Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,881 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 345,075
Pageviews Today: 544,114Threads Today: 184Posts Today: 2,680
06:51 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!
Poster Handle The Commentator
Post Content
Nancy has had a rough weekend. She has blatantly lied about the content of the posts she deleted before banning that poster. He posted her own words. She came back and claimed they were posted out of context, until the same poster came back at her with links to HER site, HER words. He didn't comment, just used her own drivel and let it speak for itself. Her only recourse was to get rid of the offending posts and ban the guy for daring to throw her own words back at her, and now she and her pathetic little band of sockpuppets claim he did more than just post her words. Good thing we have the exact quotes posted here, with time stamp. Will she dare come and start messing with this thread too?

She also showed her mean streak. By her own reckoning, she only has to be a nice STO a little more than half the time, this is an attempt to justify her meanness without making her look less than what she herself reckons she is, a mix of Mother Teresa and Joan of Arc. ROFLMAO


Do you wish for your entire life to be summed up by one or two sentences you uttered years before???

No?

Then abstain from same!

I don't see your point, unless the only safe point for you to comment on is the Mother Teresa/Joan of Arc comment, and even then, it's pretty lame.

You can tell a lot about a person not just by what they choose to reply to, but also by the things they don't reply to. Notice Maxikurt doesn't address the lies and dishonesty and despotism she displayed last night. He skims right past that and seizes on the second part to defend Nancy. Again, all I did was paraphrase her own words, which you can easily find in the archives of ZetaTalk.

I don't care what others know me for, but I am not in the public eye, I don't seek it, I don't bask in it. Nancy puts herself out there willingly. She has compiled mountains of bullshit, lots of it, bullshit that contradicts more bullshit, and she has never gotten anything right. Since she seeks the public attention, it follows that she is known by the body of her work.

Are you saying that since she said it a long time ago we shouldn't apply it today? In that case, I guess we can rule out all of those things she said back in 1995, 2000, 2003, like "weeks not months", or "Christmas Hammer" or the earth is halted in orbit, etc. Are you saying she should not be known by the entire body of her work, only approved parts of it? Aren't you the same idiot that only day or two ago was saying we debunkers will be known by our fruit? But Nancy shouldn't be?

You are such a pathetic troll and sock puppet. Your dishonesty is second only to Nancy herself, and perhaps Luser. Are you saying we should only know her by her most recent drivel and forget the past? If so, her behaviour this weekend doesn't do much for her image and credibility, banning posters for simply quoting her own words and providing links to her own website when she accused them of taking the comments out of context. She proved this weekend that the doggy spammer doesn't bother her, because he makes debunkers look bad and she can drum up sympathy, but what she can't allow is for any of her bullshit to be exposed on her chat not even when it is her own words that expose her.
 Quoting: KeepingItReal



Well said.

But I may suggest the best way to treat melfy is to just totally ignore him. Do not respond to his lies, bullshit, roleplaying, defense of ninny LIEDer, nothing. Just let him stew in his own juice.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP