Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

You're "assuming" that everyone with "any" intelligence views the bible as nothing more than than a superstitious collection of fairy tales sprinkled with a handful of factual historical "settings" such that Pilot really WAS a Roman official, Herod really was a Jewish King, and the Jews actually did have a Temple where the Dome of the Rock sits today. Otherwise - it's TOTAL fiction.



You are the one that is assuming. I am just making an observation from my point of view. I am not assuming anything. BTW, that's Pilate, not Pilot. I am not debating the historical merit of the Bible. I have read the Book front to back in 3 languages, 7 versions. They are all different. Not the kind of thing I can take at face value, when the different religions have contradictory versions. Too many people have been killed in the name of the words written in the book for me to chain my wagon to it.


Well - not "everyone" shares your viewpoint BUCKO!

Perhaps there REALLY IS some "reality" behind the "heaven", "purgatory", "hell" triad??? (And yes I know that "purgatory" is a Catholic Doctrine "thing" - and not strictly biblical)

Can't be "proved" of course - BUT CAN'T BE DISMISSED EITHER.


Of course not everyone shares my viewpoint. Too many people follow empty doctrine, and sometimes they drop it, only to follow another equally castrating and soul negating one in its place. Heaven and Hell only exist in the polarity driven human interpretation of the universe. Believe me, the universe is much more simple yet much more complex than we can comprehend. If you prefer to go to heaven, that's your choice. I hope it really does exist and you get there as you expected. Personally, I would like to go somewhere beyond Heaven and/or Hell.

Nothing in the spiritual realm can be proven or totally dismissed except as personal opinion. That isn't the basis of the debunker objections to Zetatalk. It is the concrete claims and predictions which are proven to have failed without a doubt, no matter how many lame excuses and bullshit "explanations" Nancy may make. Learn the difference.


And it logically follows that if all of her other predictions and explanations have been proven to be incorrect that her writings on spirituality are probably also flawed and not worth exploring.

First of all. Who says that those who are STO don't sin?. It has nothing to do with sinners or being Rightious.
It is either total love for the self. Or that one cares about another as one cares about himself.

Who says that one who is STO always has to be nice and friendly?

Gerard
[link to poleshift.ning.com]

For what i know zetatalk doesn't say that those who are STS are damned.


Nancy says that the STS will be sent to a PP, a planet where STS souls will be imprisoned. The undecided will reincarnate as octopus beings in a water world. Only the people that fall squarely in the STO category will inhabit a renewed earth and make zeta/human hybrid babies. That's what Nancy says. Now tell me how that is different from obeying God and going to heaven, or being sent to hell where there is gnashing of teeth if you are wicked, or spending some time in purgatory if you are lukewarm? It isn't.

The truth is that we are all unique.It is a disservice to all of us to categorize all of humanity into 3 categories.

Good and Evil, selfish and selfless are subjective moralizations. They mean nothing. The universal truth contains light and dark. They are inseparable, they are two sides of the same coin. Human consciousness has trouble seeing the whole picture, which is why we tend to take the whole and break it down into two opposing polarities. We imbue each polarity with a moral value, good or bad, light or dark, evil or righteous. One polarity always has good connotations, and the other is bad.

As long as we continue to put moral judgment on half of all that exists in the universe, we will be led by the noses in fear of punishment and our deeds will be driven by the promise of reward. Until we are all true to our own natures, humanity is not likely to develop in a positive direction.

First of all. Who says that those who are STO don't sin?. It has nothing to do with sinners or being Rightious.
It is either total love for the self. Or that one cares about another as one cares about himself.

Who says that one who is STO always has to be nice and friendly?

Gerard
[link to poleshift.ning.com]

For what i know zetatalk doesn't say that those who are STS are damned.


Nancy says that the STS will be sent to a PP, a planet where STS souls will be imprisoned. The undecided will reincarnate as octopus beings in a water world. Only the people that fall squarely in the STO category will inhabit a renewed earth and make zeta/human hybrid babies. That's what Nancy says. Now tell me how that is different from obeying God and going to heaven, or being sent to hell where there is gnashing of teeth if you are wicked, or spending some time in purgatory if you are lukewarm? It isn't.

The truth is that we are all unique.It is a disservice to all of us to categorize all of humanity into 3 categories.

Good and Evil, selfish and selfless are subjective moralizations. They mean nothing. The universal truth contains light and dark. They are inseparable, they are two sides of the same coin. Human consciousness has trouble seeing the whole picture, which is why we tend to take the whole and break it down into two opposing polarities. We imbue each polarity with a moral value, good or bad, light or dark, evil or righteous. One polarity always has good connotations, and the other is bad.

As long as we continue to put moral judgment on half of all that exists in the universe, we will be led by the noses in fear of punishment and our deeds will be driven by the promise of reward. Until we are all true to our own natures, humanity is not likely to develop in a positive direction.

>> Nancy says that the STS will be sent to a PP, a planet where STS souls will be imprisoned. The undecided will reincarnate as octopus beings in a water world. Only the people that fall squarely in the STO category will inhabit a renewed earth and make zeta/human hybrid babies. That's what Nancy says. Now tell me how that is different from obeying God and going to heaven, or being sent to hell where there is gnashing of teeth if you are wicked, or spending some time in purgatory if you are lukewarm? It isn't.

You're "assuming" that everyone with "any" intelligence views the bible as nothing more than than a superstitious collection of fairy tales sprinkled with a handful of factual historical "settings" such that Pilot really WAS a Roman official, Herod really was a Jewish King, and the Jews actually did have a Temple where the Dome of the Rock sits today. Otherwise - it's TOTAL fiction.

Well - not "everyone" shares your viewpoint BUCKO!

Perhaps there REALLY IS some "reality" behind the "heaven", "purgatory", "hell" triad??? (And yes I know that "purgatory" is a Catholic Doctrine "thing" - and not strictly biblical)

Can't be "proved" of course - BUT CAN'T BE DISMISSED EITHER.


Nothing in the spiritual realm can be proven or totally dismissed except as personal opinion. That isn't the basis of the debunker objections to Zetatalk. It is the concrete claims and predictions which are proven to have failed without a doubt, no matter how many lame excuses and bullshit "explanations" Nancy may make. Learn the difference.

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:

Gosh - I could say the same thing about modern geology!

Gerard, are you "STO"? If so, why didn't you have the common courtesy to tell me I was right about the errors on those skycharts on your website and thank me for taking the time to check your work and point out the misleading items you had posted on that page?

For those who are posting over on the bunker thread, remember the boycott. The whole idea is to let Nancy's BS sink to the bottom where it belongs. They are baiting you to keep pumping it. Just bring the logical and factual arguments over here. Don't worry, any bunkers who are participating over there are also watching here.


This weekean I will respect the boycott ... although its very hard ... its so much fun to insult and ridicule her over there ...

My bet:

She will use the following this weekend:

- red skys in Australia
- fictional story of jupiter moon
- India reports water on the moon

^ All posted on GLP this week. This is my bet ... she will say its all caused by planet X ... especially the red sky ... mark my words.

As i said before i know what i saw.

Gerard, are you "STO"? If so, why didn't you have the common courtesy to tell me I was right about the errors on those skycharts on your website and thank me for taking the time to check your work and point out the misleading items you had posted on that page?


Mennow i changed the page.

As i said before i know what i saw.

And i corrected one skychart.

And STO doesn't mean that one has to be nice and friendly all of the time.

I said you are as obnixious now as you where back then, and this thought of mine hasn't changed.

As i guess that even now i changed the page you still find it misleading. Am i right or not?

Gerard
[link to polehift.ning.com]

If Earth had suddenly shifted 90 degrees in one hour WE WOULD ALL BE DEAD, Gerard. You are simply WRONG and are refusing to listen to any reasoning explaining WHY you are wrong. You insist on your observation simply because it makes you special.

End of story.

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:



Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:

:bald_lie:

Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.


It won't be the first time that a debunker will "pledge" to do something - and it NEVER happens.

:dwagain:

Her Zetas are just silly. No zeros? They don't even grasp basic physical concepts. They can communicate with a daft Earth woman across vast distances but they can't do tenth-grade math problems on Coast to Coast? Which again isn't surprising because they're the creation of a woman who herself probably can't perform any actions more difficult that basic addition and subtraction.


Max came out vociferously defending the no zero maths that the Zetas supposedly use. He gave us an example. He says that if you have 3 apples and then you eat those apples, the result is not zero, because you are digesting those apples and the apples leave residue in the place they were. LOL No kidding!

Another interesting thing that Max not only overlooks, but spins in Nancy's favor is that up until several months ago, Nancy did not even know how to interpret celestial coordinates. We all knew that, we all called her on it, and many of us got bitched down, deleted and/or banned for daring to point that out. Well, then one day, she came out insulting the debunkers because they called her on the supposed position of a constellation in the sky, and she finally discovered while searching for cut and paste on the internet that all that time she had been totally clueless. She thought that RA and Dec were the same things as alt and azimuth. LOL. She still thinks RA stands for Right Angle. Double LOL. Funny thing is that when it was observed that given her new revelation, all of the coordinates and positions she has given over the years are rendered inaccurate. She disagreed, and so did Max. Somehow, they still claim that the coordinates given are right and that certain stars, planets and such are not where they should be. I figure that in order to determine that, you need to know for sure where things are supposed to be, but for Nancy and Max, that isn't necessary. They just know these things.

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:



Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:



Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.


It won't be the first time that a debunker will "pledge" to do something - and it NEVER happens.




That's hilarious. Just as Maxie is in the midst of claiming not to lie, he tells another. Priceless.

Her Zetas are just silly. No zeros? They don't even grasp basic physical concepts. They can communicate with a daft Earth woman across vast distances but they can't do tenth-grade math problems on Coast to Coast? Which again isn't surprising because they're the creation of a woman who herself probably can't perform any actions more difficult that basic addition and subtraction.


Max came out vociferously defending the no zero maths that the Zetas supposedly use. He gave us an example. He says that if you have 3 apples and then you eat those apples, the result is not zero, because you are digesting those apples and the apples leave residue in the place they were. LOL No kidding!

Another interesting thing that Max not only overlooks, but spins in Nancy's favor is that up until several months ago, Nancy did not even know how to interpret celestial coordinates. We all knew that, we all called her on it, and many of us got bitched down, deleted and/or banned for daring to point that out. Well, then one day, she came out insulting the debunkers because they called her on the supposed position of a constellation in the sky, and she finally discovered while searching for cut and paste on the internet that all that time she had been totally clueless. She thought that RA and Dec were the same things as alt and azimuth. LOL. She still thinks RA stands for Right Angle. Double LOL. Funny thing is that when it was observed that given her new revelation, all of the coordinates and positions she has given over the years are rendered inaccurate. She disagreed, and so did Max. Somehow, they still claim that the coordinates given are right and that certain stars, planets and such are not where they should be. I figure that in order to determine that, you need to know for sure where things are supposed to be, but for Nancy and Max, that isn't necessary. They just know these things.





KeepingItNOTsoreal, why must you spin info at GLP?

You guys never stop!

It was me that made the 3 apple argument, not ZetaMax. Get your facts straight debunker, and stop misleading willya?

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:

:bald_lie:

Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.


It won't be the first time that a debunker will "pledge" to do something - and it NEVER happens.

:dwagain:


That's hilarious. Just as Maxie is in the midst of claiming not to lie, he tells another. Priceless.




Fuck Me Now, you never cease to amaze!

You just got caught in KeepingitNotsoreal's lie. How does it feel twerp?

You wear your selfish spirit right on your sleave. Imagine that?

Her Zetas are just silly. No zeros? They don't even grasp basic physical concepts. They can communicate with a daft Earth woman across vast distances but they can't do tenth-grade math problems on Coast to Coast? Which again isn't surprising because they're the creation of a woman who herself probably can't perform any actions more difficult that basic addition and subtraction.


Max came out vociferously defending the no zero maths that the Zetas supposedly use. He gave us an example. He says that if you have 3 apples and then you eat those apples, the result is not zero, because you are digesting those apples and the apples leave residue in the place they were. LOL No kidding!

Another interesting thing that Max not only overlooks, but spins in Nancy's favor is that up until several months ago, Nancy did not even know how to interpret celestial coordinates. We all knew that, we all called her on it, and many of us got bitched down, deleted and/or banned for daring to point that out. Well, then one day, she came out insulting the debunkers because they called her on the supposed position of a constellation in the sky, and she finally discovered while searching for cut and paste on the internet that all that time she had been totally clueless. She thought that RA and Dec were the same things as alt and azimuth. LOL. She still thinks RA stands for Right Angle. Double LOL. Funny thing is that when it was observed that given her new revelation, all of the coordinates and positions she has given over the years are rendered inaccurate. She disagreed, and so did Max. Somehow, they still claim that the coordinates given are right and that certain stars, planets and such are not where they should be. I figure that in order to determine that, you need to know for sure where things are supposed to be, but for Nancy and Max, that isn't necessary. They just know these things.





KeepingItNOTsoreal, why must you spin info at GLP?

You guys never stop!

It was me that made the 3 apple argument, not ZetaMax. Get your facts straight debunker, and stop misleading willya?


Actually, it was MY thought experiment, originally, about the three apples. Why don't YOU get your facts straight?

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:



Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.


It won't be the first time that a debunker will "pledge" to do something - and it NEVER happens.




That's hilarious. Just as Maxie is in the midst of claiming not to lie, he tells another. Priceless.




Fuck Me Now, you never cease to amaze!

You just got caught in KeepingitNotsoreal's lie. How does it feel twerp?

You wear your selfish spirit right on your sleave. Imagine that?


You don't even take time to READ posts before spewing the company line. Maxie said that debunkers "NEVER" follow their own pledges. That statement of Maxie's was a lie, which is what I pointed out.

Get a life, twerp.

Her Zetas are just silly. No zeros? They don't even grasp basic physical concepts. They can communicate with a daft Earth woman across vast distances but they can't do tenth-grade math problems on Coast to Coast? Which again isn't surprising because they're the creation of a woman who herself probably can't perform any actions more difficult that basic addition and subtraction.


Max came out vociferously defending the no zero maths that the Zetas supposedly use. He gave us an example. He says that if you have 3 apples and then you eat those apples, the result is not zero, because you are digesting those apples and the apples leave residue in the place they were. LOL No kidding!

Another interesting thing that Max not only overlooks, but spins in Nancy's favor is that up until several months ago, Nancy did not even know how to interpret celestial coordinates. We all knew that, we all called her on it, and many of us got bitched down, deleted and/or banned for daring to point that out. Well, then one day, she came out insulting the debunkers because they called her on the supposed position of a constellation in the sky, and she finally discovered while searching for cut and paste on the internet that all that time she had been totally clueless. She thought that RA and Dec were the same things as alt and azimuth. LOL. She still thinks RA stands for Right Angle. Double LOL. Funny thing is that when it was observed that given her new revelation, all of the coordinates and positions she has given over the years are rendered inaccurate. She disagreed, and so did Max. Somehow, they still claim that the coordinates given are right and that certain stars, planets and such are not where they should be. I figure that in order to determine that, you need to know for sure where things are supposed to be, but for Nancy and Max, that isn't necessary. They just know these things.





KeepingItNOTsoreal, why must you spin info at GLP?

You guys never stop!

It was me that made the 3 apple argument, not ZetaMax. Get your facts straight debunker, and stop misleading willya?


Actually, it was MY thought experiment, originally, about the three apples. Why don't YOU get your facts straight?





THEN YOU would have known it was ME arguing with you and NOT ZetaMax. Yet, you state ZetaMax lied about this?

So much for your "thought experiment",eh?

What you choose to remember and not remember is very telling MeNow.

You are a very deceitful person, that much is CLEAR!

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:

:bald_lie:

Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.


It won't be the first time that a debunker will "pledge" to do something - and it NEVER happens.

:dwagain:


That's hilarious. Just as Maxie is in the midst of claiming not to lie, he tells another. Priceless.




Fuck Me Now, you never cease to amaze!

You just got caught in KeepingitNotsoreal's lie. How does it feel twerp?

You wear your selfish spirit right on your sleave. Imagine that?


You don't even take time to READ posts before spewing the company line. Maxie said that debunkers "NEVER" follow their own pledges. That statement of Maxie's was a lie, which is what I pointed out.

Get a life, twerp.




Keep spinning MeNow ... it looks good on YOU!

heh

RA is Right Angle?

Oh man. Now that is comedy gold.

But of course all her old assertions and predictions are still correct! Using advanced Zeta mathematics, 1 = 2 = 3 = any damned thing you *want* it to equal.

And as for ZetaMax's complelling explanation that there is no zero, well, he's a clever devil too. Hey Max, can I borrow all the money you have? Because even if you give me all of it, you'll still have an equivalent amount left, right?

So refusing me is just greedy, and that's oh-so STS.

Ah - just one little note of relevance ...

I HAVE ***NEVER*** POSTED ***ANY*** OPINION ABOUT THE ZETA'S ASSERTION THAT THERE IS NO ZERO.

NEVER, NADA, NOT AT **ALL**.

Any anyone who says I have is guilty of telling a:



Oh Max, you know that is a lie. You made me belly laugh out loud with that one. It is on the old debunker thread I think, or buried in one of Nancy's tedious threads. I tried searching for the old debunker thread and didn't find it. But I will find the quote and post it.


It won't be the first time that a debunker will "pledge" to do something - and it NEVER happens.




That's hilarious. Just as Maxie is in the midst of claiming not to lie, he tells another. Priceless.




Fuck Me Now, you never cease to amaze!

You just got caught in KeepingitNotsoreal's lie. How does it feel twerp?

You wear your selfish spirit right on your sleave. Imagine that?


You don't even take time to READ posts before spewing the company line. Maxie said that debunkers "NEVER" follow their own pledges. That statement of Maxie's was a lie, which is what I pointed out.

Get a life, twerp.




Keep spinning MeNow ... it looks good on YOU!

heh


Direct quote of the exchange in question with Max in bold and my in italics:

It won't be the first time that a debunker will "pledge" to do something - and it NEVER happens.


Quoting: ***ZetaMax***


That's hilarious. Just as Maxie is in the midst of claiming not to lie, he tells another. Priceless.


Exactly what is "spun" about that?

Eat shit and die, you pathetic luser.

Well I do apologize, Max. I was wrong. It was actually Kataklasm (sp?) that wrote the apple thing. I see Luser claims that it was him that posted about the apples. So, an apology is due. I will be more careful in the future. But something did come out of my error. You see, I always thought Kat was one of your sock puppets. I knew he was just someone using a double moniker, but what I didn't suspect was that he is in fact Luser. LOL. Way to go, Luser. I should have known that those two are cut from the same cloth. But you know what Max? I did find lots of other things you have said in the past, insults, applause for the banning of people on Nancy's thread and other assorted things that I had forgotten about.