Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Considering taking your wife on your "business" trip?

Nancy couldn't resist posting a new thread about a supposed NASA coverup. I suspect she might delete my post and ban me for reminding everyone of her own coverups, so I will post it here just in case.

Freestore said this:

Who needs proof, you are here


To which I replied:
This is the Zetatard motto. They live by it. If someone disagrees or can prove their LIEder wrong, they believe it to be proof that she is right. If that doesn't make perfect sense, then you too are a paid shill. LOL.

And Freestore came back at me with this gem of Freestoresque logic:
NASA is paid billions..do I need proof of that?

So I posted this:
Yet when there is something NASA does that can be twisted to look like it backs up the Zetas, you guys quote NASA as a source. When it proves you wrong or when you don't have the basic understanding to interpret what you are seeing in their images, they are pure evil. Do you think they would put images on the internet if there was something they didn't want us to see? They are under no obligation to share anything with the public. You people are so deluded and ignorant.

And then Nancy stepped into the conversation with this:
This all must have touched a nerve! The debunkers are in here throwing the ONLY thing they have - rotten tomatoes.

I mean, the facts are on the side of ... truth! Just LOOK at those images! Or is this what you want to avoid, the public actually looking.

Well, permanent location for them is ..
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

So I made the following comment:
Yes Nancy, I looked at them. You obviously don't know how to interpret what you are seeing. Just like you didn't know how to interpret celestial coordinates, thinking RA and dec were the same thing as alt and azimuth, but that didn't stop you from flaming those of us that could see you didn't know what you were talking about, it didn't stop you from banning and deleting people for pointing out your ignorance.

I actually hope people do look at your stupid images. Only the most gullible will buy your tripe about a NASA cover up. But then you know all about doctoring information, like you have been caught doing before, editing the content between the SOZT/EOZT tags to cover your mistakes and misrepresent comments made by others during your chat that prove you wrong. Like you go back and edit out some of the major contradictions on your site.

How do you like them rotten tomatoes, Nancy!

Hey Melfy -- how are sales of the dome homes going these days?

No wonder you have so much time to post here.

Sometimes I wonder if you "debunkers" are even HUMAN sometimes?!!!!!

Because of your efforts, we'll never know.

Give us a break! They weren't even commercially viable. You hadn't even come up with a workable design. In addition, the number of people who actually follow Nancy on GLP is relatively small. What did you do to promote your domes in places OTHER than GLP? There were/are many other avenues that you could have used to advertise these domes. So, really, the only reason they failed was because of your efforts...or lack thereof. Your attempt to claim that it was our fault is just as weak as User claiming the deaths in Haiti are our fault and is nothing but more shilling from you.

loony


Yeah, have you even LOOKED at the images? Go check it out yourself, you BLIND idiot!

fruitbat


Drolling idiot!

Utter anbd complete nonsense.

Nice to see Nancy hasn't changed a bit.


Utter head in the sands, cannot look as it scares me, denial stupidity!

I've lost count how many times NASA has been caught at something



Thread: NASA is hard at work


But this is really astonishing. Allowing their SOHO archives to be doctored! I mean its such a poor job of cut-and-paste that a 5 year old could do it. Just go LOOK!

This all must have touched a nerve! The debunkers are in here throwing the ONLY thing they have - rotten tomatoes.

I mean, the facts are on the side of ... truth! Just LOOK at those images! Or is this what you want to avoid, the public actually looking.

Well, permanent location for them is ..
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

Who needs proof, you are here

This is the Zetatard motto. They live by it. If someone disagrees or can prove their LIEder wrong, they believe it to be proof that she is right. If that doesn't make perfect sense, then you too are a paid shill. LOL.

Nancy...you make absolutely no sense. You claim the government is covering up any trace of "Planet X" and now you're telling us they keep forgetting to remove it from SOHO images? And wait....I thought the government needed ZetaTalk to know where "Planet X" is. If that image from 1999 is "Planet X" then I'd say they don't need you at all.

See even Hitler knew about Zetas & PX .....


[link to www.youtube.com]

Regarding attacks on Service-to-Other groups by Service-to-Self groups in the Aftertime. Of course, this will be their first thought. Conscientious groups of Service-to-Other humans, having prepared, will have food and shelter. There will be laughter coming from their midst, as they find life goes on and the good things they held precious are still in their lives. The young will grow and be curious and educated. Music still comforts and scientific discoveries still intrigue. The Service-to-Self, having not bothered to prepare, will look to these communities as a place to raid. This will be a decreasing problem, as time goes on. We have stated that the Service-to-Self humans will die out on Earth, and this is in part because they do not nurture their young, but primarily because those prone to this orientation will not reincarnate here. This is not a matter in their control, over which they have a choice.

But what about the interim, when various humans of mixed orientation or distinct Service-to-Self orientation look to the Service-to-Other communities and consider a raid. There will be assistance in these matters, from ourselves and others. Primarily this assistance will be in the form of blockage, where the Service-to-Self humans either cannot find the communities, cannot see them, or are distracted in some way. In this regard we advise these communities to be remote and not advertise themselves. Those who are to find you will do so, as they will be guided to your location. Secondarily, this assistance will come in the form of active repelling, where the Service-to-Self will find their blows or missiles do not land as expected, but turn somehow upon themselves, perhaps blowing up prior to being launched or the like. It is best, therefore, for these communities to focus on survival, and life after, and minimally on self defense. The best defense is a well chosen location.

It is also advisable to be selective on who is allowed into the community. Where the community is truly Service-to-Other, there should be only periodic encounters with the Service-to-Self orientation to deal with. Remember, the Service-to-Self will not be in close communication with each other. Cooperation is not normal among those in this orientation. Where frustrated, they will turn and look elsewhere. They will attack each other more often, as they themselves are the type to horde. Should the Service-to-Other communities be of soft heart and allow into their midst great numbers of humans who have not yet chosen their orientation, they will find they have brought the problem into their midst. The soft hearted should share knowledge of their techniques in growing food, but send the spiritually immature to live in their own groups. Thus the Service-to-Other communities will not be destroyed, and the separation will be sped along on its course, which is inevitable in any case.
[link to zetatalk.com]

loony


Yeah, have you even LOOKED at the images? Go check it out yourself, you BLIND idiot!



If someone who is supposed to be enlightening the masses via a telepathic alien trance who uses language like that then, your credibility is very questionable. Why address a name-calling post with another name-calling retort? Shows your immaturity and really makes you look like a whacked out woman.

Thanks for illustrating my point.

And now Nancy is somehow on a plane with Jesus and Buddha?

Huh?

Well God can smite any civilization God feels..whamo


At first glance it appears to me that Freestore regards Nancy as his "god".

And then Nancy stepped into the conversation with this:
This all must have touched a nerve! The debunkers are in here throwing the ONLY thing they have - rotten tomatoes.

And yet she gets upset when anyone simply asks her a question.

Your questions are not "honest" ones, nor are they "sincere".

How is it that "Planet X" is being seen near the sun in the 1999 image when you said it didn't arrive until 2003? How is it that NASA found this "rogue planet" without you giving them co-ordinates? You said they needed you and ZetaTalk so they would know where it is and when it would be here. If those two images are really "Planet X" then it seems to me that NASA doesn't need you at all and have been successfully tracking it for 10 years. Also, how do you know those images show "Planet X" and not something else? Remember...you thought an image of a flying kite was "Planet X" as well.

Here are some examples of what ZetaMax considers to be dishonest and insincere questions. I posted these in Nancy's latest thread:


How is it that "Planet X" is being seen near the sun in the 1999 image when you said it didn't arrive until 2003? How is it that NASA found this "rogue planet" without you giving them co-ordinates? You said they needed you and ZetaTalk so they would know where it is and when it would be here. If those two images are really "Planet X" then it seems to me that NASA doesn't need you at all and have been successfully tracking it for 10 years. Also, how do you know those images show "Planet X" and not something else? Remember...you thought an image of a flying kite was "Planet X" as well.


Max proves once again he isn't a "fence sitter." Take your shilling elsewhere.

>> Remember...you thought an image of a flying kite was "Planet X" as well.

How is this "sincere"????

>> Remember...you thought an image of a flying kite was "Planet X" as well.

How is this "sincere"????

That's not a question. It's a statement. And it actually happened...so how is it dishonest? I see you didn't mention that.

You attract more bees with honey, than with vinegar.

And yet she gets upset when anyone simply asks her a question.

Your questions are not "honest" ones, nor are they "sincere".

You attract more bees with honey, than with vinegar.

You attract more bees with honey, than with vinegar.


And morons are attracted to other morons, look at Gerry's "ning", a bunch of wacko's feeding off each other. If Nancy said she floated around her lounge everyone else who have a similar experience. So what's in it for you? Mommy's house?

You attract more bees with honey, than with vinegar.

Explain why we can't throw tomatoes at her like she said
we had the right to do back in 2003. I do believe that
months and months have passed since then.