Debunker Talk LIVE Chat 24/7 - A debunker's paradise!!

Good to know that you regard "civic duty" as BENEATH you. But then that should not surprise anyone. It is to be expected from STS oriented souls!!!

Well Melfster has studied four different languages during his lifetime and I can converse and understand two of them adequately.

But the above quote is in a language that is unfamiliar with.

Is it part zeta? part dumbfuckistanian, maybe?

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/09/2010 09:46 PM

Did it hurt much to crack your skull to get that much fresh concrete?

Looks like VOLARMAXIMELFYSOCKYKURT is having another melfdown

Seriously, this is what you came up with .. why did you even bother?

INDEED!!!

Let's see - English, Newzealandese, Stewpidease and Shillian. He does not understand English and Newzealandese.

Thanks for bumping the thread closer the goal of 1000 pages.

Your help is appreciated!

Last Edited by The Commentator on 03/09/2010 10:24 PM

You too, VOLARMAXIMELFYSTINKYSOCKYKURT! You have pushed us further into the zone of popularity zetadrool never achieved!

[link to www.zetasquawk.com]

poleshift dot ning is a fertile source of material!

Pardon me for thinking the obvious but since when does a lawyer get called for jury duty?

When the 'lawyer' is a sock puppet who actually works as a fast-food dancing mascot?

It didn't used to be the case. It changed about 20 years go. Attorneys rarely get selected to actually sit however. The thought is that this changed to counter what many thought was "special privilege" granted to attorneys, with no understanding of the true REASON for the exclusions.

VolarMax, do you divulge to your 'clients' that you're a woo-woo supporter of a daft old lady and her never-right aliens?

If not, why not?

Tell Volar I said hello.

You have reached a NEW LOW in your exercise of senseless STS depravity. Do really think that people can't see through your thin veneer?

What's your problem with the video, MaxiMelfyVolarKurt?

He portrayed you quite accurately, down to your happy little Zetard dance and your attire.

Now go back and pretend to be a lawyer for a while. That's always good for a chuckle.

Hi, I am new here ... what is that Zetastalk about ? Sounds like these are stupid ?!

When search for Nancy Lieder I finded this:

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

What did the dogg do ? Are this peoples stupid ?

Not to put too fine a point on it, but yes, they are stupid. Rock hard stupid. Stup[id as a bag of hair.

Of course a couple of them, you will meet them, are paid to propagate the nonsense, but in this thread they are used as a source of humor, they serve no other purpose.

Welcome!!



Yes your assertion is correct. Zetatalk is very stupid and there are stupid people that even believe in the nonsense that Ms LIEDer endeavours to contrive as being Fact and Reality.



Apparently the dog was very very innocent. It was just a case for the poor doggy that it was in the hands of a kooky woman.



Yes they continue to be stupid even when confronted with real truth and knowledge. The "bunkers", as we call those that follow and believe in zetatalk and its so called message, are very ignorant and intellectually dishonest fools. There is no nice way to put it.

Last Edited by The Lone Ranger on 03/10/2010 09:58 PM

Exactly, TC.

I like the way you put that man. The bunker fools do serve no other purpose than to be ridiculed. Honestly you know, unless some are roleplaying the part of , they really have little to no excuse for being so loyal in support of such a blatant kook such as, Nancy.

For our bunker friends there is only one reality for them on our glorious debunkers thread......

Yep, Returner. There is a vast amount of dialogue in my latest masterpiece,..... that'll get Melfy spitting nails, that comes directly from the words of Ms LIEDer and Melfy themselves. You could say my latest movie masterpiece is bordering on a bonafide documentary.....with a little added taking license with the truth.

Wow, what a thread you twerps are participating in!

The finest collection of selfishness at GLP. Well DONE, lads!

Please tell us again Dr Postspam about The CommonHater's fictional upcoming important announcement. You two shills are especially entertaining. The Frick and Frack of team NASA. Hint: We can all see you ... Boo

I used to feel that they needed to be challenged, but this thread is absolute proof of the efforts to silence Nancy.

Thank you, thankyouverymuch!!!

The paid shills like luser and whatever VolarMaxiMelfyStinkySocky calls himself this week really drive the thread, but both of them are too stupid to know what fools they are making of themselves.

Since they serve no useful purpose as humans they will just have to be examples of the horrors of mental illness.

I see you have crawled out from under the table again, then you let your fingers near a keyboard before your few brain cells were engaged, as usual your diatribe was dribbled onto the screen.

Go get some more cheap wine, your much more sensible when your comatose!

And yet you're here posting in it. Doesn't that make you a participant? Doh! Yes, it does.


Well, exposing you as selfish was pretty easy really.


Can you prove that it's fictional? Remember, you claimed that Hap is a fake astronomer even though you were given the opportunity to meet him in person several times but ran away. In addition, Hap never claimed to be an astronomer at all. Only you made that claim. Neither DrPostman or The Commentator work for NASA and never claimed to. Again, that claim comes from you and you alone. And when asked for evidence to support that claim, you run back to Nancy like a scared child to its mother. So, please tell us some more about your fictional businesses you claim to own? You're one of the most entertaining, if not most hate filled, shills on this forum. You and Nancy are the Ying and Yang of team CIA.

Hint: We can all see you, too! Boo!

Wrong again. If we really worked for the big, bad, evil government as User claims and we wanted to silence Nancy...it would have been done a long time ago. Your post is just absolute proof that you have nothing to show that Nancy is right.