Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Last night, Luser embarrassed himself by claiming I and other "debunkers" stalk Nancy. What a laugh! First of all, very few of my posts are even directed at Nancy. The same goes for the rest of the "debunkers." Our posts are directed at others. Many of them are simply questions that the flunkers refuse to address because they're afraid to. Second, you can't stalk someone who isn't even there and we all know that after Saturday, Nancy pretty much abandons her threads. I, for one, very rarely post on her thread until after she's gone. Third, I don't have any contact with Nancy. I don't know where she lives other than in Freedom, WI...nor do I have her phone number. For Luser to claim that we're stalking poor old Nancy is a joke...much like he is.

Sounds just like her indeed ... SOZT EOZT is the only thing missing.

Happy new year buddy and thx for making this thread.

Sounds just like her indeed ... SOZT EOZT is the only thing missing.

Yes, and what do these Acronyms mean, by the way!?

Last Edited by GreenTabasco on 12/31/2009 06:45 AM

Thanks. And Happy New Year to you as well, 847871.

PS: 2010 should be more entertainment on GLP as we know that Ms LIEDer will keep on pushing the same old tired and worn out false claims. As for the main bunker players? Well it could get interesting as they are running out of excuses to support Nancy and her no show planet.

Got this from Blackcrow's thread:



As you can see, it was a simple question. It involved no insults or attacks. The person asking the question was not rude in any way. And yet, here's how Blackcrow responded:



There you have it. For believers, it's best to tell people to fuck off instead of actually supporting their position. Notice how he won't even try by claiming any evidence or proof he presented wouldn't be accepted. While it might not be accepted by some...others might accept it. But by refusing to present anything, all he's doing is weakening his position. Why is it the bunkers don't understand that?

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 12/31/2009 08:55 AM

Good to see you are paying such close attention to this thread! It just proves how much MORE INTERESTING it is than any of Nancy's boring repetitive crap.

:5:

Sorry for being stupid...but SOZT/EOZT means what?

I'm thinking one is Zeta's and one is Nancy!?

As you know ZetaTalk has been called a religion...which followers have denied. Well, let's do a comparison:

Zetas:
A race of supreme beings that are able to halt, move, tilt and wobble moons, planets and entire solar systems. All knowing in Earthly affairs...including the inner workings of governments.

God:
A supreme being according to some particular conception presiding over some portion of worldly affairs.

Religion:
1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices based on faith without evidence or proof.
4. something one believes in and follows devotedly based on faith.

ZetaTalk:
1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe (i.e. 4th density), esp. when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies (i.e. Council of Worlds) and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs (i.e. STO vs STS)
2. a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects (i.e. STS vs STS or believers vs non-believers).
3. the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices based on faith without evidence or proof (i.e. those that believe Nancy and ZetaTalk).
4. something one believes in and follows devotedly based on faith (i.e. those that believe Nancy and ZetaTalk).

As you can see, ZetaTalk really is like a religion because those that follow her believe the "Zetas" are some all powerful beings that can do almost anything and know just about everything. According to Nancy, they're always right...never wrong. Those that follow her also believe they're part of some greater good. They do not question anything Nancy and the "Zetas" say. They accept it and have faith that what they've been told is true and good. Since they don't refer to the "Zetas" as gods, ZetaTalk is more like Scientology than any conventional form of religion.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 12/31/2009 09:21 AM

I figured it means "Start Of Zeta(rd) Talk" and "End Of Zeta(rd) Talk" ... but the veteran debunkers will know better.

SOZT - Start of "Zeta" talk
EOZT - End of "Zeta" talk

Yep ... Scientologie comes in mind first. Not that I like Scientologie, its really dangerous ... but I think something like Scientologie was in Nancys mind when she started ... The founder of Scientologie Hubbard was a failed SciFi-writer ... he has stuff like prison planets and so forth ... really weird stuff .... but compared to Zetatalk Scientology is really popular, which is bad of course, it destroys families ... a terrible cult.

Sometimes Nancy babbles "NancyTalk" ... which is very entrtaining too.

Hey CB.

I was the new 'debunker" earlier from work.

So, I will check out the SOZT/EOZT from the next Z-Chat this weekend to further understand.

I think I read before that you were a reformed Z-er? Care to comment, or shoud I just look for another beer? It's NeW Year after all.

I've seen the NaNCY tALK before too.

Sometimes I get the feeling that someone else besides Nancy is replying to comments...her husband perhaps?

Some replies seem overly negative and insultive which seem different from what I perceive that what Nancy would say.

Just my perception...

Actually, it means "Start of BS" and "End of BS".

Well folks, here it is the end of another year of failure for Nancy's cult. Another year has gone by and STILL not a single sign of her imaginary planet ex. Keep in mind that she's said on many occasions that 2012 was "too far out" and that it would be here "before" then.

Also, another year has gone by and I remain 100% unchallenged in my claim that not a single astronomical prediction or claim from all of ZT has ever come true.

Happy New Year debunkers!

A reformed Z-er? I'm not sure exactly what you mean. I was never a believer or follower of it...but I didn't dismiss it either. I followed what was going on for about two months (May to June 2003) with an open mind...although I could easily see that many of the claims Nancy was making simply weren't happening - such as sunsets being 15 to 20 minutes later than they were supposed to be and, most obvious of all, that "Planet X" was not undeniable in the sky as it should have been. I asked her a few questions through her website and she answered at first. But when I started asking more difficult questions, citing things she predicted but weren't happening, she quickly called me a "debunker" sent to discredit her and told me to go drown in the "pole shift"...which didn't happen on any of the three dates she gave that year (May 15, May 27 and definitely by June 1). Then, in mid-July 2003, the "Zetas" said we had only "weeks not months" for the "pole shift" to occur. In September that year, I asked her why the "pole shift" didn't happen. She quickly exclaimed that it hadn't been months yet and she hoped I found myself clinging to the side of a mountain with my limbs useless. So, that's how I ended up a "debunker." Coincidentally, 6 1/2 years, or 77 months later, we're still here.

Yeah, that pretty much sums it up too.

Well, it seems like you have a vested interest in 'debunking' so to speak. After so many years, why would you still care? I guess you may think that this question may a 'trick' but it's not, it's honest.

After the 'dog killing' audio link I had many more doubts after reading Z-talk for so long. Even after a PS wouldn't your dog be an asset? Even if you had to eat it at the last resort!?

Even in I AM LEGEND...his dog was his best friend...til the end.

Last Edited by GreenTabasco on 12/31/2009 09:54 AM

Why does anyone do any of the things they do? Why do people collect stamps, for instance? As the disclaimer at the bottom says, this site is for entertainment purposes. So I come here, read what the bunkers have to say and then post my questions or rebuttals. I find the topic of "Planet X" interesting. It's unfortunate that no one has been able to provide any evidence to show that it exists.

Last Edited by Circuit Breaker on 12/31/2009 10:11 AM

Yes, it's for entertainment value only.

So why do some people get so emotional over it?

That I do not know. Take User for instance. He claims he's only defending Nancy. Apparently, he doesn't feel she's capable of taking care of herself. Frankly, I don't think she cares. After she leaves the chat on Saturday night, she pretty much abandons it until she starts a new thread next weekend. If she cared about defending herself, she would do so. I, personally, have never advocated that Nancy should be removed from GLP or supervised. She's free to post what she wants. But the same, apparently, doesn't hold true for "debunkers" based on the number of times her followers have called for us to be banned and the attacks that we've been subjected to. Now, that's not to say some "debunkers" aren't guilty of attacks as well. Some are. But, for the most part, the attacks come from the other side first. User will claim otherwise but I can dig up an instant where a poster asked a simple question, was not rude or insulting, and User swooped in and attacked the person. It would take some time to find but, since I'm here six hours a day everyday according to User, I guess I have lots of time to find it if he wants me to.

Ok, but User doesn't seem to reply so much so lately.

I'd agree with you that Nancy doesn't seem to care, unless she posts under another name. (theory from other posters)

For the true Zeta believers - try the following experiment:

If the Earth were wobbling or had become severely inclined from its regular 23.5 degree tilt, we would immediately lose contact with all satellites in orbit around the Equator. You can prove my claim in the following manner.
1. Put a ball on a string and spin it around your head with your arm pointed to the ceiling.
2. Now tilt your arm at a 20-30 degree angle forward while still spinning the ball.
3. You will notice the spinning ball is STILL spinning horizontally, and the motion did NOT incline 20-30 degrees.
4. This proves geostationary satellites would not follow the supposed new tilt of the Earth as some have claimed would occur.

Soooooo...if we can still watch all of our cable stations, Directv and Dish Network, we're still in the same inclination as always and no wobble or extraordinary tilt has happened.
Did I make that simple enough for even a Zeta groupie to follow?

Unfortunately, they will claim that the earth's atmosphere drags the satellites along with the wobbling earth.

[link to www.zetatalk.com]

As a side note on that zetacrap page, she completely botches the explanation on how GPS works.

Thats what I think ... after any ELE-event I would be happy to have something to eat, even if its a dog ... so regarding survival tactics this advice of NAncys is dead wrong.

BTW ... you probably already know that we debunkers will all end up as Octopus on a waterworld in our next life and those glad beings that will survive PX will have to plug them dicks with a wooden plug so they dont make the women pregnant ? These are Nancys Theories, no kidding ... she is a complete creep.

Melfy found out very early that it's not a good look to be conversing with one's self on the basically now defunct Zetatalk Live Chat Threads!!

Ms LIEDer's chat threads have been truly thrown in the by even her most loyal of followers.

No, you need to use an Etch-A-Sketch and draw them a picture.