Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Wow...how could we ever have guessed?

The thing I don't get is that the "Zetas" told her she'd find her magazines face down, which she didn't. They then claimed that they don't give signs on demand because something could go wrong or the sign could be perceived wrong. How? First of all, if they had the power to put the magazines face down, then they could make sure they would be face down when Nancy arrived. Second, they told her exactly what to look for. So how could the sign be perceived wrong? And then she finds an unwrapped Starburst...but doesn't mention getting any kind of confirmation from the "Zetas" that it was indeed her sign. So, how does she know?

Right. When they told her what would be her sign, and it didn't happen, she ignored it. And then interpreted something that they hadn't mentioned at all as her "sign".

This is the kind of stuff her sheep such as Max, Gerard, 78/68 and others never question about her fairy tale. They just believe it as gospel and criticize anyone who even doubts it.

How funny can it get!

Of course, she doesn't.

Those silly bunkers.

Yes, I remember you from sci.astro. Also The Commentator and Hap. There are probably others here as well (MC?).




Anyone who was around for any length of time during ZetaBabble's heyday will instantly recognise the disingenuous and sophomoric trolling attempts by the kOOks.

I find it hilarious that housewives, waitresses/waiters, finger-painters, etc. decide to beard-the-lion of science when they haven't a clue. If they'd stick to touchy-feely new age philosophy they'd have no scientific "debunkers", but yet they *have* to wrap their concepts in a cloak of pseudo-science for god knows what reason. I guess it's a manifestation of post-modern (UFO) theology.

They'd have an heart attack if they ever took a *real* hard science curriculum at university... not 'science for non-science majors'; or if they were to be employed in one of the hard sciences and had to defend their ideas in real life.

They don't know what brutal criticism is. You live and die by the strength of your work and there is no "touchy-feely" about it. I've given and I've received. It's all part of the game and much of the fun. If you can't take it you should think about a career in the social-sciences or the liberal-arts where fuzzy answers are the norm.

They don't have a clue about science.

Have fun.


R.

Mean looking fault line

[link to earthquake.usgs.gov]

Wonder if this Volcano had something to do with this?

[link to news.nationalgeographic.com]

You're so wrapped up in Zetatalk that you've been twittering, posting on other forums, and generally being Nancy's prime supporter.

Life outside the internet when you have this record?

[link to twitter.com]
[link to omgili.com]
[link to www.google.com]

So much for Nancy's "exponential" increase in number and magnitude of quakes since 1995. The USGS site states that before today, there had been no magnitude 8 quakes all year. There is usually 1 - 2 per year. The number of quakes between 6 and 6.9 is down significantly from the yearly norm, at 87 so far, with only 3 months to go. This in comparison to the quietest year in recent times, 2001 with 121 and the highest number in 2007 with 178.

If, as Nancy claimed years ago the incidence and severity of quakes had increased exponentially, the earth would be constantly shaking with high magnitude quakes, which is not happening, not even close. A lot can happen in the last 3 months of the year, but it looks like 2009 will be a relatively quiet year for quakes, which proves that there is no increase in destructive quakes.

What name did you go under on sci.astro? GREAT times making the bunker heads explode, and even more fun watching LIEDer have a tantrum every time someone shot holes in her bullshit stories, which was most every day....

I'd rather not say.

I didn't post much and was more of the opinion that it would be better if they were gone from that inappropriate venue. I did, however, think it appropriate to debunk what could be a doomsday cult having witnessed the Heaven's Gate disaster and the probability that some of those lost souls had posted on sci.astro prior to their brainwashed demise.

Once I figured out a great many of them were collecting here at GLP before screwing up the courage to take on sci.astro I came here to the font of all lunacy.

That was in late Nov. 2002.

This *is* the proper venue for bunker-debunker clashes. That is what makes GLP so popular, I believe.

Have fun.


R.

Sie scheinen wirklich eine Form des Vergnügens davon zu bekommen. Ich denke deshalb, dass Benutzer vorbeikommt. Er bekommt Vergnügen davon, Leute anzugreifen.

Splitting hairs again???

Not at all. I'm curious to know.

Shilling again?

What about this is "splitting hairs"?

Obviously, it isn't. Max was just shilling/trolling again.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 09/29/2009 09:33 PM

No kidding. This is where it all began, with an unwrapped starburst candy. How is it splitting hairs to question whether this was a sign from the Zetas or just one of those things that happens when you mass produce things? Everything that comes after loses credibility if the "sign" that started it all wasn't a sign at all. If the sign is bogus, then it is safe to assume that the content of ZetaTalk is also suspect. The starburst moment is a good indication of the state of Nancy's mental health. Those that egg her on should be ashamed of themselves. She obviously is not playing with a full deck.

I am not convinced there is any dedicated following for Nancy anymore. Besides Gerard, Andrew, ZetaMax, and User, who is there? Maybe ten posters to the old board?


Concerning Nancy and the Starbursts.

" 'this is why we don't give signs on demand! If
they go wrong, or are perceived wrong, hysterics, etc." So I understood, not
on demand.' "

"A week later I'm in a movie house, alone, trying to relax, and get the sense that a Zeta came in and sat beside me, and I'd find a candy wrapper in my pocket or some such."


These two statements are difficult to resolve with one another.

In my opinion, it is not so much IMPOSSIBLE that a potential "sign" could go awry-- since the Zetas and their technology as described by Nancy are hypothetical entities, it is hard to say what they can and cannot do. But even if they could freeze reality and telepathically herd humans, there could be limits to how much energy they are willing to expend, especially when one factors in the theoretical "Rules of Engagement" of Nancy's universe, where entities are restricted from interfering, depending on the awareness and permissions of third density individuals within the locality. Maybe Nancy's co-worker walks into the room and flips over the magazines 9 seconds before Nancy walks in, and they cannot adjust the stack because the co-worker's soul refuses contact and the Zetas cannot lobby an exception from the Council of Worlds.

In the first instance, it is not made clear whether the Zetas deliberately lied about giving her a sign with the magazines, or whether the sign was intended, but went awry. So we don't even know if the the "Zetas" intended to make a point with the second "attempt". Maybe they just F----d up the first time, and Nancy read into it, and the next time they picked a time where no one could interfere.

Either way, there is very little difference between the mechanics of the magazine and starburst incidents. The Zetas are still entertaining Nancy's wishes with the starbursts, aren't they? The only differences are 1) time. In the first, the sign will appear the next day, in the latter it is fulfilled immediately. 2) in the second instance, Nancy is only reacting to a "sense" that a sign/miracle COULD be taking place. So the second is an easier miracle, and more uncertain, but still a direct fulfillment to her request if it is a miracle.

Still, things could go wrong. Nancy still might not react to the "sign" as planned even if it is just a sense, and even if it is a darkened empty theatre. Are they sure Nancy won't think an evil sales representative dropped that Starburst in there to poison her? That is why her interpretation makes no sense. The Zetas wouldn't be making a moral point with a new miracle. Either the Zetas simply messed up the first time, or the second time her "feeling" was just her imagination and it was no miracle or sign from the "Zetas" at all.

So her story makes no sense.

to clarify that last point further, it is entirely possible that Nancy could get this "sense" that Zeta contact was about to occur with her Starburst wrappers, only to disappointedly find nothing because they messed up again. even if they informed her post fact, she could still misinterpret the sign.

>> She obviously is not playing with a full deck.

Agreed! She is not full of consensus NONSENSE!!!

I am not convinced there is any dedicated following for Nancy anymore. Besides Gerard, Andrew, ZetaMax, and User, who is there? Maybe ten posters to the old board?

I am one as well...

Peace

Shilling again?

I'm curious as to why. For six years, she has repeatedly said "Planet X" is here...and yet, it remains a no show. What do you find so compelling about Nancy when none of her doomsday predictions have happened?

Respectfully.

Hey Circuit Breaker! Hope all is well!
Counting down to when it will be too cold for us to go to the parks anymore... Your lil girl is keeping you busy yes? :)

Peace

I know respectfully! I am glad I make you curious... better than other emotions I suppose ha ha... and I am different as well too... For me its actually been 7 years now, I just had to resign up in 04 on here... always honest, always the same name and supporting... I guess I know that I cant put it into words that will make you understand in full as to why I support this message as I do... all I know is in a way we may all be facets on the same diamond in regard to the end times we are all in... and I am happy with that...

Peace

Oh yes...she's very much a handful. I know it will be getting too cold to go to the playground soon. Monday and Tuesday last week were in the 40s....and then we were back up to 80 by the weekend. This week will be in the mid-60s. The nights are definitely cooler...it was usually in the upper 50s in August when I got up at 5:00. Now it's in the low 40s...which makes it just a bit too cold to do my bike ride. That and with fall here, the days are shorter so it isn't light outside until well after 6:00. Thursday night the low is supposed to be 31. I'm counting down the days until the first snow. Parts of Colorado Springs had some last week...but it didn't stay around long. Pikes Peak had a nice cap on it until this weekend when the temps went back up.

I'm finishing up my second semester for this degree in IT. Just a few weeks left to go. Unfortunately, it's going to take me longer to finish than I had planned because I'm limited on how many credits I can take. I can only borrow so much each semester based on our income and the amount I can borrow will only pay for 9 credits instead of the 10-12 credits per semester I was planning on taking.

For some reason I thought you lived in Florida? Or am I wrong? I am in Idaho, we might be getting some snow on the mountains by this weekend...

I wish you luck with your education, I always wondered why if someone had the desire to learn and do the work why and how should it cost anything at all?
Thats why I cant go back to college... yet...

Peace

We did live in FL until January of this year. We'd been wanting to leave for a few years. So, when my wife was offered a job here in Colorado Springs, we took it - even though we knew it might take me a while to find a job. I thought I would be able to find a job as a dispatcher here since I have over five years of experience. But very few agencies are hiring...and when they are, they have hundreds of applicants for only one or two positions. So, it hasn't gone quite to plan. However, we're not completely disappointed by that because I didn't really want to go back to doing that anymore. I wanted my weekends and holidays free again...and that's why I started school again when we got here. While I didn't want to work in 911/dispatch anymore, I didn't really want to go back to being an electronics technician. I thought about going into programming like my wife, but she said I was more of a hardware person and suggested I look into being a network systems administrator. She was right and so I'm working on a BSc in Network Communications Management. The thing that frustrates me about the loans is that the amount I borrow will be the same whether I do it in, say, 4 semesters or 10. And, actually, the amount will be more because tuition goes up each semester.

Oh well, off to bed. 5:00 comes pretty quick.

I can easily respect your desire for privacy. No problem.

Welcome aboard!

Night! Me too...

And Colorado is a safe place if you know what I mean... lol