what is a **credible source**, to you?

one that is supported by opinions of other "authoritative" figures?

then opinions of Nancy/Zetas should be a credible source to you,since it is supported by so many people, whose opinions are supported by many other people.

Sorry, but Nancy is not supported by anyone reputable.

Credible means to be given and passed a period of peer review, Non of Nancys claims havent even got anywhere near peer review.


what an entertainment!

what is "reputable", in the first place?

- worthy of respect
- Having a good reputation; honorable
- trustworthy

who decides what source is "worthy of respect" or not? based on WHAT?

"peer review" - that's exactly it, "reputable" simply means it is supported by other people. it all counts on opinions of other "reputable" people, who are credited by yet other "reputable" people....