Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

If you want some more information Andrew I suggest you look on the internet for Geomagnetic Reversals.

However ill provide you with some.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

If you want some more information Andrew I suggest you look on the internet for Geomagnetic Reversals.

However ill provide you with some.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.


"current field weakening" is effect of Nibiru approach.

these are all human estimates.

what facts show is that field was twice as stronger 2000 years ago, and 3000-4000 years ago it was as weak as it is now. and no wonder, cuz that time was a time of last Passage, the same as now.

however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

the harsh truth is that we are nowhere near that. we do NOT control the situation. more over, we do NOT know for sure what collected data means. we suggest, estimate and make guesses.

sure they do.
rocks acquired magnetic "stamp" when poles where in one place, then it shifted,and when volcanoe erupted and that rock solidified, it acquired a "stamp" of new magnetic lines

That stamp shows Magnetic reversal, doesnt show Crustial Displacement.

If you want some more information Andrew I suggest you look on the internet for Geomagnetic Reversals.

However ill provide you with some.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.


"current field weakening" is effect of Nibiru approach.

these are all human estimates.

what facts show is that field was twice as stronger 2000 years ago, and 3000-4000 years ago it was as weak as it is now. and no wonder, cuz that time was a time of last Passage, the same as now.

however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

the harsh truth is that we are nowhere near that. we do NOT control the situation. more over, we do NOT know for sure what collected data means. we suggest, estimate and make guesses.

our "dissenting voices"? bwahahaha! who do you "dissent from"? since its you, "debunkers", who oppose the original statement of ZetaTalk, you could be called "dissenters".

you are attached to ZetaTalk. your very existence (as a group) is due to ZetaTalk. without ZetaTalk there is no its debunkers

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.


then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?

however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

Many things in nature are cyclic ... planetary movement is one of it probably ... I hear some people take a bath or a shower cyclic every day ... word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?

but i very much appreciate this thread ;) keep up the good work.

why do people suppose Earth has a cycle of Magnetic Reversals? or, if we go in further detail, science says reversals occur at irregular intervals, why is that? then why do they happen at all?

you see, science is stating a guess as fact. and even more - basing further assumptions on that guess.

it is a scientific method - nothing wrong with that, but we have to remember that our guess is ... just a guess.

however, this statement of your shows how people (and scientists included), tend to "pack" every data into "cyclical" patterns. i often wonder why is that? cuz, yes, many things in nature are cyclical, but certainly not all. i think that "cyclicity" gives a sense of predictability, stability and an illusion of "control", like "Everything under ctrl, we control the situation".

Many things in nature are cyclic ... planetary movement is one of it probably ... I hear some people take a bath or a shower cyclic every day ... word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right. but cycles exist where there is an outside reason for it. even in what can seem an "inherent" variability, if one analyses all factors, one finds some external cause. that is because matter is inert by itself, if left alone. it only reacts when the area is "crowded' by other matter [be it objetcs or fields = particle flows].

tides exist because we have Moon.

biological rhythms in all life exist because of the Sun and Moon.

and so on.

why do people suppose Earth has a cycle of Magnetic Reversals? or, if we go in further detail, science says reversals occur at irregular intervals, why is that? then why do they happen at all?

you see, science is stating a guess as fact. and even more - basing further assumptions on that guess.

it is a scientific method - nothing wrong with that, but we have to remember that our guess is ... just a guess.

word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.


then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?

Most probably through the Chaotic motions of the liquid metal at the Earths core.

why do people suppose Earth has a cycle of Magnetic Reversals? or, if we go in further detail, science says reversals occur at irregular intervals, why is that? then why do they happen at all?

you see, science is stating a guess as fact. and even more - basing further assumptions on that guess.

it is a scientific method - nothing wrong with that, but we have to remember that our guess is ... just a guess.

The magnetic Reversals are not cyclical.
As I said the last one was 780,000 years ago

Here is the list,
780,000 Years ago
900,000
1,060,000
1,190,000
1,780,000
2,000,000

The list goes on, however there have been periods known as Superchrons where the poles dont reverse for upto 40 Million years.

word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.


I see.

The last Reversal took place around 780,000 years ago. Estimates based on current field weakening suggest that we are looking at another 2000 years before the field changes again.

...
Im packing data into cyclical patterns? Your the one that assumes your fairy planet is on a 3600 year spin cycle.


then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?

Most probably through the Chaotic motions of the liquid metal at the Earths core.


if left without outside influences Earth core would be almost placid. it would probably "boil" quietly as on slow fire.

why would these Chaotic motions appear? what outside cause?

while it may seem that all outside causes result in regular (cyclical) phenomena, it is not entirely true. outside factors, such as rogue asteroids or comets, present an irregular events.

word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.


I see.


Andrew you keep up that routine bro and you could end up looking like your mate, Melfy, would all kinds of skin problems.

if it is not cyclical then it represents a "catastrophic" pattern, irregular.

word on the street is that for you it's more like 10 random baths per year ?


that's right.


I see.


Andrew you keep up that routine bro and you could end up looking like your mate, Melfy, would all kinds of skin problems.



washing too much (too often) is damaging to skin and hair. it depletes it of natural fat that protects it, making it more susceptible for fungi and bacteria.

use your common sense

Rogue asteroids and comets has no gravitation effect on the core of the earth whatsoever.

The moon does, and the sun to a lesser extent, as does Jupiter. Fairy planets do not.

Magnetic reversals are not regular or Cyclical, they are Chaotic, as I have shown you, I could go back a 2 Billion years with the list of reversals, some changed and then changed again within 10,000 years, others didnt change for 40,000,000 years, there is nothing cyclical about it.

Really? Then present some of your "FACTS." These "FACTS" need to be from credible sources...which means sources OTHER than ZetaTalk. Can you do that? Can you also prove that "Planet X" exists?


[link to www.vimeo.com]

if it is not cyclical then it represents a "catastrophic" pattern, irregular.

No it represents a Chaotic pattern. I have not seen any catastrophic events linked with magnetic reversal.

Rogue asteroids and comets has no gravitation effect on the core of the earth whatsoever.

The moon does, and the sun to a lesser extent, as does Jupiter. Fairy planets do not.

Magnetic reversals are not regular or Cyclical, they are Chaotic, as I have shown you, I could go back a 2 Billion years with the list of reversals, some changed and then changed again within 10,000 years, others didnt change for 40,000,000 years, there is nothing cyclical about it.


space trash falldown is irregular event and it repesents catastrophic pattern.

and so do Magnetic reversals - if its irregular (chaotic) then its most likely catastrophic.

this video is not even ABOUT ZetaTalk, and it quotes ZT only here and there. Most of it (90%) comes from other sources than ZT

if it is not cyclical then it represents a "catastrophic" pattern, irregular.

No it represents a Chaotic pattern. I have not seen any catastrophic events linked with magnetic reversal.


have you witnessed one ever?

these rocks move along with the crust, pulled in many different directions in each new pole shift. this is what these rocks show

washing too much (too often) is damaging to skin and hair. it depletes it of natural fat that protects it, making it more susceptible for fungi and bacteria.

use your common sense

"current field weakening" is effect of Nibiru approach.

what facts show is that field was twice as stronger 2000 years ago, and 3000-4000 years ago it was as weak as it is now. and no wonder, cuz that time was a time of last Passage, the same as now.

then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?

then, what do you think is the cause for "Magnetic reversals"?

No one really knows for certain. That's why science works...it is able to admit when something is wrong when new data doesn't support the current theory. Zeta science, on the other hand, makes a claim and then twists all evidence to fit it.