have to look at other years and see what the departure is from "normal" for a better picture. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 04:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I pinned it in the hopes for more discussion. Very good Quoting: DrPostmanpoints made on that thread. I'm learning things I didn't know about the Earth and the Sun. Cool deal. There are posts from both sides of the table, but overall, everyone has been fairly civil. That could change though...depending on who shows up. A voice of reason in a world of woo-woos. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 548017 United States 09/14/2009 09:01 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 09:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 405501 United States 09/14/2009 09:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Circuit Breaker User ID: 766491 United States 09/14/2009 10:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Menow User ID: 405501 United States 09/14/2009 10:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Considering who dislikes "debunkers" the most, has the most to gain by them being gone and has moderator privileges, I can make a reasonable guess as to who it was. Quoting: Circuit BreakerI don't think it was Nancy, if that's what you mean. I'm not sure it really matters now, though. |