Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Well let me know, Menow when you see a blue Sunset, lol

Yet again, Menow, is the IDIOT!

Astronomers have hardly a clue at all about what they are talking about.


Really? Well, we are talking about whether Earth is orbiting the Sun. What are YOU talking about?


They know very LITTLE of what really is out there.


Well, the SUN is out there and Earth is orbiting it. Do you disagree or are you engaging in hyperbole? I think the latter.


There are new discoveries these days every single week.

Oh WAIT! You are declaring that science actually DISCOVERS things? How is that POSSIBLE?? I thought your position was that science knows NOTHING. Hmm.... science discovers things, but never ends up knowing anything. How odd...


Being undecided about what they study is the smartest and most honest course of action for them.


That, of course *IS* the basic tenant of the scientific method, but not applied in the hyperbolic way you describe. If scientist thought they had to RE-prove that Earth orbits the Sun each time they go to work, they would never get anything done. It's not practical. That is how things get DONE in this world, by people being far more practical than you are apparently capable of being.


You, being as self-absorbed as one can be, will never understand this. Pity for YOU.


Wot a maroon! How did you know your computer would still work today? Did you start from scratch and research computer technology from the ground up, or did you simply turn it on and expect it to work?





No Menow, my postion has never been science knows nothing. This is a classic example of how you spin and twist everything you talk about.


Oh.. Maybe I can stand corrected. This is a PERFECT opportunity for you to explain your position. After all, you really offer little beyond insults, so this will be enlightening for all!

Go right ahead.


I say science doesn't know that much. In other words, there is much more science doesn't know, then knows.


Very probably. Now... how does that affect the "Zeta" claims we have been discussing? They are: "Halted Earth" and "Simulated Seasons".

Go right ahead.


And the more science helps explain things the more questions become apparent about the science involved in the first place. ALWAYS more questions!


Yep. That is the nature of science. What is your point?


You would know NOTHING about this ... you are the kind of person that slows the scientific process down, because you already KNOW-IT-ALL. Dolt!


Oh... I just agreed with you. Now I know nothing? How does that make sense?

Go right ahead. There are some questions before you. You have the floor. Enlighten me.





YET AGAIN, you have distorted the message of my post MeNow. This time you look even sillier, if that's possible?

You keep saying "nothing". And I say "not that much". Big difference, word twister.

Spin away!

Well let me know, Menow when you see a blue Sunset, lol

:sun.set:

When you see an orange Sun setting it is called an Orange Sunset.

lol

"Oh... I just agreed with you. Now I know nothing? How does that make sense?"


You are a fraud MeNow, as you can see above ... your words!

You throw the word "nothing" around, like the good word spinner you are.

I say you know "not that much" and you say that I say "nothing". You are a LIAR. And exposed for such right on THIS point.

Well let me know, Menow when you see a blue Sunset, lol

:sun.set:

When you see an orange Sun setting it is called an Orange Sunset.

lol


Then I've seen plenty of those. You have not?

Well let me know, Menow when you see a blue Sunset, lol

:sun.set:

When you see an orange Sun setting it is called an Orange Sunset.

lol


Then I've seen plenty of those. You have not?

lol, you called this picture of the Sun setting an orange Sunset

Do you honestly see an orange Sun in this picture?

:sun.set:

"Oh... I just agreed with you. Now I know nothing? How does that make sense?"


You are a fraud MeNow, as you can see above ... your words!

You throw the word "nothing" around, like the good word spinner you are.

I say you know "not that much" and you say that I say "nothing". You are a LIAR. And exposed for such right on THIS point.


Here is a direct quote of your words:

"You would know NOTHING about this ... you are the kind of person that slows the scientific process down, because you already KNOW-IT-ALL. Dolt!"

People died in the LOBBY. "Supposedly" the fireball traveled down the elevator shafts and blew the doors open and filled the lobby with a fireball that killed a least a dozen people instantly, and left many with third degree burns - including a co-worker who was coming in through the external revolving door and had only about six inches of interior space open when he was struck.

I find that a little hard to believe but I wasn't there so I don't know. I guess it could happen. Once the force of a blast is in the shaft, it doesn't really have anywhere to go but up or down. But wouldn't it have blown the doors off every floor as it went?


Precisely my thinking. I remember after walking down 30 flights of stairs (exiting the stairwell on the second floor interior balcony that ringed the tower lobby that filled the entire space of the first two floors), that the lobby looked "dirty", "sooty", with some broken marble and glass. All security personnel that guarded the entrances to the elevators were dead (I learned that later). I don't buy the "fireball" explanation at all. I think charges were planted. As a result of the disaster in the lobby, the fire alarm did not go off for FIFTEEN MINUTES, and there was no PA system available for instructing those in the building.

"Oh... I just agreed with you. Now I know nothing? How does that make sense?"


You are a fraud MeNow, as you can see above ... your words!

You throw the word "nothing" around, like the good word spinner you are.

I say you know "not that much" and you say that I say "nothing". You are a LIAR. And exposed for such right on THIS point.


Here is a direct quote of your words:

"You would know NOTHING about this ... you are the kind of person that slows the scientific process down, because you already KNOW-IT-ALL. Dolt!"

Science is the process of breaking things down to the lowest common denominator. How can you go any slower that that?
When you wait for the peer group, let's say the dunkers, to agree on a concept, let's say density, well as you can see this will takes years to reach no conclusion. Your actions have betrayed your message once again menow.(Who in their right mind chooses a term like ME NOW to debunk a service to other concept?)

"Oh... I just agreed with you. Now I know nothing? How does that make sense?"


You are a fraud MeNow, as you can see above ... your words!

You throw the word "nothing" around, like the good word spinner you are.

I say you know "not that much" and you say that I say "nothing". You are a LIAR. And exposed for such right on THIS point.


Here is a direct quote of your words:

"You would know NOTHING about this ... you are the kind of person that slows the scientific process down, because you already KNOW-IT-ALL. Dolt!"

Science is the process of breaking things down to the lowest common denominator. How can you go any slower that that?
When you wait for the peer group, let's say the dunkers, to agree on a concept, let's say density, well as you can see this will takes years to reach no conclusion. Your actions have betrayed your message once again menow.(Who in their right mind chooses a term like ME NOW to debunk a service to other concept?)

Yet again, Menow, is the IDIOT!

Astronomers have hardly a clue at all about what they are talking about.


Really? Well, we are talking about whether Earth is orbiting the Sun. What are YOU talking about?


They know very LITTLE of what really is out there.


Well, the SUN is out there and Earth is orbiting it. Do you disagree or are you engaging in hyperbole? I think the latter.


There are new discoveries these days every single week.

Oh WAIT! You are declaring that science actually DISCOVERS things? How is that POSSIBLE?? I thought your position was that science knows NOTHING. Hmm.... science discovers things, but never ends up knowing anything. How odd...


Being undecided about what they study is the smartest and most honest course of action for them.


That, of course *IS* the basic tenant of the scientific method, but not applied in the hyperbolic way you describe. If scientist thought they had to RE-prove that Earth orbits the Sun each time they go to work, they would never get anything done. It's not practical. That is how things get DONE in this world, by people being far more practical than you are apparently capable of being.


You, being as self-absorbed as one can be, will never understand this. Pity for YOU.


Wot a maroon! How did you know your computer would still work today? Did you start from scratch and research computer technology from the ground up, or did you simply turn it on and expect it to work?





No Menow, my postion has never been science knows nothing. This is a classic example of how you spin and twist everything you talk about.


Oh.. Maybe I can stand corrected. This is a PERFECT opportunity for you to explain your position. After all, you really offer little beyond insults, so this will be enlightening for all!

Go right ahead.


I say science doesn't know that much. In other words, there is much more science doesn't know, then knows.


Very probably. Now... how does that affect the "Zeta" claims we have been discussing? They are: "Halted Earth" and "Simulated Seasons".

Go right ahead.


And the more science helps explain things the more questions become apparent about the science involved in the first place. ALWAYS more questions!


Yep. That is the nature of science. What is your point?


You would know NOTHING about this ... you are the kind of person that slows the scientific process down, because you already KNOW-IT-ALL. Dolt!


Oh... I just agreed with you. Now I know nothing? How does that make sense?

Go right ahead. There are some questions before you. You have the floor. Enlighten me.





YET AGAIN, you have distorted the message of my post MeNow. This time you look even sillier, if that's possible?

You keep saying "nothing". And I say "not that much". Big difference, word twister.

Spin away!
Quoting: User # 78/68


Well, I'm looking for where I used the term "nothing" or even implied that about your views in this post. I didn't. Well, I used the term in replying to YOUR use of it in disparaging me, but that really doesn't count, hmm?

Please be specific about where you claim I have distorted your message, 'cause I don't see it. Also, there are some questions before you about how you APPLY your "message". I'll repeat one of them. The others are easy to find. As you will notice, I AGREE with you at the beginning. We seem to be on good common ground, there. Why don't you proceed?

Very probably. Now... how does that affect the "Zeta" claims we have been discussing? They are: "Halted Earth" and "Simulated Seasons".

Go right ahead.

People died in the LOBBY. "Supposedly" the fireball traveled down the elevator shafts and blew the doors open and filled the lobby with a fireball that killed a least a dozen people instantly, and left many with third degree burns - including a co-worker who was coming in through the external revolving door and had only about six inches of interior space open when he was struck.

I find that a little hard to believe but I wasn't there so I don't know. I guess it could happen. Once the force of a blast is in the shaft, it doesn't really have anywhere to go but up or down. But wouldn't it have blown the doors off every floor as it went?


Precisely my thinking. I remember after walking down 30 flights of stairs (exiting the stairwell on the second floor interior balcony that ringed the tower lobby that filled the entire space of the first two floors), that the lobby looked "dirty", "sooty", with some broken marble and glass. All security personnel that guarded the entrances to the elevators were dead (I learned that later). I don't buy the "fireball" explanation at all. I think charges were planted. As a result of the disaster in the lobby, the fire alarm did not go off for FIFTEEN MINUTES, and there was no PA system available for instructing those in the building.

Did you feel the building shake when the plane hit? How long did it take to realize what had happened? Did people just leave the building, or was there some sort of organized evacuation? I am not trying to bait you, honestly would like to hear your accounting of the events as you lived them.

"Oh... I just agreed with you. Now I know nothing? How does that make sense?"


You are a fraud MeNow, as you can see above ... your words!

You throw the word "nothing" around, like the good word spinner you are.

I say you know "not that much" and you say that I say "nothing". You are a LIAR. And exposed for such right on THIS point.


Here is a direct quote of your words:

"You would know NOTHING about this ... you are the kind of person that slows the scientific process down, because you already KNOW-IT-ALL. Dolt!"

Science is the process of breaking things down to the lowest common denominator. How can you go any slower that that?
When you wait for the peer group, let's say the dunkers, to agree on a concept, let's say density, well as you can see this will takes years to reach no conclusion. Your actions have betrayed your message once again menow.(Who in their right mind chooses a term like ME NOW to debunk a service to other concept?)




Exactly Ac 791545, MeNow is shill name he picked for himself ... pretty obvious stuff. Probably thought he was being funny to his NASA shill friends ... like some kind of nerdy joke to them.

Now, look at Circuit Breaker's name ... now, see The Commentator ... you see the picture?

Who's Circuit does CB think he's breaking? Pretty obvious too, eh?

These guys are here at GLP to interupt a specific information flow ... their own user names infer this.

Dumb as posts, the lot of em.


KeepingItReal ... look at this twerp's name. Like I said, dumb and obvious as it gets!

MeNow, you chose a "nic" at GLP, this whole website, just to be ironic to Nancy Lieder?

That means you are here for HER.

You couldn't have OUTED yourself better!!! WOW!

You don't want to hear about his accounting of the events KeepingItUnreal, you've already called him a liar on it.

You just want to pick his story apart, so your "healer"-not ego can be salvaged. You are as obvious a dolt as we have seen here at GLP.

Well let me know, Menow when you see a blue Sunset, lol

:sun.set:

When you see an orange Sun setting it is called an Orange Sunset.

lol


Then I've seen plenty of those. You have not?

lol, you called this picture of the Sun setting an orange Sunset
Quoting: Free Store


Yes, I did.


Do you honestly see an orange Sun in this picture?

:sun.set:
Quoting: Free Store


No I don't. I didn't say I did, now did I? No. I didn't define an orange sun as an orange sunset, you did. Then I agreed to that, for the purpose of discussion and said: Then I've seen plenty of those. You have not?

Are you not honest enough to answer other's questions in the discussion after they have answered yours? No, you are not. We just went through this yesterday with Dell's question to you. You are not honest in discussion.

Well let me know, Menow when you see a blue Sunset, lol

:sun.set:

When you see an orange Sun setting it is called an Orange Sunset.

lol


Then I've seen plenty of those. You have not?

lol, you called this picture of the Sun setting an orange Sunset

Do you honestly see an orange Sun in this picture?

:sun.set:

Take a look at the Apollo moon pictures. The stars and bars look the same on the moon as on earth.

A bright white Sunset

:sun.set:

I think charges were planted. As a result of the disaster in the lobby, the fire alarm did not go off for FIFTEEN MINUTES, and there was no PA system available for instructing those in the building.

Only a Debunker would see an orange Sun.

..

He is a fraud ... he is no healer. He is a pretender, and his words betray him, every single time!

Indeed, lying is like breathing to these guys.

Yet again, Menow, is the IDIOT!

Astronomers have hardly a clue at all about what they are talking about. They know very LITTLE of what really is out there. There are new discoveries these days every single week. Being undecided about what they study is the smartest and most honest course of action for them.

You, being as self-absorbed as one can be, will never understand this. Pity for YOU.

Science has ruined the Earth with it's garbage.

Exactly Ac 791545, MeNow is shill name he picked for himself ... pretty obvious stuff. Probably thought he was being funny to his NASA shill friends ... like some kind of nerdy joke to them.

Now, look at Circuit Breaker's name ... now, see The Commentator ... you see the picture?

Who's Circuit does CB think he's breaking? Pretty obvious too, eh?

These guys are here at GLP to interupt a specific information flow ... their own user names infer this.

Dumb as posts, the lot of em.


KeepingItReal ... look at this twerp's name. Like I said, dumb and obvious as it gets!

You don't want to hear about his accounting of the events KeepingItUnreal, you've already called him a liar on it.

You just want to pick his story apart, so your "healer"-not ego can be salvaged. You are as obvious a dolt as we have seen here at GLP.