Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

It is just SAD that you were unbanned in order to share these kind of profound insights.


After all these years I can understand how difficult it is
for you to witness people being free to post their thoughts
when they don't agree with you.

It is just SAD that you were unbanned in order to share these kind of profound insights.


After all these years I can understand how difficult it is
for you to witness people being free to post their thoughts
when they don't agree with you.

You mean, free to engage in character assassination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, name calling and verbal humiliation.

You mean, free to engage in character assassination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, name calling and verbal humiliation.

Yea - let "freedom" reign!

You mean, free to engage in character assassination,

intentional infliction of emotional distress,

name calling and verbal humiliation.

Yea - let "freedom" reign!

You mean, free to engage in character assassination,


You mean when Nancy called people supposed government agents, liars...


intentional infliction of emotional distress,


You mean when Nancy says she hopes people drown, gurgling...


name calling and verbal humiliation.


You mean when Nancy calls people idiots, or tells them their questions are stupid, while not answer extremely basic questions herself...


Yea - let "freedom" reign!


And isn't that why the debunkers have their own thread, which you can't seem to leave alone?

It is just SAD that you were unbanned in order to share these kind of profound insights.


After all these years I can understand how difficult it is
for you to witness people being free to post their thoughts
when they don't agree with you.

You mean, free to engage in character assassination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, name calling and verbal humiliation.

Yea - let "freedom" reign!

If you commute into downtown Chicago, the chances are pretty good that you won't be home if disaster strikes. You may have no way to get home for days. What good are all those preparations if you can't get home to them?

This is a conundrum I had living in Mexico City. We lost our home in the 85 earthquake. My wife was on her way to work, she had just dropped the kids off at school. The maid was at home. And I was out of town. The good thing is that we had brought the kids up with drills of what to do in an emergency, we decided on places to meet if we couldn't get home. Fortunately the maid got out alive with barely a scratch when the building collapsed. I left the car and walked for a whole day to get back to the city because the highway was damaged. Phones were down. We lost everything, but we were ok. Even if we had prepared with lots of provisions, it wouldn't have done a damned bit of good. The thing that made it easier was that we already had a plan with several contingencies. It only took a few hours for the kids to reunite with my wife, and the maid also knew where to meet the family. I knew where to look for them. After that, people in Mexico City started organizing emergency plans with the other people in their buildings and at the workplace, because you never know where you will be when something like this happens. For me, this is way more important than stocking up on things.


It's definitely possible that if certain types of disaster struck, that indeed I could be caught downtown. Still, assuming I was not horrifically injured, I figure I can walk home in a little under four days (figuring 20 miles a day). Of course that assumes basically a Richter 8 quake in Chicago - which is a possibility. However, with the economy on the brink, I do believe the odds of my being unemployed in the near future are far greater than surviving a Richter 8 quake and having to walk 80 to 100 miles.

Besides, I really don't have all that much anyway. Knowledge is the most important thing to "stock up" on.

I cannot speak for Nancy.

After all these years I can understand how difficult it is
for you to witness people being free to post their thoughts
when they don't agree with you.

You mean, free to engage in character assassination, intentional infliction of emotional distress, name calling and verbal humiliation.
Yea - let "freedom" reign!


"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,"
--Evelyn Beatrice Hall

:urpwned:

:psyop1:

The more he tries to defend himself, the more he contradicts himself.

halwo litle zita.

ET phone home

halwo litle zita.

ET phone home

halwo litle zita.

ET phone home

halwo litle zita.

ET phone home

The more he tries to defend himself, the more he contradicts himself.


Now we are really zeroing in on Melfy's real issues here on GLP. Beyond Melfy's ridiculous claims of fence sitting with all things Zetatalk it is his numerous contradictions that really make for true GLP conspiracy reading.

:psyop1:

Please stop calling me Melfy. Even the voices in my head are now calling me "Melfy". (That's a JOKE son!)

Please stop calling me Melfy. Even the voices in my head are now calling me "Melfy". (That's a JOKE son!)

Please stop calling me Melfy. Even the voices in my head are now calling me "Melfy". (That's a JOKE son!)


Ok, Melfey, that's the Aussie version...

Please stop calling me Melfy. Even the voices in my head are now calling me "Melfy". (That's a JOKE son!)

halwo litle zita.

ET phone home