Well, Nancy bit and then realized something might not be quite right.

After responding to my Q, I was banned within a minute.

I made only one post the ZTChat:
Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat January 30 (Page 2)

"Reality
User ID: 871792
1/30/2010 6:57 PM Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat January 30

Good day Nancy.

In reference to your above mentioned thread discussing NASA doctoring:
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

could you look at this cyberspaceorbit page and comment whether Kent's "winged Ra" is PX?:
[link to www.cyberspaceorbit.com]

It looks exactly like the images you've identified as valid PX images.

Is Steadman's image a valid image of PX, yea or nay?

Thanks."

I then patiently waited for her to go through the que and answer my question, which she did with ZT:

Thread: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat January 30 (Page 4)

"Nancy Lieder
Forum Moderator
User ID: 872190
1/30/2010 7:55 PM
Re: ZetaTalk LIVE Chat January 30

SOZT
The Winged Globe at least is Planet X, yes.
EOZT"

I was then immediately banned.

Bingo. She's stepped in it and probably doesn't realize how, but has an inkling something isn't quite right.
I suggest copying this exchange before she deletes it.

That Steadman image is from Septembe, 2002.
How can that be PX by the sun in Sept, 2002?
From her own site, her own coordinates (RA & Dec which she doesn't understand) show PX "inbound" in Taurus, near Aldebaran.

The Sun is about 100 degrees away from that spot on that day.

That SOHO spacecraft is amazing. It can image the Sun and PX together even when PX is somewhat "behind" the spacecraft.

Nan, does that explain why you had a bad feeling about that non-confrontational, innocuous single question from me?

ZT - PX arrived in 2003
ZT - PX imaged next to sun in 2002

ZT - PX in Taurus in 2002
ZT - PX in Virgo in 2002

It's a magical planet. It's both here and not here at the same time.

ZT wrong and illucid twice in one statement.


Have fun.


R.