Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

I have said, that there is no reason anyone has to "decide" anything. It's like asking folks if they're lottery winners before they've even purchased a ticket.

>> ... never up front with a simple yes or no.

Uhhmmm, then I wouldn't be a FENCE SITTER!! Why is it "required" that anyone make a "final" determination on the issue?

6/12/2009 2:54 AM
Debunker Talk Live Chat February 6
Feel free to quote ANY poster from those silly SOZT...EOZT threads etc etc.
Or just post your thoughts/opinions.

Open Discussion on Zetatalk; Bunkers; and it/their inability, over the last Six years to provide ANY truthful Facts and Knowledge to support the absurd Failed predictions of the "Candy Wrapper Aliens".

Let's see how long the Three "bunker" Amigos can bounce off each other in their little padded room over there on Zetatalk Jive Turkey Chat!!

PS: If any of you debunkers want to meet in the GLP text/voice chat for some LIVE audio conversation we should set a day/time to meet up in one of the rooms to have a discussion etc.

:Loneranger: Would find it a pleasure to converse with some of you guys. I mean there's a wealth of different subjects to talk about besides this silly zetatalk stuff.

400 posts in 6 months

hey kurt/maxipad

planet x better show up soon if you dont want to see the debunker thread hit a thousand posts

its got 400 posts in 8 months- so it should hit 1000 posts about dec 2010

so unless your planet x shows up and wipes us all out before then then it going to be....

debunkers right again!!!

The bottom line is that for eight years the cornerstone of "ZetaTalk" was that PX would cause a catastrophic pole shift in 2003 and that all possible sources of information were to be judged according to this prediction.

Anyone that continues to trust Nancy and her imaginary "Zetas" after this has serious mental issues.

Uhhmmm, then I wouldn't be a FENCE SITTER!! Why is it "required" that anyone make a "final" determination on the issue?

The bottom line is that for eight years the cornerstone of "ZetaTalk" was that PX would cause a catastrophic pole shift in 2003 and that all possible sources of information were to be judged according to this prediction.

Anyone that continues to trust Nancy and her imaginary "Zetas" after this has serious mental issues.

The bottom line is that for eight years the cornerstone of "ZetaTalk" was that PX would cause a catastrophic pole shift in 2003 and that all possible sources of information were to be judged according to this prediction.

Anyone that continues to trust Nancy and her imaginary "Zetas" after this has serious mental issues.

I have NEVER seen a single one of her "supporters" even dare
to attempt to rationalize or justify her statement "I am
Mother Theresa and Joan of Arc, in essence". I would really
get a kick out of seeing them try.

I have NEVER seen a single one of her "supporters" even dare
to attempt to rationalize or justify her statement "I am
Mother Theresa and Joan of Arc, in essence". I would really
get a kick out of seeing them try.


Mother Theresa and Joan of Arc were extraordinarily SIMPLE. Mother Theresa was remarkable in that she simply did MORE of what everyone does from time to time - help their fellow man. She was simply a DOER, of VERY simple things. Helping a hungry and sick person to a place of shelter, cleaning thier wounds, feeding them, tending to them, and doing whatever she could to arrange other assistance for them. Her opinions otherwise were simple - even naive in some cases. She garnered attention because she was so PERSISTENT and DEDICATED to her personal mission of helping whoever turned up in her path. Followers accumulated without and recruiting on her part. The Church even tried to ignore her at first, but eventually embraced and supported her when it turned out that she was no theologian, and bought the Catholic doctrine hook, line and sinker. In this way, she was actually a form of Lenin's "useful idiot". Still, her life was TOWERING, and the example of selflessness she set will be historic and remembered for centuries.

Nancy is dedicated to her mission of warning mankind with the same level of commitment that Mother Theresa had for helping the poor. Granted, Mother Theresa's activities were EASIER to admire and celebrate, but that does not diminish the amount of dedication that either one has/had to their "mission". Both essentially took "vows of poverty" and spend nearly every waking moment tending to their "calling". Mother Theresa worked tirelessly as does Nancy - though at different purposes. And like Mother Theresa, who never challenged the Church on it's dogma, Nancy does not challenge "The Zetas" - and to that extend, it can be said that she too could be construed as a "useful idiot". If Nancy turns out in the end to be right however, she will be historically remembered and celebrated with the same enthusiasm that Mother Theresa is now, and will continue to be.

As for Joan of Arc, there is of course the parallel that both are in direct inner communication with discarnate intelligences. Joan of Arc too was a kind of "useful idiot", in that she too did not challenge her "voices" and also went along with Church dogma. Because of her "accuracy track record", she gathered a large following, and eventually led a military mission soley on the basis of her inner guidance. She really was nothing more than a very SIMPLE girl/woman. She was eventually captured and burned at the stake for her "exploits", and while Nancy's fate is yet to be determined, in another time and place, she would be meeting the same fate.

Nancy is a SIMPLE woman with an extraordinary MISSION - just like the two women she has identified with. Not entirely inappropriately either, in my "humble" opinion!

Nancy is dedicated to her mission of warning mankind with the same level of commitment that Mother Theresa had for helping the poor.

If Nancy turns out in the end to be right however, she will be historically remembered and celebrated with the same enthusiasm that Mother Theresa is now, and will continue to be.

Nancy is a SIMPLE woman with an extraordinary MISSION - just like the two women she has identified with. Not entirely inappropriately either, in my "humble" opinion!

No, Nancy is a simple woman with a delusional mission.

Mother Theresa and Joan of Arc were extraordinarily SIMPLE. Mother Theresa was remarkable in that she simply did MORE of what everyone does from time to time - help their fellow man. She was simply a DOER, of VERY simple things. Helping a hungry and sick person to a place of shelter, cleaning thier wounds, feeding them, tending to them, and doing whatever she could to arrange other assistance for them. Her opinions otherwise were simple - even naive in some cases. She garnered attention because she was so PERSISTENT and DEDICATED to her personal mission of helping whoever turned up in her path. Followers accumulated without and recruiting on her part. The Church even tried to ignore her at first, but eventually embraced and supported her when it turned out that she was no theologian, and bought the Catholic doctrine hook, line and sinker. In this way, she was actually a form of Lenin's "useful idiot". Still, her life was TOWERING, and the example of selflessness she set will be historic and remembered for centuries.

Nancy is dedicated to her mission of warning mankind with the same level of commitment that Mother Theresa had for helping the poor. Granted, Mother Theresa's activities were EASIER to admire and celebrate, but that does not diminish the amount of dedication that either one has/had to their "mission". Both essentially took "vows of poverty" and spend nearly every waking moment tending to their "calling". Mother Theresa worked tirelessly as does Nancy - though at different purposes. And like Mother Theresa, who never challenged the Church on it's dogma, Nancy does not challenge "The Zetas" - and to that extend, it can be said that she too could be construed as a "useful idiot". If Nancy turns out in the end to be right however, she will be historically remembered and celebrated with the same enthusiasm that Mother Theresa is now, and will continue to be.

As for Joan of Arc, there is of course the parallel that both are in direct inner communication with discarnate intelligences. Joan of Arc too was a kind of "useful idiot", in that she too did not challenge her "voices" and also went along with Church dogma. Because of her "accuracy track record", she gathered a large following, and eventually led a military mission soley on the basis of her inner guidance. She really was nothing more than a very SIMPLE girl/woman. She was eventually captured and burned at the stake for her "exploits", and while Nancy's fate is yet to be determined, in another time and place, she would be meeting the same fate.

Nancy is a SIMPLE woman with an extraordinary MISSION - just like the two women she has identified with. Not entirely inappropriately either, in my "humble" opinion!

Mother Theresa and Joan of Arc were extraordinarily SIMPLE. Mother Theresa was remarkable in that she simply did MORE of what everyone does from time to time - help their fellow man. She was simply a DOER, of VERY simple things. Helping a hungry and sick person to a place of shelter, cleaning thier wounds, feeding them, tending to them, and doing whatever she could to arrange other assistance for them. Her opinions otherwise were simple - even naive in some cases. She garnered attention because she was so PERSISTENT and DEDICATED to her personal mission of helping whoever turned up in her path. Followers accumulated without and recruiting on her part. The Church even tried to ignore her at first, but eventually embraced and supported her when it turned out that she was no theologian, and bought the Catholic doctrine hook, line and sinker. In this way, she was actually a form of Lenin's "useful idiot". Still, her life was TOWERING, and the example of selflessness she set will be historic and remembered for centuries.

Nancy is dedicated to her mission of warning mankind with the same level of commitment that Mother Theresa had for helping the poor. Granted, Mother Theresa's activities were EASIER to admire and celebrate, but that does not diminish the amount of dedication that either one has/had to their "mission". Both essentially took "vows of poverty" and spend nearly every waking moment tending to their "calling". Mother Theresa worked tirelessly as does Nancy - though at different purposes. And like Mother Theresa, who never challenged the Church on it's dogma, Nancy does not challenge "The Zetas" - and to that extend, it can be said that she too could be construed as a "useful idiot". If Nancy turns out in the end to be right however, she will be historically remembered and celebrated with the same enthusiasm that Mother Theresa is now, and will continue to be.

As for Joan of Arc, there is of course the parallel that both are in direct inner communication with discarnate intelligences. Joan of Arc too was a kind of "useful idiot", in that she too did not challenge her "voices" and also went along with Church dogma. Because of her "accuracy track record", she gathered a large following, and eventually led a military mission soley on the basis of her inner guidance. She really was nothing more than a very SIMPLE girl/woman. She was eventually captured and burned at the stake for her "exploits", and while Nancy's fate is yet to be determined, in another time and place, she would be meeting the same fate.

Nancy is a SIMPLE woman with an extraordinary MISSION - just like the two women she has identified with. Not entirely inappropriately either, in my "humble" opinion!


Comparing Nancy Lieder to Joan of Arc and Mother Theresa is sacrilege. In no way, shape, or form is Nancy like either of those two people.

Nancy is not like Mother Theresa - Nancy has her own self-serving mission and based on some of the comments she's made over the years, she's a very vindictive person who cares not about others.

Would Mother Theresa have wished someone to die a slow agonizing death as Nancy has wished on a few people over the years?

Would Mother Theresa have called someone "stupid" because they don't believe in her message?

Would Mother Theresa have played power games with her original believers (read some of the IRC chats from over ten years ago)?

Nancy is a SIMPLE woman with an extraordinary MISSION -

NO - of course Nancy is "no Mother Theresa". If she was, she'd be a nun in Calcutta.

As for Nancy not caring about others ... POPPYCOCK! There is a VAST difference between caring for those who are truly victims through no fault of their own, and those who simply reap what they have sown - those that enjoy their "just deserts". Its hard not to enjoy a little shaudenfraude now and then.

BULLSHIT! Nancy cares for no one but herself and those she can convince that some "rogue planet" is coming to wipe out 90% of life on Earth. Even if you've never been rude to her, if you don't believe what she says, as far as she's concerned you can go find yourself clinging to a mountain with your limbs broken and useless. The fact that you defend this woman at every opportunity proves that you are not a fence sitter, Max. So stop the charade. No one is buying it.

What is America's fascination w/ large families now and putting them on TV (18 kids and counting, Jon and Kate plus 8, Octomom, etc)? The one mother(18 kids and counting) "I'll have as many kids as the Lord gives me" and they're actually up to 19 kids now. Coincidently, they're also hyper-religious. It seems that in the coming times there's not going to be enough food for everybody and deciding to have extremely large families right now is kinda selfish. What's going on here?

SOZT
Many industrialized countries are reaching a zero population growth curve, for instance Japan, Russia, and even the United States. Without immigrants the populations of these countries would shrink. This is an issue for governments who feel they must plan for the youth to care for the aged, whether physically or via financial support such as the Social Security system. Quite frankly, these shows featuring massive families who worship having children as though it were their religion are promoted by those in government who feel the population must be ENCOURAGED to have more children. Some countries, such as Japan, have tried bo brief young mothers to start their families, without much success. This is another approach.
EOZT

Is this PX proper, one of its moons, or something different, in the movie It can be seen moving around:

[link to api.ning.com]

[link to api.ning.com]

SOZT
The tail of Planet X is composed of dozens of moons the size of the Earth’s Moon, much debris, and charged red dust. Depending upon the angle, sunlight can blaze off a portion of the dust cloud around a Moon Swirl, so it looks like a spash of light with a drifing tail. Or it can blaze off the individual moons in a swirl, each surrounding by its own dust cloud, so it appears as a String of Pearls. Or under close inspection, the individual moons may be visible.

Nancy still has believers? The mind boggles.

(Has she killed any dogs of late?)

The magnetosphere is acting up often. Even today, and it also occured a few times that not only the south pole but also the north pole seems to be gone. The reason for the south pole missing has been explained already by the Zetas but could the Zetas share a light on why the north pole of the magnetosphere is also acting up.

From 8 February
[link to api.ning.com]

Today
[link to poleshift.ning.com]

Last chat I asked you about when PX entered our system and when it stopped. Your answer “in early 2003 it entered the solar system at a rapid pace” is obviously says me nothing because “early” is not a concrete date. Look:
1) During GLP session on 8.08.2009 you stated “Planet X was visible in the evening sky in late March, 2003, and then moved within Earth’s orbit so it was lost in the glare of the Sun”, and so we do not have CDD images after April 12.
2) But in the article “Planet X Distance Guide” [ [link to www.zetatalk.com] PX is calculated to be only near Jupiter in April 12.
3) And in the article “A Twirling Wobble” it is said that only around 15th May “… Planet X was just coming into the inner solar system”.
So, here is a contradiction of 3 statements and I would like you at least confirm the ACCURATE date of when PX entered Pluto’s orbit and then the Earth’s orbit, because scanning ZT I collided with general phrases and such contradictions.

SOZT
Your point 2) was written by a human, NOT by us. You are splitting hairs to say just when the glare of the Sun affected visibility – after April 12, around May 15, and this is petty. This will be the last such petty question from you that we will address. What on Earth are you doing with your time?
EOZT

Zeta's have said no exact dates for PX's passage but can they share when PX will be visible to the public's naked eyes?

SOZT
Since we have stated that Planet X will be visible to all some 7.3 weeks before passage, the answer to your question is clearly NO, a date will NOT be given. Please stop trying to game us into an answer as we resent this.
EOZT

Nancy still has believers? The mind boggles.

(Has she killed any dogs of late?)



Don't forget that half the population is below average intelligence, and ninnie LIEDer only selects those to the very far left of the bell curve to be her paid shills and attack hampsters.

But then only those on the far left of the bell curve are pathologically gullible enough to swallow her line of bullshit.

Nancy does not pay me to be an attack rodent.

Nancy still has believers? The mind boggles.

(Has she killed any dogs of late?)



Don't forget that half the population is below average intelligence, and ninnie LIEDer only selects those to the very far left of the bell curve to be her paid shills and attack hampsters.

But then only those on the far left of the bell curve are pathologically gullible enough to swallow her line of bullshit.

Nancy does not pay me to be an attack rodent.

Why are so many ceo's and govenrment people around the world quitting their jobs in the last month or two. And will there be other tell tale signs that something is happening.

NancyTalk: this was addressed a couple weeks ago:
[link to www.zetatalk.com]

SOZT
If resignations are a clue that those who have heard the rumors and taken them seriously are preparing for a dash to their safe locations, then the actions of those in government or those who are wealthy should be watched for further clues. What is the reaction when disasters such as earthquakes or floods occur? Is the response limited, as though MORE such disasters are expected at any minute, or the traditional response with promises to rebuild everything? Are wealthy people found increasingly in mountain retreats, inland, where formerly at the beach?
EOZT